신생아나 영아의 급성신부전증의 치료를 위하여서 복막투석이 매우 유효한 방법으로 알려져 있지만 혈역학적으로 불안정한 상태에서 저용량, 고농도의 투석액으로 자주 교환하는 방법이 통상적인 투석방법과 마찬가지로 효율적인지를 알아보기 위하여 본 연구를 시도하였다. 대상환아는 신생아와 영유아에서 혈역학적으로 불안정하리라 추정되는 7례의 급성신부전증 환아를 대상으로 저용량($14.2{\pm}4.2ml/kg$), 고농도(4.25% dextrose)의 투석액을 30-45분의 짧은 간격으로 교환하는 복막투석을 실시하여 통상적인 방법을 사용한 4례의 환아와 비교하였다. 환아의 연령은 $1.9{\pm}1.3$개월이었고, 체중은 $4.6{\pm}1.6kg$이었으며 신부전증을 일으킨 원인은 패혈증과 이에 동반한 쇽 5례와 심장수술 후 과다혈량 상태가 생긴 2례였다. 도관은 경피적으로 pigtail 도관이나 Tenckhoff 도관을 삽입하였다. 유효한외과여과율은 $0.27{\pm}0.09ml/min$로서 통상적인 방법에 의한 $0.29{\pm}0.09ml/min$와 유의한 차이가 없었다. 또한 투석 24시간 후 혈중 BUN은 $95.6{\pm}37.5mg/dl$에서 $ 75.7{\pm}25.9mg/dl$로 감소하였고, 혈중 pH는 $7.122{\pm}0.048$에서 $7.326{\pm}0.063$으로 증가하였다. 투석중의 부작용으로는 2례의 고혈당증, 2례의 도관 주위 누출, 1례의 경한 저나트륨혈증과 1례의 복막염이 발생하였으나 비교적 용이하게 교정이 가능하였다. 이들 환아중 2례의 환아가 선행질환의 악화로 사망하였다.
신생아나 영아의 급성신부전증의 치료를 위하여서 복막투석이 매우 유효한 방법으로 알려져 있지만 혈역학적으로 불안정한 상태에서 저용량, 고농도의 투석액으로 자주 교환하는 방법이 통상적인 투석방법과 마찬가지로 효율적인지를 알아보기 위하여 본 연구를 시도하였다. 대상환아는 신생아와 영유아에서 혈역학적으로 불안정하리라 추정되는 7례의 급성신부전증 환아를 대상으로 저용량($14.2{\pm}4.2ml/kg$), 고농도(4.25% dextrose)의 투석액을 30-45분의 짧은 간격으로 교환하는 복막투석을 실시하여 통상적인 방법을 사용한 4례의 환아와 비교하였다. 환아의 연령은 $1.9{\pm}1.3$개월이었고, 체중은 $4.6{\pm}1.6kg$이었으며 신부전증을 일으킨 원인은 패혈증과 이에 동반한 쇽 5례와 심장수술 후 과다혈량 상태가 생긴 2례였다. 도관은 경피적으로 pigtail 도관이나 Tenckhoff 도관을 삽입하였다. 유효한외과여과율은 $0.27{\pm}0.09ml/min$로서 통상적인 방법에 의한 $0.29{\pm}0.09ml/min$와 유의한 차이가 없었다. 또한 투석 24시간 후 혈중 BUN은 $95.6{\pm}37.5mg/dl$에서 $ 75.7{\pm}25.9mg/dl$로 감소하였고, 혈중 pH는 $7.122{\pm}0.048$에서 $7.326{\pm}0.063$으로 증가하였다. 투석중의 부작용으로는 2례의 고혈당증, 2례의 도관 주위 누출, 1례의 경한 저나트륨혈증과 1례의 복막염이 발생하였으나 비교적 용이하게 교정이 가능하였다. 이들 환아중 2례의 환아가 선행질환의 악화로 사망하였다.
Peritoneal dialysis has been widely considered to be the dialytic treatment of choice for acute renal failure in infants and young children, because the technique is simple, safe and easily adapted for these patients. Also peritoneal dialysis in infants might have more effective ultrafiltration and ...
