$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Food Preferences in Dogs: Effect of Dietary Composition and Intrinsic Variables on Diet Selection 원문보기

Animals an open access journal from MDPI, v.9 no.5, 2019년, pp.219 -   

Alegría-Morán, Raúl A. (Departamento de Medicina Preventiva Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8820808, Chile) ,  Guzmán-Pino, Sergio A. (ralegria@veterinaria.uchile.cl) ,  Egaña, Juan Ignacio (Departamento de Fomento de la Producció) ,  Muñoz, Carem (n Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santa Rosa 11735, La Pintana, Santiago 8820000, Chile) ,  Figueroa, Jaime (sguzmanp@uchile.cl (S.A.G-P.))

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Simple SummaryPreference tests allow the study of some aspects of the feeding behavior of domestic dogs. However, besides sensorial proprieties of food, intrinsic characteristics of dogs may play a role in diet selection. The aim of this study was to describe the feeding behavior of dogs in relation...

주제어

참고문헌 (51)

  1. 1. Aldrich G.C. Koppel K. Pet Food Palatability Evaluation: A Review of Standard Assay Techniques and Interpretation of Results with a Primary Focus on Limitations Animals 2015 5 43 55 10.3390/ani5010043 26479136 

  2. 2. Tobie C. Péron F. Larose C. Assessing Food Preferences in Dogs and Cats: A Review of the Current Methods Animals 2015 5 126 137 10.3390/ani5010126 26479142 

  3. 3. Luño I. Palacio J. García-Belenguer S. González-Martínez Á. Rosado B. Emotional eating in companion dogs: Owners’ perception and relation with feeding habits, eating behavior, and emotional state J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2018 25 17 23 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.03.005 

  4. 4. Houpt K.A. Smith S.L. Taste Preferences and their Relation to Obesity in Dogs and Cats Can. Vet. J. 1981 22 77 81 7248879 

  5. 5. Case L.P. Daristotle L. Hayek M.G. Raasch M.F. Chapter 19—Feeding Regimens for Dogs and Cats Canine and Feline Nutrition 3rd ed. Mosby Saint Louis, MO, USA 2011 191 198 

  6. 6. Bradshaw J.W.S. The Evolutionary Basis for the Feeding Behavior of Domestic Dogs ( Canis familiaris ) and Cats ( Felis catus ) J. Nutr. 2006 136 1927S 1931S 10.1093/jn/136.7.1927S 16772461 

  7. 7. Hewson-Hughes A.K. Hewson-Hughes V.L. Colyer A. Miller A.T. McGrane S.J. Hall S.R. Butterwick R.F. Simpson S.J. Raubenheimer D. Geometric analysis of macronutrient selection in breeds of the domestic dog, Canis lupus familiaris Behav. Ecol. Off. J. Int. Soc. Behav. Ecol. 2013 24 293 304 10.1093/beheco/ars168 

  8. 8. Axelsson E. Ratnakumar A. Arendt M.-L. Maqbool K. Webster M.T. Perloski M. Liberg O. Arnemo J.M. Hedhammar Å. Lindblad-Toh K. The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet Nature 2013 495 360 10.1038/nature11837 23354050 

  9. 9. Hall N.J. Péron F. Cambou S. Callejon L. Wynne C.D.L. Food and Food-Odor Preferences in Dogs: A Pilot Study Chem. Sens. 2017 42 361 370 10.1093/chemse/bjx016 

  10. 10. Cabanac M. Physiological Role of Pleasure Science 1971 173 1103 1107 10.1126/science.173.4002.1103 5098954 

  11. 11. DMC Información Meteológica Available online: http://www.meteochile.cl/PortalDMC-web/index.xhtml (accessed on 7 April 2018) 

  12. 12. AOAC Official Methods of Analysis 18th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists Arlington, VA, USA 2005 

  13. 13. Griffin R. Palatability testing methods: Parameters and analyses that influence test conditions Petfood Technology Kvamme J. Phillips T. Watt Publishing Co. Texas, USA 2003 187 193 

  14. 14. R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria 2016 

  15. 15. Thrusfield M. Christley R. Veterinary Epidemiology 4th ed. Wiley-Blackwell Hoboken, NJ, USA 2018 888 

