$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

스포츠웨어 선택기준 집단의 추구혜택, 국내 및 해외 브랜드에 대한 태도, 스포츠웨어 선호이미지
Sportswear Evaluative Criteria Segments: Benefits Sought, Attitudes toward Imported and Domestic Brands, and Sportswear Image Preferences 원문보기

한국의류학회지 = Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, v.31 no.12, 2007년, pp.1742 - 1753  

황진숙 (건국대학교 의상학과)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구는 스포츠웨어 선택기준으로 스포츠웨어 시장을 세분화하고 세분화된 시장간 스포츠웨어 추구 혜택, 국내 및 해외 브랜드에 대한 태도, 스포츠웨어 선호이미지의 차이를 보고자 하였다. 자료수집은 서울에 거주하는 성인남녀를 대상으로 총 773부의 설문지를 통계분석에 사용하였다. 통계는 요인분석, 군집분석, t-test, 카이 검정을 사용하였으며, 자료분석 결과 스포츠웨어 시장은 브랜드/디자인, 기능성 중심의 두 세분시장으로 나누어졌으며 두 세분시장은 스포츠웨어 추구혜택, 국내 및 해외 브랜드에 대한 태도, 스포츠웨어 선호이미지에서 유의한 차이를 나타냈다. 브랜드/디자인을 중요한 선택기준으로 하는 세분시장은 스포츠웨어 추구혜택으로 이성어필/인상향상, 개성, 신분과시를 추구하며 해외 브랜드에 대해 긍정적인 태도를 나타냈고, 고급스러운 이미지의 스포츠웨어를 선호하였다. 반면 기능성을 중시하는 세분시장은 편안함을 추구하였고, 국내 브랜드에 긍정적인 태도를 보였으며, 단순하고 활동적인 이미지의 스포츠웨어를 선호하였다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The purposes of this study were to segment consumer groups by evaluative criteria and to find the differences among the groups in regard to sportswear benefits sought, domestic and imported brand attitudes, and sportswear image preferences. The subjects used for the study were 773 male and female co...

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

제안 방법

  • A principal component factor analysis with varimax rotation was conducted to identify evaluative criteria factors. Using eigen-values of one or greater, three evaluative criteria factors were identified in <Table 1>.
  • A principal component factor analysis with varimax rotation was conducted to identify sportswear image preference factors. Using eigen-values of one or greater, four image factors were identified in <Table 7.
  • The measures of previous studies which were frequently cited and had diverse items were used. Because of lack of previous measures dealing with sportswear, the study conducted a pre-test. In the pre-test, 70 male and female adult consumers were asked to write down the benefits they want in sportswear, criteria they used in purchasing sportswear, and preferred sportswear image.
  • First, the study segmented the consumers based on evaluative criteria. Second, the study investigated the differences between the segments in regard to sportswear benefits sought.
  • The puiposes of this study were to segment Korean sportswear market by sportswear evaluative criteria and to identify the profiles of each segment with sportswear benefits, attitudes toward imported and domestic brands, and sportswear image preferences. Despite the dominance of imported brands in sportswear mket, there were very few studies regarding attitudes toward imported and domestic sportswear brands.
  • The purposes of the study were to segment Korean sportswear market by sportswear evaluative criteria and to identify the profiles of each segment with sportswear benefits, attitudes toward imported and domestic brands, and sportswear image preferences. The summary of the results were as followed.
  • The questionnaire was developed based on previous studies and a pre-test. The measures of previous studies which were frequently cited and had diverse items were used.
  • and apathetic users of clothing. The researchers found the differences among the segments concerning psychographics, shopping orientation, store patronage behavior, and demographics. Lee and Lim(1998b) investigated clothing benefits sought by women aged 30 to 49 and identified five dimensions of clothing benefits sought: brand, individuality, fashion, activity, and economics.
  • Second, the study investigated the differences between the segments in regard to sportswear benefits sought. Third, the study investigated the differences between the segments in regard to attitudes toward domestic and imported sportswear brands. Fourth, the study investigated the differences between the segments in regard to sportswear image preferences.
  • To develop the demographic profiles of the two sportswear groups, chi-square was calculated to investigate the differences of groups in age, sex, education level, occupation, marital status, and income in <Table 9>. The results showed that the groups were different in regard to age, education level, occupation, marital status, and income.

