본 연구는「산림기본법」제28조〜제30조, 「임업ㆍ산촌진흥법」제23조 등 법적 근거에 의해 수립한 제2차 산촌진흥기본계획(’18∼’27)의 5대 추진전략과 20개 중점 추진과제에 대해 정책입안자인 전문가 그룹은 AHP분석으로 정책 우선순위를 도출하였고, 정책수혜자인 산촌생태마을주민(전라권)은 IPA방법으로 중요도-만족도를 평가하여 제2차 산촌진흥기본계획의 실효성 증진을 위한 기초자료를 제공하고자 수행하였다. 그 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 부문별 선정된 요인의 ...
본 연구는「산림기본법」제28조〜제30조, 「임업ㆍ산촌진흥법」제23조 등 법적 근거에 의해 수립한 제2차 산촌진흥기본계획(’18∼’27)의 5대 추진전략과 20개 중점 추진과제에 대해 정책입안자인 전문가 그룹은 AHP분석으로 정책 우선순위를 도출하였고, 정책수혜자인 산촌생태마을주민(전라권)은 IPA방법으로 중요도-만족도를 평가하여 제2차 산촌진흥기본계획의 실효성 증진을 위한 기초자료를 제공하고자 수행하였다. 그 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 부문별 선정된 요인의 상대적 중요도 및 우선순위를 살펴보면, 전문가는 1계층에서 ‘경제·소득’(0.306), 2계층서 ‘산촌마을의 생활환경 관리강화’(0.358), ‘산촌 경영 역량강화’(0.338), ‘주민 행복서비스 향상으로 삶의질 제고’(0.389), ‘산촌마을 생태·체험관광 자원 발굴’(0.453), ‘산촌리더 양성 및 마을간 협력·공유 확산’(0.317)이 중요도가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 산촌생태마을 주민은 1계층에서 ‘인력·거버넌스’(4.21), 2계층에서 ‘산촌마을의 생활환경 관리강화’(4.13), ‘산촌 6차산업화 등 신규비즈니스 육성’(3.94), ‘산촌생태마을 사후관리 강화 및 운영 활성화’(4.34), ‘산촌마을 생태·체험관광 자원 발굴’(4.11), ‘산촌마을 주민간 유대·협력 강화’(4.36)가 상대적으로 높은 중요도를 보였다. 둘째, 산촌생태마을 주민이 중요하게 인지하고 있는 상위 10개 요인에 대해 만족도가 낮은 Ⅱ사분면 요인은 1)산촌생태마을 사후관리 강화 및 운영 활성화, 2)주민행복서비스 향상으로 삶의질 제고, 3)도시 청년·은퇴세대 귀산촌 붐 조성, 4)산림복지시설과 연계한 장기 체류형 마을 조성, 5)산촌정책의 체계적 추진을 위한 지원체계 정비로 나타났다. 셋째, 2017년 산촌 6차산업화 육성사업 추진마을과 비사업지마을 주민을 대상으로 상위 10개 요인에 대한 만족도가 낮은 Ⅱ사분면 요인은 1)산촌마을의 생활환경 관리강화, 2)주민행복서비스 향상으로 삶의질 제고, 3)산촌마을 생태·체험관광 자원 발굴 총 3개로 분석되었다. 이러한 분석 결과를 바탕으로 산촌지역 활성화를 위해서 다음과 같은 제언을 하고자 한다. 첫째, 6차산업화를 통해 농·산촌의 지역경제를 활성화 시킬 수 있는 기틀을 마련할 필요가 있다. 둘째, 가치사슬 모델이 접목된 6차산업화 산촌지역 구축과 이를 달성하기 위한 산촌진흥기본계획 정책추진과 산림청의 주도적인 산촌정책 시행이 필요하다. 셋째, 산촌정책 수립에 있어서 주민의 의견을 수렴하고, 추진과정에서는 획일화되고 균등한 지원이 아닌 마을별로 여건, 운영역량 등을 해당 전문가의 진단을 실시한 뒤 차등지원을 통해 단계적으로 추진해야 한다는 것이다.