  16. 16. Pinheiro J. Bates D. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus Springer New York, NY, USA 2000 

  17. 17. Dohoo R. Martin W. Stryhn H. Veterinary Epidemiologic Research 2nd ed. VER Inc. Charlottetown, PEI, Canada 2009 865 

  18. 18. Demidenko E. Mixed Models: Theory and Applications with R Wiley Hoboken, NJ, USA 2013 

  19. 19. Di Rienzo J. Guzman A. Casanoves F. A multiple comparisons method based on the distribution of the root node distance of a binary tree obtained by average linkage of the matrix of Euclidean distances between treatment means J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2002 7 129 142 10.1198/10857110260141193 

  20. 20. De Brito C.B.M. Félix A.P. de Jesus R.M. de França M.I. de Oliveira S.G. Krabbe E.L. Maiorka A. Digestibility and palatability of dog foods containing different moisture levels, and the inclusion of a mould inhibitor Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2010 159 150 155 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.06.001 

  21. 21. Zicker S.C. Evaluating Pet Foods: How Confident Are You When You Recommend a Commercial Pet Food? Top. Companion Anim. Med. 2008 23 121 126 10.1053/j.tcam.2008.04.003 18656838 

  22. 22. German A.J. The Growing Problem of Obesity in Dogs and Cats J. Nutr. 2006 136 1940S 1946S 10.1093/jn/136.7.1940S 16772464 

  23. 23. Solà-Oriol D. van Kempen T. Torrallardona D. Relationships between glycaemic index and digesta passage of cereal-based diets in pigs Livest. Sci. 2010 134 41 43 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.06.091 

  24. 24. Solà-Oriol D. Torrallardona D. Roura E. Feed preference in pigs: Relationship between cereal preference and nutrient composition and digestibility J. Anim. Sci. 2014 92 220 228 10.2527/jas.2013-6791 24352962 

  25. 25. Coppinger R. Schneider R. Evolution of working dogs The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behaviour and Interactions with People Serpell J. Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 1995 21 47 

  26. 26. Bhadra A. Bhattacharjee D. Paul M. Singh A. Gade P.R. Shrestha P. Bhadra A. The meat of the matter: A rule of thumb for scavenging dogs? Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 2016 28 427 440 10.1080/03949370.2015.1076526 

  27. 27. Bhadra A. Bhadra A. Preference for meat is not innate in dogs J. Ethol. 2014 32 15 22 10.1007/s10164-013-0388-7 

  28. 28. Dust J.M. Grieshop C.M. Parsons C.M. Karr-Lilienthal L.K. Schasteen C.S. Quigley I.J.D. Merchen N.R. Fahey J.G.C. Chemical composition, protein quality, palatability, and digestibility of alternative protein sources for dogs J. Anim. Sci. 2005 83 2414 2422 10.2527/2005.83102414x 16160054 

  29. 29. Cooke L.J. Wardle J. Age and gender differences in children’s food preferences Br. J. Nutr. 2005 93 741 746 10.1079/BJN20051389 15975175 

  30. 30. Martínez-Ruiz N.R. López-Díaz J.A. Wall-Medrano A. Jiménez-Castro J.A. Angulo O. Oral fat perception is related with body mass index, preference and consumption of high-fat foods Physiol. Behav. 2014 129 36 42 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.02.010 24534166 

  31. 31. Smith S.L. Kronfeld D.S. Banta C.A. Owners’ perception of food flavor preferences of pet dogs in relation to measured preferences of laboratory dogs Appl. Anim. Ethol. 1983 10 75 87 10.1016/0304-3762(83)90113-X 

  32. 32. Mehrkam L.R. Wynne C.D.L. Behavioral differences among breeds of domestic dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris ): Current status of the science Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2014 155 12 27 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.03.005 

  33. 33. James W.T. McCay C.M. A study of food intake, activity, and digestive efficiency in different type dogs Am. J. Vet. Res. 1950 11 412 413 14783267 

  34. 34. Gittleman J.L. Carnivore olfactory bulb size: Allometry, phylogeny and ecology J. Zool. 1991 225 253 272 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1991.tb03815.x 

