목적: 국한성병기 소세포폐암 환자에서 하루 두 번 분할조사에 의한 동시 화학방사선치료의 효율성을 치료 반응률, 생존율, 실패양상, 치료부작용 등의 관점에서 평가하기 위해 후향적 연구를 수행하였다. 대상 및 방법: 1993년 2월부터 2002년 10월까지 총 76명의 환자가 조직학적으로 증명된 국한성병기 소세포폐암으로 하루 두 번 분할조사에 의한 동시 화학방사선치료를 시행 받았다. 대상환자 중 남성은 84% (64/76)이었고, 중앙연령은 57세였다(32-75세). 흉부방사선치료는 120 또는 150 cGy/fraction로 최소 6시간의 간격을 두고 하루 두 번, 한 주에 5일 시행하였다. 총 흉부조사선량의 중앙값은 50.4 Gy였다(45-51 Gy). 동시 화학치료은 3주 간격으로 교대 CAV ($cytoxan\;1000mg/m^2,\;adriamycin\;40mg/m^2,\;vincristine\;1mg/m^2$)/PE ($cisplatin\;60mg/m^2,\;etoposide\;100mg/m^2$)이거나, 혹은 단독 PE 요법이 사용되었다. 화학치료 횟수의 중앙값은 6회였다(1-9회). 예방적 전뇌조사는 완전관해를 보인 환자에게 25 Gy/10 fractions로 시행되었다. 중앙추적관찰기간은 18개월이었다(1-136개월). 결과: 치료의 반응률은 86%이었다: 완전관해가 39명(52%), 부분관해가 26명(34%)이었다. 중앙생존기간은 23개월이었다. 1년, 2년, 3년 생존율은 각각 72%, 50%, 30%이었다. 단변량분석에서 치료 반응률이 생존율의 유의한 예후인자로 밝혀졌다(p<0.001). 등급 3 이상의 급성부작용은 백혈구감소 46명(61%), 적혈구 감소 5명 (6%), 혈소판 감소 10명(13%), 식도염 5명(6%), 그리고 폐독성이 2명(2%)에서 있었다. 추척관찰이 가능했던 73명의 환자 중 총 38명(52%)에서 병의 진행이 관찰되었다. 첫 번째 원격전이 장소의 빈도는 뇌가 가장 높았다. 결론: 하루 두 번 분할조사에 의한 동시 화학방사선치료는 국한성병기 소세포폐암 환자에서 나쁘지 않은 부작용과 함께 양호한 치료반응 및 생존율의 결과를 보였다. 생존율의 유의한 예후인자로 밝혀진 치료 반응률을 향상시키기 위해 방사선치료 분할방식, 화학요법제제, 화학방사선치료의 결합방식에 대한 추가적인 연구가 필요할 것으로 생각된다.
목적: 국한성병기 소세포폐암 환자에서 하루 두 번 분할조사에 의한 동시 화학방사선치료의 효율성을 치료 반응률, 생존율, 실패양상, 치료부작용 등의 관점에서 평가하기 위해 후향적 연구를 수행하였다. 대상 및 방법: 1993년 2월부터 2002년 10월까지 총 76명의 환자가 조직학적으로 증명된 국한성병기 소세포폐암으로 하루 두 번 분할조사에 의한 동시 화학방사선치료를 시행 받았다. 대상환자 중 남성은 84% (64/76)이었고, 중앙연령은 57세였다(32-75세). 흉부방사선치료는 120 또는 150 cGy/fraction로 최소 6시간의 간격을 두고 하루 두 번, 한 주에 5일 시행하였다. 총 흉부조사선량의 중앙값은 50.4 Gy였다(45-51 Gy). 동시 화학치료은 3주 간격으로 교대 CAV ($cytoxan\;1000mg/m^2,\;adriamycin\;40mg/m^2,\;vincristine\;1mg/m^2$)/PE ($cisplatin\;60mg/m^2,\;etoposide\;100mg/m^2$)이거나, 혹은 단독 PE 요법이 사용되었다. 화학치료 횟수의 중앙값은 6회였다(1-9회). 예방적 전뇌조사는 완전관해를 보인 환자에게 25 Gy/10 fractions로 시행되었다. 중앙추적관찰기간은 18개월이었다(1-136개월). 결과: 치료의 반응률은 86%이었다: 완전관해가 39명(52%), 부분관해가 26명(34%)이었다. 중앙생존기간은 23개월이었다. 1년, 2년, 3년 생존율은 각각 72%, 50%, 30%이었다. 단변량분석에서 치료 반응률이 생존율의 유의한 예후인자로 밝혀졌다(p<0.001). 등급 3 이상의 급성부작용은 백혈구감소 46명(61%), 적혈구 감소 5명 (6%), 혈소판 감소 10명(13%), 식도염 5명(6%), 그리고 폐독성이 2명(2%)에서 있었다. 추척관찰이 가능했던 73명의 환자 중 총 38명(52%)에서 병의 진행이 관찰되었다. 첫 번째 원격전이 장소의 빈도는 뇌가 가장 높았다. 결론: 하루 두 번 분할조사에 의한 동시 화학방사선치료는 국한성병기 소세포폐암 환자에서 나쁘지 않은 부작용과 함께 양호한 치료반응 및 생존율의 결과를 보였다. 생존율의 유의한 예후인자로 밝혀진 치료 반응률을 향상시키기 위해 방사선치료 분할방식, 화학요법제제, 화학방사선치료의 결합방식에 대한 추가적인 연구가 필요할 것으로 생각된다.
