[논문]Trifocal versus Bifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens Implantation after Cataract Surgery or Refractive Lens Exchange: a Meta-analysis

Yoon, Chang Ho; Shin, In-Soo; Kim, Mee Kum

doi:10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e275

Trifocal versus Bifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens Implantation after Cataract Surgery or Refractive Lens Exchange: a Meta-analysis 원문보기

Journal of Korean medical science : JKMS, v.33 no.44, 2018년, pp.e275 -

Yoon, Chang Ho (Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea .) , Shin, In-Soo (Department of Education, Jeonju University College of Education, Jeonju, Korea .) , Kim, Mee Kum (Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea .)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

BackgroundWe compared the efficacy between trifocal and bifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.MethodsThrough PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL, we searched potentially relevant articles published from 1990 to 2018. Defocus curves, visual acuities (VAs) were measured as primary outcomes. Spectacle dependence, postoperative refraction, contrast sensitivity (CS), glare, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were measured as secondary outcomes. Effects were pooled using random-effects method.ResultsWe included 11 clinical trials, with a total of 787 eyes (395 subjects). The trifocal IOL group showed better binocular distance VA corrected with defocus levels of −0.5, −1.0, −1.5, and −2.5 diopter than the bifocal IOL group (All P ≤ 0.004). The trifocal IOL group showed better monocular uncorrected distance and intermediate VAs (mean difference [MD], −0.04 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.07, −0.01; P = 0.006 and MD, −0.07 logMAR; 95% CI, −0.13, −0.01; P = 0.03, respectively). Postoperative refraction, glare, CS, and HOAs were not significantly different from each other.ConclusionThe overall findings indicate that trifocal diffractive IOL implantation is better than the bifocal diffractive IOL in intermediate VA, and provides similar or better in distance and near VAs without any major deterioration in the visual quality.

주제어

참고문헌 (41)

1 Keates RH Pearce JL Schneider RT Clinical results of the multifocal lens J Cataract Refract Surg 1987 13 5 557 560 3312575

상세보기
2 Calladine D Evans JR Shah S Leyland M Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction Sao Paulo Med J 2015 133 1 68 25626855
3 Shah S Peris-Martinez C Reinhard T Vinciguerra P Visual outcomes after cataract surgery: multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses J Refract Surg 2015 31 10 658 666 26465253

상세보기
4 Lane SS Morris M Nordan L Packer M Tarantino N Wallace RB 3rd Multifocal intraocular lenses Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2006 19 1 89 105 16500531

상세보기
5 Voskresenskaya A Pozdeyeva N Pashtaev N Batkov Y Treushnicov V Cherednik V Initial results of trifocal diffractive IOL implantation Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010 248 9 1299 1306 20526609

상세보기
6 Gatinel D Pagnoulle C Houbrechts Y Gobin L Design and qualification of a diffractive trifocal optical profile for intraocular lenses J Cataract Refract Surg 2011 37 11 2060 2067 22018368

상세보기
7 Montés-Micó R Madrid-Costa D Ruiz-Alcocer J Ferrer-Blasco T Pons AM In vitro optical quality differences between multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lenses J Cataract Refract Surg 2013 39 6 928 936 23688880

상세보기
8 Madrid-Costa D Ruiz-Alcocer J Ferrer-Blasco T García-Lázaro S Montés-Micó R Optical quality differences between three multifocal intraocular lenses: bifocal low add, bifocal moderate add, and trifocal J Refract Surg 2013 29 11 749 754 24203806

상세보기
9 Papadatou E Del Águila-Carrasco AJ Esteve-Taboada JJ Madrid-Costa D Montés-Micó R Assessing the in vitro optical quality of presbyopic solutions based on the axial modulation transfer function J Cataract Refract Surg 2016 42 5 780 787 27255256

상세보기
10 Brito P Salgado-Borges J Neves H Gonzalez-Meijome J Monteiro M Light-distortion analysis as a possible indicator of visual quality after refractive lens exchange with diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses J Cataract Refract Surg 2015 41 3 613 622 25708210

상세보기
11 Jonker SM Bauer NJ Makhotkina NY Berendschot TT van den Biggelaar FJ Nuijts RM Comparison of a trifocal intraocular lens with a +3.0 D bifocal IOL: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial J Cataract Refract Surg 2015 41 8 1631 1640 26432120

상세보기
12 Gundersen KG Potvin R Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens Clin Ophthalmol 2016 10 455 461 27051269
13 Mojzis P Kukuckova L Majerova K Liehneova K Piñero DP Comparative analysis of the visual performance after cataract surgery with implantation of a bifocal or trifocal diffractive IOL J Refract Surg 2014 30 10 666 672 25291749

상세보기
14 Wan X Wang W Liu J Tong T Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range BMC Med Res Methodol 2014 14 1 135 25524443
15 Sistrom CL Mergo PJ A simple method for obtaining original data from published graphs and plots AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000 174 5 1241 1244 10789769
16 Shinichi A Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Online Kensaku 2014 35 3 154 155
17 Wells GA Shea B O'Connell D Peterson J Welch V Losos M http://www.ohri.ca/Programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp Accessed Oct 19, 2016
18 Chinn S A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis Stat Med 2000 19 22 3127 3131 11113947

