다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기
Steel construction : Design and research, v.6 no.1, 2013년, pp.47 - 53
Scharff, Rüdiger (Ingenieurgesellschaft Peil Ummenhofer mbH, Daimlerstr. 18, 38112 Braunschweig) , Siems, Michael
AbstractA study into the feasibility of monopile foundations at sites in the North Sea with water depths as great as 35 m has been carried out in which various options for the geometric configuration and the selection of material were considered. In parameter studies, simplified design methods were applied to assess the effects of the individual load components at the draft design stage. The fatigue limit state becomes more and more relevant as the water depth increases; therefore, dynamic effects must be examined with special care. Turbine concepts with low RNA mass and low rated speed help to achieve the desired design in the soft‐stiff regime. As a result, it can be said that monopile foundations with their great manufacturing advantages can be constructed for water depths beyond the current limits of practical experience if the logistical challenges in handling large masses are solved.
[1] Germanischer Lloyd: Guideline for the Certification of Offshore Wind Turbines in Rules and Guidelines, Part IV – Industrial Services, 2005 ed.
[2] Deutsches Institut für Bautechnik: Richtlinie für Windenergieanlagen, Mar 2004 ed.
[3] Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geotechnik e.V.: Empfehlungen des Arbeitskreises Pfähle (EA Pfähle), 2nd ed., 2012, Ernst & Sohn, Berlin.
[4] German Maritime & Hydrographic Agency: Anwendungshinweise für den Standard “Konstruktive Ausführung von Offshore‐Windenergieanlagen des BSH” (rev. ed.), 2012 ed.
[5] American Petroleum Institute: Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms – Load and Resistance Factor Design. API‐RP 2A‐LRFD, 1st ed., Jul 1993.
[6] American Petroleum Institute: Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms – Working Stress Design. API‐RP 2A‐WSD, 21st ed., Dec 2000, with errata & supplement 3, Oct 2007.
[7] Hapel , K.‐H. : Festigkeitsanalyse dynamisch beanspruchter Offshore‐Konstruktionen. Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1990.
[8] Gasch , R. , Twele , J. : Windkraftanlagen. 7th ed., Vieweg+Teubner, 2011.
[9] Kühn , M. : Dynamics and Design Optimisation of Offshore Wind Energy Conversion Systems. PhD Thesis, Delft University, 2001.
[10] Achmus , M. : Bemessung von Monopiles für die Gründung von Offshore‐Windenergieanlagen. Bautechnik 88 (2011), pp. 602– 616.
[11] Wiemann , J. , Lesny , K. , Richwien , W. : Evaluation of Pile Diameter Effects on Soil‐Pile stiffness”; Proc. 7th German Wind Energy Conference (DEWEK), 2004.
[12] Krolis , V. D. , van der Zwaag , G. L. , de Vries , W. : Determining the Embedded Pile Length for Large‐Diameter Monopiles. Marine Technology Society Journal, vol. 44, No. 1, 2010, pp. 24–31.
[13] Stahlmann , J. , Gattermann , J. : Gründung von Offshore‐Windenergieanlagen – Stand der Technik? Proc. 8th colloquium “Bauen in Boden und Fels”, Technische Akademie Esslingen, 2012.
[14] Tas¸an , E. : Zur Dimensionierung der Monopile‐Gründungen von Offshore‐Windenergieanlagen. PhD Thesis, TU Berlin, 2011.
[15] Dührkop , J. : Zyklisch horizontal belastete Offshore‐Monopiles. Workshop “Gründungen von Offshore‐Windenergieanlagen”, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Veröffentlichungen des Institutes für Bodenmechanik und Felsmechanik, vol. 172, 2010, pp. 209–223.
[16] Schaumann , P. , Kleineidam , P. , Wilke , F. : Fatigue Design bei Offshore‐Windenergieanlagen. Stahlbau 73 (2004), pp. 716–726.
[17] Ummenhofer , T. , Herion , S. , Weich , I. : Schweißnahtnachbehandlung mit höherfrequenten Hämmerverfahren – Ermüdungsfestigkeit, Qualitätssicherung, Bemessung. Stahlbau 78 (2009), pp. 605–612.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Copyright KISTI. All Rights Reserved.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.