$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

A Mobile App (BEDSide Mobility) to Support Nurses’ Tasks at the Patient's Bedside: Usability Study 원문보기

JMIR mHealth and uHealth, v.6 no.3, 2018년, pp.e57 -   

Ehrler, Frederic (Division of Medical Information Sciences University Hospitals of Geneva Geneva Switzerland) ,  Weinhold, Thomas (Division of Medical Information Sciences University Hospitals of Geneva Geneva Switzerland) ,  Joe, Jonathan (Biomedical & Health Informatics University of Washington Seattle, WA United States) ,  Lovis, Christian (Division of Medical Information Sciences University Hospitals of Geneva Geneva Switzerland) ,  Blondon, Katherine (Department of General Internal Medicine University Hospitals of Geneva Geneva Switzerland)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

BackgroundThe introduction of clinical information systems has increased the amount of clinical documentation. Although this documentation generally improves patient safety, it has become a time-consuming task for nurses, which limits their time with the patient. On the basis of a user-centered meth...

주제어

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 1 Bates DW Cohen M Leape LL Overhage JM Shabot MM Sheridan T Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001 8 4 299 308 11418536 11418536 

  2. 2 McAlearney AS Robbins J Hirsch A Jorina M Harrop JP Perceived efficiency impacts following electronic health record implementation: an exploratory study of an urban community health center network Int J Med Inform 2010 12 79 12 807 16 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.09.002 20961803 S1386-5056(10)00160-7 20961803 

  3. 3 Poissant L Pereira J Tamblyn R Kawasumi Y The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005 12 5 505 16 10.1197/jamia.M1700 15905487 M1700 15905487 

  4. 4 Yee T Needleman J Pearson M Parkerton P Parkerton M Wolstein J The influence of integrated electronic medical records and computerized nursing notes on nurses' time spent in documentation Comput Inform Nurs 2012 06 30 6 287 92 10.1097/NXN.0b013e31824af835 22411414 22411414 

  5. 5 Hripcsak George Vawdrey DK Fred MR Bostwick SB Use of electronic clinical documentation: time spent and team interactions J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011 18 2 112 7 10.1136/jamia.2010.008441 21292706 jamia.2010.008441 21292706 

  6. 6 Ammenwerth E Spötl H-p The time needed for clinical documentation versus direct patient care. A work-sampling analysis of physicians' activities Methods Inf Med 2009 48 1 84 91 19151888 09010084 19151888 

  7. 7 Category M Domain Q Findings C Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2009 Impact of Health IT on Nurses? Time Spent on Direct Patient Care https://healthit.ahrq.gov/ 

  8. 8 Fahimi F Abbasi Nazari Mohammad Abrishami R Sistanizad M Mazidi T Faghihi T Soltani Rasoul Baniasadi Shadi Transcription errors observed in a teaching hospital Arch Iran Med 2009 03 12 2 173 5 19249889 0014 19249889 

  9. 9 Toivonen R Choi D Nevala N Ergonomics Product Development of a Mobile Workstation for Health Care J. Usability Studies 2011 7 1 40 50 

  10. 10 Wu RC Straus SE Evidence for handheld electronic medical records in improving care: a systematic review BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006 06 20 6 26 10.1186/1472-6947-6-26 16787539 1472-6947-6-26 16787539 

  11. 11 Ventola CL Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits P T 2014 05 39 5 356 64 24883008 24883008 

  12. 12 Ehrler F Wipfli R Teodoro D Sarrey E Walesa M Lovis C Challenges in the Implementation of a Mobile Application in Clinical Practice: Case Study in the Context of an Application that Manages the Daily Interventions of Nurses JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2013 06 12 1 1 e7 10.2196/mhealth.2344 25100680 v1i1e7 25100680 

  13. 13 Ehrler F Haller G Sarrey E Walesa M Wipfli R Lovis C Assessing the Usability of Six Data Entry Mobile Interfaces for Caregivers: A Randomized Trial JMIR Hum Factors 2015 12 15 2 2 e15 10.2196/humanfactors.4093 27025648 v2i2e15 27025648 

  14. 14 Prgomet M Georgiou A Westbrook J The impact of mobile handheld technology on hospital physicians' work practices and patient care: a systematic review J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009 16 6 792 801 10.1197/jamia.M3215 19717793 M3215 19717793 

