보고서 정보
주관연구기관 |
한국해양수산개발원 Korea Maritime Institute |
보고서유형 | 최종보고서 |
발행국가 | 대한민국 |
언어 |
한국어
|
발행년월 | 2012-02 |
과제시작연도 |
2011 |
주관부처 |
국토교통부 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport |
등록번호 |
TRKO201400019908 |
과제고유번호 |
1615002467 |
사업명 |
해양연구기획 |
DB 구축일자 |
2014-11-10
|
키워드 |
유정통제기.시장 환경.기술수준.기술개발 계획.사업화전략.Subsea Tree.Market Condition.Technical Status.Technology Development Strategy.Business Model.
|
초록
▼
Subsea Tree는 해저생산플랜트의 핵심장비로서 생산용 유정(Well)의 압력과 유량을 통제하기 위한 밸브들로 구성된 장비를 말하며, 1980년 해저 189m 지점에 설치된 이후 최근에는 2,500m 이하까지 설치되고 있음.
Subsea Tree 관련 해외업체로는 Cameron, FMC Technology, Aker Solution, GE Oil & Gas 등을 들 수 있으며, 이들 업체들은 기술 및 제품에 대한 높은 진입장벽을 형성하고 있음.
현재까지 주된 기술개발 트렌드는 Subsea Tree를 구성하는 다양한 V
Subsea Tree는 해저생산플랜트의 핵심장비로서 생산용 유정(Well)의 압력과 유량을 통제하기 위한 밸브들로 구성된 장비를 말하며, 1980년 해저 189m 지점에 설치된 이후 최근에는 2,500m 이하까지 설치되고 있음.
Subsea Tree 관련 해외업체로는 Cameron, FMC Technology, Aker Solution, GE Oil & Gas 등을 들 수 있으며, 이들 업체들은 기술 및 제품에 대한 높은 진입장벽을 형성하고 있음.
현재까지 주된 기술개발 트렌드는 Subsea Tree를 구성하는 다양한 Valves와 본체에 관련한 것이었으나, 최근 해저 지진 등의 해양사가 빈번해짐에 따라 다양한 사고에 대비할 수 있는 Monitoring system이나 SCM, SIS와 같은 기술개발이 요구되고 있음.
우리나라가 Subsea Tree 기술개발에 성공할 경우 Subsea Tree 시장의 독과점적 지위를 확보함으로써 외화가득액 제고는 물론 해양플랜트 산업 전반에 걸쳐 파급 효과가 클 것으로 기대됨.
Abstract
▼
Subsea Tree as a core equipment of subsea producing equipment is the equipment which consists of valves to control pressure and flow of producing well. Subsea Tree has currently been established below 2,500m conjunction with control and power system since it was established 189m subsea in 1980. As C
Subsea Tree as a core equipment of subsea producing equipment is the equipment which consists of valves to control pressure and flow of producing well. Subsea Tree has currently been established below 2,500m conjunction with control and power system since it was established 189m subsea in 1980. As Cameron, FMC Technology, Aker Solution, and GE Oil & Gas are considered a leading foreign companies of Subsea Tree, these companies have been completed higher entry barriers of technology and products.
The technology developing field of Subsea Tree System is increasing because of brisk R&D of subsea production due to development of subsea and the polar regions and also accompanies with patent application. U.S. accounts for 71% of patents in the world. The current trend of technology development is related to various valves consisting of Subsea Tree and main body, but the trend is moving to monitoring system, SCM, and SIS preparing various marine accident such as subsea earthquake.
The number of Subsea Tree from 2011 to 2015 is estimated to total 2,140 which is the 21% increased number comparing with past 5 years (2006-2010).
This number comes to total US$ 10.32 billion which is the 31% increased amount comparing with past 5 years. As China, the biggest competitive country of Korea recently announced 'Offshore Plant Industry Innovation & Development Strategy (2011-2020), China is devoting all energy for offshore plant industry promotion. However, there is no technology development case of Subssea Tree in Korea. The result of expert questionnaire inquiry (the 5 scale) showed 3.9 of the importance of technology development , 3.6 of timeliness , 3.9 of necessity , and 3.8 of ripple effect. Accordingly, technology development of Subsea Tree should be required.
The target of this planning research is to develop intelligence Subsea Tree System Technology which has possibility of real-time surveillance through subsea camera and vibration sensor, satisfying 1,500m depth, 10,000 psi pressure, -35℃ -175℃temperature, and level 3 of SIL. As a technology development strategy, two stage development strategy is adopted as original technology development and commercialization technology development. In the first stage, Condition Monitoring System development is completed, then Subsea Control Module and Work Over Control System developemnt is finalized at the second stage.
Another technology would be completed during the whole period of the first and second stage. Self-technology development is the principle, but another technology development would be pushed ahead with self development and introduction of leading technology. The parallel technology of self-development and introduction of leading technology is Hydraulic Line Connector, Fail-Safe Valves, Condition Monitoring System, Work Over Control System, and Safety Instrumented System.
This research proposes higher governmental funding by considering domestic R&D condition such as technology accumulation, infrastructure, and human resources to attract private company's participation. Out of total 29.4 billion KRW R&D expenditure, 10.8 billion KRW for 1st stage(3 years) is applied from 80% of government and 20% of private sector. At the 2nd stage, 18.6 billion KRW is from 70% of government and 30% of private.
In order to enter into market in spite of technology development success, business strategy was established. As a representative strategy, this research comes up with co-R&D with foreign leading Subsea Technology company and enter into market through domestic E&P companies such as KNOC, KOGAS, Daewoo International, DSME E&R etc. Specifically, this research proposed Test Simulator building measure, fast track record secure way, Joint Venture or Consotium establishment, and Nich Market entry way.
This research also proposed cooperation way with MKE and MLTL R&D and original technology secure way by avoiding patent of foreign leading company.
Specifically, separated R&D is proposed at the initial stage to prepare Preliminary Feasibility Test when MLTL R&D is related. Then, integrated R&D should be carried forward to consider circumstance change.
When technology development would be successful, we secure the position of monopoly and expect to earn huge amount of foreign exchange. In addition, riffle effect of offshore plant industry would be enormous. Specifically, we can expect to soar national prestige by securing technology competitiveness of offshore plant package, preoccupancy of marine resources development, and improvement of marine science and technology. In addition, economic analysis despite very conservative hypothesis shows higher economic feasibility that 36.2 billion KRW of productivity and value-added which is 1.23 times economic riffle effect.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.