다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기
Zdrowie publiczne = Polish journal of public health, v.129 no.3, 2019년, pp.99 - 104
Gierszon, Patrycja (Department of Applied Psychology, Medical University of Lublin, Poland) , Milanowska, Joanna (Department of Applied Psychology, Medical University of Lublin, Poland) , Łopuszańska, Urszula (Department of Applied Psychology, Medical University of Lublin, Poland) , Sidor, Katarzyna (Department of Experimental Haematooncology, Medical University of Lublin, Poland) , Paziewska, Magdalena (Department of Applied Psychology, Medical University of Lublin, Poland) , Samardakiewicz, Marzena
AbstractIntroduction.The profession of a nurse is next to the medical profession, one of the pillars of medical care in Poland and in the world. In recent years, the need to see the importance of this profession and the responsibility associated with it, both by the public and the doctors, is increasingly underlined.Aim.The research carried out is an attempt to answer the question, what attitudes towards nurses are shaped by future doctors already during the studies and what influence on students’ self-esteem on these attitudes.Material and methods.The research was conducted among 89 students of the medical faculty, Medical University in Lublin in April 2018. A questionnaire of own authorship was used, constructed on the basis of descriptive research carried out by Maik M. et al and the Rosenberg Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SES). The obtained results were subjected to statistical analysis using the STATISTICA program, version 13.1.Result.The vast majority of medical students (80%) believe that the role of a nurse is underestimated both in society and in the medical community. Students think that this work requires sacrifice and constant vigilance. Students who have encountered nursing staff notice symptoms of burnout in some of them, such as depersonalization of patients (56%). However, most of them (60%) think that this is ungrateful work and often interferes with family life. Students do not agree that the nurse should always be smiling and optimistic (75%). She values her features such as patience, good organization of time (86%) and ability to cooperate with doctors (91%). Most of students think that a nurse is a partner of a doctor (73%), while almost half (49%) of them see imperfections in cooperation both professional groups, resulting from the lack of mutual respect (64%). Students notice the commitment and hard work performed by nurses (70%), and also, although to a lesser extent, they appreciate their knowledge (56%).Conclusion.Appreciation of the nurse’s role on the part of doctors seems to be particularly important due to the need for cooperation of medical staff. The quality of cooperation between the interdisciplinary team and, consequently, the quality of care and medical care depends to a large extent on the mutual respect, understanding and correct communication between these professional groups.
1. Naczelna Izba Pielęgniarek i Położnych. Raport Naczelnej Rady Pielęgniarek i Położnych: Zabezpieczenie społeczeństwa polskiego w świadczenia pielęgniarek i położnych. Warszawa: Naczelna Izba Pielęgniarek i Położnych; 2017. http://nipip.pl/wpcontent/uploads/2017/03/Raport_druk_2017.pdf (access: 25.05.2018).
2. Urbanek B. Zmaganie o profesję w XIX i XX wieku. In: B. Urbanek (ed.) Zawód pielęgniarki na ziemiach polskich w XIX i XX wieku. Warszawa: Wyd. Makmed; 2008. p. 56-79.
3. Dobińska Ż. Historia i etos zawodu pielęgniarki w Polsce. Pol Prz Nauk Zdrowiu. 2014;2(39):172.
4. PAP/Rynek Zdrowia; 27 marca 2017. http://www.rynekzdrowia.pl/Politykazdrowotna/Radziwill-musimy-pracowac-nad-prestizem-zawodow-pielegniarki-i-poloznej,171471,14.html (access: 25.05.2018).
10.17219/pzp/79703 5. Koralewicz DE, Kuriata-Kościelniak E, Mróz S. Opinia studentów pielęgniarstwa na temat wizerunku zawodowego pielęgniarek w Polsce. Piel Zdr Publ. 2017;7(4):285-92.10.17219/pzp/79703
6. Baumann, K. Świadomość samego siebie. Eduk Dialog. 2005;10:7-31.
7. Szpitalak M, Polczyk R. Samoocena. Geneza, struktura, funkcje i metody pomiaru. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego; 2015.
8. Niebrzydowski L. Psychologia wychowawcza - samoświadomość, aktywność, stosunki interpersonalne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo PWN; 1989.
9. Janiszewska-Nieścioruk Z. Samoocena, samoocena dzieci i młodzieży z niepełnosprawności intelektualną. In: T. Pilch (ed.) Encyklopedia pedagogiczna XXI wieku. Warszawa: ŻAK; 2006.
10. Szewczuk W. Słownik psychologiczny. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Wiedza Powszechna; 1985.
11. Aronson E, Akert R, Wilson T. Psychologia społeczna - serce i umysł. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Zyski S-ka; 1997.
12. Wells LE, Marwell G. Self-esteem: Its conceptualization and measurement. Beverly Hills: CA; 1976.
10.2307/1389002 13. Smelser NJ. Overview of the ten-year report on the behavioral and social sciences. Sociol Perspect. 1989;32(1):1-4.10.2307/1389002
14. Wojciszke B. Człowiek wśród ludzi. Zarys psychologii społecznej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar; 2002.
15. Niebrzydowski L. Rodzaje samooceny uczniów klas V-VIII. Psychol Wychow. 1974;4:432-45.
16. Szpitalak M, Polczyk R. Samoocena. Geneza, struktura, funkcje i metody pomiaru. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego; 2015.
17. Dzwonkowska I, Lachowicz-Tabaczek K, Łaguna M. Samoocena i jej pomiar (SES), polska adaptacja skali SES M. Rosenberga. Podręcznik. Warszawa: PTP; 2008.
18. Maik M, Marcinowicz L, Zarzycka D, et al. Zawód pielęgniarki w opinii studentów medycyny. Pielęg XXI wieku. 2009;3(28):23-30.
19. Fejfer-Wirbał E, Gładczuk J, Marcinowicz L. Relacje lekarz-pielęgniarka w polskiej literaturze medycznej. Med Rodz. 2013;1:19-22.
20. Włodarczyk D, Tobolska B. Wizerunek zawodu pielęgniarki z perspektywy lekarzy, pacjentów i pielęgniarek. Med Pr. 2011;62(3):269-79.
10.1097/NNA.0000000000000624 21. Ma C, Stimpfel AW. The association between nurse shift patterns and nurse-nurse and nurse-physician collaboration in acute care Hospital Units. J Nurs Adm. 2018;48(6):335-41.10.1097/NNA.000000000000062429799816
10.20883/pielpol.2017.66 22. Siwek M, Nowak-Starz G. Współczesny wizerunek pielęgniarstwa w opinii społeczeństwa. Pielęg Pol. 2017;3(65):487-500.10.20883/pielpol.2017.66
10.1097/NNA.0000000000000460 23. House S, Havens D. Nurses’ and Physicians’ Perceptions of Nurse-Physician Collaboration. JONA. 2017;47(3):165-71.10.1097/NNA.000000000000046028157818
10.3109/13561820.2014.934338 24. Matziou V, Vlahioti E, Perdikaris P, et al. Physician and nursing perceptions concerning interprofessional communication and collaboration. J Interprof Care. 2014;28(6):526-33.10.3109/13561820.2014.93433825003547
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문
Copyright KISTI. All Rights Reserved.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.