This study’s purpose is to identify which factors affect the Social welfare expenditure of local government. The concrete subject for inquiry is as follows.
First, this study analyzes the characteristic and level of local government social welfare finance, social environmental factors, politica...
This study’s purpose is to identify which factors affect the Social welfare expenditure of local government. The concrete subject for inquiry is as follows.
First, this study analyzes the characteristic and level of local government social welfare finance, social environmental factors, political and administrative factors. Second, this study analyzes that how much social environmental factors and political and administrative factors affected Social welfare expenditure. Third, this study compares the effect of independent variables on the social welfare budget ratio, the social welfare expenditures per capita of residents, the social welfare local governments own revenue ratio variables which measure the the social welfare expenditure. Fourth, this study analyzes the effect of political and administrative characteristic of local government on the social welfare expenditure by features of political and administrative characteristic of local government. Finally, putting together these result, this study suggests the characteristic and implication of social welfare finance expenditure of local government.
To perform this study, this study analyzed the research material during 2009~2015 of 222 local governments, and examined the welfare expenditure from the social welfare budget ratio, the social welfare expenditures per capita of residents, the social welfare local governments own revenue ratio. This study analyzed local governments synthetically like this and this study's analysis was also performed comparing local administration unit(like autonomous region, city(si), town(gun)), political ground(like the existence or nonexistence of regionalism partisan). This study executed analysis such as descriptive statistical analysis, t-test, Anova for analyzing general characteristic of variables and executed analysis such as correlation analysis, pooled regression analysis to identify the factors influencing the relationship between variables and welfare expenditure.
The result of this study is as follows. First, this study's result appeared differently in several respects, which welfare expenditure was influenced by statistically significant differences, the degree of influence and directivity depends on what our study set up the dependent variable. This result showed that this study have to choose carefully the dependent variable for analyzing the impact factors in welfare expenditure. This result can identify with welfare expenditure ranking of local governments show difference depends on what our study set up the dependent variable.
Second, this study's result showed that state subsidy ratio and fiscal self-reliance ratio affected on the welfare expenditure positively in general. In the final analysis, welfare expenditure of local governments affected by policy of the central government very much. At the same time, this study's result showed that there was an enormous gap in the welfare expenditure of local governments depend on the financial capability.
Third, this study showed that the type of local government effects on the welfare expenditure. Especially, there is a noticeable distinction between local government and city and town in fiscal self-reliance ratio and the rate of dependence of upper government effects on the welfare expenditure. But, this difference is the difference of influence by national welfare system and underlying cause of this difference is related to local fiscal capacity for their area. In other words, government subsidies ratio is determined by local fiscal capacity. So, it was very likely that the gap the welfare expenditure of local governments is caused by the difference of the estimation method of government subsidies ratio. In conclusion, this study judged that the improvement of the estimation method of standards subsidies ratio and different subsidies ratio which determine the present government subsidies ratio is required to narrow the gap between the government subsidies ratio.
Fourth, influence of political variables about welfare expenditure of basic local government is very little. But if the type of local governments by the political ground was distinguished and compared the influence in this study, this study was able to identify that political characteristic affected on the welfare expenditure. In other words, policy decisions on political ideology and inclination has not been identified obviously in regionalism partisan area. On the other hand, policy decisions on political ideology and inclination has been identified obviously without regionalism partisan area. In this way, influence factors which affected on the welfare expenditure differently appeared depend on the political ground. Especially, The fact that this study identified the influence which affected on the welfare expenditure was a noticeable distinction by the political ground in political variables is of great significance.
Despite this research result and meaning, this study has a some limitations. this study's follow-up research subject is as follows on the some limitations. First, because this study uses the limited materials in 2009~2015's, this study could not analyzed specific system and political influencing relationship which can affect on the welfare expenditure of local government. So, follow-up research need to analyze the influence factors of the welfare expenditure in the consideration of various factors.
Second, this study considered the inclination of politics of a local government head, the inclination of politics of a local assembly man for analyzing the effect of political factors on the welfare expenditure. But this study's limit is that judgment basis of the individual inclination of politics judged it on the one's own party or past one's own party. So, follow-up research need to fix a standard more delicately.
At the same time, for analyzing the influence factors of the welfare expenditure which considered peculiar local politic environment of Korea this study compared the regionalism partisan's effect upon regionalism partisan. But the fact that this study used advanced research's theoretical background which could judge one's regionalism partisan distinguished standard by operant definition of research has a limit to generalise. So, follow-up research need to study on the standard setting and development of index which allows to judge one's regionalism partisan objectively.
Third, this study didn't define the characteristic of dependent variable clearly. So, there is a limit that interpret the meaning of influence on the independent variable about the dependent variable. So, first of all follow-up research must study theoretically and empirically what this research defines on the welfare expenditure in identifying estimation and decision factor of welfare expenditure of local government, and then this study need to suggest clearly the concept and characteristic of dependent variable which estimates the welfare expenditure. If such process was performed before, the follow-up research can interpret that the independent variable affect on the dependent variable which defines the welfare expenditure and the follow-up research also can interpret the result's meaning.
Fourth, the follow-up research should identify how budget of an own business was organized for estimating more delicately about the effort of the welfare expenditure of local government. welfare expenditure ratio of welfare its own finances using the study was the easy variables to estimate the welfare budget ratio and the welfare expenditure variables per person. But, this variables also have a limit to estimate a local government's own effort in that variables affect on the policy of the central government. So, the budget data of an own business need to be constructed for estimating a local government's own effort about the welfare expenditure in the future.
