수자원 기술자들은 수자원 계획에 있어서 중요한 월유출 모의 모형을 개발하여 왔으며, 우리 나라에서는 가지야마 모형을 대표적인 월유출 모형으로 이용하고 있다. 최근 Xiong과 Guo (1999)는 2-변수 월 물수지 방정식 모형 을 제안하였고, 수자원 계획과 기상학적인 영향을 분석하기 위하여 제안한 모형을 이용할 수 있음을 보였다. 그러나 그들은 시간변환 변수 c와 저수지 포장 용수량 변수 SC를 시행착오에 의하여 추정하였다. 따라서, 본 연구의 목적은 2-변수 모형의 변수인 c와 SC를 추정하는 방법론을 제안하고, 2-변수 월 물수지 방정식 모형과 가지야마 모형을 한강 유역과 IHP 대표유역에 적용하여 비교 점토하고자 한다. c는 실제 증발산량과 잠재 증발산량 사이의 관계에 의하여 추정하였고, SC는 CN 값과의 관계를 사용하여 추정하였으며, 추정된 모형변수 c와 SC는 2-변 수 월 물수지 방정식 모형을 위하여 초기치 혹은 최적치로 이용할 수 있음을 보이고자 한다.
수자원 기술자들은 수자원 계획에 있어서 중요한 월유출 모의 모형을 개발하여 왔으며, 우리 나라에서는 가지야마 모형을 대표적인 월유출 모형으로 이용하고 있다. 최근 Xiong과 Guo (1999)는 2-변수 월 물수지 방정식 모형 을 제안하였고, 수자원 계획과 기상학적인 영향을 분석하기 위하여 제안한 모형을 이용할 수 있음을 보였다. 그러나 그들은 시간변환 변수 c와 저수지 포장 용수량 변수 SC를 시행착오에 의하여 추정하였다. 따라서, 본 연구의 목적은 2-변수 모형의 변수인 c와 SC를 추정하는 방법론을 제안하고, 2-변수 월 물수지 방정식 모형과 가지야마 모형을 한강 유역과 IHP 대표유역에 적용하여 비교 점토하고자 한다. c는 실제 증발산량과 잠재 증발산량 사이의 관계에 의하여 추정하였고, SC는 CN 값과의 관계를 사용하여 추정하였으며, 추정된 모형변수 c와 SC는 2-변 수 월 물수지 방정식 모형을 위하여 초기치 혹은 최적치로 이용할 수 있음을 보이고자 한다.
Hydrologists have tried to develop monthly runoff simulation models which are important factor in wafer resources planning. One of the models called Kajiyama formu]a is widely used for monthly runoff simulation in Korea. In recent work by Xiong and Guo (1999), they suggested Two-parameter monthly wa...
Hydrologists have tried to develop monthly runoff simulation models which are important factor in wafer resources planning. One of the models called Kajiyama formu]a is widely used for monthly runoff simulation in Korea. In recent work by Xiong and Guo (1999), they suggested Two-parameter monthly water balance model to simulate the runoff and showed that the model can be used for the water resources planning program and the climate impact studies. However, they estimated two parameters of transformation of time scale, c and of the field capacity, SC by the trial and error method. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to suggest the estimation methodologies of c and SC, and compare Kajiyama formula with a Two-parameter monthly water balance model to simulate the runoff in Han river and IHP representative basins in Korea. The c is estimated by using the relationship of actual and potential evaporations, and SC is estimated from association with CN. We show that the estimated c and SC can be used as the initial or optimal values in the model.
Hydrologists have tried to develop monthly runoff simulation models which are important factor in wafer resources planning. One of the models called Kajiyama formu]a is widely used for monthly runoff simulation in Korea. In recent work by Xiong and Guo (1999), they suggested Two-parameter monthly water balance model to simulate the runoff and showed that the model can be used for the water resources planning program and the climate impact studies. However, they estimated two parameters of transformation of time scale, c and of the field capacity, SC by the trial and error method. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to suggest the estimation methodologies of c and SC, and compare Kajiyama formula with a Two-parameter monthly water balance model to simulate the runoff in Han river and IHP representative basins in Korea. The c is estimated by using the relationship of actual and potential evaporations, and SC is estimated from association with CN. We show that the estimated c and SC can be used as the initial or optimal values in the model.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
문제 정의
We really thank to the anonymous reviewers. The indications and the comments of the re viewers were of a great help for the significant improvements in the manuscript.
However, the simple models can still be efficient and useful in runoff simulation, just like the conceptual hydrological model is still of great use in flood forecasting despite the emergency of the physical based mcxlels (Woolhiser, 1996). Therefore, one of our aims is to apply the simple models of Kajiyama and Two-parameter monthly water balance model to the Han river and IHP representative basins in Korea.
제안 방법
Kim (1984) simplified the water balance for river runoff by the relationship of rainfall, evapotranspiration, and variation of soil water content. He was done regression analysis with the variables of watershed rainfall, the measured evaporation, and runoff of previous month for investigating the effects of variables on monthly runoff. KRIHS (1987) developed a model called KRIHS by using water balance analysis of the watershed for the estimation of monthly runoff.
The TPM was suggested by Xiong and Guo (1999) and we modified the original model for the estimations of parameters. The modified model which we suggested in this study has proved to be quite efficient in simulating the monthly runoff with the simple structure and two parameters. The modified model could be also used at the ungaged site because the parameters can be estimated by using the meteorological and geological conditions and the parameter optimization by using observations is not required in the mcxiified model.
대상 데이터
The Model I, Model II, and Kajiyama formula can be compared by the RMSE and 7?2 in Table6. The RMSE are 34, 38mm in Model I, 27.11mm in Model II, and 42.48mm in Kajiyama formula for ChungMi site, and 43.40mm in Model I, 33.61mm in Model II, and 50.50mm in Kajiyama formula for HoengSung site. The T?2 are 8679%, 91.
The study areas are the Han river and IHP representative basins in Korea. The data sets used are the monthly rainfalls, runoffs and pan evaporations at the basins (Table 1).
이론/모형
The optimum values of the proposed two parameters of the model can be obtained by automatic optimization with Simplex method (Fig. 1). However, Xiong and Guo (1999) did not describe for the initial values of two parameters and they estimated those by the trial and error method.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.