A study on the level of the consciousness of the students' human rights and the awareness level of students' human rights abuses Park Jeong Hyeon Major in Adolescent Education Graduate School of Education Chonbuk National University With the advent of the 21st century, the word "human rights" has ri...
A study on the level of the consciousness of the students' human rights and the awareness level of students' human rights abuses Park Jeong Hyeon Major in Adolescent Education Graduate School of Education Chonbuk National University With the advent of the 21st century, the word "human rights" has risen as the social issue in this country and there is no doubt that it is the fundamental rights of every human being that should not be violated in any possible case. Since the foundation of the Korean Teacher's and Education Workers' union which advocates the "true education" on May 28, 1985, people started to show an interest toward the students suffering from poor educational environments. It led to the making of the ordinance to protect students’ basic human rights on September 17th, followed by its announcement on October 5th in the same year, and became effective as of March, 1st, 2011. In fact, teachers, students and their parents all agree that students' basic rights should be protected, but they wonder how much they should be. Some people argue that students' rights must be restricted in a considerable amount in order that the students can only concentrate on their study. Others argue that their rights should be completely guaranteed in any case. Then we need to arrange with the problem how much we should guarantee the students' human rights. To do this, it is necessary to provide proper evidence on necessity and appropriateness of the students' human rights and to identify what the students themselves think of their rights and what they require. This study is thus attempted to figure out which level of the consciousness of human rights the students are on and how much they recognize the state of the human rights abuse. The subjects of the study are male and female students who are in the 3rd grade of middle schools and the 1st grade of high schools in Jeonju, other towns and cities of Jeollabuk-Do. The result shows that they generally think it is not fair to restrict on running for class leaders based on their grades, to give a regulation on hair, to take a specific religious class, to join the self regulating study, and to examine their belongings. Also, it is widely thought that it is right to give an opportunity to suggest their opinions about the content or process during class, to let them use school facility freely, and to collect and serve students' opinions about such an important topic like amending school regulations. The students mostly agreed that they should be offered a chance to say for oneself or to get an appropriate help from an expert in case of severe disciplinary actions from school. A few differences in the variables in each item were also shown. There was some gap of ideas among schools and regions about the restriction on running for class leaders based on their grades. Concerning the regulation on hair, they did not agree to the idea regardless of the variables. Regarding "taking a special religious class", they showed different opinions according to the sex and location of schools. As for "joining the self-regulating study", the result varied according to the sex and parents' economic status. Concerning the "examination of belongings", the answers were also diverse according to the parents' economic standard and the level of schools. Concerning the questions like "Giving a chance to suggest students' opinion about the content or process during a class, letting them use school facility freely, collecting and serving students' opinions about such as an important topic like amending school regulations", students' also showed different ideas based on the gender, the location of schools and the level of schools. About "giving a chance to the serious violator against a school regulation to say for oneself or to get helped from an expert in case of severe disciplinary actions from school", they had different opinions according to the location of schools. Lastly, referring to "the corporal punishment", the answeres werr different according to the sex and the level of schools. In conclusion, although the answers varied widely according to each variables all in all, the level of students' awareness of the human rights was considerably high. Even though the ordinance to protect students’ basic human rights is not legislated yet in this region, the survey showed that most students did not feel that their rights are seriously abused. Presumably, this should be caused by the reason that many students in Jeonju area take private lessons and relatively feel free from compulsory self-regulating study at school in the evening. Also it is widely accepted that corporal punishment at school should be banned under no circumstances. It is found that the students still think their rights are not sufficiently protected in the following cases: "regulation on hair" and "examination of their belongings". This should suggest that the schools still can not fully secure students' rights despite the fact that the students aware their human rights considerably highly.
A study on the level of the consciousness of the students' human rights and the awareness level of students' human rights abuses Park Jeong Hyeon Major in Adolescent Education Graduate School of Education Chonbuk National University With the advent of the 21st century, the word "human rights" has risen as the social issue in this country and there is no doubt that it is the fundamental rights of every human being that should not be violated in any possible case. Since the foundation of the Korean Teacher's and Education Workers' union which advocates the "true education" on May 28, 1985, people started to show an interest toward the students suffering from poor educational environments. It led to the making of the ordinance to protect students’ basic human rights on September 17th, followed by its announcement on October 5th in the same year, and became effective as of March, 1st, 2011. In fact, teachers, students and their parents all agree that students' basic rights should be protected, but they wonder how much they should be. Some people argue that students' rights must be restricted in a considerable amount in order that the students can only concentrate on their study. Others argue that their rights should be completely guaranteed in any case. Then we need to arrange with the problem how much we should guarantee the students' human rights. To do this, it is necessary to provide proper evidence on necessity and appropriateness of the students' human rights and to identify what the students themselves think of their rights and what they require. This study is thus attempted to figure out which level of the consciousness of human rights the students are on and how much they recognize the state of the human rights abuse. The subjects of the study are male and female students who are in the 3rd grade of middle schools and the 1st grade of high schools in Jeonju, other towns and cities of Jeollabuk-Do. The result shows that they generally think it is not fair to restrict on running for class leaders based on their grades, to give a regulation on hair, to take a specific religious class, to join the self regulating study, and to examine their belongings. Also, it is widely thought that it is right to give an opportunity to suggest their opinions about the content or process during class, to let them use school facility freely, and to collect and serve students' opinions about such an important topic like amending school regulations. The students mostly agreed that they should be offered a chance to say for oneself or to get an appropriate help from an expert in case of severe disciplinary actions from school. A few differences in the variables in each item were also shown. There was some gap of ideas among schools and regions about the restriction on running for class leaders based on their grades. Concerning the regulation on hair, they did not agree to the idea regardless of the variables. Regarding "taking a special religious class", they showed different opinions according to the sex and location of schools. As for "joining the self-regulating study", the result varied according to the sex and parents' economic status. Concerning the "examination of belongings", the answers were also diverse according to the parents' economic standard and the level of schools. Concerning the questions like "Giving a chance to suggest students' opinion about the content or process during a class, letting them use school facility freely, collecting and serving students' opinions about such as an important topic like amending school regulations", students' also showed different ideas based on the gender, the location of schools and the level of schools. About "giving a chance to the serious violator against a school regulation to say for oneself or to get helped from an expert in case of severe disciplinary actions from school", they had different opinions according to the location of schools. Lastly, referring to "the corporal punishment", the answeres werr different according to the sex and the level of schools. In conclusion, although the answers varied widely according to each variables all in all, the level of students' awareness of the human rights was considerably high. Even though the ordinance to protect students’ basic human rights is not legislated yet in this region, the survey showed that most students did not feel that their rights are seriously abused. Presumably, this should be caused by the reason that many students in Jeonju area take private lessons and relatively feel free from compulsory self-regulating study at school in the evening. Also it is widely accepted that corporal punishment at school should be banned under no circumstances. It is found that the students still think their rights are not sufficiently protected in the following cases: "regulation on hair" and "examination of their belongings". This should suggest that the schools still can not fully secure students' rights despite the fact that the students aware their human rights considerably highly.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.