본 연구는「산림기본법」제28조〜제30조, 「임업ㆍ산촌진흥법」제23조 등 법적 근거에 의해 수립한 제2차 산촌진흥기본계획(’18∼’27)의 5대 추진전략과 20개 중점 추진과제에 대해 정책입안자인 전문가 그룹은 AHP분석으로 정책 우선순위를 도출하였고, 정책수혜자인 산촌생태마을주민(전라권)은 IPA방법으로 중요도-만족도를 평가하여 제2차 산촌진흥기본계획의 실효성 증진을 위한 기초자료를 제공하고자 수행하였다. 그 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 부문별 선정된 요인의 상대적 중요도 및 우선순위를 살펴보면, 전문가는 1계층에서 ‘경제·소득’(0.306), 2계층서 ‘산촌마을의 생활환경 관리강화’(0.358), ‘산촌 경영 역량강화’(0.338), ‘주민 행복서비스 향상으로 삶의질 제고’(0.389), ‘산촌마을 생태·체험관광 자원 발굴’(0.453), ‘산촌리더 양성 및 마을간 협력·공유 확산’(0.317)이 중요도가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 산촌생태마을 주민은 1계층에서 ‘인력·거버넌스’(4.21), 2계층에서 ‘산촌마을의 생활환경 관리강화’(4.13), ‘산촌 6차산업화 등 신규비즈니스 육성’(3.94), ‘산촌생태마을 사후관리 강화 및 운영 활성화’(4.34), ‘산촌마을 생태·체험관광 자원 발굴’(4.11), ‘산촌마을 주민간 유대·협력 강화’(4.36)가 상대적으로 높은 중요도를 보였다. 둘째, 산촌생태마을 주민이 중요하게 인지하고 있는 상위 10개 요인에 대해 만족도가 낮은 Ⅱ사분면 요인은 1)산촌생태마을 사후관리 강화 및 운영 활성화, 2)주민행복서비스 향상으로 삶의질 제고, 3)도시 청년·은퇴세대 귀산촌 붐 조성, 4)산림복지시설과 연계한 장기 체류형 마을 조성, 5)산촌정책의 체계적 추진을 위한 지원체계 정비로 나타났다. 셋째, 2017년 산촌 6차산업화 육성사업 추진마을과 비사업지마을 주민을 대상으로 상위 10개 요인에 대한 만족도가 낮은 Ⅱ사분면 요인은 1)산촌마을의 생활환경 관리강화, 2)주민행복서비스 향상으로 삶의질 제고, 3)산촌마을 생태·체험관광 자원 발굴 총 3개로 분석되었다. 이러한 분석 결과를 바탕으로 산촌지역 활성화를 위해서 다음과 같은 제언을 하고자 한다. 첫째, 6차산업화를 통해 농·산촌의 지역경제를 활성화 시킬 수 있는 기틀을 마련할 필요가 있다. 둘째, 가치사슬 모델이 접목된 6차산업화 산촌지역 구축과 이를 달성하기 위한 산촌진흥기본계획 정책추진과 산림청의 주도적인 산촌정책 시행이 필요하다. 셋째, 산촌정책 수립에 있어서 주민의 의견을 수렴하고, 추진과정에서는 획일화되고 균등한 지원이 아닌 마을별로 여건, 운영역량 등을 해당 전문가의 진단을 실시한 뒤 차등지원을 통해 단계적으로 추진해야 한다는 것이다.
This study has been performed in the purpose that the expert group, the policy planners, deduced policy priority by AHP analysis about 5 major propelling strategies of the 2nd Mountain Village Promotion Basic Planning('18~'27) and 20 main propelling subjects, which were build by the legal ground of ...
This study has been performed in the purpose that the expert group, the policy planners, deduced policy priority by AHP analysis about 5 major propelling strategies of the 2nd Mountain Village Promotion Basic Planning('18~'27) and 20 main propelling subjects, which were build by the legal ground of the "Framework Action Forestry Article 28~30" and the Law of Forestry·Mountain Village Development Article 23, and the residents of the mountain eco-village(Jeolla area) estimated the importance and satisfaction with IPA to provide basic data for the improvement of the policy effectiveness of the 2th Mountain Village Promotion Basic Planning. The summery of the result is as below. First, if the comparative importance and priority of the selected factors in each sector were examined, it shows that the experts put importance on 'economy·income(0.306) in the first class, and put importance on 'strengthening management of the life environment of the mountain village'(0.358), 'strengthening the management ability of the mountain village'(0.338), 'improvement of the quality of life by enhancing the happiness service for the residents'(0.389), 'discovering the resource of eco·experience tour of the mountain village'(0.453), 'forster of the mountain leader and spreading cooperation·sharing between villages'(0.317) in the second class. The residents of the mountain eco-village put comparatively high importance on 'manpower·governance'(4.21) in the first class, and put high importance on 'strengthening the management of the life environment of the mountain village'(4.13), 'fostering new business including the 6th industrialization of the mountain village'(3.94), 'strengthening follow-up management and activation of the management of the mountain eco- village'(4.34), 'discovering the resource of eco·experience tour of the mountain village'(4.11), and 'strengthening the bond·cooperation between residents of the mountain villages'(4.36), in the second class. Second, the II quadrat factors with low satisfaction on top 10 factors that the residents of the mountain eco-villages take importance are, 1) strengthening follow-up management and activation of the management of mountain eco-village, 2) improvement of the quality of life by enhancing the happiness service for the residents, 3) establishing boom of returning to the mountain village for urban young people and retired generation, 4) building prolonged stay type village connected to forest welfare facility, 5) organizing the supporting system for the systemic propel of the mountain village policy. Third, II quadrat factors with low satisfaction on top 10 factors estimated by the residents of the propelling village of the 6th industrialization fostering business and the non business village among the mountain villages at 2017 were analyzed as three including 1) strengthening the management of the life environment of the mountain village, 2) improvement of the quality of life by enhancing the happiness service for the residents, 3) discovering the resource of eco·experience tour of the mountain village. Suggestions