본 연구는 6개월 이상의 만성 비치성 구강안면통증(orofacial pain, OFP) 환자들을 대상으로 통증으로 인한 사회심리적 영향을 평가하고, 대학병원의 구강안면통증 전문클리닉에 내원한 OFP 환자들의 임상적 특성(유발사건, 이전 치료병력 등)을 조사하고자 하였다. 연구를 위하여 2008년 9월부터 6개월간 단국대학교 치과대학 부속 치과병원 구강내과 구강안면통증클리닉에 내원한 초진환자 중 OFP 환자들의 초진시 진료기록과 면담 전 대기실에서 작성한 만성통증척도(Graded Chronic Pain Scale, GCPS) 설문지를 조사분석하였다. 본원에 지난 6개월간 내원한 다양한 비치성 구강안면통증 572 명의 환자들 중 63%는 이전 치료 경험이 있었고 약물치료, 상담, 물리치료의 순으로 빈도가 높았고, 전문과목은 일반치과와 정형외과의 순서였다. 환자들의 89.2%는 턱관절장애였고 6.4%는 삼차신경통을 포함한 신경병성동통, 4.5%는 2가지 이상의 OFP가 공존하는 복합성 안면통증(mixed OFP)이었다. 통증의 발생과 관련한 유발요인에 대해서는 환자들의 약 35%가 인지하고 있었으며, 외상, 치과치료의 순으로 빈도가 높았다. OFP 환자의 약 반 정도(46%)는 만성 통증을 가진 환자였으며, 이 중 40%에 이르는 많은 환자들이 구강안면통증으로 인하여 일상적인 활동과 사회적 활동 및 업무능력에 상당히 제한(high disability)을 받는다고 보고하였다. 여성일수록, 나이가 많을수록, 통증병력이 길수록(>5년) 그리고 턱관절장애보다는 신경병성 통증과 복합성 구강안면통증 환자들이 더 심한 사회심리적 활동제한을 보였다.(p=0.000) 이러한 연구결과는 환자가 자신의 만성통증에 수반되는 사회적, 심리적 장애(disability)를 잘 이해할 수 있도록 사회심리적 지원이 필요하며, 가능한 한 조기에 전문가에게 내원하여 정확한 진단을 받을 필요가 있음을 보여준다.
본 연구는 6개월 이상의 만성 비치성 구강안면통증(orofacial pain, OFP) 환자들을 대상으로 통증으로 인한 사회심리적 영향을 평가하고, 대학병원의 구강안면통증 전문클리닉에 내원한 OFP 환자들의 임상적 특성(유발사건, 이전 치료병력 등)을 조사하고자 하였다. 연구를 위하여 2008년 9월부터 6개월간 단국대학교 치과대학 부속 치과병원 구강내과 구강안면통증클리닉에 내원한 초진환자 중 OFP 환자들의 초진시 진료기록과 면담 전 대기실에서 작성한 만성통증척도(Graded Chronic Pain Scale, GCPS) 설문지를 조사분석하였다. 본원에 지난 6개월간 내원한 다양한 비치성 구강안면통증 572 명의 환자들 중 63%는 이전 치료 경험이 있었고 약물치료, 상담, 물리치료의 순으로 빈도가 높았고, 전문과목은 일반치과와 정형외과의 순서였다. 환자들의 89.2%는 턱관절장애였고 6.4%는 삼차신경통을 포함한 신경병성동통, 4.5%는 2가지 이상의 OFP가 공존하는 복합성 안면통증(mixed OFP)이었다. 통증의 발생과 관련한 유발요인에 대해서는 환자들의 약 35%가 인지하고 있었으며, 외상, 치과치료의 순으로 빈도가 높았다. OFP 환자의 약 반 정도(46%)는 만성 통증을 가진 환자였으며, 이 중 40%에 이르는 많은 환자들이 구강안면통증으로 인하여 일상적인 활동과 사회적 활동 및 업무능력에 상당히 제한(high disability)을 받는다고 보고하였다. 여성일수록, 나이가 많을수록, 통증병력이 길수록(>5년) 그리고 턱관절장애보다는 신경병성 통증과 복합성 구강안면통증 환자들이 더 심한 사회심리적 활동제한을 보였다.(p=0.000) 이러한 연구결과는 환자가 자신의 만성통증에 수반되는 사회적, 심리적 장애(disability)를 잘 이해할 수 있도록 사회심리적 지원이 필요하며, 가능한 한 조기에 전문가에게 내원하여 정확한 진단을 받을 필요가 있음을 보여준다.
