본 연구는 한국인을 위한 지각된 중년기 스트레스 척도를 개발하고 타당화하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이를 위해 먼저 중년기 스트레스와 관련된 문헌고찰, 스트레스 관련 척도, 중년 성인남녀와 면담 등을 통하여 기초 예비문항을 작성한 후 심리학 교수 2명과 내용 타당도를 검증하여 54문항의 예비척도를 개발하였다. 개발된 예비척도에 대해 중년 성인남녀 194명을 대상으로 탐색적 요인분석을 실시하였다. 탐색적 ...
본 연구는 한국인을 위한 지각된 중년기 스트레스 척도를 개발하고 타당화하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이를 위해 먼저 중년기 스트레스와 관련된 문헌고찰, 스트레스 관련 척도, 중년 성인남녀와 면담 등을 통하여 기초 예비문항을 작성한 후 심리학 교수 2명과 내용 타당도를 검증하여 54문항의 예비척도를 개발하였다. 개발된 예비척도에 대해 중년 성인남녀 194명을 대상으로 탐색적 요인분석을 실시하였다. 탐색적 요인분석 결과, 신체적 건강 요인 6문항, 경제활동 요인 6문항, 대인관계 요인 5문항, 노후 및 미래조망 요인 5문항으로 4요인 22문항 구조가 확정되었다. 중년 성인남녀 255명을 대상으로 지각된 중년기 스트레스 척도에 대한 확인적 요인분석을 실시한 결과 χ²/df = 1.955이며, RMSEA 값은 .061, CFI값은 .916, TLI 값은 .905으로 전반적으로 양호한 적합도를 보이는 것으로 확인되어 4요인 모형이 적합함을 확인할 수 있었고, 지각된 스트레스 척도(PSS-K), 심리적 안녕감 척도(PWBS), 심리적 건강 척도(PWI) 및 한국판 우울 척도(CES-D)와의 상관분석을 통해 수렴 및 변별 타당도를 확인하였다. 마지막으로 2주의 간격을 두고 같은 설문지로 재검사를 실시하여 검사-재검사 신뢰도를 확인하였다. 끝으로 본 연구의 의의와 제한점에 대하여 논의하였다.
본 연구는 한국인을 위한 지각된 중년기 스트레스 척도를 개발하고 타당화하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이를 위해 먼저 중년기 스트레스와 관련된 문헌고찰, 스트레스 관련 척도, 중년 성인남녀와 면담 등을 통하여 기초 예비문항을 작성한 후 심리학 교수 2명과 내용 타당도를 검증하여 54문항의 예비척도를 개발하였다. 개발된 예비척도에 대해 중년 성인남녀 194명을 대상으로 탐색적 요인분석을 실시하였다. 탐색적 요인분석 결과, 신체적 건강 요인 6문항, 경제활동 요인 6문항, 대인관계 요인 5문항, 노후 및 미래조망 요인 5문항으로 4요인 22문항 구조가 확정되었다. 중년 성인남녀 255명을 대상으로 지각된 중년기 스트레스 척도에 대한 확인적 요인분석을 실시한 결과 χ²/df = 1.955이며, RMSEA 값은 .061, CFI값은 .916, TLI 값은 .905으로 전반적으로 양호한 적합도를 보이는 것으로 확인되어 4요인 모형이 적합함을 확인할 수 있었고, 지각된 스트레스 척도(PSS-K), 심리적 안녕감 척도(PWBS), 심리적 건강 척도(PWI) 및 한국판 우울 척도(CES-D)와의 상관분석을 통해 수렴 및 변별 타당도를 확인하였다. 마지막으로 2주의 간격을 두고 같은 설문지로 재검사를 실시하여 검사-재검사 신뢰도를 확인하였다. 끝으로 본 연구의 의의와 제한점에 대하여 논의하였다.
The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Perceived Stress Scale for Middle Aged individuals. To develop a preliminary questionnaire, 9 middle aged individuals were interviewd and existing scales were also used as references. The validity of the questionnaire w...
The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Perceived Stress Scale for Middle Aged individuals. To develop a preliminary questionnaire, 9 middle aged individuals were interviewd and existing scales were also used as references. The validity of the questionnaire was examined based on item review conducted by 2 experts in the field as well as exploratory factor analysis conducted using 194 middle aged men and women. Factor analysis results were used to finalize the factor structure of the Perceived Stress Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis was then carried out using 255 middle aged adults to confirm the suitability of the model underlying the Perceived Stress Scale for middle aged individuals. Also, to support criterion related validity of the scale scores, correlation analyses were conducted between the Perceived Stress Scale, Psychological Well-Being Scale, Psychological Well-being Index and the Korean version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale(K-CES-D) was carried out. This development study led to the Perceived Stress Scale for Middle Age Individuals including 22 questions and 4 underlying factors. The factors are: 'physical health', 'relationship', 'retirement and economic activity' and 'old age'. The correlation between the factors and between questionnaires were high. The goodness of model fit was also supported based on confirmatory analysis. Moreover, Cronbach's α(internal consistency coefficients) was high at .92 and item-total correlation coefficients ranged from .77~.84, which shows moderately high correlations. By checking the internal consistency reliability, the reliability was also found to be high. Secondly, the 4-factor model was found to be effective based on confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity also showed moderate scores(RMSEA=.061, TLI=.905, CFI=.916). Lastly, to verify construct validity of the scale, correlation analysis between perceived stress and psychological well-being was carried out. As expected, perceived stress of middle age revealed positive and significant relationships with perceived stress and negative relationships with the other indices. Test-retest analyses also revealed support for the reliability of the scale scores. Finally, the limitations and implications of the study’s findings are discussed.
The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Perceived Stress Scale for Middle Aged individuals. To develop a preliminary questionnaire, 9 middle aged individuals were interviewd and existing scales were also used as references. The validity of the questionnaire was examined based on item review conducted by 2 experts in the field as well as exploratory factor analysis conducted using 194 middle aged men and women. Factor analysis results were used to finalize the factor structure of the Perceived Stress Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis was then carried out using 255 middle aged adults to confirm the suitability of the model underlying the Perceived Stress Scale for middle aged individuals. Also, to support criterion related validity of the scale scores, correlation analyses were conducted between the Perceived Stress Scale, Psychological Well-Being Scale, Psychological Well-being Index and the Korean version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale(K-CES-D) was carried out. This development study led to the Perceived Stress Scale for Middle Age Individuals including 22 questions and 4 underlying factors. The factors are: 'physical health', 'relationship', 'retirement and economic activity' and 'old age'. The correlation between the factors and between questionnaires were high. The goodness of model fit was also supported based on confirmatory analysis. Moreover, Cronbach's α(internal consistency coefficients) was high at .92 and item-total correlation coefficients ranged from .77~.84, which shows moderately high correlations. By checking the internal consistency reliability, the reliability was also found to be high. Secondly, the 4-factor model was found to be effective based on confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity also showed moderate scores(RMSEA=.061, TLI=.905, CFI=.916). Lastly, to verify construct validity of the scale, correlation analysis between perceived stress and psychological well-being was carried out. As expected, perceived stress of middle age revealed positive and significant relationships with perceived stress and negative relationships with the other indices. Test-retest analyses also revealed support for the reliability of the scale scores. Finally, the limitations and implications of the study’s findings are discussed.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.