$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

A Multi-criteria Framework for Decision Process in Retrofit Optioneering through Interactive Data Flow 원문보기

Procedia engineering, v.180, 2017년, pp.859 - 869  

Cecconi, Fulvio Re (Politecnico di Milano Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, via Ponzio 31, Milano 20133, Italy) ,  Tagliabue, Lavinia C. (University of Brescia, Department of Civil, Environmental, Architectural Engineering and Mathematics, Via Branze 42, Brescia 25123, Italy) ,  Maltese, Sebastiano (Politecnico di Milano Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, via Ponzio 31, Milano 20133, Italy) ,  Zuccaro, Martina (Politecnico di Milano Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, via Ponzio 31, Milano 20133, Italy)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Abstract Aim of this research is to deliver a system of procedures and instruments that allows comparing different scenarios of restoration and retrofit of existing buildings applicable each time a relevant decision about the asset has to be made. The system developed takes advantages of Building I...

주제어

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Directive 2010/31/EU of The European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance in buildings (recast), Journal of the European Union L. 153/13, 18.6.2010. 

  2. Legge ordinaria del Parlamento n? 373/76 “Norme per il contenimento del consumo energetico per usi termici negli edifici”, pubblicata sulla Gazzetta Ufficiale Italiana n? 148 del 07/06/1976. 

  3. Legge 9 gennaio 1991, n. 10, in materia di “Norme per l’attuazione del Piano energetico nazionale in materia di uso razionale dell’energia, di risparmio energetico e di sviluppo delle fonti rinnovabili di energia”. 

  4. Energy & Buildings Balaras 31 2 143 2000 10.1016/S0378-7788(99)00028-6 Potential for energy conservation in apartment buildings 

  5. Energy and Buildings Ma 55 889 2012 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.08.018 Existing building retrofits: method- ology and state-of-the-art 

  6. ENEA, Caratterizzazione dei consumi energetici nazionali delle strutture ad uso ufficio, (2009), www.enea.it/enea_paese. 

  7. D.P.R. 26 agosto 1993, n. 412, Regolamento recante norme per la progettazione, l’installazione, l’esercizio e la manutenzione degli impianti termici degli edifici ai fini del contenimento dei consumi di energia, in attuazione dell’art. 4, comma 4, della L. 9 gennaio 1991, n. 10, Gazz. Uff. 14 ottobre 1993, n. 242, S.O. 

  8. ENEA, Rapporto energia e ambiente 2007. Analisi e scenari, Ente per le Nuove tecnologie, l’Energia e l’Ambiente, Roma, 2008. 

  9. ENEA, Valutazione dei consumi nell’edilizia esistente e benchmark mediante codici semplificati: analisi di edifici residenziali, Roma 2008. 

  10. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.01.003 P. de Wildea, M. van der Voordenb, Providing computational support for the selection of energy saving building components, Energy and Buildings, Volume 36, Issue 8, August 2004, Pages 749-758. 

  11. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.030 Y. Shao, P. Geyer, W. Lang, Integrating requirement analysis and multi-objective optimization for office building energy retrofit strategies, Energy and Buildings, Volume 82, October 2014, Pages 356-368. 

  12. 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9 C. L. Hwang, K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, 1981. 

  13. 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1 S. H. Zanakis, A. Solomon, N. Wishart, S. Dublish, Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods, European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 107, 1998, Pages 507-529. 

  14. 10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4_5 S.J. Chen, C.L. Hwang, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, No. 375, Sringer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1992. 

  15. E. Triantaphyllou, B. Shu, S. Nieto Sanchez, and T. Ray, Multi-Criteria Decision Making: An Operations Research Approach, Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, (J.G. Webster, Ed.), John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, Vol. 15, pp. 175-186, 1998. 

  16. T. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980. 

  17. 10.1016/j.renene.2009.07.008 G. Zheng, Y. Jing, H. Huang, G. Shi, X. Zhang, Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchical process model for building energy conservation assessment, J. Renewable energy, Volume 35, 2010, Pages 78-87. 

  18. 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.04.008 P. Lai, A. Potter, M. Beynon, A. Beresford, Evaluating the efficiency performance of airports using an integrated AHP/DEA-AR technique, J. Transport Policy, Volume 42, 2015, Pages 75-85. 

