Purpose: This study conducted to determine potential effectiveness of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy on the active and passive range of motion, resting pain, tenderness, grip strength, pinch grip strength and QuickDASH (quick disability of the arm, shoulder and hand) in patients with lateral epic...
Purpose: This study conducted to determine potential effectiveness of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy on the active and passive range of motion, resting pain, tenderness, grip strength, pinch grip strength and QuickDASH (quick disability of the arm, shoulder and hand) in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Methods: Total 30 patients who suffered from lateral epicondylitis as diagnosed by medical doctor were divided into two groups, i.e. extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) group (15 patients) and taping therapy (TT) group (15 patients) respectively. And then, these 2 groups of patients were asked to take total 3 sessions of medical treatment prescribed for each group. In order to determine potential effectiveness of 2 therapies, 2 groups of patients were asked to take three sessions (before treatment, after the 1st therapeutic session, and after the 3rd therapeutic session) of measurement on their active and passive range of motion, resting pain, tenderness, grip strength and fingertip pinch grip strength. And they were also asked to participate in 2 sessions (before treatment and after the 3rd therapeutic session) of questionnaire survey using QuickDASH as a formulated questionnaire form. From measurement and survey, all collected data were statistically processed using SPSS (ver 12.0 for Windows). All measurement data on pain, active and passive range of motion, grip strength, pinch grip strength and tenderness as measured at three sessions (before treatment, after the 1st therapeutic session and after the 3rd therapeutic session) were analyzed in form of repeated one-way ANOVA, whereas QuickDASH score data were analyzed in form of paired sample t-test. In addition, this study used independent sample t-test to determine any potential significant difference between ESWT group and TT group. Statistical significance level was set at = 0.05. Results: After two groups of lateral epicondylitis cases were treated with ESWT and TT respectively, the results of measurement on their active and passive range of motion, resting pain, tendernss, grip strength, pinch grip strength and QuickDASH were outlined as follows: 1) According to comparative analysis on potential effects of two therapies on range of motion at three sessions between two groups, it was found that ESWT group showed significant results in the measurement of both passive and active extension angle on statistical basis (p0.05), but showed significant results in the measurement of active extension angle (p0.05), but there were significant differences between 2 groups after the 1st and 3rd therapeutic session (p<0.05). 2) According to comparative analysis on potential effects of two therapies on rest pain at three sessions between 2 groups, it was found that both ESWT group and TT group showed significant results of measurement on statistical basis (p0.05), but there were significant differences between two groups after the 1st and 3rd therapeutic session (p<0.05). 3) According to comparative analysis on potential effects of two therapies on tenderness at three sessions between two groups, it was found that both ESWT group and TT group showed significant results of measurement on statistical basis (p0.05), but there were significant differences between two groups after the 3rd therapeutic session (p<0.05). 4) According to comparative analysis on potential effects of two therapies on grip strength at 3 sessions between two groups, it was found that only ESWT group showed significant results of measurement on statistical basis (p0.05). And according to analysis on potential differences in grip strength between two groups, it was found that there was no significant differences between 2 groups before treatment and after the 1st and 3rd therapeutic session (p>0.05). 5) It was found that ESWT group showed significant results of measurement in pinch grip strength on statistical basis (p<0.05). According to significance test at 3 sessions of this study, it was found that ESWT group showed significant results before and after treatment, and after the completion of the 1st and the 3rd therapeutic session on statistical basis (p0.05). According to significance test at 3 sessions, it was found that TT group showed significant results before treatment and after the 3rd therapeutic session on statistical basis (p0.05). 6) According to analysis on potential differences in QuickDASH score between two groups before treatment and after the 3rd therapeutic session, it was found that ESWT group tended to score significantly lower QuickDA
Purpose: This study conducted to determine potential effectiveness of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy on the active and passive range of motion, resting pain, tenderness, grip strength, pinch grip strength and QuickDASH (quick disability of the arm, shoulder and hand) in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Methods: Total 30 patients who suffered from lateral epicondylitis as diagnosed by medical doctor were divided into two groups, i.e. extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) group (15 patients) and taping therapy (TT) group (15 patients) respectively. And then, these 2 groups of patients were asked to take total 3 sessions of medical treatment prescribed for each group. In order to determine potential effectiveness of 2 therapies, 2 groups of patients were asked to take three sessions (before treatment, after the 1st therapeutic session, and after the 3rd therapeutic session) of measurement on their active and passive range of motion, resting pain, tenderness, grip strength and fingertip pinch grip strength. And they were also asked to participate in 2 sessions (before treatment and after the 3rd therapeutic session) of questionnaire survey using QuickDASH as a formulated questionnaire form. From measurement and survey, all collected data were statistically processed using SPSS (ver 12.0 for Windows). All measurement data on pain, active and passive range of motion, grip strength, pinch grip strength and tenderness as measured at three sessions (before treatment, after the 1st therapeutic session and after the 3rd therapeutic session) were analyzed in form of repeated one-way ANOVA, whereas QuickDASH score data were analyzed in form of paired sample t-test. In addition, this study used independent sample t-test to determine any potential significant difference between ESWT group and TT group. Statistical significance level was set at = 0.05. Results: After two groups of lateral epicondylitis cases were treated with ESWT and TT respectively, the results of measurement on their active and passive range of motion, resting pain, tendernss, grip strength, pinch grip strength and QuickDASH were outlined as follows: 1) According to comparative analysis on potential effects of two therapies on range of motion at three sessions between two groups, it was found that ESWT group showed significant results in the measurement of both passive and active extension angle on statistical basis (p0.05), but showed significant results in the measurement of active extension angle (p0.05), but there were significant differences between 2 groups after the 1st and 3rd therapeutic session (p<0.05). 2) According to comparative analysis on potential effects of two therapies on rest pain at three sessions between 2 groups, it was found that both ESWT group and TT group showed significant results of measurement on statistical basis (p0.05), but there were significant differences between two groups after the 1st and 3rd therapeutic session (p<0.05). 3) According to comparative analysis on potential effects of two therapies on tenderness at three sessions between two groups, it was found that both ESWT group and TT group showed significant results of measurement on statistical basis (p0.05), but there were significant differences between two groups after the 3rd therapeutic session (p<0.05). 4) According to comparative analysis on potential effects of two therapies on grip strength at 3 sessions between two groups, it was found that only ESWT group showed significant results of measurement on statistical basis (p0.05). And according to analysis on potential differences in grip strength between two groups, it was found that there was no significant differences between 2 groups before treatment and after the 1st and 3rd therapeutic session (p>0.05). 5) It was found that ESWT group showed significant results of measurement in pinch grip strength on statistical basis (p<0.05). According to significance test at 3 sessions of this study, it was found that ESWT group showed significant results before and after treatment, and after the completion of the 1st and the 3rd therapeutic session on statistical basis (p0.05). According to significance test at 3 sessions, it was found that TT group showed significant results before treatment and after the 3rd therapeutic session on statistical basis (p0.05). 6) According to analysis on potential differences in QuickDASH score between two groups before treatment and after the 3rd therapeutic session, it was found that ESWT group tended to score significantly lower QuickDA
Keyword
#가쪽위관절융기염 체외 충격파 치료
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.