Purpose: A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the efficiency and feasibility of twice daily radiation therapy plus concurrent chemotherapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer in terms of treatment response, survival, patterns of failure, and acute toxicities. Materials and Methods: B...
Purpose: A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the efficiency and feasibility of twice daily radiation therapy plus concurrent chemotherapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer in terms of treatment response, survival, patterns of failure, and acute toxicities. Materials and Methods: Between February 1993 and October 2002, 76 patients of histologically proven limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) were treated with twice daily radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy. Male was in 84% (64/76), and median age was 57 years (range, 32-75 years). Thoracic radiation therapy consisted of 120 or 150 cGy per fraction, twice a day at least 6 hours apart, 5 days a week. Median total dose was 50.4 Gy (range, 45-51 Gy). Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of CAV ($cytoxan\;1000mg/m^2,\;adriamycin\;40mg/m^2,\;vincristine\;1mg/m^2$) alternating with PE ($cisplatin\;60mg/m^2,\;etoposide\;100mg/m^2$) or PE alone, every 3 weeks. The median cycle of chemotherapy was six (range, 1-9 cycle). Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was recommended to the patients who achieved a complete response (CR). PCI scheme was 25 Gy/10 fractions. Median follow up was 18 months (range, 1-136 months). Results: Overall response rate was 86%; complete response in 39 (52%) and partial response in 26 (34%) patients. The median overall survival was 23 months. One, two, and three year overall survival rate was 72%, 50% and 30%, respectively. In univariate analysis, the treatment response was revealed as a significant favorable prognostic factor for survival (p<0.001). Grade 3 or worse acute toxicities were leukopenia in 46 (61%), anemia in 5 (6%), thrombocytopenia in 10 (13%), esophagitis in 5 (6%), and pulmonary toxicity in 2 (2%) patients. Of 73 evaluable patients, 40 (55%) patients subsequently had disease progression. The most frequent first site of distant metastasis was brain. Conclusion: Twice daily radiation therapy plus concurrent chemotherapy produced favorable response and survival for LS-SCLC patients with tolerable toxicities. To improve the treatment response, which proved as a significant prognostic factor for survival, there should be further investigations about fractionation scheme, chemotherapy regimens and compatible chemoradiotherapy schedule.
Purpose: A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the efficiency and feasibility of twice daily radiation therapy plus concurrent chemotherapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer in terms of treatment response, survival, patterns of failure, and acute toxicities. Materials and Methods: Between February 1993 and October 2002, 76 patients of histologically proven limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) were treated with twice daily radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy. Male was in 84% (64/76), and median age was 57 years (range, 32-75 years). Thoracic radiation therapy consisted of 120 or 150 cGy per fraction, twice a day at least 6 hours apart, 5 days a week. Median total dose was 50.4 Gy (range, 45-51 Gy). Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of CAV ($cytoxan\;1000mg/m^2,\;adriamycin\;40mg/m^2,\;vincristine\;1mg/m^2$) alternating with PE ($cisplatin\;60mg/m^2,\;etoposide\;100mg/m^2$) or PE alone, every 3 weeks. The median cycle of chemotherapy was six (range, 1-9 cycle). Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was recommended to the patients who achieved a complete response (CR). PCI scheme was 25 Gy/10 fractions. Median follow up was 18 months (range, 1-136 months). Results: Overall response rate was 86%; complete response in 39 (52%) and partial response in 26 (34%) patients. The median overall survival was 23 months. One, two, and three year overall survival rate was 72%, 50% and 30%, respectively. In univariate analysis, the treatment response was revealed as a significant favorable prognostic factor for survival (p<0.001). Grade 3 or worse acute toxicities were leukopenia in 46 (61%), anemia in 5 (6%), thrombocytopenia in 10 (13%), esophagitis in 5 (6%), and pulmonary toxicity in 2 (2%) patients. Of 73 evaluable patients, 40 (55%) patients subsequently had disease progression. The most frequent first site of distant metastasis was brain. Conclusion: Twice daily radiation therapy plus concurrent chemotherapy produced favorable response and survival for LS-SCLC patients with tolerable toxicities. To improve the treatment response, which proved as a significant prognostic factor for survival, there should be further investigations about fractionation scheme, chemotherapy regimens and compatible chemoradiotherapy schedule.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
제안 방법
Radiation therapy used 6 or 10 MV photons. Fraction dose of 120 or 150 cGy, twice daily with at least 6 hours interfraction interval, was given 5 days a week. Total thoracic radiation dose ranged from 45 to 51 Gy with median 50.
