$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Towards an open science publishing platform 원문보기

F1000Research, v.5, 2016년, pp.130 -   

Tracz, Vitek (F1000, London, UK) ,  Lawrence, Rebecca (F1000, London, UK)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The way science and research is done is rapidly becoming more open and collaborative. The traditional way of publishing new findings in journals is becoming increasingly outdated and no longer serves the needs of much of science. Whilst preprints can bring significant benefits of removing delay and ...

주제어

참고문헌 (31)

  1. 1 Krumholz HM : The End of Journals. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 ; 8 ( 6 ): 533 – 534 . 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002415 26555127 

  2. 2 Bishop D : Will traditional science journals disappear ? 2015 Reference Source 

  3. 3 Björk B Solomon D : The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals. J Informetr. 2013 ; 7 ( 4 ): 914 – 923 . 10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.001 

  4. 4 WHO : Developing Global Norms for Sharing Data and Results during Public Health Emergencies . Reference Source 

  5. 5 Oransky I : 17 retractions from SAGE journals bring total fake peer review count to 250 - Retraction Watch blog . 2015 Reference Source 

  6. 6 Moylan E : Inappropriate manipulation of peer review - BioMed Central blog . 2015 Reference Source 

  7. 7 Chalmers L : Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. JAMA. 1990 ; 263 ( 10 ): 1405 – 8 . 10.1001/jama.1990.03440100121018 2304220 

  8. 8 Chalmers I Dickersin K : Biased under-reporting of research reflects biased under-submission more than biased editorial rejection. [version 1; referees: 3 approved]. F1000Res. 2013 ; 2 : 1 . 10.12688/f1000research.2-1.v1 3782352 --> 24358860 

  9. 9 Senn S : Authors are also reviewers: problems in assigning cause for missing negative studies. [version 1; referees: 4 approved]. F1000Res. 2013 ; 2 : 17 . 10.12688/f1000research.2-17.v1 3752705 --> 24358845 

  10. 10 Nature Publishing Group (NPG) : Author Insights 2014. Figshare. 2016 Reference Source 

  11. 11 Butler D : Dutch lead European push to flip journals to open access. Nature. 2016 ; 529 ( 7584 ): 13 . 10.1038/529013a 26738577 

  12. 12 OA monitoring . Research Information Network. 2015 Reference Source 

  13. 13 The Reckoning: An Analysis of Wellcome Trust Open Access Spend 2013–14 . Wellcome Trust Blog. Reference Source 

  14. 14 Casadevall A Fang FC : Causes for the persistence of impact factor mania. MBio. 2014 ; 5 ( 2 ): e00064 – e00014 . 10.1128/mBio.00064-14 3967521 --> 24643863 

  15. 15 Brembs B Button K Munafò M : Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 ; 7 : 291 . 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291 3690355 --> 23805088 

  16. 16 Casadevall A Fang FC : Impacted science: impact is not importance. MBio. 2015 ; 6 ( 5 ): e01593 – e01515 . 10.1128/mBio.01593-15 4620476 --> 26463169 

  17. 17 Lozano G Larivière V Gingras Y : The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers’ citations in the digital age. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol. 2012 ; 63 ( 11 ): 2140 – 2145 . 10.1002/asi.22731 

  18. 18 Sahel JA : Quality versus quantity: assessing individual research performance. Sci Transl Med. 2011 ; 3 ( 84 ): 84cm13 . 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002249 3338409 --> 21613620 

  19. 19 Vale RD : Accelerating scientific publication in biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 ; 112 ( 44 ): 13439 – 13446 . 10.1073/pnas.1511912112 4640799 --> 26508643 

  20. 20 Curry S : The power of preprint. The Biologist. 2015 ; 62 ( 6 ): 7 Reference Source 

  21. 21 Lauer MS Krumholz HM Topol EJ : Time for a prepublication culture in clinical research? Lancet. 2015 ; 386 ( 10012 ): 2447 – 2449 . 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01177-0 26738703 

  22. 22 The Remarkable Transformation of E-Biomed into PubMed Central . Reference Source 

  23. 23 F1000Research FAQs . Reference Source 

  24. 24 van Rooyen S Godlee F Evans S : Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers’ recommendations: a randomised trial. BMJ. 1999 ; 318 ( 7175 ): 23 – 27 . 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.23 27670 --> 9872878 

  25. 25 Kowalczuk MK Dudbridge F Nanda S : Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models. BMJ Open. 2015 ; 5 ( 9 ): e008707 . 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008707 4593157 --> 26423855 

  26. 26 F1000Research - How it Works . Reference Source 

  27. 27 Paglione L Lawrence R : Data exchange standards to support and acknowledge peer-review activity. Learn Publ. 2015 ; 28 ( 4 ): 309 – 316 . 10.1087/20150411 

  28. 28 Wilsdon J Allen L Belfiore E : The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management . UK: HEFCE; 2015 10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363 

  29. 29 Hicks D Wouters P Waltman L : Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature. 2015 ; 520 ( 7548 ): 429 – 431 . 10.1038/520429a 25903611 

  30. 30 San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment: Putting science into the assessment of research . 2003 Reference Source 

  31. 31 Hutchins BI Yuan X Anderson JM : Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A new metric that uses citation rates to measure influence at the article level. bioRxiv. 2015 10.1101/029629 

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로