본 연구에서는 선행 연구를 통해 제시된 공급사슬관리 시스템의 다양한 도입 요인에 대해서 그 중요도를 분석하기 위하여 AHP 기법을 이용하여 연구하였다. 지금까지 연구된 공급사슬관리 시스템의 도입 요인에 대해서 국내외 문헌을 통하여 SCM의 도입 요인을 조직 특성, 거래 특성, 관계 특성, 정보 특성 등 4개의 특성으로 범주화하였으며, 각 특성에 대한 세부 도입 요인으로 조직 특성 요인은 도입 전략, CEO 지원, 정보 기술 성숙도, 평가측정시스템 개발, 혁신 선도자 등 5개 요인, 거래 특성 요인은 거래 기간, 납기/품질, 목표 공유 등 3개 요인, 관계 특성 요인은 신뢰, 협력, 갈등, 상호 의존성, 몰입 등 5개 요인, 정보 특성 요인은 정보의 질, 정보 공유, 정보 교환 등 3개 요인을 설정해서 총 16개의 세부 도입 요인으로 분석하였다. AHP 기법을 이용하여 SCM 도입 요인의 중요도를 분석한 결과 SCM 도입 요인에 관한 1차 계층 요인 중에서는 조직 특성(0.387)의 중요도가 가장 높게 분석되었으며, 관계 특성(0.291), 정보 특성(0.167), 거래 특성(0.155) 순으로 분석되었다. 1차 계층 요인의 중요도와 2차 계층 요인의 중요도를 동시에 고려해서 분석한 결과에서는 가장 중요한 도입 요인이 CEO 지원(.169)이었고, 그 다음으로 신뢰(.124), 도입 전략(.089), 목표 공유(.081), 정보 교환(.069), 협력(.064), 정보 공유(.057) 요인 순으로 분석되었다.
본 연구에서는 선행 연구를 통해 제시된 공급사슬관리 시스템의 다양한 도입 요인에 대해서 그 중요도를 분석하기 위하여 AHP 기법을 이용하여 연구하였다. 지금까지 연구된 공급사슬관리 시스템의 도입 요인에 대해서 국내외 문헌을 통하여 SCM의 도입 요인을 조직 특성, 거래 특성, 관계 특성, 정보 특성 등 4개의 특성으로 범주화하였으며, 각 특성에 대한 세부 도입 요인으로 조직 특성 요인은 도입 전략, CEO 지원, 정보 기술 성숙도, 평가측정시스템 개발, 혁신 선도자 등 5개 요인, 거래 특성 요인은 거래 기간, 납기/품질, 목표 공유 등 3개 요인, 관계 특성 요인은 신뢰, 협력, 갈등, 상호 의존성, 몰입 등 5개 요인, 정보 특성 요인은 정보의 질, 정보 공유, 정보 교환 등 3개 요인을 설정해서 총 16개의 세부 도입 요인으로 분석하였다. AHP 기법을 이용하여 SCM 도입 요인의 중요도를 분석한 결과 SCM 도입 요인에 관한 1차 계층 요인 중에서는 조직 특성(0.387)의 중요도가 가장 높게 분석되었으며, 관계 특성(0.291), 정보 특성(0.167), 거래 특성(0.155) 순으로 분석되었다. 1차 계층 요인의 중요도와 2차 계층 요인의 중요도를 동시에 고려해서 분석한 결과에서는 가장 중요한 도입 요인이 CEO 지원(.169)이었고, 그 다음으로 신뢰(.124), 도입 전략(.089), 목표 공유(.081), 정보 교환(.069), 협력(.064), 정보 공유(.057) 요인 순으로 분석되었다.
This study aims to analyze the importances of various SCM adoption factors suggested in precedent researches with AHP. SCM adoption factors were categorized by four types: organization factor, transaction factor, relation factor, and information factor. Each factor has sub-factors. Organization fact...
