다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기
Energy and buildings, v.166, 2018년, pp.145 - 153
Yamin Garretón, Julieta Alejandra (INAHE- CCT-CONICET Mendoza, Avenida Ruiz Leal s) , Colombo, Elisa Margarita (Departamento de Luminotecnia, Luz y Visió) , Pattini, Andrea Elvira (n, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnologí)
AI-Helper
Abstract Existing glare metrics are usually tested in controlled studies and have certain limitations when predicting extremely bright scenes typical of clear sky with great daylight availability. A field-based research was carried out, where 26 real offices with direct sunlight were evaluated. Dif...
Energy Build Perez-Lombard 40 394 2008 10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.03.007 A review on buildings energy consumption information
Build. Environ. Krarti 40 747 2005 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.08.007 A simplified method to estimate energy savings of artificial lighting use from daylighting
2011 World Energy Outlook
2002 Lighting for Work Places Part 1: Indoor (ISO: 8995-1: 2002 E)
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. Carlucci 47 1016 2015 10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.062 A review of indices for assessing visual comfort with a view to their use in optimization processes to support building integrated design
Boyce 2003 Human Factors in Lighting. Lighting Research Center
Boyce 2014 Human Factors in Lighting
Light. Res. Technol. Clear 45 141 2012 10.1177/1477153512444527 Discomfort glare: what do we actually know?
Energy Build. Suk 64 113 2013 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.04.020 Development of new daylight glare analysis methodology using absolute glare factor and relative glare factor
Energy Build. Wienold 38 743 2006 10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.017 Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras
Leukos Van Den Wymelenberg 10 145 2014 10.1080/15502724.2014.881720 A critical investigation of common lighting design metrics for predicting human visual comfort in offices with daylight
Build. Environ. Yamin Garreton 88 142 2015 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.11.010 Degree of eye opening: a new discomfort glare indicator
Build. Environ. Konstantzos 87 244 2015 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.007 Experimental and simulation analysis of daylight glare probability in offices with dynamic window shades
Wienold 2009 Daylight Glare in Offices
Osterhaus 2002 35th Annu. ANZAScA Conf., Geelong, Australia Recommended luminance ratios and their application in the design of daylighting systems for offices
Sol. Energy Osterhaus 79 140 2005 10.1016/j.solener.2004.11.011 Discomfort glare assessment and prevention for daylight applications in office environments
Wienold 2005 Proc. LuxEuropa, Berlin Towards a new daylight glare rating
Leukos Van Den Wymelenberg 7 103 2010 10.1582/LEUKOS.2010.07.02003 The effect of luminance distribution patterns on occupant preference in a daylit office environment
Osterhaus 2009 Proc. 11th Eur. Conf. Light., Lux Europe, Istanbul (TR) Design guidelines for glare-free daylit work environments
M.S. Rea, The IESNA Lighting Handbook: Reference & Application, (2000).
Energy Build. Suk 130 8 2016 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.08.021 Absolute glare factor and relative glare factor based metric: predicting and quantifying levels of daylight glare in office space
Energy Build. Suk 64 113 2013 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.04.020 Development of new daylight glare analysis methodology using absolute glare factor and relative glare factor
Indoor Built Environ. Lim 19 486 2010 10.1177/1420326X10376440 Predicted performance of shading devices for healthy visual environment
J. Environ. Psychol. Wang 30 226 2010 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.12.001 Investigation of declared seating preference and measured cognitive performance in a sunlit room
Energy Build. Galasiu 38 728 2006 10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.001 Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: a literature review
I.S.T. 21/ECBCS, Post occupancy evaluation of daylight in buildings, Gavle, Sweden, 1999.
J. Christoffersen, J. Wienold, Report ECCO-DBUR-0303-01: Monitoring Procedure for Assessment of User Reaction to Glare, Denmark, 2005.
Light. Res. Technol. Iwata 30 81 1998 10.1177/096032719803000205 Examination of the limitations of predicted glare sensation vote (PGSV) as a glare index for a large source: towards a comprehensive development of discomfort glare evaluation
Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Hopkinson 2 124 1950 10.1080/17470215008416585 The multiple criterion technique of subjective appraisal
Light. Res. Technol. Inanici 38 123 2006 10.1191/1365782806li164oa Evaluation of high dynamic range photography as a luminance data acquisition system
Energy Build. Wienold 38 743 2006 10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.017 Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras
Wienold 944 2009 11th Conf. Int. Build. Perform. Simul. Assoc. Dynamic daylight glare evaluation
Kumaragurubaran 25 2013 Proc. BS2013 13th Conf. Int. Build. Perform. Simul. Assoc. Hdrscope: high dynamic range image processing toolkit for lighting simulations and analysis
1999 Daylighting and Window Design
Int. J. Light. Res. Technol. Bodmann 26 135 1994 10.1177/096032719402600302 Predicted brightness-luminance phenomena
DiLaura 2010 The Lighting Handbook: Reference and Application
Biochem. Medica McHugh 22 276 2012 10.11613/BM.2012.031 Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic
Walpole 1993 Probability and Statistics For Engineers and Scientists
Am. J. Sociol. Jones 98 3 451 1992 10.1086/230046 Was there a Hawthorne effect?
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
저자가 공개 리포지터리에 출판본, post-print, 또는 pre-print를 셀프 아카이빙 하여 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
Copyright KISTI. All Rights Reserved.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.