초록

Ⅴ. 결론
○ 성인지예산제도는 평등한 사회로 변화하는 동인
○ 점진적이지만 바른 변화
○ 핵심사업평가제도와의 연계 효과는 사업단위로 나타날 것임
○ 작아보이지만 구체적인 사례들이 누적되어 제도의 필요성을 입증하고, 제도에 대한 공감대를 형성하며, 성인지예산제도가 형평성이라는 가치에 어떻게 기여할 수 있는지, 그 과정에서 사업의 효율성 역시 제고될 수있음을 보여준다면 그 효과는 매우 클 것임
○ 누적되는 사례들을 통해 제도와 성별에 대한 인식의 전환을 기대함

(출처 : 연구요약 14p)

Abstract ▼

It has been a decade since the introduction of the Gender Budgeting System. The budget system was designed to change the government’s fiscal operation so that it could be run on gender perspective through the application of the gender perspective to its budgeting process. For the past 10 years, the

It has been a decade since the introduction of the Gender Budgeting System. The budget system was designed to change the government’s fiscal operation so that it could be run on gender perspective through the application of the gender perspective to its budgeting process. For the past 10 years, the system has continuously evolved, yet failed to bring gender-based change to the government fiscal operation method.

This study finds the absence of institutions that could enhance the accountability of the government as the reason of the failure. Only when the government raises the awareness on gender equality and strengthens its will to and responsibility for improving the equality,changes of gender equality in the fiscal operation will take place. The government, however, is not with such institutional measures thatcan reinforce such intent and accountability at the moment. Bearing this in mind, the study puts focus on the assessment system.

The assessment system provides diverse information through its evaluation process in relation to relevant projects, offers feedbacks,and calls for the government’s accountability. If such assessment systems are put in place, different gender equality information will be available, and a greater responsibility for gender inequality will fall on the government. Under this circumstance, the study looks into diversified assessment schemes that can be introduced to the gender budgeting system. Specifically, examination is made to an independent evaluation system, and linkages to the government’s job assessment, autonomous appraisal on fiscal projects, and the evaluation system on core projects. Impacts and problems of each scheme are analyzed, and practically applicable solutions are put on comparison and analysis.

The outcome shows that the linkage to the evaluation system on core projects is the most appropriate assessment scheme. The two programs have very high similarities in terms of evaluation purpose,object, and actor. If linked to each other, they are believed to address major problems found with the current gender budgeting system, including the lack of implementation, relevant projects’information, the feedback system, and so on. Particularly, the linkage of the two plans can make possible different perspective evaluations on not only the Gender Budgeting System but coreprojects. Given that, there are mutually complementary natures between the two.

In light of this, the study suggests the three-phased measure of linking the core project evaluation system to the Gender Budgeting System. Phase 1, 2, and 3 are about content linkage, object linkage, and integration linkage, respectively. The study also lays out institutional grounds and specific time schedules for those associations to be carried out, along with linkage cases. It is highly expected that the linkage to the core project evaluation system will invite changes to the government’s fiscal projects tothe direction of gender equality, and linkage cases will bring the change of gender equality to the government’s fiscal operationmethod.

(출처 : Abstract 154p)

목차 Contents

• 표지 ... 1
• 발간사 ... 4
• 연구요약 ... 6
• 목차 ... 16
• 표목차 ... 18
• 그림목차 ... 20
• Ⅰ. 서 론 ... 22
• 1. 연구배경 및 목적 ... 24
• 가. 연구배경 ... 24
• 나. 연구목적 ... 25
• 2. 연구내용 및 방법 ... 28
• 가. 연구내용 ... 28
• 나. 연구방법 ... 29
• Ⅱ. 연계 필요성 ... 32
• 1. 왜 평가해야 하는가 ... 34
• 가. 책임의 문제 ... 34
• 나. 정보의 문제 ... 52
• 2. 왜 연계해야 하는가 ... 55
• 가. 평가체계에 관한 논의 ... 55
• 나. 평가체계의 방향 ... 61
• 3. 왜 핵심사업평가제도인가 ... 67
• 가. 평가제도별 연계방안 ... 67
• 나. 평가제도별 연계방안 비교 ... 96
• Ⅲ. 연계방안 ... 102
• 1. 제도 간 상호보완성 ... 104
• 2. 제도 간 연계방안 ... 107
• 가. 1단계 연계방안 ... 108
• 나. 2단계 연계방안 ... 116
• 다. 3단계 연계방안 ... 117
• 라. 고려사항 ... 121
• Ⅳ. 연계사례 ... 124
• 1. 성과지표 개선 사례 ① ... 127
• 가. 고용노동부 ‘청년내일채움공제’ ... 127
• 2. 성과지표 개선 사례 ② ... 130
• 가. 중소벤처기업부 ‘창업기업지원융자’ ... 130
• 3. 사업 운영 방식 개선 및 수요자 중심 지원 강화 사례 ... 134
• 가. 통일부 ‘북한이탈주민 사회적응지원’ ... 134
• Ⅴ. 결 론 ... 138
• 참고문헌 ... 142
• Abstract ... 154
• 끝페이지 ... 158