This study’s purpose is to identify which factors affect the Social welfare expenditure of local government. The concrete subject for inquiry is as follows.
First, this study analyzes the characteristic and level of local government social welfare finance, social environmental factors, political and administrative factors. Second, this study analyzes that how much social environmental factors and political and administrative factors affected Social welfare expenditure. Third, this study compares the effect of independent variables on the social welfare budget ratio, the social welfare expenditures per capita of residents, the social welfare local governments own revenue ratio variables which measure the the social welfare expenditure. Fourth, this study analyzes the effect of political and administrative characteristic of local government on the social welfare expenditure by features of political and administrative characteristic of local government. Finally, putting together these result, this study suggests the characteristic and implication of social welfare finance expenditure of local government.
To perform this study, this study analyzed the research material during 2009~2015 of 222 local governments, and examined the welfare expenditure from the social welfare budget ratio, the social welfare expenditures per capita of residents, the social welfare local governments own revenue ratio. This study analyzed local governments synthetically like this and this study's analysis was also performed comparing local administration unit(like autonomous region, city(si), town(gun)), political ground(like the existence or nonexistence of regionalism partisan). This study executed analysis such as descriptive statistical analysis, t-test, Anova for analyzing general characteristic of variables and executed analysis such as correlation analysis, pooled regression analysis to identify the factors influencing the relationship between variables and welfare expenditure.
The result of this study is as follows. First, this study's result appeared differently in several respects, which welfare expenditure was influenced by statistically significant differences, the degree of influence and directivity depends on what our study set up the dependent variable. This result showed that this study have to choose carefully the dependent variable for analyzing the impact factors in welfare expenditure. This result can identify with welfare expenditure ranking of local governments show difference depends on what our study set up the dependent variable.
Second, this study's result showed that state subsidy ratio and fiscal self-reliance ratio affected on the welfare expenditure positively in general. In the final analysis, welfare expenditure of local governments affected by policy of the central government very much. At the same time, this study's result showed that there was an enormous gap in the welfare expenditure of local governments depend on the financial capability.
Third, this study showed that the type of local government effects on the welfare expenditure. Especially, there is a noticeable distinction between local government and city and town in fiscal self-reliance ratio and the rate of dependence of upper government effects on the welfare expenditure. But, this difference is the difference of influence by national welfare system and underlying cause of this difference is related to local fiscal capacity for their area. In other words, government subsidies ratio is determined by local fiscal capacity. So, it was very likely that the gap the welfare expenditure of local governments is caused by the difference of the estimation method of government subsidies ratio. In conclusion, this study judged that the improvement of the estimation method of standards subsidies ratio and different subsidies ratio which determine the present government subsidies ratio is required to narrow the gap between the government subsidies ratio.
Fourth, influence of political variables about welfare expenditure of basic local government is very little. But if the type of local governments by the political ground was distinguished and compared the influence in this study, this study was able to identify that political characteristic affected on the welfare expenditure. In other words, policy decisions on political ideology and inclination has not been identified obviously in regionalism partisan area. On the other hand, policy decisions on political ideology and inclination has been identified obviously without regionalism partisan area. In this way, influence factors which affected on the welfare expenditure differently appeared depend on the political ground. Especially, The fact that this study identified the influence which affected on the welfare expenditure was a noticeable distinction by the political ground in political variables is of great significance.
Despite this research result and meaning, this study has a some limitations. this study's follow-up research subject is as follows on the some limitations. First, because this study uses the limited materials in 2009~2015's, this study could not analyzed specific system and political influencing relationship which can affect on the welfare expenditure of local government. So, follow-up research need to analyze the influence factors of the welfare expenditure in the consideration of various factors.
Second, this study considered the inclination of politics of a local government head, the inclination of politics of a local assembly man for analyzing the effect of political factors on the welfare expenditure. But this study's limit is that judgment basis of the individual inclination of politics judged it on the one's own party or past one's own party. So, follow-up research need to fix a standard more delicately.
At the same time, for analyzing the influence factors of the welfare expenditure which considered peculiar local politic environment of Korea this study compared the regionalism partisan's effect upon regionalism partisan. But the fact that this study used advanced research's theoretical background which could judge one's regionalism partisan distinguished standard by operant definition of research has a limit to generalise. So, follow-up research need to study on the standard setting and development of index which allows to judge one's regionalism partisan objectively.
Third, this study didn't define the characteristic of dependent variable clearly. So, there is a limit that interpret the meaning of influence on the independent variable about the dependent variable. So, first of all follow-up research must study theoretically and empirically what this research defines on the welfare expenditure in identifying estimation and decision factor of welfare expenditure of local government, and then this study need to suggest clearly the concept and characteristic of dependent variable which estimates the welfare expenditure. If such process was performed before, the follow-up research can interpret that the independent variable affect on the dependent variable which defines the welfare expenditure and the follow-up research also can interpret the result's meaning.
Fourth, the follow-up research should identify how budget of an own business was organized for estimating more delicately about the effort of the welfare expenditure of local government. welfare expenditure ratio of welfare its own finances using the study was the easy variables to estimate the welfare budget ratio and the welfare expenditure variables per person. But, this variables also have a limit to estimate a local government's own effort in that variables affect on the policy of the central government. So, the budget data of an own business need to be constructed for estimating a local government's own effort about the welfare expenditure in the future.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.