$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Analysis of Participant Factors That Affect the Diagnostic Performance of Screening Mammography: A Report of the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea 원문보기

Korean journal of radiology : official journal of the Korean Radiological Society, v.18 no.4, 2017년, pp.624 - 631  

Kim, Young Joong (Department of Radiology, Konyang University Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon 35365, Korea.) ,  Lee, Eun Hye (Department of Radiology, Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon 14584, Korea.) ,  Jun, Jae Kwan (National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea.) ,  Shin, Dong-Rock (Department of Radiology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung 25440, Korea.) ,  Park, Young Mi (Department of Radiology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan 47392, Korea.) ,  Kim, Hye-Won (Department of Radiology, Wonkwang University Hospital, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan 54538, Korea.) ,  Kim, Youme (Department of Radiology, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan 31116, Korea.) ,  Kim, Keum Won (Department of Radiology, Konyang University Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon 35365, Korea.) ,  Lim, Hyo Soon (Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University College of Med) ,  Park, Jeong Seon ,  Kim, Hye Jung ,  Jo, Hye-Mi

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

ObjectiveTo analyze participant factors that affect the diagnostic performance of screening mammography.Materials and MethodsWe enrolled 128756 cases from 10 hospitals between 2005 and 2010. We analyzed recall rate, cancer detection rate (CDR) per 1000 examinations, positive predictive value (PPV), ...

주제어

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 1 Humphrey LL Helfand M Chan BK Woolf SH Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med 2002 137 5 Part 1 347 360 12204020 

  2. 2 Ballard-Barbash R Taplin SH Yankaskas BC Ernster VL Rosenberg RD Carney PA Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997 169 1001 1008 9308451 

  3. 3 Elmore JG Jackson SL Abraham L Miglioretti DL Carney PA Geller BM Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy Radiology 2009 253 641 651 19864507 

  4. 4 Carney PA Sickles EA Monsees BS Bassett LW Brenner RJ Feig SA Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography Radiology 2010 255 354 361 20413750 

  5. 5 Carney PA Miglioretti DL Yankaskas BC Kerlikowske K Rosenberg R Rutter CM Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography Ann Intern Med 2003 138 168 175 12558355 

  6. 6 Rosenberg RD Yankaskas BC Abraham LA Sickles EA Lehman CD Geller BM Performance benchmarks for screening mammography Radiology 2006 241 55 66 16990671 

  7. 7 Kerlikowske K Grady D Barclay J Sickles EA Ernster V Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography JAMA 1996 276 33 38 8667536 

  8. 8 Kerlikowske K Zhu W Hubbard RA Geller B Dittus K Braithwaite D Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy JAMA Intern Med 2013 173 807 816 23552817 

  9. 9 Sickles EA Wolverton DE Dee KE Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists Radiology 2002 224 861 869 12202726 

  10. 10 Suh M Choi KS Park B Lee YY Jun JK Lee DH Trends in cancer screening rates among Korean men and women: results of the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2004-2013 Cancer Res Treat 2016 48 1 10 25943324 

  11. 11 Lee EH Kim KW Kim YJ Shin DR Park YM Lim HS Performance of screening mammography: a report of the alliance for breast cancer screening in Korea Korean J Radiol 2016 17 489 496 27390540 

  12. 12 Kolb TM Lichy J Newhouse JH Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations Radiology 2002 225 165 175 12355001 

  13. 13 Laya MB Larson EB Taplin SH White E Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography J Natl Cancer Inst 1996 88 643 649 8627640 

  14. 14 D'Orsi CJ Bassett LW Berg WA Feig SA Jackson VP Kopans DB BI-RADS: mammography D'Orsi CJ Mendelson EB Ikeda DM BIRADS® breast imaging reporting and data system: breast imaging atlas 4th ed Reston, VA American College of Radiology 2003 

  15. 15 Park SK Kang D Kim Y Yoo KY Epidemiologic characteristics of the breast cancer in Korea J Korean Med Assoc 2009 52 937 945 

  16. 16 Murphy IG Dillon MF Doherty AO McDermott EW Kelly G O'Higgins N Analysis of patients with false negative mammography and symptomatic breast carcinoma J Surg Oncol 2007 96 457 463 17929256 

  17. 17 Mandelson MT Oestreicher N Porter PL White D Finder CA Taplin SH Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers J Natl Cancer Inst 2000 92 1081 1087 10880551 

  18. 18 Checka CM Chun JE Schnabel FR Lee J Toth H The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012 198 W292 W295 22358028 

  19. 19 Tabar L Fagerberg G Chen HH Duffy SW Smart CR Gad A Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results from the Swedish Two-County Trial Cancer 1995 75 2507 2517 7736395 

  20. 20 Brekelmans CT Collette HJ Collette C Fracheboud J de Waard F Breast cancer after a negative screen: follow-up of women participating in the DOM Screening Programme Eur J Cancer 1992 28A 893 895 1524918 

  21. 21 Suzuki A Kuriyama S Kawai M Amari M Takeda M Ishida T Age-specific interval breast cancers in Japan: estimation of the proper sensitivity of screening using a population-based cancer registry Cancer Sci 2008 99 2264 2267 18795941 

  22. 22 Boyd NF Guo H Martin LJ Sun L Stone J Fishell E Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer N Engl J Med 2007 356 227 236 17229950 

  23. 23 Harvey JA Bovbjerg VE Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk Radiology 2004 230 29 41 14617762 

  24. 24 Roelofs AA Karssemeijer N Wedekind N Beck C van Woudenberg S Snoeren PR Importance of comparison of current and prior mammograms in breast cancer screening Radiology 2007 242 70 77 17185661 

  25. 25 Wang WL Hsu SD Wang JH Huang LC Hsu WL Survey of breast cancer mammography screening behaviors in Eastern Taiwan based on a health belief model Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2014 30 422 427 25002381 

  26. 26 Moodi M Rezaeian M Mostafavi F Sharifirad GR Determinants of mammography screening behavior in Iranian women: a population-based study J Res Med Sci 2012 17 750 759 23798942 

  27. 27 Juon HS Kim M Shankar S Han W Predictors of adherence to screening mammography among Korean American women Prev Med 2004 39 474 481 15313086 

  28. 28 Kim SA Chang JM Cho N Yi A Moon WK Characterization of breast lesions: comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography Korean J Radiol 2015 16 229 238 25741187 

LOADING...
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로