참고문헌 (52)

1. Bagstad KJ, Villa F, Johnson G, Voigt B (2011) ARIES-artificial intelligence for ecosystem services: a guide to models and data, version 1.0. ARIES report series, 1.0. The Aries Consortium. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seeaRev/meeting2013/EG13-BG-7.pdf . Accessed 11 Mar 2016 

2. Ecosyst Serv KJ Bagstad 5 27 2013 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.004 Bagstad KJ, Semmens DJ, Waage S, Winthrop R (2013) A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosyst Serv 5:27-39 

   상세보기

3. Ecol Soc KJ Bagstad 19 2 64 2014 10.5751/ES-06523-190264 Bagstad KJ, Villa F, Batker D, Harrison-Cox J, Voigt B, Johnson GW (2014) From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments. Ecol Soc 19(2):64 

   

4. Environ Resource Econ IJ Bateman 48 2 177 2011 10.1007/s10640-010-9418-x Bateman IJ, Mace GM, Fezzi C, Atkinson G, Turner K (2011) Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environ Resource Econ 48(2):177-218 

   상세보기

5. Issues Glob Water Syst Res R Boumans 2 10 2007 Boumans R, Costanza R (2007) The multiscale integrated Earth Systems model (MIMES): the dynamics, modeling and valuation of ecosystem services. Issues Glob Water Syst Res 2:10-11 

6. Ecol Econ R Boumans 41 3 529 2002 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00098-8 Boumans R, Costanza R, Farley J, Wilson M, Portela R, Rotmans J, Villa F, Grasso M (2002) Modeling the dynamics of the integrated earth system and the value of global ecosystem services using the GUMBO model. Ecol Econ 41(3):529-560 

   상세보기

7. Bouwman AF, Kram T, Goldewijk KK (2006) Integrated modelling of global environmental change, an overview of IMAGE 2.4. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven. http://www.pbl.nl/sites/default/files/cms/publicaties/500110002.pdf . Accessed 11 Mar 2016 

8. Ecol Econ J Boyd 63 2 616 2007 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002 Boyd J, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ 63(2):616-626 

   상세보기

9. Landsc Online B Burkhard 15 1 2009 10.3097/LO.200915 Burkhard B, Kroll F, Müller F, Windhorst W (2009) Landscapes’ capacities to provide ecosystem services-a concept for land-cover based assessments. Landsc Online 15:1-22 

   상세보기

10. Ecol Ind B Burkhard 21 17 2012 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Ind 21:17-29 

    상세보기

11. Environ Life Y Chung 16 120 1998 Chung Y (1998) The methods for increasing water resources in forest. Environ Life 16:120-133 (in Korean) 

12. CICES (Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services) (2013) CICES V4.3. European Environment Agency. www.cices.eu . Accessed 11 Mar 2016 

13. Nature R Costanza 387 253 1997 10.1038/387253a0 Costanza R, d’Arge R, Groot Rd, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253-260 

    상세보기

14. Proc Natl Acad Sci RM Cowling 105 28 9483 2008 10.1073/pnas.0706559105 Cowling RM, Egoh B, Knight AT, O’Farrell PJ, Reyers B, Rouget M, Roux DJ, Welz A, Wilhelm-Rechman A (2008) An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(28):9483-9488 

    상세보기

15. Proc Natl Acad Sci GC Daily 105 28 9455 2008 10.1073/pnas.0804960105 Daily GC, Matson PA (2008) Ecosystem services: from theory to implementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(28):9455-9456 

    상세보기

16. Ecol Complex RS Groot de 7 3 260 2010 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7(3):260-272 

    상세보기

17. Ecol Econ E Dominati 69 9 1858 2010 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.002 Dominati E, Patterson M, Mackay A (2010) A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils. Ecol Econ 69(9):1858-1868 

    상세보기

18. Agric Ecosyst Environ B Egoh 127 1 135 2008 10.1016/j.agee.2008.03.013 Egoh B, Reyers B, Rouget M, Richardson DM, Le Maitre DC, van Jaarsveld AS (2008) Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127(1):135-140 

    상세보기

19. European Union (2014) Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services: indicators for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/knowledge/ecosystem_assessment/pdf/2ndMAESWorkingPaper.pdf . Accessed 11 Mar 2016 

20. Ecosyst Serv J Frélichová 8 110 2014 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001 Frélichová J, Vačkář D, Pártl A, Loučková B, Harmáčková ZV, Lorencová E (2014) Integrated assessment of ecosystem services in the Czech Republic. Ecosyst Serv 8:110-117 

