地主共同 住宅開發事業의 妥當性 分析에 관한 硏究 : 住宅建設 등록업체들이 Developer로의 變化을 위한 方向 硏究 Study on Analysis of Feasibility of Landowner Joint Housing Development Project : Centering on Method of Fixing Land Cost and Construction Cost by Agreement원문보기
1. This study is to suggest a method for promoting the Euijeongbu Site Development Project and further to have the prediction theory intensive in the current transitional situation of the development market ufere activities of Developers equipped with specialty and ...
1. This study is to suggest a method for promoting the Euijeongbu Site Development Project and further to have the prediction theory intensive in the current transitional situation of the development market ufere activities of Developers equipped with specialty and experience in projects are not universalized but most of Developer organizations exist intermixedly in large construction companies. This study was intended to be carried out primarily on the basis of the know-how acquired through actual works in the field by comparing the field survey method with a similar project that this researche is promoting in 친e reai development market. 2. Also, in this report, emphasis was intended to be laid on the prediction of market. Particularly, this report was meant to be characterized by a financial aspect and presentation of consulting cases on development. This study has been performed in terms of the feasibility study in the consulting report on participation in a project, based on relevant references, while any general theory was excluded from this study as far as possible. 3. The scope of this study was defined in order to analyze the feasibility of the joint housing development project as follows; firstly, its geographical and spatial scope was defined within Oie site of the JangAm-dong case in Euijeongbu-si. Secondly, its time scope was defined by making 1998 a reference year (year of the project preparation : year 0). Thirdlv, its content scope was defined by analyzing the feasibility of the joint housing development project case in terms of Developer's position. For such analysis, the theory and method of the investment-based development and various approaches required for the actuai field survey were intended to be suggested. The analysis of the feasibility of the joint housing development project is comprised of the analysis of the business availability on the basis of marketability, possibility to acquire pormits/approvals from competent authorities, development of competitive design including building area and layout, and further the analysis of arty profitability that Developer can secure in the project on the basis of such analyzed business availability. 4. In order to accomplish the objectives of this study, the following methods of studying were employed; 1) The theory of investment analysis was systematically established by comparing and referring to iocal market survey cases, and then it was applied to the analysis of the feasibility. 2) Related statistical data and reports were analyzed and then the analyzed results were used as a tool to analyze the feasibility of the project site. From the viewpoint of a person experienced in working with a construction company, most of the current consulting reports by local Consultants seem to have some drawbacks in estimation of the construction cost which accounts for more than 60% of the project cost and the project management. Actually, such consulting reports are of a level to simpiy make a proposal comparing and presenting similar cases. However, this report covers the real estate consulting business inciuding participation in any project, enabling the project owner (corporation) to secure the project profitability and furthermore to save the special added tax to be imposed on the project. 5. The land cost usually accounts for 30%~50% of the total project cost in the joint housing development project. This cost has been a factor to force the construction company to have more financial burden at the initial stage, being a direct cause of both difficulty ill funding and excessive burden of interest until sales revenue is actually collected. In terms of the land cost involvement, the project promotion type could be categorized into the fixed land cost type where the construction company (for the present, the leading Deveioper) quotes a fixed land cost to the project owner (land owner) and the fixed construction cost type where the project owner requires the construction company to fix the construction cost and then has the construction company to execute the project on behalf of him. In case of the fixed construction cost type, when the project owner, ufo have no sufficient experience or capability in the project management, does not control the cash flow well and goes into bankruptcy, all responsibilities may be transferred to the construction company. Since the method described in this study is to have both the project owner and the construction company agree on the appropriate sale price on the basis of the marketing survey by an expert consulting company after approval of the housing construction program, and then fix the project profit (including the land cost) and the construction cost, it can be thought that Ule method of this study is the method for the landowner joint development project as advanced one more step than the conventional method to fix the project profit and the construction cost before approval of the housirig construction program. 6. It is thought that one project site can be studied, approached and discussed in various respects. In this study, centering on the method of fixing the land cost (project profit, etc.) and the corlstruction cost by agreement, conclusion has been derived through analysis of marketability and economic availability of the case site in consideration of the changing trend in the housing market and the economic environmental parameters for the housing development project after the economic crisis to have needed the IMF relief fund and assistance.