대상 데이터

  • Data were collected through distributing questionnaires to adults aged 20 years and older during October, 2002. Approximately 800 questionnaires were administered, and 773 completed questionnaires were used for data analysis. The characteristics of the respondents were described by following.
  • who were residents in Seoul, Korea. Data were collected through distributing questionnaires to adults aged 20 years and older during October, 2002. Approximately 800 questionnaires were administered, and 773 completed questionnaires were used for data analysis.
  • The subjects of the study were sportswear purchasers who were residents in Seoul, Korea. Data were collected through distributing questionnaires to adults aged 20 years and older during October, 2002.

데이터처리

  • The result of cluster analysis showed that there were two groups of sportswear segments. T-test was used to investigate the differences between two groups in regard to the sportswear criteria factors, and the groups were named based on the t-test result in <Table 2>. Brand/ design-oriented group included 349 respondents and the group members considered brand/fashion and design more important while the function group included 422 respondents and the respondents considered function as more important sportswear criterion.
  • The statistical analyses used for the study were factor analysis, cluster analysis, t-test, and chi-square test. Factor analysis was used to identify factors of evaluative criteria, sportswear benefits sought, and sportswear image preferences.
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (42)

  1. Ahn, S. H., Suh, Y. H., & Suh, M. S. (2000). An exploratory research on hierarchical causality of personal value, benefits sought and clothing product attributes. Journal of Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 24(5), 652-662 

  2. Ahtola, O. T. (1985). Hedonic and utilitarian aspect of consumer behavior: An attitudinal perspective. Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 7-10 

  3. Baron, R. A. & Byrne, D. (1987). Social Psychology: Understanding human interaction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon 

  4. Beaudoin, P. (1994). Fashion leaders' ethnocentrism and attitude toward buying domestic and imported apparel. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, FL 

  5. Beaudoin, P., Moore, M. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2000). Fashion leaders' and followers' attitudes toward buying domestic and imported apparel. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 18(1), 56-64 

  6. Blackwell, R. D., Miniard, P. W., & Engel, J. F. (2001). Consumer Behavior (9th ed.). South-Western Thomson Learning: Cincinnati, OH 

  7. Cassil, N. L. & Drake, M. F. (1987). Apparel selection criteria related to female consumers' lifestyle. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 6(1), 20-28 

  8. Chae, J. & Rhee, E. (2005). Attitude and purchase frequency toward foreign luxury goods related to age and social stratification variables. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 29(6), 885-895 

  9. Chung, I. & Rhee, E. (1992). A study on clothing images: Their constructing factors and evaluative dimensions. Journal of the Society of Clothing and Textiles, 16(4), 379-391 

  10. Dickerson, K. G. (1987). Relative importance of country of origin as an attribute in apparel choices. Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 11(4), 333-343 

  11. Eastlick, M. A. & Feinberg, R. A. (1995). Differences in attitudes toward catalog retailers of apparel among social/economic risk orientation groups. Clothing and Textile Research Journal, 13(4), 220-226 

  12. Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1990). Consumer behavior. Chicago: The Dryden Press 

  13. Ericksen, M. K. & Sirgy, M. J. (1989). Achievement motivation and clothing behavior: A self image congruence analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 307-326 

  14. Fiore, A. M. & Darnhorst, M. L. (1992). Intrinsic cues as predictors of perceived quality of apparel. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 5, 168-178 

  15. Overwhelming outdoor wear in sportswear market. (2005, 6). Fashion Channel, p.38-42 

  16. Forney, J. C., Park, E. J., & Brandon, L. (2005). Effects of evaluative criteria on fashion brand extension. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 9(2), 156-165 

