Ferdowsi, Ali
(Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Tarbiat Moallem University of Tehran Shahid Mofatteh St, Tehran, Iran)
,
Ferdosi, Masoud
(Health Care and Services Management, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Isfahan, Iran)
,
Mehrani, Mohammd Javad
(Department of Civil Engineering. Islamic Azad University of Khomenishahr, Khomenishahr, Iran)
Introduction:Medical wastes are among hazardous wastes and their disposal requires special methods prior to landfilling. Medical wastes are divided into infected and non-infected wastes and the infected wastes require treatment. Incineration is one of the oldest methods for treatment of medical wast...
Introduction:Medical wastes are among hazardous wastes and their disposal requires special methods prior to landfilling. Medical wastes are divided into infected and non-infected wastes and the infected wastes require treatment. Incineration is one of the oldest methods for treatment of medical wastes, but their usage have faced wide objections due to emission of hazardous gases such as CO2 and CO as well as Carcinogenic gases such as Dioxins and Furans which are generated as a result of incomplete combustion of compositions like PVCs. Autoclave is one the newest methods of medical wastes treatment which works based on wet disinfection.Methods:The statistical population in this descriptive, comparative study includes hospitals located in Isfahan city and the sample hospitals were selected randomly. To environmentally evaluate the Autoclave method, TST (time, steam, temperature) and Spore tests were used. Also, samples were made from incinerator’s stack gases and their analyses results were compared with WHO standards.Findings:TST and spore tests results were negative in all cases indicating the success of treatment process. The comparison of incinerator’s stack gases with WHO standards showed the high concentration of CO in some samples indicating the incomplete combustion. Also, the incineration efficiency in some cases was less than 99.5 percent, which is the efficiency criterion according to the administrative regulations of wastes management law of Iran. No needle stick was observed in Autoclave method during the compaction of bags containing wastes, and the handlers were facing no danger in this respect. The comparison of costs indicated that despite higher capital investment for purchasing autoclave, its current costs (e.g. maintenance, etc) are much less than the incineration method.Discussion:Totally, due to inappropriate operation of incinerators and lack of air pollution control devices, the use of incinerators doesn’t seem rational anymore. Yet, despite the inefficiency of autoclaves in treatment of bulky wastes such as Anatomical wastes, their usage seems logic considering the very low amounts of such wastes. Also, considering the amount of generated wastes in Isfahan hospitals, a combination of centralized and non-centralized autoclaves is recommended for treatment of infected wastes. Mobile autoclaves may also be considered according to technical and economical conditions. It must not be forgotten that the priority must be given to the establishment of waste management systems particularly to personnel training to produce less wastes and to well separate them.
Introduction:Medical wastes are among hazardous wastes and their disposal requires special methods prior to landfilling. Medical wastes are divided into infected and non-infected wastes and the infected wastes require treatment. Incineration is one of the oldest methods for treatment of medical wastes, but their usage have faced wide objections due to emission of hazardous gases such as CO2 and CO as well as Carcinogenic gases such as Dioxins and Furans which are generated as a result of incomplete combustion of compositions like PVCs. Autoclave is one the newest methods of medical wastes treatment which works based on wet disinfection.Methods:The statistical population in this descriptive, comparative study includes hospitals located in Isfahan city and the sample hospitals were selected randomly. To environmentally evaluate the Autoclave method, TST (time, steam, temperature) and Spore tests were used. Also, samples were made from incinerator’s stack gases and their analyses results were compared with WHO standards.Findings:TST and spore tests results were negative in all cases indicating the success of treatment process. The comparison of incinerator’s stack gases with WHO standards showed the high concentration of CO in some samples indicating the incomplete combustion. Also, the incineration efficiency in some cases was less than 99.5 percent, which is the efficiency criterion according to the administrative regulations of wastes management law of Iran. No needle stick was observed in Autoclave method during the compaction of bags containing wastes, and the handlers were facing no danger in this respect. The comparison of costs indicated that despite higher capital investment for purchasing autoclave, its current costs (e.g. maintenance, etc) are much less than the incineration method.Discussion:Totally, due to inappropriate operation of incinerators and lack of air pollution control devices, the use of incinerators doesn’t seem rational anymore. Yet, despite the inefficiency of autoclaves in treatment of bulky wastes such as Anatomical wastes, their usage seems logic considering the very low amounts of such wastes. Also, considering the amount of generated wastes in Isfahan hospitals, a combination of centralized and non-centralized autoclaves is recommended for treatment of infected wastes. Mobile autoclaves may also be considered according to technical and economical conditions. It must not be forgotten that the priority must be given to the establishment of waste management systems particularly to personnel training to produce less wastes and to well separate them.
1 Medical Wastes Administrative Management Regulations of Waste Management Law of Iran Commission of Sub Structural Affairs, Industry and Environment 2008 (in Farsi)
2 Omrani Q Etabi F Sadeghi M Banaei B The Comparison of Technical, Environmental and economical Aspects of Autoclaving, Incineration and Landfilling in Medical wastes Disposal Environ Sci & Tech, 2. Wastes management law 2007 1383/02/02
3 Iran Wastes Management Law 1383/02/02 (22/04/2005) (in Farsi)
4 Pruss A Giroult E Rushbrook P Safe Management of Wastes from Health Care Activities Chapter 8: Treatment and Disposal Technologies for Health- Care Waste 1999 World Health Organization 77 112
5 Inventory of Sources of Dioxin in the United States (EPA/600/ P-98/002Aa) 1998 National Center for Environmental Assessment, USEPA 2 13
6 Emmanuel J Puccia CJ Spurgin RA Non-incineration medical waste treatment technologies 2001 Washington, DC Health Care without Harm
7 Cole E Application of Disinfection and Sterilization to Infectious Waste Management North Carolina Board of Science and Technology 1997
8 Forbes BA Sahm DF Weissfeld AS Diagnostic Microbiology 2002 11th ed St. Louis Mo. Bailey and Scott’s 19
9 Prόss A Giroult E Rushbrook P Safe management of wastes from health-care activities 2010 Geneva, Switzerland World Health Organization (WHO) Available from: www.who.int/entity/water_sanitation_health/medicalwaste/wastemanag/en/ [Last cited on 1999]
10 Al-Khatib IA Al-Qaroot YS Ali-Shtayeh MS Management of healthcare waste in circumstances of limited resources: A case study in the hospitals of Nablus city, Palestine Waste Manag Res 2009 27 305 312 19423582
11 Gautam V Thapar R Sharma M Biomedical waste management: Incineration vs. environmental safety Indian J Med Microbial 2010 28 191 192
12 Radian Corporation Medical Waste Incineration Emission Test Report Research Triangle Park 1991
13 Keyvani N Environmental Standards and regulations Green Circle Pub, Environmental Protection Organization 1382 (in Farsi)
14 Mehmet Emin Birpınar and Mehmet Sinan Bilgili and Tuğba Erdoğan. Medical waste management in Turkey: A case study of Istanbul Waste Management 2009 29 1 445 448 18550354
이 논문을 인용한 문헌
활용도 분석정보
상세보기
다운로드
내보내기
활용도 Top5 논문
해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다. 더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.