1. This study is to suggest a method for promoting the Euijeongbu Site Development Project and further to have the prediction theory intensive in the current transitional situation of the development market ufere activities of Developers equipped with specialty and experience in projects are not universalized but most of Developer organizations exist intermixedly in large construction companies. This study was intended to be carried out primarily on the basis of the know-how acquired through actual works in the field by comparing the field survey method with a similar project that this researche is promoting in 친e reai development market. 2. Also, in this report, emphasis was intended to be laid on the prediction of market. Particularly, this report was meant to be characterized by a financial aspect and presentation of consulting cases on development. This study has been performed in terms of the feasibility study in the consulting report on participation in a project, based on relevant references, while any general theory was excluded from this study as far as possible. 3. The scope of this study was defined in order to analyze the feasibility of the joint housing development project as follows; firstly, its geographical and spatial scope was defined within Oie site of the JangAm-dong case in Euijeongbu-si. Secondly, its time scope was defined by making 1998 a reference year (year of the project preparation : year 0). Thirdlv, its content scope was defined by analyzing the feasibility of the joint housing development project case in terms of Developer's position. For such analysis, the theory and method of the investment-based development and various approaches required for the actuai field survey were intended to be suggested. The analysis of the feasibility of the joint housing development project is comprised of the analysis of the business availability on the basis of marketability, possibility to acquire pormits/approvals from competent authorities, development of competitive design including building area and layout, and further the analysis of arty profitability that Developer can secure in the project on the basis of such analyzed business availability. 4. In order to accomplish the objectives of this study, the following methods of studying were employed; 1) The theory of investment analysis was systematically established by comparing and referring to iocal market survey cases, and then it was applied to the analysis of the feasibility. 2) Related statistical data and reports were analyzed and then the analyzed results were used as a tool to analyze the feasibility of the project site. From the viewpoint of a person experienced in working with a construction company, most of the current consulting reports by local Consultants seem to have some drawbacks in estimation of the construction cost which accounts for more than 60% of the project cost and the project management. Actually, such consulting reports are of a level to simpiy make a proposal comparing and presenting similar cases. However, this report covers the real estate consulting business inciuding participation in any project, enabling the project owner (corporation) to secure the project profitability and furthermore to save the special added tax to be imposed on the project. 5. The land cost usually accounts for 30%~50% of the total project cost in the joint housing development project. This cost has been a factor to force the construction company to have more financial burden at the initial stage, being a direct cause of both difficulty ill funding and excessive burden of interest until sales revenue is actually collected. In terms of the land cost involvement, the project promotion type could be categorized into the fixed land cost type where the construction company (for the present, the leading Deveioper) quotes a fixed land cost to the project owner (land owner) and the fixed construction cost type where the project owner requires the construction company to fix the construction cost and then has the construction company to execute the project on behalf of him. In case of the fixed construction cost type, when the project owner, ufo have no sufficient experience or capability in the project management, does not control the cash flow well and goes into bankruptcy, all responsibilities may be transferred to the construction company. Since the method described in this study is to have both the project owner and the construction company agree on the appropriate sale price on the basis of the marketing survey by an expert consulting company after approval of the housing construction program, and then fix the project profit (including the land cost) and the construction cost, it can be thought that Ule method of this study is the method for the landowner joint development project as advanced one more step than the conventional method to fix the project profit and the construction cost before approval of the housirig construction program. 6. It is thought that one project site can be studied, approached and discussed in various respects. In this study, centering on the method of fixing the land cost (project profit, etc.) and the corlstruction cost by agreement, conclusion has been derived through analysis of marketability and economic availability of the case site in consideration of the changing trend in the housing market and the economic environmental parameters for the housing development project after the economic crisis to have needed the IMF relief fund and assistance.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.