for the activation of Mountain village area were as follows. First, the ground able to activate local economy of farming and mountain villages through 6th industrialization is needed. Second, the establishment of 6th industrialization mountain village area connected with the value chain model, the policy propulsion of the mountain village promotion basic planning to accomplish it and the leading execution of the mountain village policy by Korea Forest Service are needed. Third, in the process of establishing the mountain policy, after collecting the opinions of the residents and diagnosing the conditions and management abilities according to each village, rather than providing the uniformed and equalized support, in the propulsion process, and it must be propelled step by step through differentiated supports.
This study has been performed in the purpose that the expert group, the policy planners, deduced policy priority by AHP analysis about 5 major propelling strategies of the 2nd Mountain Village Promotion Basic Planning('18~'27) and 20 main propelling subjects, which were build by the legal ground of the "Framework Action Forestry Article 28~30" and the Law of Forestry·Mountain Village Development Article 23, and the residents of the mountain eco-village(Jeolla area) estimated the importance and satisfaction with IPA to provide basic data for the improvement of the policy effectiveness of the 2th Mountain Village Promotion Basic Planning. The summery of the result is as below. First, if the comparative importance and priority of the selected factors in each sector were examined, it shows that the experts put importance on 'economy·income(0.306) in the first class, and put importance on 'strengthening management of the life environment of the mountain village'(0.358), 'strengthening the management ability of the mountain village'(0.338), 'improvement of the quality of life by enhancing the happiness service for the residents'(0.389), 'discovering the resource of eco·experience tour of the mountain village'(0.453), 'forster of the mountain leader and spreading cooperation·sharing between villages'(0.317) in the second class. The residents of the mountain eco-village put comparatively high importance on 'manpower·governance'(4.21) in the first class, and put high importance on 'strengthening the management of the life environment of the mountain village'(4.13), 'fostering new business including the 6th industrialization of the mountain village'(3.94), 'strengthening follow-up management and activation of the management of the mountain eco- village'(4.34), 'discovering the resource of eco·experience tour of the mountain village'(4.11), and 'strengthening the bond·cooperation between residents of the mountain villages'(4.36), in the second class. Second, the II quadrat factors with low satisfaction on top 10 factors that the residents of the mountain eco-villages take importance are, 1) strengthening follow-up management and activation of the management of mountain eco-village, 2) improvement of the quality of life by enhancing the happiness service for the residents, 3) establishing boom of returning to the mountain village for urban young people and retired generation, 4) building prolonged stay type village connected to forest welfare facility, 5) organizing the supporting system for the systemic propel of the mountain village policy. Third, II quadrat factors with low satisfaction on top 10 factors estimated by the residents of the propelling village of the 6th industrialization fostering business and the non business village among the mountain villages at 2017 were analyzed as three including 1) strengthening the management of the life environment of the mountain village, 2) improvement of the quality of life by enhancing the happiness service for the residents, 3) discovering the resource of eco·experience tour of the mountain village. Suggestions for the activation of Mountain village area were as follows. First, the ground able to activate local economy of farming and mountain villages through 6th industrialization is needed. Second, the establishment of 6th industrialization mountain village area connected with the value chain model, the policy propulsion of the mountain village promotion basic planning to accomplish it and the leading execution of the mountain village policy by Korea Forest Service are needed. Third, in the process of establishing the mountain policy, after collecting the opinions of the residents and diagnosing the conditions and management abilities according to each village, rather than providing the uniformed and equalized support, in the propulsion process, and it must be propelled step by step through differentiated supports.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.