  17. Hirschmen, E. C. & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(Summer), 92-101 

  18. Hong, K. (1996). A study on the dimension of consumers' attitudes and brand image toward imported casual brands. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing & Textiles, 20(6), 1096-1106 

  19. Huddleston, P., Cassill, N. L., & Hamilton, L. K. (1993). Apparel selection criteria as predictors of brand orientation. Clothing and Textile Research Journal, 12(1), 51-56 

  20. Hwang, J. (2004). Sportswear benefits segments: Attitude toward domestic and imported brands, shopping attitude, and purchasing behavior. Journal of Korean Society of clothing and Textiles, 28(5), 690-700 

  21. Hwang, J. (2005). The effect of Desired Sportswear Benefits on Sportswear Image Preferences and Store Patronage. Korean Home Economics Association, 43(4), 65-78 

  22. Hwang, J. & Na, Y. J. (1999). The relationships between body-cathexis and clothing image preferences in male college students. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 49, 65-72 

  23. Jenkins, M. C. (1973). Clothing and textile evaluative criteria: Basis for benefit segmentation and reflection of underlying values. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, OR 

  24. Jenkins, M. C. & Dickey, L. F. (1976). Consumer types based On evaluative criteria underlying clothing decisions. Home Economics Research Journal, 4, 150-162 

  25. Kaiser, S. (1990). The social psychology of clothing. NY: Macmillan 

  26. Kim, E. A. & Lee, M. H. (1992). Clothing image and clothing design preferences relating to personal values. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 18, 269-281 

  27. Kim, J. H. & Hong, K. H. (2000). A study on shopping orientation and information source by male's clothing benefits. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing & Textiles, 18(2), 263-272 

  28. Koh, A. (1994). Consumer intention to purchase domestic/foreign brand jeans: Beliefs, attitude, and individual characteristics. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing & Textiles, 18(2), 263-272 

  29. Korea Fashion Association. (2003). Women's and men's market analysis. Seoul 

  30. Lee, R. & Lee, M. (2004). A study on consumer's value, sportswear benefits sought and attribute evaluation. The Research Journal of the Costume Studies, 12(6), 1031-1044 

  31. Lee, M. H. (1997). Brand selection of shirts and jeans relating to consumers' characteristics: A comparative study between domestic and foreign brand. Journal of Korean Home Economics Association, 35(1), 263-275 

  32. Lee, S. H. & Lim, S. J. (1998a). A study on consumers' response to domestic/foreign brand women's apparel Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing & Textiles, 22(4), 493-502 

  33. Lee, S. H. & Lim, S. J. (1998b). A study on benefit sought of clothing and clothing style preferences by fashion leadership. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing & Textiles, 22(7), 942-951 

  34. Lee, S. H. & Lim, S. J. (2003). A study on market segmentation through clothes image preferences and benefit (Part 1). Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 27(1), 100-110 

  35. Oh, J. M. & Huh, K. S. (1995). A study on the development of jeans via conjoint analysis. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 19(3), 448-462 

  36. Park, H. & Dickerson, K. G. (2002). Attitudes, subjective norms and behavioral intentions toward purchasing imported casual clothing. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 26(12), 1791-1803 

  37. Peter, J. P. & Olson, J. C. (1987). Consumer behavior. Homewood, IL: Irwin, Inc 

  38. Ryou, E. J. & Lim, S. J. (1998). A study on consumer's value systems and clothing behavior. Journal of Korean Society of clothing and Textiles, 22(6), 749-759 

  39. Schiffman, L. G. & Kanuk, L. L. (1994). Consumer behavior. NJ: Prentice Hall 

  40. Shim, S. & Bickle, M. C. (1994). Benefit segments of the female apparel market: Psychographies, shopping orientations, and demographics. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12(2), 1-12 

  41. Solomon, M. R. & Rabolt, N. J. (2004). Consumer behavior in fashion. NJ: Pearson Education, Inc 

  42. Xu, Y. & Paulins, V. A. (2005). College students' attitude toward shopping online for apparel product-exploring a rural versus urban campus. Journal of fashion Marketing and Management, 9(4), 1361-2026 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로