This study is designed to grasp the speciality of social workers working for community welfare center and to inquire into related factors which have an influence on professionalism and to present measures to reinforce the speciality of social workers on the basis of the findings with the view of con...
This study is designed to grasp the speciality of social workers working for community welfare center and to inquire into related factors which have an influence on professionalism and to present measures to reinforce the speciality of social workers on the basis of the findings with the view of contributing to the qualitative enhancement of social welfare service and the professional development of social welfare work. With this in mind, I worked with 167 community welfare center and 556 social workers across the nation. The research shows that first, the expert degree of social workers in community welfare center stands at 3.09, or an average level, in terms of the 5 point measurement. The factor of professional identity turns out to be highest among the 7 subordinate factors related to the professionalism of social workers, which is followed by the specialty of the relevant projects, supervision, self-regulation, the level of expert education, reeducation and training, and the amount of work in regular order. Second, the professionalism of social workers turns out to be high in case of the female subjects, those in higher position, and those with higher scholastic attainments. Third, the more properly the work of the subjects are allocated, the speciality of social workers turn out to be higher. This research indicates that the professionalism of social workers can be dynamically exerted and improved when their work is allocated in consideration of the aptitude, or abilities and professionalism of each individual social workers. Fourth, when the number of social workers working for social workers accounts for eight to nine, specialty turns out to be higher than when the number ranges from four to seven. Fifth, when communications are properly channeled, the professionalism of social workers turns out to be high. This research has it that communications serve as an important factor which reflects the democratic form and self-regulation of social workers for meeting time works as a facilitator in providing supervision and planing and evaluating projects. Sixth, in case the directors possess social worker's licenses, and their expert knowledge is high, the specialty of social workers turns out to be high. Seventh, supervision turns out to be highest in terms of the interrelation between the professionalism of social workers and each subordinate factor. The factor of supervision is followed by reeducation & training, self-regulation, the specialty of projects, the level of expert education, professional identity, and the amount of work in good order. And the professionalism of the directors turns out to have the greatest influence on that of social workers, which is followed by the degree of communication at a time of meeting, the propriety of work allotment, and position in regular order. The findings show that supervision and reeducation & training should be highlighted and that the level of expert education in colleges should be enhanced as a vehicle for consolidating the professionalism of social workers. The method of offering subsidies should be converted into support by program and the allocation of work should be guaranteed in consideration of self-regulation and specialty with a view to securing responsibilities for the specialty of projects. And the expert knowledge of the directors should be improved, and positive communications should be introduced to the community welfare center. These measures to reinforce the professionalism of social workers will not only lead directly to the enhancement of the quality of social welfare service for the clients, but also lead to the special development of social welfare projects. Finally, scientific and diversified researches should be made to measure the professionalism of social workers and more systematic and in-depth follow-up researches should be made to shed light on the factors which influence the professionalism of social workers.
This study is designed to grasp the speciality of social workers working for community welfare center and to inquire into related factors which have an influence on professionalism and to present measures to reinforce the speciality of social workers on the basis of the findings with the view of contributing to the qualitative enhancement of social welfare service and the professional development of social welfare work. With this in mind, I worked with 167 community welfare center and 556 social workers across the nation. The research shows that first, the expert degree of social workers in community welfare center stands at 3.09, or an average level, in terms of the 5 point measurement. The factor of professional identity turns out to be highest among the 7 subordinate factors related to the professionalism of social workers, which is followed by the specialty of the relevant projects, supervision, self-regulation, the level of expert education, reeducation and training, and the amount of work in regular order. Second, the professionalism of social workers turns out to be high in case of the female subjects, those in higher position, and those with higher scholastic attainments. Third, the more properly the work of the subjects are allocated, the speciality of social workers turn out to be higher. This research indicates that the professionalism of social workers can be dynamically exerted and improved when their work is allocated in consideration of the aptitude, or abilities and professionalism of each individual social workers. Fourth, when the number of social workers working for social workers accounts for eight to nine, specialty turns out to be higher than when the number ranges from four to seven. Fifth, when communications are properly channeled, the professionalism of social workers turns out to be high. This research has it that communications serve as an important factor which reflects the democratic form and self-regulation of social workers for meeting time works as a facilitator in providing supervision and planing and evaluating projects. Sixth, in case the directors possess social worker's licenses, and their expert knowledge is high, the specialty of social workers turns out to be high. Seventh, supervision turns out to be highest in terms of the interrelation between the professionalism of social workers and each subordinate factor. The factor of supervision is followed by reeducation & training, self-regulation, the specialty of projects, the level of expert education, professional identity, and the amount of work in good order. And the professionalism of the directors turns out to have the greatest influence on that of social workers, which is followed by the degree of communication at a time of meeting, the propriety of work allotment, and position in regular order. The findings show that supervision and reeducation & training should be highlighted and that the level of expert education in colleges should be enhanced as a vehicle for consolidating the professionalism of social workers. The method of offering subsidies should be converted into support by program and the allocation of work should be guaranteed in consideration of self-regulation and specialty with a view to securing responsibilities for the specialty of projects. And the expert knowledge of the directors should be improved, and positive communications should be introduced to the community welfare center. These measures to reinforce the professionalism of social workers will not only lead directly to the enhancement of the quality of social welfare service for the clients, but also lead to the special development of social welfare projects. Finally, scientific and diversified researches should be made to measure the professionalism of social workers and more systematic and in-depth follow-up researches should be made to shed light on the factors which influence the professionalism of social workers.
주제어
#사회복지관 사회복지사 전문성 사회복지서비스
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.