This study aims to analyze the importances of various SCM adoption factors suggested in precedent researches with AHP. SCM adoption factors were categorized by four types: organization factor, transaction factor, relation factor, and information factor. Each factor has sub-factors. Organization factor has five sub-factors: adoption strategy, support of CEO, maturity of information technology, development of assessment system, and innovation leadership. Transaction factor has three sub-factors: transaction period, delivery/quality,
and shared goal. Relation factor has five sub-factors: trust, collaboration, inter-dependence, conflict, and immersion. Information factor has three sub-factors: information quality, information share, and information exchange. There are sixteen sub-factors altogether. Analyzing the importances of SCM adoption factors with AHP, the importance of organization factor(.387) ranked the highest. Relation factor(.291), information factor(.167), and transaction factor(.155) followed. Putting the analysis results of primary hierarchy factors and
secondary hierarchy factors together, support of CEO(.169) ranked the highest and trust(.124), adoption strateg (.089), share goal(.081), information exchange(.069), collaboration(.064), and information share (.057) followed.
This study aims to analyze the importances of various SCM adoption factors suggested in precedent researches with AHP. SCM adoption factors were categorized by four types: organization factor, transaction factor, relation factor, and information factor. Each factor has sub-factors. Organization factor has five sub-factors: adoption strategy, support of CEO, maturity of information technology, development of assessment system, and innovation leadership. Transaction factor has three sub-factors: transaction period, delivery/quality,
and shared goal. Relation factor has five sub-factors: trust, collaboration, inter-dependence, conflict, and immersion. Information factor has three sub-factors: information quality, information share, and information exchange. There are sixteen sub-factors altogether. Analyzing the importances of SCM adoption factors with AHP, the importance of organization factor(.387) ranked the highest. Relation factor(.291), information factor(.167), and transaction factor(.155) followed. Putting the analysis results of primary hierarchy factors and
secondary hierarchy factors together, support of CEO(.169) ranked the highest and trust(.124), adoption strateg (.089), share goal(.081), information exchange(.069), collaboration(.064), and information share (.057) followed.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
문제 정의
Actual research with survey was done to meet the purpose of this study. The survey was conducted among SCM specialists and users working in Seoul area to collect the data for practice analysis.
Actual research with survey was done to meet the purpose of this study. The survey was conducted among SCM specialists and users working in Seoul area to collect the data for practice analysis. The collected data were analyzed with analytic hierarchy process developed by Saaty.
adoption of SCM is much vital as the building of SCM should be linked with corporation internal process as well as relevant other enterprises. This study aims to research the importance of each adoption factor looking through precedent studies.
제안 방법
The questions to evaluate primary hierarchy model were designed to compare the importance of each four categories: organization factor, transaction factor, relation factor, and information factor. And the questions to evaluate secondary hierarchy model were designed to compare the importance of sub-factors under four categories in primary hierarchy model. Basic scale for paired comparison suggested by Saaty[28] was applied.
Above all the rest, support of CEO, trust, and adoption strategy can be suggested as vital factors for SCM adoption. Meanwhile this study acquires significances by drawing various SCM adoption factors through researching precedent studies, generating importance of each factor with AHP, and suggesting priority of sub-factors. Precedent studies have approached more from adoption factors and achievement, but this study explains about the relation among categorized four factors (organization, transaction, relation, and information) and also the relation among sub-factors of each factor through statistical method.
Targets of this survey were carefully selected to study the structured hierarchy models practically. SCM specialists working at enterprises, universities, and institutes were selected and, consequently, total of 43 questionnaires were analyzed.
이론/모형
SCM specialists working at enterprises, universities, and institutes were selected and, consequently, total of 43 questionnaires were analyzed. Expert Choice 11 was applied to analyze the importance of hierarchy models suggested as study model. Survey was re-conducted among the respondent with consistency rate of over 0.
성능/효과
Putting the analysis results of various factors together, primary hierarchy factors and secondary hierarchy factors were considered simultaneously. First, the importance of organization factor(.387) ranked the highest. Relation(.
Putting the analysis results of various factors together, primary hierarchy factors and secondary hierarchy factors were considered simultaneously. First, the importance of organization factor(.387) ranked the highest. Relation(.
