본 연구는 삼성의료원 소아정신과 학습장애 특수 클리닉에 내원한 학습부진 아동을 대상으로 학습부진의 원인이 되는 장애와 학습부진 아동에서 학습장애의 유병율을 알아보고자 하였다 이들은 $6{\sim}15$세 사이의 197명으로 구성되었으며 결과는 아래와 같았다. 1) 대상군중 우울증등의 정서장애가 33%로 가장 많았으며 주의력결핍 과잉황동장애가 31%로 두번째의 빈도를 나타내었다. 2) 대상군중 학습장애 환아는 41명으로 20.8%의 빈도율을 보였다. 3) 학습장애의 공존병리중 주의력결핍 과잉활동장애가 44%로 가장 높은 빈도를 나타내었다. 4) 주의력결핍 과잉활동장애가 공존하는 학습장애군과 학습장애만 있는 군에서는 성별이나 연령차이, 지능차이는 없었으며 뇌파의 이상 소견에 대해서도 차이가 없었다. 그러나 주의력결핍 과잉활동장애가 없는 단독 학습장애군은 주의력결핍 과잉활동장애가 공존하는 학습장애군보다 더 늦은 나이에 발병하였고 학업성취도 면에서 우수하였는데 특히 국어, 수학, 사회, 음악 과목에서 격차가 컸다.
본 연구는 삼성의료원 소아정신과 학습장애 특수 클리닉에 내원한 학습부진 아동을 대상으로 학습부진의 원인이 되는 장애와 학습부진 아동에서 학습장애의 유병율을 알아보고자 하였다 이들은 $6{\sim}15$세 사이의 197명으로 구성되었으며 결과는 아래와 같았다. 1) 대상군중 우울증등의 정서장애가 33%로 가장 많았으며 주의력결핍 과잉황동장애가 31%로 두번째의 빈도를 나타내었다. 2) 대상군중 학습장애 환아는 41명으로 20.8%의 빈도율을 보였다. 3) 학습장애의 공존병리중 주의력결핍 과잉활동장애가 44%로 가장 높은 빈도를 나타내었다. 4) 주의력결핍 과잉활동장애가 공존하는 학습장애군과 학습장애만 있는 군에서는 성별이나 연령차이, 지능차이는 없었으며 뇌파의 이상 소견에 대해서도 차이가 없었다. 그러나 주의력결핍 과잉활동장애가 없는 단독 학습장애군은 주의력결핍 과잉활동장애가 공존하는 학습장애군보다 더 늦은 나이에 발병하였고 학업성취도 면에서 우수하였는데 특히 국어, 수학, 사회, 음악 과목에서 격차가 컸다.
This is a preliminary report on the first segment of a continuing and prospective teaming disorder study project in Korea. Study subjects were 197 children, aged between 6 and 15 referred for psychiatric evaluation of scholastic problems. Demographic data, psychiatric diagnoses and intelligence and ...
This is a preliminary report on the first segment of a continuing and prospective teaming disorder study project in Korea. Study subjects were 197 children, aged between 6 and 15 referred for psychiatric evaluation of scholastic problems. Demographic data, psychiatric diagnoses and intelligence and achievement test results were reviewed and analyzed. Analyses of data lead to the following conclusions : (1) About 20.8% of children referred for scholastic problems were diagnosed of teaming disorder(LD). The most prevalent diagnosis among these children with scholastic problem was emotional disorder, especially depressive disorder(33%), (2) The comorbid rate of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder(ADHD) of 41 children with LD was 44%, (3) Male/female ratio was 5.8:1 among all of the LD children, 17:1 among children with LD and ADHD and 3.6:l among children with LD but without ADHD, (4) 83% of children with LD scored above middle level on socioeconomic status(SES), (5) Age, SES, IQ, family psychiatric history, past history of medical and psychiatric illness, onset of age, pattern of peer relationship, number of friends, presence of adaptation problem and academic achievements of children with LD and ADHD compared to those of children with LD but without ADHD. No significant differences between two groups were found on age, SES, IQ, family psychiatric history, past history of medical and psychiatric illness, pattern of peer relationship, number of friends and presence of adaptation problem. However, there were significant differences in academic achievements of Korean language total, speaking and listening score, arithmetic score, social science score and music score of children with LD and ADHD compared to those of children with LD but without ADHD. Also there was an ealier onset of age in LD and ADHD group when compared to LD but without ADHD group.
This is a preliminary report on the first segment of a continuing and prospective teaming disorder study project in Korea. Study subjects were 197 children, aged between 6 and 15 referred for psychiatric evaluation of scholastic problems. Demographic data, psychiatric diagnoses and intelligence and achievement test results were reviewed and analyzed. Analyses of data lead to the following conclusions : (1) About 20.8% of children referred for scholastic problems were diagnosed of teaming disorder(LD). The most prevalent diagnosis among these children with scholastic problem was emotional disorder, especially depressive disorder(33%), (2) The comorbid rate of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder(ADHD) of 41 children with LD was 44%, (3) Male/female ratio was 5.8:1 among all of the LD children, 17:1 among children with LD and ADHD and 3.6:l among children with LD but without ADHD, (4) 83% of children with LD scored above middle level on socioeconomic status(SES), (5) Age, SES, IQ, family psychiatric history, past history of medical and psychiatric illness, onset of age, pattern of peer relationship, number of friends, presence of adaptation problem and academic achievements of children with LD and ADHD compared to those of children with LD but without ADHD. No significant differences between two groups were found on age, SES, IQ, family psychiatric history, past history of medical and psychiatric illness, pattern of peer relationship, number of friends and presence of adaptation problem. However, there were significant differences in academic achievements of Korean language total, speaking and listening score, arithmetic score, social science score and music score of children with LD and ADHD compared to those of children with LD but without ADHD. Also there was an ealier onset of age in LD and ADHD group when compared to LD but without ADHD group.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.