[논문]A randomised comparison of three different immobilisation devices for thoracic and abdominal cancers

Hubie, Catherine; Shaw, Maddison; Bydder, Sean; Lane, Jonny; Waters, Gemma; McNabb, Megan; Kearvell, Rachel; Concannon, Alicia; Bharat, Chrianna; Appleyard, Rob

doi:10.1002/jmrs.202

A randomised comparison of three different immobilisation devices for thoracic and abdominal cancers 원문보기

Journal of medical radiation sciences, v.64 no.2, 2017년, pp.90 - 96

Hubie, Catherine (Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Nedlands Western Australia Australia) , Shaw, Maddison (Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Nedlands Western Australia Australia) , Bydder, Sean (Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Nedlands Western Australia Australia) , Lane, Jonny (Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Nedlands Western Australia Australia) , Waters, Gemma (Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Nedlands Western Australia Australia) , McNabb, Megan (Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Nedlands Western Australia Australia) , Kearvell, Rachel (Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Nedlands Western Australia Australia) , Concannon, Alicia (Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Nedlands Western Australia Australia) , Bharat, Chrianna (Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Nedlands Western Australia Australia) , Appleyard, Rob (Faculty of Health Science Sheffield Hallam University Sheffield UK)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

AbstractIntroductionPatient immobilisation is critically important for both highly conformal conventionally fractionated radiotherapy and for stereotactic body radiotherapy. Different immobilisation devices are available to maintain patient position for radiotherapy but the most suitable one remains unknown.MethodsForty‐five patients were randomly allocated to one of three immobilisation devices; the Q fix arm shuttle, BodyFIX without wrap or BodyFIX with wrap. Patients were imaged before and after treatment to ascertain intra‐fraction and inter‐fraction motion. Bony anatomy was used for matching to determine the positional accuracy of each device. Treatments were timed using a standard method. Patient comfort and staff satisfaction questionnaires were also issued to determine comfort, ease of use and preferences for each device.ResultsThe BodyFIX without wrap was the more accurate device; however, the differences between the devices were not statistically significant. The BodyFIX with wrap was found to take significantly longer to set up and set down compared to the arm shuttle and the BodyFIX without wrap (all P < 0.001). Patients (37%) marginally preferred the BodyFIX with wrap. Most (81%) staff preferred the BodyFIX without wrap.ConclusionImmobilisation using the BodyFIX without wrap was deemed to be suitable for clinical use. It was a clinically accurate device, the more efficient in terms of set up and set down time, the most preferred by staff and was accepted by patients.

참고문헌 (24)

1 Dahele M , Verbakel W , Cuijpers J , Slotman B , Senan S . An analysis of patient positioning during stereotactic lung radiotherapy performed without rigid external immobilization . Radiother Oncol 2012 ; 104 : 28 – 32 . 22647659

상세보기
2 Chang J , Balter P , Dong L , et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy in centrally and superiorly located stage I or isolated recurrent non‐small‐cell lung cancer . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008 ; 72 : 967 – 71 . 18954709

상세보기
3 Sahgal A , Roberge D , Schellenberg D , et al. The Canadian Association of radiation oncology scope of practice guidelines for lung, liver and spine stereotactic body radiotherapy . Clin Oncol 2012 ; 24 : 629 – 39 .
4 Winnie L , Purdie TG , Taremi M , et al. Effect of immobilization and performance status on intrafraction motion for stereotactic lung radiotherapy: Analysis of 133 patients . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011 ; 81 : 1568 – 75 . 21075559

상세보기
5 Winnie L , Sahgal A , Foote M , Millar B‐A , Jaffray DA , Letoureau D . Impact of immobilization on intrafraction motion for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy using cone beam computed tomography . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012 ; 84 : 520 – 6 . 22401920

상세보기
6 Bignardi M , Cozzi L , Fogliata A , et al. Critical appraisal of volumetric modulated arc therapy in stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastases to abdominal lymph nodes . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009 ; 75 : 1570 – 7 . 19880261

상세보기
7 Han K , Cheung P , Basaran P , Poon I , Yeung L , Lochray F . A comparison of two immobilization systems for stereotactic body radiation therapy of lung tumors . Radiother Oncol 2010 ; 95 : 103 – 8 . 20189669

