$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

라디오 광고에서 언어 힘의 설득 효과와 정보원 성(性)의 영향
The Effects of Power-of-Speech and Sex of Source on Persuasion, in Radio CM 원문보기

마케팅과학연구 = Journal of Korean academy of marketing science, v.16 no.1, 2006년, pp.93 - 116  

천현숙 (중앙대 광고홍보학과) ,  리대룡 (중앙대 광고홍보학과)

초록

본 연구의 목적은 라디오 광고에서 정보원이 사용하는 언어 힘이 설득에 효과가 있는지를 관찰하고, 그 효과를 정보원의 성 그 자체의 효과와 비교해 봤을 때 과연 어떤 것이 설득을 결정하는 더 큰 요소인지를 알아보는 데 있다. 이 문제와 관련하여 선행 연구들은 일관성 없는 결괄르 보여주었다. 어떤 연구는 오디오 커뮤니케이션에서 언어 힘의 설득 효과는 학자의 성에 달려있다고 주장했고(Carli, 1990), 또 어ㅏ떤 연구는 오디오 커뮤니케이션에서 언어 힘의 설득 효과는 학자의 성에 관계없이 나타나는 굳건한 효과임을 주장했다(Holtgraves & Lasky, 1999; Erickson, Lind, Johnson, & O'Barr, 1978). 이에 본 연구는 라디오 광고에서 언어 힘과 정보원 성의 상호작용을 관찰함으로써 언어 힘의 설득 효과에 정보원의 성이 어떤 영향을 미치는지에 대한 실험적 증거를 제시하고자 했다. 실험 결과, 라디오 광고에서 정보원이 사용하는 언어 힘은 설득에 강한 효과가 있으며, 그 효과는 정보원 성의 영향을 받지 않는다는 것이 밝혀졌다. 이는 언어 힘의 지위 효과가 성의 지위 효과보다 더 강력하다는 것을 함축한다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The main purpose of this study is to examine whether power-of-speech have an impact on persuasion in radio CM and to determine what is stronger variable either power-of-speech or sex of source. Previous research showed confused result about this issue. Some research supposed the effect of power-of-s...

주제어

참고문헌 (76)

  1. 마케팅과학연구 김경훈, 박진용, 김동율 문학일 233 6 2000 

  2. 광고연구 김완석 권윤숙 31 34 1997 

  3. 마케탕과학 연구 박영봉 김송병 159 2 1998 

  4. 마케팅과 학연 구 박영봉 이희욱 하태길 181 7 2001 

  5. 마 케 팅과학연구 박종원, 윤성준 최동춘 59 12 2003 

  6. 광고홍보연구 이상빈 오병수 79 7 1 1999 

  7. 마케 팅과학연 구 이숭인 정회진 43 1 1998 

  8. 한국광고홍보학보 천현숙 리대룡 7 8 1 2000 

  9. The Nature of Prejudice Allprot G. W. 1954 

  10. Areni, Charles S., Sparks, John R.. Language power and persuasion. Psychology & marketing, vol.22, no.6, 507-525.

  11. Aronovitch, Charles D.. The Voice of Personality: Stereotyped Judgments and their Relation to Voice Quality and Sex of Speaker. The Journal of social psychology, vol.99, no.2, 207-220.

  12. Language and Social Knowledge: Uncertainty in Interpersonal Relations Berger C. R. 1982 

  13. Expectation States Theory: A Theoretic Research Program Berger J. 163 1974 

  14. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach Berger J. 1977 

  15. Berger, J, Rosenholtz, S J, Zelditch, M. Status Organizing Processes. Annual review of sociology, vol.6, 479-508.

  16. Blankenship, Kevin L., Holtgraves, Thomas. The Role of Different Markers of Linguistic Powerlessness in Persuasion. Journal of language and social psychology, vol.24, no.1, 3-24.

  17. Bradac, James J., Hemphill, Michael R., Tardy, Charles H.. Language style on trial: Effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech upon judgments of victims and villains. Western journal of speech communication : WJSC, vol.45, no.4, 327-341.

  18. Bradac, J.J., Konsky, C.W., Elliott, N.D.. Verbal behavior of interviewees: The effects of several situational variables on verbal productivity, disfluency, and lexical diversity. Journal of communication disorders, vol.9, no.3, 211-225.

