. Introduction In the beginning ef the capitalistic society, individuals were able to manage their lives en the basis of individualism which comprises the principles of private prcperty, of free competition and of the pursuit of prcfits. Hcwever, individualism tcgether with the laisez-faire type of ...
. Introduction In the beginning ef the capitalistic society, individuals were able to manage their lives en the basis of individualism which comprises the principles of private prcperty, of free competition and of the pursuit of prcfits. Hcwever, individualism tcgether with the laisez-faire type of economic policy only brought about the vicious cicle of economic inequality whereas the rich are growing richer, while the poor, the poorer. Today, mest of the countries in the world are no longer characterized as what they call "Nachtwachterstaat" but as "Wohlfahrtsstaat"(Welfare states) in which governments are positively involved in the protection of individuals' economic lives. Concerning the right of living, the Article 30 of the Korean Constitution states that "all the people have the right to lead descent lives." Since the military revolution of May 16, 1961, the Korean government has established various laws and orders relating to the nation's social welfare system and thus provided the basis of the social welfare administration. Contrary to this new development of the social welfare regulations, we cannot but point out the fact that the govornment has been mainly concerned with nation's industrialization, while neglecting the implementation of the social welfare system. The premise of this thesis is that beth areas should be emphasized simultaneously. The central question to answer in this paper is what conditions provide "the greatest good for the greatest number." . In Chapter , we first discuss why all the people within a society should be protected under the social welfare system. And then, we define the public assistance system, social insure ance system and the ether social welfare system, and review historically how these systems came into being and what developmental processes these systems did take. Chapter deals with the social welfare systems which are developed in Europe and America and compares these with Korean systems. First, we examine the public assistance system developed in the European countries and then, we extend our observation to the Korean public assistance system with special emphasis in the life protection system, disaster relief system, and military relief system. Second, we examine the European social insurance systems with which the Korean syatem is compared. Especially in the case of the Korean system, industrial relief compensation systems, medical insurance system, national welfare pansion system, pansions for public officials and military personnel are examined in detail. Chapter covers other types of social welfare systems which seem appropriate for discussion. Our observation extends to the welfare systems for children, women and old age pecple. The labor welfare systems and job security systems are also examined. In Chapter , we examine the content and the coverage of the budget for the social welfare administraticn in Korea. We also examine various grvernmental institutions which provide the social security functions. Those are the Ministry of Public Health, the Department of Labor. The Relief Bureau, the Ministry of General Affairs and the Department of Public Health in Seoul Special City. . Conclusion In our final chapter(Chapter ), we summarize administrative problems posed in the Korean social welfare instituticns and give suggestions for improvement. (1) The public assistance system in Korea is not broad enough to cover all the people who urgently need help. Therefore, the government should increase the funds for the public assistance. At the same time, it should improve methods of distributing those funds to the people. (2) The social insurance system has been established in Korea for more than ten years. Yet, we find that only a few people enjoy this insurance. Given the fact that the level of national income is considerably low, it is not desirable to expand this system on the national level all at once. The gradual application of this system to the practical life is recommended. (3) Although firm basis of the medical insurance system has been established by law, the medical insurance is not frequently utilized in Korea. Along with rapid industrialization, Korea seems to face to the growing public health problems. The medical insurance system should be reviewed carefully. (4) The national welfare pansion law was made on December 24, 1973. At this moment, this law is not activated. However, it is clear that this law has some deficiencies in the methods of bearing expenses, in clarifying the objectives and in the process of paying insurance. These need be revised. (5) Considering the crucial role the labor welfare administration organs play for the public welfare, it is urgent to reinforce both the quantity and the quality of the labor welfare offices and especially to increase the number of labor supervisors.
. Introduction In the beginning ef the capitalistic society, individuals were able to manage their lives en the basis of individualism which comprises the principles of private prcperty, of free competition and of the pursuit of prcfits. Hcwever, individualism tcgether with the laisez-faire type of economic policy only brought about the vicious cicle of economic inequality whereas the rich are growing richer, while the poor, the poorer. Today, mest of the countries in the world are no longer characterized as what they call "Nachtwachterstaat" but as "Wohlfahrtsstaat"(Welfare states) in which governments are positively involved in the protection of individuals' economic lives. Concerning the right of living, the Article 30 of the Korean Constitution states that "all the people have the right to lead descent lives." Since the military revolution of May 16, 1961, the Korean government has established various laws and orders relating to the nation's social welfare system and thus provided the basis of the social welfare administration. Contrary to this new development of the social welfare regulations, we cannot but point out the fact that the govornment has been mainly concerned with nation's industrialization, while neglecting the implementation of the social welfare system. The premise of this thesis is that beth areas should be emphasized simultaneously. The central question to answer in this paper is what conditions provide "the greatest good for the greatest number." . In Chapter , we first discuss why all the people within a society should be protected under the social welfare system. And then, we define the public assistance system, social insure ance system and the ether social welfare system, and review historically how these systems came into being and what developmental processes these systems did take. Chapter deals with the social welfare systems which are developed in Europe and America and compares these with Korean systems. First, we examine the public assistance system developed in the European countries and then, we extend our observation to the Korean public assistance system with special emphasis in the life protection system, disaster relief system, and military relief system. Second, we examine the European social insurance systems with which the Korean syatem is compared. Especially in the case of the Korean system, industrial relief compensation systems, medical insurance system, national welfare pansion system, pansions for public officials and military personnel are examined in detail. Chapter covers other types of social welfare systems which seem appropriate for discussion. Our observation extends to the welfare systems for children, women and old age pecple. The labor welfare systems and job security systems are also examined. In Chapter , we examine the content and the coverage of the budget for the social welfare administraticn in Korea. We also examine various grvernmental institutions which provide the social security functions. Those are the Ministry of Public Health, the Department of Labor. The Relief Bureau, the Ministry of General Affairs and the Department of Public Health in Seoul Special City. . Conclusion In our final chapter(Chapter ), we summarize administrative problems posed in the Korean social welfare instituticns and give suggestions for improvement. (1) The public assistance system in Korea is not broad enough to cover all the people who urgently need help. Therefore, the government should increase the funds for the public assistance. At the same time, it should improve methods of distributing those funds to the people. (2) The social insurance system has been established in Korea for more than ten years. Yet, we find that only a few people enjoy this insurance. Given the fact that the level of national income is considerably low, it is not desirable to expand this system on the national level all at once. The gradual application of this system to the practical life is recommended. (3) Although firm basis of the medical insurance system has been established by law, the medical insurance is not frequently utilized in Korea. Along with rapid industrialization, Korea seems to face to the growing public health problems. The medical insurance system should be reviewed carefully. (4) The national welfare pansion law was made on December 24, 1973. At this moment, this law is not activated. However, it is clear that this law has some deficiencies in the methods of bearing expenses, in clarifying the objectives and in the process of paying insurance. These need be revised. (5) Considering the crucial role the labor welfare administration organs play for the public welfare, it is urgent to reinforce both the quantity and the quality of the labor welfare offices and especially to increase the number of labor supervisors.
주제어
#사회복지행정제도 사회복지 laissez-faire
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.