    상세보기

21. GFERI (Gyeongsangnamdo Forest Environmental Research Institute) (2014) New forest technology. Gyeongsangnamdo Forest Environmental Research Institute. http://tree.gndo.kr/05research/020703.jsp . Accessed 13 May 14 (in Korean) 

22. R Haines-Young 110 2010 10.1017/CBO9780511750458.007 Ecosystem ecology Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2010) The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In: Raffaelli DG, Frid CLJ (eds) Ecosystem ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 110-139 

    

23. Ecol Ind R Haines-Young 21 39 2012 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.004 Haines-Young R, Potschin M, Kienast F (2012) Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: mapping marginal changes and trade-offs. Ecol Ind 21:39-53 

    상세보기

24. J Natl Park Res HY Heo 1 3 169 2010 Heo HY, Hockings M, Shin WW, Chung HJ, Dudley N, Shadie P, Vaisanen R, Vincent G, Kim H, Park SY, Yang SW (2010) Management effectiveness evaluation of Korea’s protected area system. J Natl Park Res 1(3):169-179 

25. Technol Forecast Soc Chang I Keppo 74 7 936 2007 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.024 Keppo I, O’Neill BC, Riahi K (2007) Probabilistic temperature change projections and energy system implications of greenhouse gas emission scenarios. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 74(7):936-961 

    상세보기

26. KFRI (Korea Forest Research Institute) (2011) The 5th national forestry inventory report. Korea Forest Research Institute Press, pp 30-36 (in Korean) 

27. KFS (Korea Forest Service) 11 2007 The effect of forest tending works for improving the green infrastructure function KFS (Korea Forest Service) (2007) The effect of forest tending works for improving the green infrastructure function. Korea Forest Service Press, Daejeon, pp 11-22 (in Korean) 

28. KFS (Korea Forest Service) 1 2010 Forest tending works manual KFS (Korea Forest Service) (2010) Forest tending works manual. Korea Forest Service Press, Daejeon, pp 1-10 (in Korean) 

29. Kim JH, Kim KD, Kim RH, Park CR, Youn HJ, Lee SW, Choi HT, Kim JJ (2010) A study on the estimation and the evaluation methods of public function of forest. Korea Forest Research Institute. http://book.nifos.go.kr/KFRICAB/IMG/006/001/155077.pdf . Accessed 11 Mar 2016 (in Korean) 

30. Korean Inst For Recreat JH Kim 16 4 9 2012 10.34272/forest.2012.16.4.002 Kim JH, Kim RH, Youn HJ, Lee SW, Choi HT, Kim JJ, Park CR, Kim KD (2012) Valuation of nonmarket forest resources. Korean Inst For Recreat 16(4):9-18 (in Korean) 

    상세보기

31. Ecol Ind L Koschke 21 54 2012 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010 Koschke L, Fuerst C, Frank S, Makeschin F (2012) A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecol Ind 21:54-66 

    상세보기

32. Global Biogeochem Cycles CJ Kucharik 14 3 795 2000 10.1029/1999GB001138 Kucharik CJ, Foley JA, Delire C, Fisher VA, Coe MT, Lenters JD, Young-Molling C, Ramankutty N, Norman JM, Gower ST (2000) Testing the performance of a dynamic global ecosystem model: water balance, carbon balance, and vegetation structure. Global Biogeochem Cycles 14(3):795-825 

    상세보기

33. Layke C (2009) Measuring nature’s benefits: a preliminary roadmap for improving ecosystem service indicators. World Resources Institute, Washington. http://pdf.wri.org/measuring_natures_benefits.pdf . Accessed 11 Mar 2016 

34. J For Sci K Lee 41 124 1995 Lee K (1995) A system for evaluation and allocation of forest functions. J For Sci 41:124-137 (in Korean) 

35. J Lee 21 1989 Study on forest classification and evaluation method Lee J, Kim J, Seo O (1989) Study on forest classification and evaluation method. Korea Forest Service Press, Daejeon, pp 21-54 (in Korean) 

36. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Island Press Washington, DC. http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf . Accessed 11 Mar 2016 

37. Ecosyst Serv J Maes 1 1 31 2012 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 Maes J, Egoh B, Willemen L, Liquete C, Vihervaara P, Schägner JP, Grizzetti B, Drakou EG, Notte AL, Zulian G, Bouraoui F, Luisa Paracchini M, Braat L, Bidoglio G (2012) Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosyst Serv 1(1):31-39 

    상세보기

38. Energy Policy Y Matsuoka 23 4 357 1995 10.1016/0301-4215(95)90160-9 Matsuoka Y, Kainuma M, Morita T (1995) Scenario analysis of global warming using the Asian Pacific Integrated Model (AIM). Energy Policy 23(4):357-371 