  19. Bradac, James J., Mulac, Anthony. A molecular view of powerful and powerless speech styles: Attributional consequences of specific language features and communicator intentions. Communication monographs, vol.51, no.4, 307-319.

  20. Bradac, James J., Mulac, Anthony. Attributional Consequences of Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles in a Crisis-Intervention Context. Journal of language and social psychology, vol.3, no.1, 1-19.

  21. Bradac, James J., Street Jr., Richard L.. Powerful and powerless styles of talk: A theoretical analysis of language and impression formation. Research on language and social interaction, vol.23, no.1, 195-241.

  22. Brennan, Susan E., Williams, Maurice. The feeling of another's knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of memory and language, vol.34, no.3, 383-398.

  23. Burgoon, Michael J., Jones, Stephen B., Stewart, Diane. TOWARD A MESSAGE-CENTERED THEORY OF PERSUASION: THREE EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF LANGUAGE INTENSITY. Human communication research, vol.1, no.3, 240-256.

  24. Language and Gender: Interdisciplinary Perspectives Cameron D. 31 1995 

  25. Carli, Linda L.. Gender, language, and influence.. Journal of personality and social psychology, vol.59, no.5, 941-951.

  26. Chaiken, Shelly. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.. Journal of personality and social psychology, vol.39, no.5, 752-766.

  27. Social Influence: The Ontario Symposium Chaiken S. 3 1987 

  28. Chaiken, Shelly, Eagly, Alice H.. Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility.. Journal of personality and social psychology, vol.34, no.4, 605-614.

  29. Chaiken, Shelly, Eagly, Alice H.. Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience.. Journal of personality and social psychology, vol.45, no.2, 241-256.

  30. Unintended Thought: Limits of Awareness, Intention, and Control Chaiken S. 212 1989 

  31. Chaiken, S., Maheswaran, D.. Heuristic Processing Can Bias Systematic Processing: Effects of Source Credibility, Argument Ambiguity, and Task Importance on Attitude Judgment. Journal of personality and social psychology, vol.66, no.3, 460-.

  32. Crosby, Faye, Nyquist, Linda. The female register: an empirical study of Lakoff's hypotheses. Language in society, vol.6, no.3, 313-322.

  33. Interaction rhythms: Periodicity in communication behavior Crown C. L. 1982 

  34. Dubois, Betty Lou, Crouch, Isabel. The question of tag questions in women's speech: they don't really use more of them, do they?↓. Language in society, vol.4, no.3, 289-294.

  35. Eagly, Alice H.. Gender and social influence: A social psychological analysis.. The American psychologist, vol.38, no.9, 971-981.

  36. New Directions in Attribution Research Eagly A. H. 37 6 1981 

  37. Child discourse Edelsky C. 1977 

  38. Erickson, Bonnie, Lind, E.Allan, Johnson, Bruce C, O'Barr, William M. Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech. Journal of experimental social psychology, vol.14, no.3, 266-279.

  39. 10.1525/sp.1978.25.4.03a00050 

  40. Gibbons, Pamela, Busch, Jon, Bradac, James J.. Powerful Versus Powerless Language: Consequences for Persuasion, Impression Formation, and Cognitive Response. Journal of language and social psychology, vol.10, no.2, 115-133.

  41. Speech Style and Social Evaluation Giles H. 1975 

  42. Journal, of Psychology Goldberg P. A. 309 26 1974 

  43. Grob, Lindsey M., Meyers, Renee A., Schuh, Renee. Powerful/powerless language use in group interactions: Sex differences or similarities?. Communication quarterly, vol.45, no.3, 282-303.

  44. Hannah, Annette, Murachver, Tamar. Gender and Conversational Style as Predictors of Conversational Behavior. Journal of language and social psychology, vol.18, no.2, 153-174.

  45. Holtgraves, Thomas. Styles of language use: Individual and cultural variability in conversational indirectness.. Journal of personality and social psychology, vol.73, no.3, 624-637.

  46. Language as social action Holtgraves T. 2001 

  47. Holtgraves, Thomas, Lasky, Benjamin. Linguistic Power and Persuasion. Journal of language and social psychology, vol.18, no.2, 196-205.

