$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

A Bayesian network assessment of macroinvertebrate responses to nutrients and other factors in streams of the Eastern Corn Belt Plains, Ohio, USA

Ecological modelling, v.345, 2017년, pp.21 - 29  

McLaughlin, D.B. ,  Reckhow, K.H.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Over the past several years, the United States Environmental Protection Agency has urged states to adopt numeric nutrient criteria to protect water quality. In a number of states, new numeric nutrient criteria have incorporated both a nutrient (nitrogen and/or phosphorus) criterion and a biological ...

주제어

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Ann. Limnol. ?Int. J. Limnol. Adriaenssens 40 3 181 2004 10.1051/limn/2004016 Application of Bayesian belief networks for the prediction of macroinvertebrate taxa in rivers 

  2. Environ. Modell. Softw. Aguilera 26 1376 2011 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.06.004 Bayesian networks in environmental modelling 

  3. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. Ayre 18 5 946 2012 10.1080/10807039.2012.707925 A Bayesian approach to landscape ecological risk assessment applied to the Upper Grande Ronde watershed, Oregon 

  4. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. Barton 8 3 418 2012 10.1002/ieam.1327 Bayesian networks in environmental and resource management 

  5. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. Borsuk 8 3 462 2012 10.1002/ieam.233 A Bayesian network model for integrative river rehabilitation planning and management 

  6. Environ. Modell. Softw. Chen 37 134 2012 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.03.012 Good practice in Bayesian network modelling 

  7. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. Cormier 32 272 2013 10.1002/etc.2056 A method for assessing causation of field exposure-response relationships 

  8. Cowell 1999 Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems 

  9. Freshw. Biol. Death 2015 10.1111/fwb.12655 How good are Bayesian belief networks for environmental management? A test with data from an agricultural river catchment 

  10. Trends Ecol. Evol. Dodds 22 12 669 2007 10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.010 Trohpic state, eutrophication and nutrient criteria in streams 

  11. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. Farmani 8 3 456 2012 10.1002/ieam.192 An evolutionary bayesian belief network methodology for participatory decision making under uncertainty: an application to groundwater management 

  12. Environ. Modell. Softw. Fienen 63 14 2015 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.007 A cross-validation package driving Netica with python 

  13. Hydrobiologia Figueroa-Nieves 568 287 2006 10.1007/s10750-006-0114-3 Controls on chlorophyll-a in nutrient-rich agricultural streams in Illinois, USA 

  14. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. Henriksen 8 3 430 2012 10.1002/ieam.195 Use of Bayesian belief networks for dealing with ambiguity in integrated groundwater management 

  15. Freshw. Sci. Hieskary 34 2 574 2015 10.1086/680662 Development of eutrophication criteria for Minnesota streams and rivers using multiple lines of evidence 

  16. Am. J. Political Sci. Honaker 54 April (2) 561 2010 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00447.x What to do about missing values in time series cross-section data 

  17. Honaker 2010 Amelia II: A Program for Missing Data. 

  18. J. Environ. Qual. Jarvie 42 295 2013 10.2134/jeq2012.0085 Phosphorus mitigation to control river eutrophication: murky waters, inconvenient truths, and postnormal science 

  19. Jensen 2007 Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs 

  20. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. Johnson 8 3 473 2011 10.1002/ieam.262 Integrating Bayesian networks and geographic information systems: good practice examples 

  21. Kjaerulff 2008 Bayesian Networks and Influence Diagrams: A Guide to Construction and Analysis 

  22. Korb 2004 Bayesian Artificial Intelligence 

  23. Can. J. For. Res. Marcot 36 3063 2006 10.1139/x06-135 Guidelines for developing and updating Bayesian belief networks applied to ecological modeling and conservation 

  24. Ecol. Modell. Marcot 230 50 2012 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.01.013 Metrics for evaluating performance and uncertainty of Bayesian network models 

  25. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. McLaughlin 8 4 674 2012 10.1002/ieam.1301 Assessing the predictive performance of risk-based water quality criteria using decision error estimates from ROC analysis 

  26. Environ. Manage. Miltner 2010 10.1007/s00267-010-9439-9 A method and rationale for deriving nutrient criteria for small rivers and streams in Ohio 

  27. J. Environ. Qual. Morgan 35 1110 2006 10.2134/jeq2005.0433 Relationships among nutrients, chlorophyll-a, and dissolved oxygen in agricultural streams in Illinois 

  28. NRC (National Research Council) 2001 Assessing the TMDL Approach to Water Quality Management 

  29. Pearl 1988 Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference 

  30. Pearl 2009 Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference 

  31. Environ. Modell. Softw. Qian 69 14 2015 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.03.001 A continuous variable Bayesian networks model for water quality modeling: a case study of setting nitrogen criterion for small rivers and streams in Ohio, USA 

  32. Ambio Rahikainen 43 115 2014 10.1007/s13280-013-0482-7 Toward integrative management advice of water quality, oil spills, and fishery in the gulf of Finland: a Bayesian approach 

  33. Environ. Sci. Technol. Reckhow 39 2913 2005 10.1021/es048584i A predictive approach to nutrient criteria 

  34. Reckhown 2010 Proceedings of the 43nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-43) January 5-8 Bayesian networks for the assessment of the effect of urbanization on stream macroinvertebrates 

  35. Environ. Sci. Technol. Richardson 41 8084 2007 10.1021/es062624w Estimating ecological thresholds for phosphorus in the Everglades 

  36. J. Environ. Qual. Royer 37 437 2008 10.2134/jeq2007.0344 Assessment of chlorophyll-a as a criterion for establishing nutrient standards in the streams and rivers of Illinois 

  37. Ecol. Indic. Smith 7 371 2007 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.03.001 A nutrient biotic index (NBI) for use with benthic macroinvertebrate communities 

  38. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. Suter 4 4 486 2008 10.1897/IEAM_2008-017.1 What is meant by risk-based environmental quality criteria? 

  39. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2010. Letter to EPA Administrator re: SAB Review of Empirical Approaches for Nutrient Criteria Derivation. EPA-SAB-10-006. April 27, 2010. http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab%5Csabproduct.nsf/E09317EC14CB3F2B85257713004BED5F/$File/EPA-SAB-10-006-unsigned.pdf (Accessed 05 March 2015). 

  40. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2011. Letter to EPA Administrator re: SAB Review of EPA’s Draft Approaches for Deriving Numeric Nutrient Criteria for Florida’s Estuaries, Coastal Waters, and Southern Inland Flowing Waters. EPA-SAB-11-010. July 19, 2011. Available online: http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab%5Csabproduct.nsf/DCC3488B67473BDA852578D20058F3C9/$File/EPA-SAB-11-010-unsigned.pdf (Accessed 05 March 2015). 

  41. Ecol. Modell. Uusitalo 203 312 2007 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.11.033 Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling 

  42. Environ. Manage. Van Looy 55 1343 2015 10.1007/s00267-015-0477-1 Unravelling river system impairments in stream networks with an integrated risk approach 

  43. Weisberg 2010 Bias and Causation: Models and Judgment for Valid Comparisons 

관련 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로