    상세보기

39. MOE (Korea Ministry of Environment) (2014) Republic of Korea’s fifth national report to the convention on biological diversity. Ministry of Environment. https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/kr/kr-nr-05-en.pdf . Accessed 11 Mar 2016 

40. Landsc Online F Müller 23 1 2010 10.3097/LO.201023 Müller F, de Groot R, Willemen L (2010) Ecosystem services at the landscape scale: the need for integrative approaches. Landsc Online 23:1-11 

    상세보기

41. Mulligan M, Guerry A, Arkema K, Bagstad K, Villa F (2010) Capturing and quantifying the flow of ecosystem services. In: Silvestri S, Kershaw F (eds) Framing the flow: innovative approaches to understand, protect and value ecosystem services across linked habitats. UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK. http://www.unep.org/pdf/Framing_the_Flow_lowres_20final.pdf . Accessed 11 Mar 2016 

42. Proc Natl Acad Sci R Naidoo 105 28 9495 2008 10.1073/pnas.0707823105 Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R, Fisher B, Green RE, Lehner B, Malcolm T, Ricketts TH (2008) Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(28):9495-9500 

    상세보기

43. Front Ecol Environ E Nelson 7 1 4 2009 10.1890/080023 Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron D, Chan KM, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7(1):4-11 

    상세보기

44. Paltsev S, Reilly JM, Jacoby HD, Eckaus RS, McFarland JR, Sarofim MC, Asadoorian MO, Babiker MH (2005) The MIT emissions prediction and policy analysis (EPPA) model: version 4. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change. http://globalchange.mit.edu/files/document/MITJPSPGC_Rpt125.pdf . Accessed 11 Mar 03 2016 

45. Biogeochemistry WJ Parton 5 1 109 1988 10.1007/BF02180320 Parton WJ, Stewart JW, Cole CV (1988) Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils: a model. Biogeochemistry 5(1):109-131 

    상세보기

46. Science C Perrings 331 6021 1139 2011 10.1126/science.1202400 Perrings C, Duraiappah A, Larigauderie A, Mooney H (2011) The biodiversity and ecosystem services science-policy interface. Science 331(6021):1139-1140 

    상세보기

47. Technol Forecast Soc Chang K Riahi 63 2 175 2000 10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00111-0 Riahi K, Roehrl RA (2000) Greenhouse gas emissions in a dynamics-as-usual scenario of economic and energy development. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 63(2):175-205 

    상세보기

48. Schröter D, Acosta-Michlik L, Arnell A, Araújo M, Badeck F, Bakker M, Bondeau A, Bugmann H, Carter T, Vega-Leinert A (2004) Advanced terrestrial ecosystem analysis and modelling. ATEAM Final report 2004. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam. https://www.pik-potsdam.de/ateam/ateam_final_report_sections_5_to_6.pdf . Accessed 11 Mar 2016 

49. Sharp R, Tallis HT, Ricketts T, Guerry AD, Wood SA, Chaplin-Kramer R, Nelson E, Ennaanay D, Wolny S, Olwero N, Vigerstol K, Pennington D, Mendoza G, Aukema J, Foster J, Forrest J, Cameron D, Arkema K, Lonsdorf E, Kennedy C, Verutes G, Kim CK, Guannel G, Papenfus M, Toft J, Marsik M, Bernhardt J, Griffin R, Glowinski K, Chaumont N, Perelman A, Lacayo M, Mandle L, Hamel P, Vogl AL (2014) InVEST +VERSION+ user’s guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford. http://data.naturalcapitalproject.org/nightly-build/invest-users-guide/InVEST_+VERSION+_Documentation.pdf . Accessed 11 Mar 2016 

50. TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity) (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. http://www.teebweb.org/publication/mainstreaming-the-economics-of-nature-a-synthesis-of-the-approach-conclusions-and-recommendations-of-teeb/ . Accessed 11 Mar 2016 

51. F Villa 77 2004 10.1007/0-387-21555-7_4 Landscape simulation modeling: a spatially explicit dynamic approach Villa F, Voinov A, Fitz C, Costanza R (2004) Calibration of large spatial models: a multistage, multiobjective optimization technique, landscape simulation modeling. In: Costanza R, Voinov A (eds) Landscape simulation modeling: a spatially explicit dynamic approach. Springer, New York, pp 77-116 

    

52. Landsc Urban Plan L Willemen 88 1 34 2008 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.08.004 Willemen L, Verburg PH, Hein L, van Mensvoort MEF (2008) Spatial characterization of landscape functions. Landsc Urban Plan 88(1):34-43 

    상세보기