  48. HOSMAN, LAWRENCE A.. The Evaluative Consequences of Hedges, Hesitations, and Intensifiers: "Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles". Human communication research, vol.15, no.3, 383-406.

  49. Hosman, Lawrence A., Siltanen, Susan A.. The attributional and evaluative consequences of powerful and powerless speech styles: An examination of the ‘control over others’ and ‘control of self’ explanations. Language & communication, vol.14, no.3, 287-298.

  50. Hosman, Lawrence A., Wright II, John W.. The effects of hedges and hesitations on impression formation in a simulated courtroom context. Western journal of speech communication : WJSC, vol.51, no.2, 173-188.

  51. Women's Studies in Communication Johnson C. 37 10 1987 10.1080/07491409.1987.11089703 

  52. Johnson, Craig, Vinson, Larry. Placement and frequency of powerless talk and impression formation. Communication quarterly, vol.38, no.4, 325-333.

  53. Attitudes toward Language Variation: Social and Applied Contexts Kramarae C. 84 1982 

  54. Language and woman's place Lakoff R. T. 1975 

  55. Language and social psychology Lind E. A. 66 1979 

  56. 10.2307/1251955 

  57. Meeker, B F, Weitzel-O'Neill, P A. Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in task-oriented groups.. American sociological review, vol.42, no.1, 91-105.

  58. Miller, Norman, Maruyama, Geoffrey, Beaber, Rex J., Valone, Keith. Speed of speech and persuasion.. Journal of personality and social psychology, vol.34, no.4, 615-624.

  59. Mischel, Harriet N.. Sex bias in the evaluation of professional achievements.. Journal of educational psychology, vol.66, no.2, 157-166.

  60. Mulac, Anthony, Incontro, Carol R., James, Margaret R.. Comparison of the gender-linked language effect and sex role stereotypes.. Journal of personality and social psychology, vol.49, no.4, 1098-1109.

  61. Language and Speech Mulac A. 243 25 3 1982 10.1177/002383098202500303 

  62. Mulac, Anthony, Wiemann, John M., Widenmann, Sally J., Gibson, Toni W.. Male/female language differences and effects in same‐sex and mixed‐sex dyads: The gender‐linked language effect. Communication monographs, vol.55, no.4, 315-335.

  63. Munch, James M., Swasy, John L.. Rhetorical Question, Summarization Frequency, and Argument Strength Effects on Recall. The Journal of consumer research, vol.15, no.1, 69-76.

  64. Newcombe, Nora, Arnkoff, Diane B.. Effects of speech style and sex of speaker on person perception.. Journal of personality and social psychology, vol.37, no.8, 1293-1303.

  65. Linguistic Evidence O'Barr W. M. 1982 

  66. Oxoby, Robert J. Status characteristics, cognitive bias, and incentives in teams. The Journal of socio-economics, vol.31, no.3, 301-316.

  67. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1 

  68. Ridgeway, Cecilia L., Berger, Joseph. Expectations, Legitimation, and Dominance Behavior in Task Groups. American sociological review, vol.51, no.5, 603-617.

  69. Language and Speech Smith B. L. 145 18 2 1975 10.1177/002383097501800203 

  70. Sparks, John R, Areni, Charles S. The effects of sales presentation quality and initial perceptions on persuasion: a multiple role perspective. Journal of business research, vol.55, no.6, 517-528.

  71. Sparks, John R., Areni, Charles S., Cox, K. Chris. An investigation of the effects of language style and communication modality on persuasion. Communication monographs, vol.65, no.2, 108-125.

  72. Street Jr., Richard L., Brady, Robert M., Lee, Raymond. Evaluative responses to communicators: The effects of speech rate, sex, and interaction context. Western journal of speech communication : WJSC, vol.48, no.1, 14-27.

  73. Attitudes toward language variation Street Jr R.L. 175 1982 

  74. Wanitzek, Ulrike. The Power of Language in the Discourse on Women's Rights: Some Examples from Tanzania. Africa today, vol.49, no.1, 3-19.

  75. Williams, JohnE., Bennett, SusanM.. The definition of sex stereotypes via the adjective check list. Sex roles, vol.1, no.4,

  76. Western Journal of Speech Communication Wright Jr J.W. 14 48 1 1983 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로