One to two months after completion of chemoradiothearpy, response was evaluated with clinical examination, chest X-ray, fiberoptic bronchoscopy and chest CT. A complete response (CR) was defined as the disappearance of all.
Patients with histologically confirmed LS-SCLC, treated between February 1993 and October 2002, were enrolled in this study. Pretreatment staging was done with physical examination, chest X-ray, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, pulmonary function test, computed tomography (CT) scans of chest including liver and adrenals, CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain, radionuclide bone scan, complete blood cell count with differential, and serum chemistry profile. Limited-stage was defined as disease confined to one hemithorax including bilateral mediastinal, ipsilateral hilar and supraclavicular lymph nodes with no pleural effusion.
대상 데이터
Patients with histologically confirmed LS-SCLC, treated between February 1993 and October 2002, were enrolled in this study. Pretreatment staging was done with physical examination, chest X-ray, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, pulmonary function test, computed tomography (CT) scans of chest including liver and adrenals, CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain, radionuclide bone scan, complete blood cell count with differential, and serum chemistry profile.
이론/모형
Survival period was calculated from the first day of treatment to death or last follow up. Survival curves were constructed using Kaplan-Meier method, and Log-rank test was used to evaluate prognostic variables.
성능/효과
In the present study, timing of TRT was varied among patients and the regimen of concurrent chemotherapy was median six cycles of alternating CAV/PE or PE alone. After median follow up of 18 months, median overall survival was 23 months, and one, two, three year overall survival rate was 72%, 50%, 30%, respectively. Better response to chemoradiotherapy was realized in improved survival (p<0.
Median survival was 23 months. One, two and three year overall survival rates was 72%, 50% and 30%, respectively.
후속연구
However, the optimal methods regarding TRT and chemotherapy for LS-SCLC still remain controversial, and further studies are needed to find better ways that can improve treatment response and increase survival.
Twice daily radiation therapy plus concurrent chemotherapy yielded favorable response and survival with tolerable toxicities for LS-SCLC patients. To improve the treatment response, which revealed as a significant prognostic factor for survival, there should be further investigations about fractionation scheme, chemotherapy regimens, and compatible chemoradiotherapy schedule.
참고문헌 (21)
Cancer incidence in Korea 1999-2001, Ministry of Health and Welfare 2005
Annual report of the cause of deaths in Korea, Ministry of Health and Welfare 2004
Scientific Committee of Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Disease. National survey of lung cancer in Korea. J Korean Aca Tuber Res Dis 1999;46:455-465
Turrisi AT 3rd, Kim K, Blum R, et al. Twice-daily compared with once-daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer treated concurrently with cisplatin and etoposide. N Engl J Med 1999;340:265-271
Warde P, Payne D. Does thoracic irradiation improve survival and local control in limited-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung? A meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:890-895
Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF. Toxicity criteria of the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995;31:1341-1346
Ihde DC, Pass HI, Glatstein E. Cancer of the lung. In: DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds. Cancer: principles & practice of oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven. 1997:849- 949
Fukuoka M, Furuse K, Saijo N, et al. Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus cisplatin and etoposide versus alternation of these regimens in small cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991;83:855-861
Sandler AB. Current management of small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol 1997;24:462-476
Carney DN, Mitchell JB, Kinsella TJ. In vitro radiation and chemotherapy sensitivity of established cell lines of human small cell lung cancer and its large cell morphologic variants. Cancer Res 1983;43:2806-2811
Kim JS, Kim JS, Kim JO, Kim SY, Cho MJ. Once vs. twice daily thoracic irradiation in limited stage small cell lung cancer. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 1998;16:291-301
Fried DB, Morris DE, Hensing TA, et al. A meta-analysis evaluating the timing of thoracic radiation therapy in combined modality therapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;57:S139-140
Goldie JH, Coldman AJ. A mathematical model for relating sensitivity of tumors to their spontaneous mutation rate. Cancer Treat Rep 1979;63:1727-1733
Tayler CW, Crowley J, Williamson SK, et al. Treatment of small cell lung cancer with an alternating chemotherapy regimen given at weekly intervals: a Southwest oncology group pilot study. J Clin Oncol 1990;8:1811-1817
Choi JH. Chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer. J Lung Cancer 2003;2:91-99
Stupp R, Monnerat C, Turrisi AT 3rd, Perry MC, Leyvraz S. Small cell lung cancer: state of the art and future perspectives. Lung Cancer 2004;45:105-117
Auperin A, Arriagada R, Pignon JP, et al. Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission. N Engl J Med 1999;341:476-484
Arriagada R, Le Chevalier T, Riviere A, et al. Patterns of failure after prophylactic cranial irradiation in small-cell lung cancer: analysis of 505 randomized patients. Ann Oncol 2002;13: 748-754
Bogart JA, Herndon JE 2nd, Lyss AP, et al. 70 Gy thoracic radiotherapy is feasible concurrent with chemotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: analysis of Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 39808. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;59:460-468
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.