[논문]Application of Systems Readiness Level Methods in Advanced Fossil Energy Applications

Knaggs, M.; Ramsey, J.; Unione, A.; Harkreader, D.; Oelfke, J.; Keairns, D.; Bender, W.

doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.071

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The Department of Energy's Fossil Energy Program (FE), through the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), has been tasked with developing fossil energy technologies to meet U.S. greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals for over a decade. NETL has adopted Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) for ...

The Department of Energy's Fossil Energy Program (FE), through the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), has been tasked with developing fossil energy technologies to meet U.S. greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals for over a decade. NETL has adopted Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) for the last five years to estimate progress in technology development under its research portfolio. Advanced fossil energy systems need to be tested at full-scale in an integrated facility before they can be considered ready for commercial deployment. Commercial-scale demonstrations of energy technology present numerous challenges associated with first-of-a-kind facilities, one in particular being the need to integrate multiple emerging technologies that were previously demonstrated in pilot-scale applications into a design that can be constructed and operated under commercial plant operating conditions. Systems Readiness Level (SRL) methodology is an analysis approach developed by the Department of Defense (DoD) as a metric for assessing progress in developing major military systems. SRL methodology builds on Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) widely used in government agencies to assess the maturity of emerging technologies under development. To estimate the level of readiness of a system comprising multiple emerging technologies in their current state, SRL methodology unites the TRL for each technology with Integration Readiness Levels that express the need for each of these technologies to be integrated with other technologies in the system. A matrix algebra approach is then used to estimate an overall level of systems readiness for the intended system. NETL tested SRL methodology in a pilot application with the objective of developing better analysis tools to support major decisions regarding advanced fossil energy technologies. NETL applied SRL methodology to estimate the readiness of two advanced fossil energy technology projects using data that was available at the time they were initiated. This paper describes the successful pilot application, the lessons learned and the potential for SRL methodology to support technology development.

Keyword

참고문헌 (6)

10.21236/ADA530242 Brian Sauser (Stevens Institute of Technology, SIT), Dinesh Verma (SIT), Jose Ramirez-Marquez (SIT), Ryan Gove (SIT): A Systems Approach to Expanding the Technology Readiness Level within Defense Acquisition, International Journal of Defense Acquisition Management (IJDAM), Volume 1, pgs. 39-58, 2008.
Richard Volkert (U.S. Navy), Ken Michaud (U.S. Navy), Eric Forbes (Northrup Grumman, NG), Peter Gentile (NG), Tom Sondi (NG): Implementation of a Methodology Supporting a Comprehensive System of- Systems Maturity Analysis for Use by the Littoral Combat Ship Mission Module Program, Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Acquisition Research Symposium of the Naval Postgraduate School, Volume I (NPSAM- 09-019), 2009.
Edouard Kujawski, Systems Engineering Department, Naval Post Graduate School: The trouble with the System Readiness Level (SRL) Index for managing the acquisition of defense systems, National Defense Industrial Association, 13th Annual Systems Engineering Conference, San Diego, CA, 2010.
Brian Atwater and Joe Uzdzinski (Lockheed Martin Mission Systems & Training): Holistic Sustainment Maturity: The Extension of System Readiness Methodology across all Phases of the Lifecycle of a Complex System, Conference on Systems Engineering Research, (CSER), Procedia Computer Science 28 (2014) 601-609), 2014.
Daniel Chien, VP, Engineering, General Dynamics Armament &Technical Products, Inc.: Ready or Not? Using Readiness Levels to Reduce Risk on the Path to Production, General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products Presentation, 2011.
TE1, Architecture Design & Systems Engineering, Systemmetric Engineering & Analysis Team: NSA System Readiness Assessment;1; (SRA) Engineering Handbook, Version 1.0, June 2014.

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

활용도 분석정보

상세보기

다운로드

내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

[해외논문] Application of Systems Readiness Level Methods in Advanced Fossil Energy Applications 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Keyword

참고문헌 (6)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

활용도 분석정보

활용도 Top5 논문

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

연합인증

[해외논문] Application of Systems Readiness Level Methods in Advanced Fossil Energy Applications 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Keyword

참고문헌 (6)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

활용도 분석정보

활용도 Top5 논문 더보기

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

활용도 Top5 논문