5%). Second, support of CEO(.169) under organization factor ranked the highest and trust(.124) under relation factor, adoption strategy(.089) under organization factor, shared goal(.081) under transaction factor, information exchange(.069) under information factor, collaboration(.064) under relation factor, and information share(.057) under information factor followed. Third, support of CEO(.
참고문헌 (28)
Thomas, D. J. and P. M. Griffin, "Coordinated Supply Chain Management," European Journal of Operations Research, 94(1), pp. 1-15, 1996.
Cooper, M. C. and Ellram, L. M., "Characteristics of Supply Chain Management and Its Implication for Purchasing and Logistics Strategy," International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 13-24, 1993.
La Londe, B. J., "Building a Supply Chain Relationship," Supply Chain Management Review, 2, pp. 7-8, 1998.
Moon, J. B., "Study on the Effects of Supply Chain Integration based on Information System on Business Results" Graduated School of Seoul National University. 2005.
S. R. Choi, "Influential Factors of Information Exchange between SCM Partners" Graduated School of Chung Nam National University. 2002.
Stank, T. P., Keller, S. B. and Daugherty, P. J., "Supply chain collaboration and logistical service performance", Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 29-48, 2002.
P. S. Kim, "Study on Precedent factors, Activities and Results of SCM", Graduated School of Kei Myung University. 2004.
Monczka, R., Peterson, K., Handfield, R. and Ragatz, G., "Success Factors in Strategic Supplier Alliances: The Buyng Company Perspective," Decision Sciences, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 553-576, 1998.
Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D. and Zacharia, Z. G., "Defining Supply Chain Management," Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 1-25, 2001.
Moberg, C. R., "Identifying the antecedents of information exchange among buyers and seller", Doctoral dissertation, Cleveland State Univ., 2000.
Premkumar, G. and Ramamurthy, K., "The role of interorganizational and organizational factors on the decision mode for adoption of Interorganizational systems", Decision Science, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 303-336, 1995.
Higginson, J. K. and Alam, A., "Supply chain management techniques in medium-to-small manufacturing firms", International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 19-31, 1997.
Ross, D. F. Competing Through Supply Chain Management : Creating Winning Strategies Through Supply Chain Partnerships, Chapman & Hall, New York, 1998.
Moorman, C., Deshpande, R. and Zaltman, G., "Factor affecting trust in market research relationships", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 81-101, 1993.
Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. and Kumar, N., "Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis", International Journal of research in Marketing, 15(2), pp. 222-248, 1998.
Macbeth, D. and N. Ferguson, Partnership Sourcing: An Integrated Supply Chain Approach, Pitman Publishing, London, 1994.
Daugherty, P. J. Stank, T. P. and D. S. Rogers, "Third-party logistics service providers: Purchasers' perceptions", International Journa of Purchasing and Materials Management, 32(2), pp. 23-29, 1996.
Tang, J. E., Shee, D. and T. Tang, "Conceptual model for interactive buyer-supplier relationship in electronic commerce", International Journal of Information Management, 21, pp .49-68, 2001.
Evans, P. B. and Wurster, T. S., "Strategy and the new economics of information", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 71-82, 1997.
Marien, Edward J., "The Four Supply Chain Enablers," Supply Chain Management Review, 4(1), pp. 60-68, 2000.
Guinipero, L. C. and Brand, R. R., "Purchasing's Role in Supply Chain Management," The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp.29-38, 1996.
Davenport, T. H., "Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise Systems," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76, No. 4, Jul-Aug., pp. 121-131, 1998.
Tyndal, G., Gopal, C., partsch, W. and J. Kamauff, "Making it happen: the value proceding supply chain", ernst & Young, On-line report, 2000.
Fisher, M. L., Hammond, J. H., Obermeyer, W. R. and A. Raman, "Making supply meet demand in an Uncertain World", Harvard Business Review, May-June, 1994.
Derocher, R. P. and Kilpatrick, J., "Six Supply Chain Lessons for the Millennium," Supply Chain Management Review, Winter, pp. 34-40, 2000.
Park, Y. W., "SCM Assessment and factors for Successful Application", Graduated School of Chung Ang University. 2003.
Saaty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.