The aim of the study was to evaluate psychosocial impact of non-dental chronic orofacial pain (OFP) on daily living using the graded chronic pain (GCP) scale. It is also investigated the clinical profile such as demographics, event related to initiation of OFP and prior treatments for patients. Duri...
The aim of the study was to evaluate psychosocial impact of non-dental chronic orofacial pain (OFP) on daily living using the graded chronic pain (GCP) scale. It is also investigated the clinical profile such as demographics, event related to initiation of OFP and prior treatments for patients. During previous 6 months since September 2008, 572 patients (M:F=1:1.5, mean age=34.7 years) with non-dental OFP attended university-based specialist orofacial pain clinic (Dankook University Dental Hospital, Cheonan) to seek care although 63% of them already experienced related treatment for their OFP problem. They visited the most frequently general dental practitioner and orthopedic doctors due to their pain problem and medication was the most commonly employed modality. Most of the patients (89.2%) had TMD and the most common related event to initiation of their pain was trauma, followed by dental treatment. Almost half of the patients (46%) suffered from chronic pain(${\geq}6\;M$) and 40% of them exhibited relatively high disability due to chronic OFP. GCP pain intensity and disability days were significantly different for age and diagnosis (p<0.05) but not for gender and duration. GCP grades were affected by all the factors including gender, age, pain duration and diagnosis.(p=0.000) Female gender, elders, and long lasting pain were closely related to high disability. The patients with neuropathic Pain and mixed OFP rather than TMD were graded as being highly disabled. Conclusively, a considerable percentage of chronic OFP patients reports high pain-related disability in their daily, social and work activity, which suggest a need for psychosocial support and importance of earlier referral for appropriate diagnosis and tailored management.
The aim of the study was to evaluate psychosocial impact of non-dental chronic orofacial pain (OFP) on daily living using the graded chronic pain (GCP) scale. It is also investigated the clinical profile such as demographics, event related to initiation of OFP and prior treatments for patients. During previous 6 months since September 2008, 572 patients (M:F=1:1.5, mean age=34.7 years) with non-dental OFP attended university-based specialist orofacial pain clinic (Dankook University Dental Hospital, Cheonan) to seek care although 63% of them already experienced related treatment for their OFP problem. They visited the most frequently general dental practitioner and orthopedic doctors due to their pain problem and medication was the most commonly employed modality. Most of the patients (89.2%) had TMD and the most common related event to initiation of their pain was trauma, followed by dental treatment. Almost half of the patients (46%) suffered from chronic pain(${\geq}6\;M$) and 40% of them exhibited relatively high disability due to chronic OFP. GCP pain intensity and disability days were significantly different for age and diagnosis (p<0.05) but not for gender and duration. GCP grades were affected by all the factors including gender, age, pain duration and diagnosis.(p=0.000) Female gender, elders, and long lasting pain were closely related to high disability. The patients with neuropathic Pain and mixed OFP rather than TMD were graded as being highly disabled. Conclusively, a considerable percentage of chronic OFP patients reports high pain-related disability in their daily, social and work activity, which suggest a need for psychosocial support and importance of earlier referral for appropriate diagnosis and tailored management.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
문제 정의
As Pain is a comprehensive, biopsychosocial phenomenon, improved understanding and successful management of pain need assessment of health-related quality of life and psychological states. The aim of the study was to evaluate psychosocial impact of non-dental COFP on daily living using the graded chronic pain (GCP) scale. It is also investigated the clinical profile such as demographics, event related to initiation of OFP and prior treatments for patients who attended university-based orofacial pain clinic for seeking diagnosis and treatment of their pain problems.
제안 방법
Information was collected retrospectively from clinical records of the eligible patients, which included gender, age, pain duration, presence and types of related event to initiation of OFP and previous associated treatment. Data on numbers and types of specialty of the clinicians involved in the previous treatment prior to our consultation were also collected.
t-tests, one-way ANOVA were employed to determine whether factors such as gender, age, pain duration and diagnosis affected pain intensity and disability days. To evaluate difference in levels of disability for patient with COFP according to age, gender, pain duration and diagnosis, Chi-square tests were performed. Level of significance was defined as p<0.
