The purpose of this study was to know The Old-age Pension Benefits realities & manner of the Old-age Pension Beneficiaries. Analysed data were collected through a questionnaire survey, which was given to 468 beneficiaries in Kyungju area. This survey conducted in February 2005. Data were analysed th...
The purpose of this study was to know The Old-age Pension Benefits realities & manner of the Old-age Pension Beneficiaries. Analysed data were collected through a questionnaire survey, which was given to 468 beneficiaries in Kyungju area. This survey conducted in February 2005. Data were analysed through the chi-square test.
The major result are as follows ;
In general characteristics of beneficiaries, The proportion of Early Old-age Pension beneficiary was 73.7%, Active Old-age Pension was 11.8%. The average age was 61, average Pension amount was 270thousand Won, however, active Old-age Pension amount was 190 thousand Won. average entitlement period was 32.5 months and 54.1% of total beneficiaries have extra income.
In the survey of having job, There was significant positive correlation between 25.4% of Reduced Old-age Pension, 27.1% of Early Old-age Pension beneficiaries replied to" having job with little more income" but 54.9% of Active Ole-age Pension beneficiaries replied. To be related to the higher Pension amount, Over 400 thousand Won Pension amount(44.7%) beneficiaries replied to"having job with much more income".
This showing that he(she) would have job when the difference is great between Pension amount and extra income.
In the characteristics of beneficiaries practical use, 79.6% of respondents replied to"spare time use" but no more than 7.2% of respondents replied to"livelihood use"
In comparison between contributions and Pension amount, 55.4% of Reduced Old-age Pension respondents replied to"less than contributions", 67.3% of Active Ole-age Pension beneficiaries replied to this. If the entitlement period is shorter, the more they replied to "less than contributions".
In opinion of the Non-duplication of benefit, 46.5% of total respondents replied to "negative to the choice", but 33.5% and 20.0% of respondents replied to "positive to the choice" and "choice but limited" respectably. Therefore, it can be limited as social security insurance.
In the point of the diminution of the allowance scale, 62.4% of the respondent replied to "maintaining allowance". Hence, it is demand for understanding of National Pension system in three pillars structure for old age guard station by the minimum national responsibility , retirement annuity or allowance by the social responsibility, private pension or saving by the private responsibility.
In the contribution of the Old-age Pension for old ages, 83.7%, of total respondent replied that is a little helpful. 87.1% replied that is very necessary. So, it is considerably contribute for old ages but it is not using for livelihood use. so far.
The purpose of this study was to know The Old-age Pension Benefits realities & manner of the Old-age Pension Beneficiaries. Analysed data were collected through a questionnaire survey, which was given to 468 beneficiaries in Kyungju area. This survey conducted in February 2005. Data were analysed through the chi-square test.
The major result are as follows ;
In general characteristics of beneficiaries, The proportion of Early Old-age Pension beneficiary was 73.7%, Active Old-age Pension was 11.8%. The average age was 61, average Pension amount was 270thousand Won, however, active Old-age Pension amount was 190 thousand Won. average entitlement period was 32.5 months and 54.1% of total beneficiaries have extra income.
In the survey of having job, There was significant positive correlation between 25.4% of Reduced Old-age Pension, 27.1% of Early Old-age Pension beneficiaries replied to" having job with little more income" but 54.9% of Active Ole-age Pension beneficiaries replied. To be related to the higher Pension amount, Over 400 thousand Won Pension amount(44.7%) beneficiaries replied to"having job with much more income".
This showing that he(she) would have job when the difference is great between Pension amount and extra income.
In the characteristics of beneficiaries practical use, 79.6% of respondents replied to"spare time use" but no more than 7.2% of respondents replied to"livelihood use"
In comparison between contributions and Pension amount, 55.4% of Reduced Old-age Pension respondents replied to"less than contributions", 67.3% of Active Ole-age Pension beneficiaries replied to this. If the entitlement period is shorter, the more they replied to "less than contributions".
In opinion of the Non-duplication of benefit, 46.5% of total respondents replied to "negative to the choice", but 33.5% and 20.0% of respondents replied to "positive to the choice" and "choice but limited" respectably. Therefore, it can be limited as social security insurance.
In the point of the diminution of the allowance scale, 62.4% of the respondent replied to "maintaining allowance". Hence, it is demand for understanding of National Pension system in three pillars structure for old age guard station by the minimum national responsibility , retirement annuity or allowance by the social responsibility, private pension or saving by the private responsibility.
In the contribution of the Old-age Pension for old ages, 83.7%, of total respondent replied that is a little helpful. 87.1% replied that is very necessary. So, it is considerably contribute for old ages but it is not using for livelihood use. so far.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.