상세보기
19 Postolache C Postolache O Comparation of refractive results with bifocal implants at Lisa 809 and trifocal at Lisa tri839 Rom J Ophthalmol 2015 59 2 100 102 26978870

상세보기
20 Alió JL Kaymak H Breyer D Cochener B Plaza-Puche AB Quality of life related variables measured for three multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses: a prospective randomised clinical trial Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018 46 4 380 388 29044974
21 Kaymak H Breyer D Alió JL Cochener B Visual performance with bifocal and trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses: a prospective three-armed randomized multicenter clinical trial J Refract Surg 2017 33 10 655 662 28991332

상세보기
22 Mojzis P Kukuckova L Majerova K Ziak P Piñero DP Postoperative visual performance with a bifocal and trifocal diffractive intraocular lens during a 1-year follow-up Int J Ophthalmol 2017 10 10 1528 1533 29062771
23 Bilbao-Calabuig R González-López F Amparo F Alvarez G Patel SR Llovet-Osuna F Comparison between mix-and-match implantation of bifocal intraocular lenses and bilateral implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses J Refract Surg 2016 32 10 659 663 27722752

상세보기
24 Cochener B Prospective clinical comparison of patient outcomes following implantation of trifocal or bifocal intraocular lenses J Refract Surg 2016 32 3 146 151 27027620

상세보기
25 Plaza-Puche AB Alio JL Analysis of defocus curves of different modern multifocal intraocular lenses Eur J Ophthalmol 2016 26 5 412 417 27135091

상세보기
26 Vilar C Hida WT de Medeiros AL Magalhães KRP de Moraes Tzelikis PF Chaves MAPD Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses Clin Ophthalmol 2017 11 1393 1397 28814826

상세보기
27 Gundersen KG Potvin R Comparison of visual outcomes and subjective visual quality after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of apodized diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses Clin Ophthalmol 2016 10 805 811 27274184
28 Plaza-Puche AB Alio JL Sala E Mojzis P Impact of low mesopic contrast sensitivity outcomes in different types of modern multifocal intraocular lenses Eur J Ophthalmol 2016 26 6 612 617 27135090

상세보기
29 Liu JW Haw WW Optimizing outcomes of multifocal intraocular lenses Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2014 25 1 44 48 24257245

상세보기
30 de Vries NE Webers CA Montés-Micó R Ferrer-Blasco T Nuijts RM Visual outcomes after cataract surgery with implantation of a +3.00 D or +4.00 D aspheric diffractive multifocal intraocular lens: comparative study J Cataract Refract Surg 2010 36 8 1316 1322 20656154

상세보기
31 Cochener B Vryghem J Rozot P Lesieur G Heireman S Blanckaert JA Visual and refractive outcomes after implantation of a fully diffractive trifocal lens Clin Ophthalmol 2012 6 1421 1427 22969289

상세보기
32 Marques EF Ferreira TB Comparison of visual outcomes of 2 diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses J Cataract Refract Surg 2015 41 2 354 363 25661129

상세보기
33 Vinas M Gonzalez-Ramos A Dorronsoro C Akondi V Garzon N Poyales F In vivo measurement of longitudinal chromatic aberration in patients implanted with trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses J Refract Surg 2017 33 11 736 742 29117412

상세보기
34 Millán MS Vega F Ríos-López I Polychromatic image performance of diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses: longitudinal chromatic aberration and energy efficiency Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016 57 4 2021 2028 27100158
35 Millán MS Vega F Extended depth of focus intraocular lens: chromatic performance Biomed Opt Express 2017 8 9 4294 4309 28966865

상세보기
36 Shen Z Lin Y Zhu Y Liu X Yan J Yao K Clinical comparison of patient outcomes following implantation of trifocal or bifocal intraocular lenses: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sci Rep 2017 7 1 45337 28422087
37 de Silva SR Evans JR Kirthi V Ziaei M Leyland M Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016 12 CD003169 27943250
38 Chiam PJ Chan JH Aggarwal RK Kasaby S ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery: quality of vision J Cataract Refract Surg 2006 32 9 1459 1463 16931256

상세보기
39 de Vries NE Webers CA Touwslager WR Bauer NJ de Brabander J Berendschot TT Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses J Cataract Refract Surg 2011 37 5 859 865 21397457

상세보기
40 Cetinkaya S Dadaci Z Acir NO Cetinkaya YF Yener HI Ozcimen M Visual outcomes of multifocal intraocular lens implantation in patients with cataract and high hyperopia and patient selection Int J Ophthalmol 2015 8 6 1258 1260 26682185
41 Xu Z Cao D Chen X Wu S Wang X Wu Q Comparison of clinical performance between trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses: a meta-analysis PLoS One 2017 12 10 e0186522 29073156

상세보기

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

Trifocal versus Bifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens Implantation after Cataract Surgery or Refractive Lens Exchange: a Meta-analysis 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (41)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

연관된 기능

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트