상세보기
8 Potters L , Kavanagh B , Galvin JM , et al. American Society for therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and American College of Radiology practice guideline for the performance of stereotactic body radiation therapy . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010 ; 76 : 326 – 32 . 20117285
9 Wulf J , Hädinger U , Oppitz U , Olshausen B , Flentje M . Stereotactic radiotherapy of extracranial targets: CT simulation and accuracy of treatment in the stereotactic body frame . Radiother Oncol 2000 ; 57 : 225 – 36 . 11054527

상세보기
10 Purdie TG , Moseley DJ , Bissonnette J‐P , et al. Respiration correlated cone‐beam computed tomography and 4DCT for evaluating target motion in stereotactic lung radiation therapy . Acta Oncol 2006 ; 45 : 915 – 22 . 16982558

상세보기
11 Purdie TG , Bissonnette J‐P , Franks K , et al. Cone‐beam computed tomography for on‐line guidance of lung stereotactic radiotherapy: Localization, verification and intrafraction tumor position . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007 ; 68 : 243 – 52 . 17331671
12 Liu H‐W , Khan R , Nugent Z , Krobutschek K , Dunscombe P , Lau H . Factors influencing intrafractional target shifts in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy . Pract Radiat Oncol 2013 ; 4 : e45 – 51 . 24621431
13 Gutiérrez AN , Stahakis S , Crownover R , Esquivel C , Shi C , Papanikolaou N . Clinical evaluation of an immobilization system for stereotactic body radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy . Med Dosim 2011 ; 36 : 126 – 9 . 20435464
14 Nagata Y , Takayama K , Matsuo Y , et al. Clinical outcomes of a phase I/II study of 48 Gy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in 4 fractions for primary lung cancer using a stereotactic body frame . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004 ; 63 : 1427 – 31 .
15 Nagata Y , Hiroka M , Mizowaki T , et al. Survey of stereotactic body radiation therapy in Japan by the Japan 3‐D Conformal External Beam Radiotherapy Group . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009 ; 75 : 343 – 7 . 19735861

상세보기
16 Siva S , Devereux T , Kron T , et al. Vacuum immobilisation reduces tumour excursion and minimises intrafraction error ina cohort of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for pulmonary metastases . J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2014 ; 58 : 244 – 52 . 24103219
17 Dahele M , Verbakel W , Cuijpers J , Slotman B , Senan S . An analysis of patient positioning during stereotactic lung radiotherapy performed without rigid external immobilization . Radiother Oncol 2012 ; 104 : 29 – 32 .
18 Torgerson D , Roberts C . Randomisation methods: Concealment . BMJ 1999 ; 319 : 7206 .
19 Foster R , Meyer J , Iyengar P , et al. Localization accuracy and immobilization effectiveness of a stereotactic body fram for a variety of treatment sites . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013 ; 87 : 911 – 6 . 24351410
20 Dawood O , Mahadevan A , Googman K . Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases . Eur J Cancer 2009 ; 45 : 2947 – 59 . 19773153

상세보기
21 Galvin J , Bednarz G . Quality assurance procedures for stereotactic body radiation therapy . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008 ; 71 : S122 – 5 . 18406909

상세보기
22 Wang Z , Nelson J , Yoo S , Woo QJ , Kirkpatrick JP , Yin F‐F . Refinement of treatment setup and target localization accuracy using three‐dimensional cone‐beam computed tomography for stereotactic body radiotherapy . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009 ; 73 : 571 – 7 . 19147021

상세보기
23 Cao M , Lasley FD , Das I , Des Rosiers CM , Slessinger ED , Cardenes HR . Evaluation of rotational errors in treatment setup of stereotactic body radiation therapy of liver cancer . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012 ; 84 : e435 – 40 . 22727886

상세보기
24 Faculty of Radiation Oncology . The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists . Guidelines for Safe Practice of Stereotactic Body (Ablative) Radiation Therapy, 2015 .

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

A randomised comparison of three different immobilisation devices for thoracic and abdominal cancers 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

참고문헌 (24)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트