A total of 24 leading forest management zones are currently operated in 2022, since the Korea Forest Service designated them in private forests. The leading forest management has contributed to the expansion of the infrastructures for forest management, increase of mountain owners’ incomes through t...
A total of 24 leading forest management zones are currently operated in 2022, since the Korea Forest Service designated them in private forests. The leading forest management has contributed to the expansion of the infrastructures for forest management, increase of mountain owners’ incomes through the promotion of forest byproduct production areas, increase of mountain owners’ incomes through the production of forest trees, use of equipment and purchase of civil engineering materials, which are necessary for the forest employment, and the establishment of local forest resources’ virtuous cycle through the connection between sawmills/facilities for processing forest products and local societies. The results of this study, however, show that there are some problems in the selection of leading forest management zones, the forest employment of them and the management of them.
Based on the results, it, therefore, attempts to suggest important improvements necessary for developing the leading forest management zones.
The presence of mountain owners’ self-pay for the commercial tree planting within the leading forest management zones is determined by each local government. Mountain owners who are responsible for self-pay accounting for 10% of the cost of tree planting in the leading forest management zones, and therefore, suffer a loss of revenues, may raise complaints about the fairness, compared to those who have no self-pay. Hence, it is necessary for the Korea Forest Service to develop detailed guidelines, and the cost for repairing defects is not fixed for tree planting in the leading forest management zones, so economic subjects would bear the economic burden. The cost for repairing defects should be also reflected in the tree planting in the leading forest management zones, like the general tree planting.
The performance of tendering young trees in the leading forest management zones is entirely poor, because managements subjects passively tender young tress, due to the business expenses that are too low to practically tender them. Although the tendering young trees will be an essential project for producing superior plants in the future, it would be difficult to foster commercial trees, if the project cannot be conducted in time, due to a lack of business expenses. It is, therefore, necessary to fix the business expenses enough to practically perform the project, in designing it.
Although forest byproduct production areas were promoted to increase the incomes of registered mountain owners and villagers, they were actually managed only by cooperative units consisting of a handful of people. The cooperative units earned incomes by producing forest products, while mountain owners and some villagers earned incomes from employment. The forest byproduct production areas are managed by few people, so it may be doubted that unfair privileges exist, and it is also concerned about the occurrence of disputes around the ownership of forest byproduct production areas after the end of leases. The process of an adequate negotiation among mountain owner panels, management panels, villagers, cooperative units, etc. is required to prevent such problems mentioned above, in promoting forest byproduct production areas. Moreover, forest product cultivation techniques and so on should be continuously educated by management subjects as well as local governments, for the success of forest byproduct production areas.
A total of 24 leading forest management zones are currently operated in 2022, since the Korea Forest Service designated them in private forests. The leading forest management has contributed to the expansion of the infrastructures for forest management, increase of mountain owners’ incomes through the promotion of forest byproduct production areas, increase of mountain owners’ incomes through the production of forest trees, use of equipment and purchase of civil engineering materials, which are necessary for the forest employment, and the establishment of local forest resources’ virtuous cycle through the connection between sawmills/facilities for processing forest products and local societies. The results of this study, however, show that there are some problems in the selection of leading forest management zones, the forest employment of them and the management of them.
Based on the results, it, therefore, attempts to suggest important improvements necessary for developing the leading forest management zones.
The presence of mountain owners’ self-pay for the commercial tree planting within the leading forest management zones is determined by each local government. Mountain owners who are responsible for self-pay accounting for 10% of the cost of tree planting in the leading forest management zones, and therefore, suffer a loss of revenues, may raise complaints about the fairness, compared to those who have no self-pay. Hence, it is necessary for the Korea Forest Service to develop detailed guidelines, and the cost for repairing defects is not fixed for tree planting in the leading forest management zones, so economic subjects would bear the economic burden. The cost for repairing defects should be also reflected in the tree planting in the leading forest management zones, like the general tree planting.
The performance of tendering young trees in the leading forest management zones is entirely poor, because managements subjects passively tender young tress, due to the business expenses that are too low to practically tender them. Although the tendering young trees will be an essential project for producing superior plants in the future, it would be difficult to foster commercial trees, if the project cannot be conducted in time, due to a lack of business expenses. It is, therefore, necessary to fix the business expenses enough to practically perform the project, in designing it.
Although forest byproduct production areas were promoted to increase the incomes of registered mountain owners and villagers, they were actually managed only by cooperative units consisting of a handful of people. The cooperative units earned incomes by producing forest products, while mountain owners and some villagers earned incomes from employment. The forest byproduct production areas are managed by few people, so it may be doubted that unfair privileges exist, and it is also concerned about the occurrence of disputes around the ownership of forest byproduct production areas after the end of leases. The process of an adequate negotiation among mountain owner panels, management panels, villagers, cooperative units, etc. is required to prevent such problems mentioned above, in promoting forest byproduct production areas. Moreover, forest product cultivation techniques and so on should be continuously educated by management subjects as well as local governments, for the success of forest byproduct production areas.
주제어
#사유림 경영 선도산림경영단지 산림사업 단기소득임산물생산단지 산주협의체
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.