Peritoneal dialysis has been widely considered to be the dialytic treatment of choice for acute renal failure in infants and young children, because the technique is simple, safe and easily adapted for these patients. Also peritoneal dialysis in infants might have more effective ultrafiltration and clearance than in adults. In certain circumstances associated with hemodynamic instability, ordinary volume peritoneal dialysis(30-50 ml/kg body weight per exchange) or hemodialysis may not be suitable unfortunately. But frequent cycled, low volume, high concentration peritoneal dialysis may be more available to manage the hemodynamically untable acute renal failure of newborns and infants. Seven infants underwent peritoneal dialysis for hemodynamically unstable acute renal failure with low exchange volume($14.2{\pm}4.2ml/kg$), short exchange time(30 to 45 minutes) and hypertonic glucose solution(4.25% dextrose). Age was $1.9{\pm}1.3$ months and body weight was $4.6{\pm}1.6kg $. Etiology of acute renal failure was secondary to sepsis with or without shock(5 cases) and postcardiac operation(2 cases). Catheter was inserted percutaneously with pigtail catheter or Tenkhoff catheter by Seldinger method. Dialysate was commercially obtained Peritosol which contained sodium, chloride, potassium, magnesium, lactate and calcium. Net ultrafiltration(ml/min) showed no difference between low volume dialysis and control($0.27{\pm}0.09$ versus $0.29{\pm}0.09$) Blood BUN decreased from $95.7{\pm}37.5$ to $75.7{\pm}25.9mg/dl$ and blood pH increased from $7.122{\pm}0.048$ to $7.326{\pm}0.063$ after 24 hours of peritoneal dialysis. We experienced hyperglycemia which were controlled by insulin(2 episodes), leakage at the exit site(2), mild hyponatremia(1) and Escherichia coli peritonitis(1). Two children of low volume dialysis died despite the treatment. In our experience, low volume and high concentration peritoneal dialysis with frequent exchange may have sufficient ultrafiltration and clearance without significant complications in the certain risked acute renal failure of infants.
Peritoneal dialysis has been widely considered to be the dialytic treatment of choice for acute renal failure in infants and young children, because the technique is simple, safe and easily adapted for these patients. Also peritoneal dialysis in infants might have more effective ultrafiltration and clearance than in adults. In certain circumstances associated with hemodynamic instability, ordinary volume peritoneal dialysis(30-50 ml/kg body weight per exchange) or hemodialysis may not be suitable unfortunately. But frequent cycled, low volume, high concentration peritoneal dialysis may be more available to manage the hemodynamically untable acute renal failure of newborns and infants. Seven infants underwent peritoneal dialysis for hemodynamically unstable acute renal failure with low exchange volume($14.2{\pm}4.2ml/kg$), short exchange time(30 to 45 minutes) and hypertonic glucose solution(4.25% dextrose). Age was $1.9{\pm}1.3$ months and body weight was $4.6{\pm}1.6kg $. Etiology of acute renal failure was secondary to sepsis with or without shock(5 cases) and postcardiac operation(2 cases). Catheter was inserted percutaneously with pigtail catheter or Tenkhoff catheter by Seldinger method. Dialysate was commercially obtained Peritosol which contained sodium, chloride, potassium, magnesium, lactate and calcium. Net ultrafiltration(ml/min) showed no difference between low volume dialysis and control($0.27{\pm}0.09$ versus $0.29{\pm}0.09$) Blood BUN decreased from $95.7{\pm}37.5$ to $75.7{\pm}25.9mg/dl$ and blood pH increased from $7.122{\pm}0.048$ to $7.326{\pm}0.063$ after 24 hours of peritoneal dialysis. We experienced hyperglycemia which were controlled by insulin(2 episodes), leakage at the exit site(2), mild hyponatremia(1) and Escherichia coli peritonitis(1). Two children of low volume dialysis died despite the treatment. In our experience, low volume and high concentration peritoneal dialysis with frequent exchange may have sufficient ultrafiltration and clearance without significant complications in the certain risked acute renal failure of infants.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.