  19. 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.014 F.R. Lima Junior, L. Osiro, L.C.R. Carpinetti, A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection, J. Applied Soft Computing, Volume 21, 2014, Pages 194-209. 

  20. 10.1016/j.apm.2014.03.007 S. Vinodh, M. Prasanna, N. Hari Prakash, Integrated Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS for selecting the best plastic recycling method: A case study, J. Applied Mathematical Modelling, Volume 38 Number 19-20, 2014, Pages 4662-4672. 

  21. 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.015 A.C. Brent, D.E.C. Rogers, T.S.M. Ramabitsa-Siimane, M.B. Rohwer, Application of the analytical hierarchy process to establish health care waste management systems that minimize infection risks in developing countries, European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 181, 2007, Pages 403-424. 

  22. 10.1016/0377-2217(94)00368-8 N. Bryson, and A. Mobolurin, An action learning evaluation procedure for multiple criteria decision making problems, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 96, 1995, pp. 379-386. 

  23. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.019 J.K.W. Wong, H. Li, Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems, J. Building and Environment, Volume 43, 2008, Pages 108-125. 

  24. 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.025 S. Hsueh, M. Yan, Enhancing Sustainable Community Developments A Multi-criteria Evaluation Model for Energy Efficient Project Selection, International Conference on Energy, Environment and Development - ICEED2010, Energy Procedia, Volume 5, 2011, Pages 135-144. 

  25. 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.018 Y. Yang, B. Lia, R. Yao, A method of identifying and weighting indicators of energy efficiency assessment in Chinese residential buildings, Energy Policy, Volume 38, Issue 12, December 2010, Pages 7687-7697. 

  26. H. A. Linstone ; M. Turoff, Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, 1975, Addison-Wesley Publishing. 

  27. 10.3390/en5082818 S. Hsueh, A Fuzzy Utility-Based Multi-Criteria Model for Evaluating Households’ Energy Conservation Performance: A Taiwanese Case Study, Energies 2012, Volume 5, Issue 8, 2818-2834. 

  28. 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.016 L. Vidal, F. Marle, J. Bocquet, Using a Delphi process and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects, Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 38, Issue 5, May 2011, Pages 5388-5405. 

  29. 10.1016/j.scs.2012.05.004 S. H. Alyami, Y. Rezgui, Sustainable building assessment tool development approach, Sustainable Cities and Society, Volume 5, December 2012, Pages 52-62. 

  30. 10.3390/en5114462 K. Liu, S. Hsueh, W. Wu, Y. Chen, A DFuzzy-DAHP Decision-Making Model for Evaluating Energy-Saving Design Strategies for Residential Buildings, Energies 2012, Volume 5 Issue 11, Pages 4462-4480. 

  31. 10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458 N. Dalkey, O. Helmer, An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts, Management Science, 1963, Volume 9 Issue3, pp. 458-467. 

  32. 10.1016/0038-0121(71)90041-3 J. Pill, The Delphi method: Substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Volume 5, Issue 1, February 1971, Pages 57-71. 

  33. 10.1016/j.autcon.2013.05.017 N. Singhaputtangkul,S.P. Low,A.L. Teo,B.-G. Hwang, Knowledge-baseddecision support system quality function deployment (KBDSS-QFD) tool for assessment of building envelopes, Automation in Construction, 2013, Volume 35, Pages 314-328. 

  34. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.08.018 Z. Ma, P. Cooper, D. Daly, L. Ledo, Existing building retrofits: Methodology and state-of-the-art, Energy and Buildings, 2012, Volume 55, Pages 889-902. 

  35. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.06.009 E Asadia, M.G. da Silva, C.H. Antunesc, L. Diasc, L. Glicksman, Multi-objective optimization for building retrofit: A model using genetic algorithm and artificial neural network and an application, Energy and Buildings, 2014, Volume 81, Pages 444-456. 

  36. Energy and Buildings Flourentzou 34 185 2002 10.1016/S0378-7788(01)00106-2 Elaboration of retrofit scenarios 

  37. Structural Survey Ilter 33 3 228 2015 10.1108/SS-02-2015-0008 BIM for building refurbishment and maintenance: current status and research directions 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로