[논문]Is PEEK cage better than titanium cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery? A meta-analysis

Li, Zhi-jun; Wang, Yao; Xu, Gui-jun; Tian, Peng

doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1234-1

Is PEEK cage better than titanium cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery? A meta-analysis 원문보기

BMC musculoskeletal disorders, v.17, 2016년, pp.379 -

Li, Zhi-jun (Department of Orthopedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, No.154, Anshan Road, Tianjin, 300052 People’s Republic of China) , Wang, Yao (Department of oncological surgery, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Tianjin Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, No.6 Changjiang Road, Tianjin, 300100 People’s Republic of China) , Xu, Gui-jun (Department of Orthopedics, Tianjin Hospital, No. 406, Jiefang Nan Road, Tianjin, 300211 People’s Republic of China) , Tian, Peng (Department of Orthopedics, Tianjin Hospital, No. 406, Jiefang Nan Road, Tianjin, 300211 People’s Republic of China)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

BackgroundThis meta-analysis was performed to identify the benefits and disadvantages of the PEEK cage and titanium cage.MethodsWe used “cervical or cervicle”, “titanium”, and “polyetheretherketone or PEEK” as keywords. Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and other databases were searched to identify eligible studies that were published before October 2015. In addition, the Google search engine was used to manually search for relevant journals or conference proceedings. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials that compared the PEEK cage and titanium cage for anterior cervical surgery were included. The meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.1 software.ResultsTwo randomized and two non-randomized clinical trials were retrieved with a total of 184 segments from 107 patients in the PEEK cage group and 211 segments from 128 patients in the titanium cage group. The quality assessment scores ranged from 16 to 18 with high heterogeneity. There were no differences in functional status according to the Odom criteria, fusion rate, final local segmental angle and loss of correction between the two groups. Although more subsidence occurred in the titanium cage group, the effects of loss of the local segmental angle or the whole cervical Cobb angle on cervical function in the long-term are still not clear.ConclusionThe present meta-analysis indicated no significant difference in functional and radiographic performance between the PEEK and titanium cages, although more subsidence occurred in the titanium cage group. More high-quality studies are needed to confirm these results to offer more information for the choice in clinical practice.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1234-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

주제어

참고문헌 (40)

1. CLOWARD RB The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks J Neurosurg 1958 15 6 602 17 10.3171/jns.1958.15.6.0602 13599052

상세보기
2. Baba H Furusawa N Tanaka Y Wada M Imura S Tomita K Anterior decompression and fusion for cervical myeloradiculopathy secondary to ossification of the posterior ligament Int Orthop 1994 18 4 204 09 10.1007/BF00188323 8002108

상세보기
3. Baba H Furusawa N Imura S Kawahara N Tsuchiya H Tomita K Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993 18 15 2167 73 10.1097/00007632-199311000-00004 8278827

상세보기
4. Younger EM Chapman MW Morbidity at bone graft donor sites J Orthop Trauma 1989 3 3 192 95 10.1097/00005131-198909000-00002 2809818

상세보기
5. Bagby GW Arthrodesis by the distraction-compression method using a stainless steel implant Orthopedics 1988 11 6 931 34 3387340

상세보기
6. Brantigan JW Steffee AD A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993 18 14 2106 07 10.1097/00007632-199310001-00030 8272967

상세보기
7. Ray CD Threaded titanium cages for lumbar interbody fusions Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997 22 6 667 79 10.1097/00007632-199703150-00019 9089940

상세보기
8. Hacker RJ Cauthen JC Gilbert TJ Griffith SL A prospective randomized multicenter clinical evaluation of an anterior cervical fusion cage Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 25 20 2646–54, 2655 10.1097/00007632-200010150-00017 11034651

상세보기
9. Profeta G de Falco R Ianniciello G Profeta L Cigliano A Raja AI Preliminary experience with anterior cervical microdiscectomy and interbody titanium cage fusion (Novus CT-Ti) in patients with cervical disc disease Surg Neurol 2000 53 5 417 26 10.1016/S0090-3019(00)00207-X 10874139

상세보기
10. Hwang SL Lin CL Lieu AS Lee KS Kuo TH Hwang YF Three-level and four-level anterior cervical discectomies and titanium cage-augmented fusion with and without plate fixation J Neurosurg Spine 2004 1 2 160 67 10.3171/spi.2004.1.2.0160 15347001

상세보기
11. Gercek E Arlet V Delisle J Marchesi D Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning Eur Spine J 2003 12 5 513 16 10.1007/s00586-003-0539-6 12827473

상세보기
12. Chou YC Chen DC Hsieh WA Chen WF Yen PS Harnod T Efficacy of anterior cervical fusion: comparison of titanium cages, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages and autogenous bone grafts J Clin Neurosci 2008 15 11 1240 45 10.1016/j.jocn.2007.05.016 18801658

상세보기
13. Kersten RF van Gaalen SM de Gast A Oner FC Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in cervical applications: a systematic review Spine J 2015 15 6 1446 60 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.030 24374100

상세보기
14. Sukeik M Alshryda S Haddad FS Mason JM Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of tranexamic acid in total hip replacement J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2011 93 1 39 46 10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.24984 21196541

상세보기
15. Slim K Nini E Forestier D Kwiatkowski F Panis Y Chipponi J Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument Anz J Surg 2003 73 9 712 16 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x 12956787

상세보기
16. Higgins JP Thompson SG Deeks JJ Altman DG Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses BMJ 2003 327 7414 557 60 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 12958120

상세보기
17. Lau J Ioannidis JP Schmid CH Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews Ann Intern Med 1997 127 9 820 26 10.7326/0003-4819-127-9-199711010-00008 9382404

