The most important bases of maritime laws in China are laws enacted by Constitution, a legislative institution of National People's Congress and Legislation of NPC Standing Committee. However, in reality, the institution, which become the basis of Chinese marine policy and leads overall maritime aff...
The most important bases of maritime laws in China are laws enacted by Constitution, a legislative institution of National People's Congress and Legislation of NPC Standing Committee. However, in reality, the institution, which become the basis of Chinese marine policy and leads overall maritime affairs, is a State Council of the Chinese central government and many objects of our researches on Chinese marine policy and laws are composed centering on this administration law. Therefore, in understanding Chinese maritime laws, it becomes an important prerequisite to understand relevant laws (statutes), administration law, statutes of local province, mutual authority relationships of these legislative institutions, and interpretation authority regarding laws (statutes). In May 2003, Chinese State Council ratified and declared ${\ll}$Guideline of the national maritime economic development plan${\gg}$ and this is the first macroinstructive document enacted by the Chinese government for promoting maritime economy in integration development. This plan guideline shows very well a new policy and deployment direction of maritime policy in China. China is already striving to lead its maintenance stage of domestic legislation into a new stage under the UN maritime laws agreement system and this is an expression of intention to take national policy regarding the ocean as a new milestone for the national economy through concurrent developments in various fields such as national territory, economy, science technology, national defense, and maritime biology. In this point, Chinese maritime policy and maritime legislation provide lots of indexes of lessons in many parts. In particular, regarding Korea, which has to solve many issues with China in Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and Balhae, we have to realize that we can maximize national interest only with a systematic approach to research on changes of domestic policies and maritime legislation within China. In addition, in understanding Chinese maritime related laws, we have to realize it is an important task to not only understand legislative subjects for mutual creation of order within the entire frame of law orders of China but also to predict and react to direction of policy of Chinese domestic legislation through dynamics of these subjects.
The most important bases of maritime laws in China are laws enacted by Constitution, a legislative institution of National People's Congress and Legislation of NPC Standing Committee. However, in reality, the institution, which become the basis of Chinese marine policy and leads overall maritime affairs, is a State Council of the Chinese central government and many objects of our researches on Chinese marine policy and laws are composed centering on this administration law. Therefore, in understanding Chinese maritime laws, it becomes an important prerequisite to understand relevant laws (statutes), administration law, statutes of local province, mutual authority relationships of these legislative institutions, and interpretation authority regarding laws (statutes). In May 2003, Chinese State Council ratified and declared ${\ll}$Guideline of the national maritime economic development plan${\gg}$ and this is the first macroinstructive document enacted by the Chinese government for promoting maritime economy in integration development. This plan guideline shows very well a new policy and deployment direction of maritime policy in China. China is already striving to lead its maintenance stage of domestic legislation into a new stage under the UN maritime laws agreement system and this is an expression of intention to take national policy regarding the ocean as a new milestone for the national economy through concurrent developments in various fields such as national territory, economy, science technology, national defense, and maritime biology. In this point, Chinese maritime policy and maritime legislation provide lots of indexes of lessons in many parts. In particular, regarding Korea, which has to solve many issues with China in Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and Balhae, we have to realize that we can maximize national interest only with a systematic approach to research on changes of domestic policies and maritime legislation within China. In addition, in understanding Chinese maritime related laws, we have to realize it is an important task to not only understand legislative subjects for mutual creation of order within the entire frame of law orders of China but also to predict and react to direction of policy of Chinese domestic legislation through dynamics of these subjects.
중국 문헌에 의하면 대륙 해안은 약 18,000 km에 달하고 도서 해안은 약 14,000 km에 달한다3). 중국은 500평방미터 이상의 섬이 6,500개 이상에 이르고 대부분의 섬은 근해에 분포하고 있다.
도서 해안은 몇 km에 달하는가?
중국 문헌에 의하면 대륙 해안은 약 18,000 km에 달하고 도서 해안은 약 14,000 km에 달한다3). 중국은 500평방미터 이상의 섬이 6,500개 이상에 이르고 대부분의 섬은 근해에 분포하고 있다.
중극 근해에 분포한 500평방미터 이상의 섬들이 경제권 형성 여건을 동시에 갖추고 있는 이유는 무엇인가?
중국은 500평방미터 이상의 섬이 6,500개 이상에 이르고 대부분의 섬은 근해에 분포하고 있다. 이들 섬은 중국과의 해양경계획정을 요하는 국가간에 중요한 작용을 하고 있으며 주로 해안선과 가까운 거리를 유지하고 있기 때문에 해안과 섬을 중심으로 경제권 형성 여건을 동시에 갖추고 있다4).
참고문헌 (31)
郭道暉. 1988. 中國立法制度. 人民出版社, 北京. 184 p
郭道暉. 1998. 當代中國立法. 中國民主法制出版社, 北京. 603 p
國家海洋局政策法規辦公室編. 1998. 中華人民共和國海洋法 規選編. 海洋出版社, 北京. 479 p
金羽. 1993. 登小平思想寶庫. 紅旗出版社, 北京. 393 p
杜之. 1981. 中外條約關係之變遷. 中央文物供應社, 台北. 306 p
馬懷德. 1999. 中國立法體制·程序與監督. 中國法制出版社, 北京. 375 p
양희철, 박성욱, 권문상. 2004. 해양경계획정제도에 대한 중국의 입장과 통킹만 사례 고찰. Ocean and Polar Res., 26(4), 669-678
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.