  35. 35. Hall N.J. Glenn K. Smith D.W. Wynne C.D.L. Performance of Pugs, German Shepherds, and Greyhounds ( Canis lupus familiaris ) on an odor-discrimination task J. Comp. Psychol. 2015 129 237 246 10.1037/a0039271 26010195 

  36. 36. Ferrell F. Preference for sugars and nonnutritive sweeteners in young beagles Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 1984 8 199 203 10.1016/0149-7634(84)90041-1 6205334 

  37. 37. Galef B.G. Animal Traditions: Experimental Evidence of Learning by Imitation in an Unlikely Animal Curr. Biol. 2010 20 R555 R556 10.1016/j.cub.2010.05.002 20619805 

  38. 38. Becques A. Serra J. Gouat P. Larose C. Effects of Pre- and Postnatal Olfactogustatory Experience on Early Preferences at Birth and Dietary Selection at Weaning in Kittens Chem. Sens. 2009 35 41 45 10.1093/chemse/bjp080 

  39. 39. Wells D.L. Hepper P.G. Perinatal Olfactory Learning in the Domestic Dog Chem. Sens. 2005 31 207 212 10.1093/chemse/bjj020 

  40. 40. Diez M. Nguyen P. Obesity: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology and Management of the Obese Dog Encyclopedio of Canine Clinical Nutrition Pibot P. Biourge V. Elliot D. Aniwa SAS Aimargues, France 2006 481 491 

  41. 41. Nakamura Y. Sanematsu K. Ohta R. Shirosaki S. Koyano K. Nonaka K. Shigemura N. Ninomiya Y. Diurnal Variation of Human Sweet Taste Recognition Thresholds Is Correlated With Plasma Leptin Levels Diabetes 2008 57 2661 2665 10.2337/db07-1103 18633111 

  42. 42. Sartor F. Donaldson L.F. Markland D.A. Loveday H. Jackson M.J. Kubis H.-P. Taste perception and implicit attitude toward sweet related to body mass index and soft drink supplementation Appetite 2011 57 237 246 10.1016/j.appet.2011.05.107 21600942 

  43. 43. Houpt K.A. Coren B. Hintz H.F. Hilderbrant J.E. Effect of sex and reproductive status on sucrose preference, food intake, and body weight of dogs J. Am. Vet. Med Assoc. 1979 174 1083 1085 571424 

  44. 44. Burkholder W.J. Toll P.W. Obesity Small Animal Clinical Nutrition Hand M.S. Thatcher C.D. Remillard R.L. Roudebush P. Mark Morris Institute Topeka, KS, USA 2000 476 508 

  45. 45. Durrer J.L. Hannon J.P. Seasonal variations in caloric intake of dogs living in an arctic environment Am. J. Physiol. Leg. Content 1962 202 375 378 10.1152/ajplegacy.1962.202.2.375 

  46. 46. Quiniou N. Dubois S. Noblet J. Voluntary feed intake and feeding behaviour of group-housed growing pigs are affected by ambient temperature and body weight Livest. Prod. Sci. 2000 63 245 253 10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00135-9 

  47. 47. Ferket P.R. Gernat A.G. Factors that affect feed intake of meat birds: A review Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2006 5 905 911 10.3923/ijps.2006.905.911 

  48. 48. Serisier S. Feugier A. Delmotte S. Biourge V. German A.J. Seasonal Variation in the Voluntary Food Intake of Domesticated Cats ( Felis Catus ) PLoS ONE 2014 9 e96071 10.1371/journal.pone.0096071 24759851 

  49. 49. Willner P. Towell A. Sampson D. Sophokleous S. Muscat R. Reduction of sucrose preference by chronic unpredictable mild stress, and its restoration by a tricyclic antidepressant Psychopharmacology 1987 93 358 364 10.1007/BF00187257 3124165 

  50. 50. Fureix C. Beaulieu C. Argaud S. Rochais C. Quinton M. Henry S. Hausberger M. Mason G. Investigating anhedonia in a non-conventional species: Do some riding horses Equus caballus display symptoms of depression? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2015 162 26 36 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.11.007 

  51. 51. Figueroa J. Solà-Oriol D. Manteca X. Pérez J.F. Dwyer D.M. Anhedonia in pigs? Effects of social stress and restraint stress on sucrose preference Physiol. Behav. 2015 151 509 515 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.08.027 26311465 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로