상세보기
18. Chen Y Wang X Lu X Yang L Yang H Yuan W Comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective, randomized, control study with over 7-year follow-up Eur Spine J 2013 22 7 1539 46 10.1007/s00586-013-2772-y 23568254

상세보기
19. Niu CC Liao JC Chen WJ Chen LH Outcomes of interbody fusion cages used in 1 and 2-levels anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: titanium cages versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages J Spinal Disord Tech 2010 23 5 310 16 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181af3a84 20124907

상세보기
20. Cabraja M Oezdemir S Koeppen D Kroppenstedt S Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone cages BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012 13 172 10.1186/1471-2474-13-172 22978810

상세보기
21. Malloy KM Hilibrand AS Autograft versus allograft in degenerative cervical disease Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002 394 27 38 10.1097/00003086-200201000-00004 11795743

상세보기
22. Yang X Chen Q Liu L Song Y Kong Q Zeng J Comparison of anterior cervical fusion by titanium mesh cage versus nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide cage following single-level corpectomy Int Orthop 2013 37 12 2421 27 10.1007/s00264-013-2101-4 24057657

상세보기
23. Moreland DB Asch HL Clabeaux DE Castiglia GJ Czajka GA Lewis PJ Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with implantable titanium cage: initial impressions, patient outcomes and comparison to fusion with allograft Spine J 2004 4 2 184 91 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.05.001 15016396

상세보기
24. Schmieder K Wolzik-Grossmann M Pechlivanis I Engelhardt M Scholz M Harders A Subsidence of the wing titanium cage after anterior cervical interbody fusion: 2-year follow-up study J Neurosurg Spine 2006 4 6 447 53 10.3171/spi.2006.4.6.447 16776355

상세보기
25. Toth JM Wang M Estes BT Scifert JL Seim HR Turner AS Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications Biomaterials 2006 27 3 324 34 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.011 16115677

상세보기
26. Katzer A Marquardt H Westendorf J Wening JV von Foerster G Polyetheretherketone--cytotoxicity and mutagenicity in vitro Biomaterials 2002 23 8 1749 59 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00300-3 11950045

상세보기
27. Hwang SL Hwang YF Lieu AS Lin CL Kuo TH Su YF Outcome analyses of interbody titanium cage fusion used in the anterior discectomy for cervical degenerative disc disease J Spinal Disord Tech 2005 18 4 326 31 10.1097/01.bsd.0000164198.30725.2d 16021013

상세보기
28. Cho DY Liau WR Lee WY Liu JT Chiu CL Sheu PC Preliminary experience using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in the treatment of cervical disc disease Neurosurgery 2002 51 6 1343 49 12445338

상세보기
29. Barsa P Suchomel P Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion Eur Spine J 2007 16 9 1395 400 10.1007/s00586-006-0284-8 17221174

상세보기
30. Meier U Kemmesies D Experiences with six different intervertebral disc spacers for spondylodesis of the cervical spine Orthopade 2004 33 11 1290 99 10.1007/s00132-004-0707-3 15340803

상세보기
31. Lemcke J Al-Zain F Meier U Suess O Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Spacers for Anterior Cervical Fusion: A Retrospective Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial Open Orthop J 2011 5 348 53 10.2174/1874325001105010348 22016753

상세보기
32. Pechlivanis I Thuring T Brenke C Seiz M Thome C Barth M Non-fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and implantation of empty polyetheretherketone cages Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011 36 1 15 20 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cbf870 20562731

상세보기
33. Wilke HJ Kettler A Goetz C Claes L Subsidence resulting from simulated postoperative neck movements: an in vitro investigation with a new cervical fusion cage Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 25 21 2762 70 10.1097/00007632-200011010-00008 11064521

상세보기
34. Francke EI Demetropoulos CK Agabegi SS Truumees E Herkowitz HN Distractive force relative to initial graft compression in an in vivo anterior cervical discectomy and fusion model Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010 35 5 526 30 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bb0e6e 20147873

상세보기
35. Yang JJ Yu CH Chang BS Yeom JS Lee JH Lee CK Subsidence and nonunion after anterior cervical interbody fusion using a stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage Clin Orthop Surg 2011 3 1 16 23 10.4055/cios.2011.3.1.16 21369474

상세보기
36. Garber ST Brockmeyer DL Management of subaxial cervical instability in very young or small-for-age children using a static single-screw anterior cervical plate: indications, results, and long-term follow-up J Neurosurg Spine 2016 24 6 892 6 10.3171/2015.10.SPINE15537 26895532

상세보기
37. Katsuura A Hukuda S Saruhashi Y Mori K Kyphotic malalignment after anterior cervical fusion is one of the factors promoting the degenerative process in adjacent intervertebral levels Eur Spine J 2001 10 4 320 24 10.1007/s005860000243 11563618

상세보기
38. Takeshima T Omokawa S Takaoka T Araki M Ueda Y Takakura Y Sagittal alignment of cervical flexion and extension: lateral radiographic analysis Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002 27 15 E348 55 10.1097/00007632-200208010-00014 12163735

상세보기
39. Thome C Krauss JK Zevgaridis D A prospective clinical comparison of rectangular titanium cages and iliac crest autografts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion Neurosurg Rev 2004 27 1 34 41 10.1007/s10143-003-0297-2 12905078

상세보기
40. Wu WJ Jiang LS Liang Y Dai LY Cage subsidence does not, but cervical lordosis improvement does affect the long-term results of anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical disc disease: a retrospective study Eur Spine J 2012 21 7 1374 82 10.1007/s00586-011-2131-9 22205113

상세보기

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

Is PEEK cage better than titanium cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery? A meta-analysis 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (40)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

연관된 기능

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트