데이터처리
Chi-square tests were used to investigate difference in the proportion of gender, age, pain duration in the diagnostic groups. t-tests, one-way ANOVA were employed to determine whether factors such as gender, age, pain duration and diagnosis affected pain intensity and disability days. To evaluate difference in levels of disability for patient with COFP according to age, gender, pain duration and diagnosis, Chi-square tests were performed.
성능/효과
According to distribution of GCP disability grade in the patients with COFP, 39.6% of them showed high disability due to their COFP, while 60.4% had low disability.(Table 7) Female gender was more in high disability group than male gender, which was inverted in low disability group.
In addition to disability levels of patients with non-dental COFP, it was also investigated the clinical profile of patients who visited University-based specialist orofacial pain clinic to seek care for their pain problems during a 6-month period. According to the results, most of the patients had TMD, which indicates a need to pay more attention to variable OFP conditions rather than TMD, aside from relatively high prevalence of TMD in this field. A study conducted by the authors before through a country-based database of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRAS) also showed lack of participation of dental profession in OFP conditions such as trigeminal neuralgia, atypical facial pain and burning mouth syndrome.
Based on diagnostic criteria, 89.2% of patients had TMD whereas NeP was 6.3% and MFP 4.5%. Female preponderance was found in NeP and MOFP groups, which failed to demonstrate significant gender difference.
Long pain duration over 5 years increased disability, while there was no significant difference up to 5 years. With respect to diagnosis, 66.6% of patients suffering from NeP were found to have high disability and 62.9% of MOFP patients had high disability. In TMD group, a proportion of low disability (64.
후속연구
To overcome the limitation of the present study in terms of high proportion of patients with TMD, it is needed a study with a larger sample of other OFP conditions rather than TMD to clearly compare a variety of complex OFP conditions. A further study should also be performed to determine how change in pain intensity related to successful management affects disability through long-term follow-ups.
참고문헌 (39)
Merskey H: Pain terms: A list with definitions and notes on usage. Pain 1979;6:249-252
Okeson JP: Bell’s orofacial pains: The clinical management of orofacial pain. 6thed.,Chicago,2005, Quintessence
Zakrzewska JM and Harrison SD: Assessment and management of orofacial pain. Amsterdam, 2002, Elsevier
Simpson KH: Chronic non-cancer pain In: Chronic pain. Dickman A & Simpson KH eds. Oxford, 2008, Oxford University Press
Main CJ and Waddell G: Behavioural responses to examination. A reappraisal of the interpretation of 'non-organic signs'. Spine 1998:23:2367-2371
Aggarwal VR, McBeth J, Zakrzewska JM, Lunt M, Macfarlane GJ: Are reports of mechanical dysfunction in chronic oro-facial pain related to somatisation? A population based study. Eur J Pain 2008;12:501-507
Lipton JA, Ship JA, Larach-Robinson D: Estimated prevalence and distribution of reported orofacial pain in the United States. J Am Dent Assoc 1993:124:115-121
Locker D & Grushka M: Prevalence of oral and facial pain and discomfort: preliminary results of a mail survey. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1987;15:169-172
Chung JW, Kim JH, Kim HD et al Chronic orofacial pain among Korean elders: prevalence, and impact using the graded chronic pain scale. Pain 2004;112:164-170
Wolf E, Birgerstam P, Nilner M, Petersson K. Patients' experience of consultations for nonspecific chronic orofacial pain: A phenomenological study. J Orofac Pain 2006;20:226-233
Foreman PA, Harold PL, Hay KD. An evaluation of the diagnosis, treatment and outcome of patients with chronic orofacial pain. N Z Dent J 1994;90:44-48
Zakrzewska JM, Jorns TP, Spatz A: Patient led conferences ？ Who attends, are their expectations met and do they vary in three different countries? Eur J Pain 2009;13:486-491
Forssell H, Santalahti P, Puukka P, Talo S: Searching for an assessment instrument to determine temporomandibular disorders pain profiles for the purposes of primary health care. Int J of Rehabil Res 2005;28:203-209
Hahn HM, Yun TH, Shin YW, Kim KH, Yoon DJ, Chung KJ: A standardization study of Beck Depression Inventory in Korea. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 1986;25:487-502
Cho MJ and Kim KH: Use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale in Korea. J Nerv Ment Dis 1998;186:304-310
Tait RC, Chibnall JT: Factor structure of the Pain Disability Index in workers' compensation claimants with lower back injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1141-1146
Turk DC, Rudy TE: Toward an empirically derived taxotomy of chronic pan patients: integration of psychological assessment data. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988;56:233-238
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.