  15. 15 Strudwick Gillian Predicting nurses' use of healthcare technology using the technology acceptance model: an integrative review Comput Inform Nurs 2015 05 33 5 189 98; quiz E1 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000142 25974361 00024665-201505000-00004 25974361 

  16. 16 Kuo K Liu C Ma C An investigation of the effect of nurses' technology readiness on the acceptance of mobile electronic medical record systems BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013 08 12 13 88 10.1186/1472-6947-13-88 23938040 1472-6947-13-88 23938040 

  17. 17 Cornell P Riordan M Townsend-Gervis M Mobley R Barriers to critical thinking: workflow interruptions and task switching among nurses J Nurs Adm 2011 10 41 10 407 14 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822edd42 21934427 00005110-201110000-00006 21934427 

  18. 18 Johnson C Johnson T Zhang J A user-centered framework for redesigning health care interfaces J Biomed Inform 2005 02 38 1 75 87 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.005 15694887 S1532-0464(04)00153-4 15694887 

  19. 19 Cornell P Herrin-Griffith D Keim C Petschonek S Sanders A D'Mello Sidney Golden Teresa W Shepherd Gayle Transforming nursing workflow, part 1: the chaotic nature of nurse activities J Nurs Adm 2010 09 40 9 366 73 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181ee4261 20798619 00005110-201009000-00006 20798619 

  20. 20 Skov MB Høegh RT Supporting information access in a hospital ward by a context-aware mobile electronic patient record Pers Ubiquitous Comput 2005 10 4 205 14 10.1007/s00779-005-0049-0 

  21. 21 Murphy M Kay J Patient identification: problems and potential solutions Vox Sang 2004 07 87 Suppl 2 197 202 10.1111/j.1741-6892.2004.00482.x 15209916 VOX482 15209916 

  22. 22 Cohen MD Hilligoss PB The published literature on handoffs in hospitals: deficiencies identified in an extensive review Qual Saf Health Care 2010 04 08 19 6 493 7 10.1136/qshc.2009.033480 20378628 20378628 

  23. 23 Birmingham P Buffum MD Blegen MA Lyndon A Handoffs and patient safety: grasping the story and painting a full picture West J Nurs Res 2015 11 37 11 1458 78 10.1177/0193945914539052 24951369 0193945914539052 24951369 

  24. 24 Whitty JA Spinks J Bucknall T Tobiano G Chaboyer W Patient and nurse preferences for implementation of bedside handover: do they agree? Findings from a discrete choice experiment Health Expect 2017 20 4 742 50 10.1111/hex.12513 27804191 27804191 

  25. 25 Yeung MS Lapinsky SE Granton JT Doran DM Cafazzo JA Examining nursing vital signs documentation workflow: barriers and opportunities in general internal medicine units J Clin Nurs 2012 04 21 7-8 975 82 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03937.x 22243491 22243491 

  26. 26 Gearing P Olney C Davis K Lozano D Smith L Friedman B Enhancing patient safety through electronic medical record documentation of vital signs J Healthc Inf Manag 2006 20 4 40 5 17091789 17091789 

  27. 27 Nelson N Evans R Samore M Gardner R Detection and prevention of medication errors using real-time bedside nurse charting J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005 12 4 390 7 10.1197/jamia.M1692 15802486 M1692 15802486 

  28. 28 Zhang J Johnson TR Patel VL Paige DL Kubose T Using usability heuristics to evaluate patient safety of medical devices J Biomed Inform 2003 36 1-2 23 30 14552844 S1532046403000601 14552844 

  29. 29 Yen PY Bakken S Review of health information technology usability study methodologies J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012 19 3 413 22 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000020 21828224 amiajnl-2010-000020 21828224 

  30. 30 Jaspers M Steen T van DBC Geenen M The think aloud method: a guide to user interface design Int J Med Inform 2004 11 73 11-12 781 95 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.08.003 15491929 S1386-5056(04)00182-0 15491929 

  31. 31 Brooke J 1996 2018-02-22 SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale https://hell.meiert.org/core/pdf/sus.pdf 

  32. 32 Bangor A Kortum P Miller J Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale J Usability Stud 2009 4 3 114 23 

  33. 33 Kaya N Factors affecting nurses' attitudes toward computers in healthcare Comput Inform Nurs 2011 02 29 2 121 9 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181f9dd0f 20975539 20975539 

  34. 34 Virzi RA Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how Many subjects is enough? Hum Factors 1992 34 4 457 68 10.1177/001872089203400407 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로