선택한 단어 수는 입니다.
최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
선택한 단어 수는 30입니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
제안 방법
- At this point of the first half of 2010, where three years have passed since its outset, this study aims to provide directions for improvement by examining problems of NLRP and quantitatively analyzing the initial expectations and performances of the system.
- Five-step Likert scale for expectation and performance of NLRP constructed for each variable so as to compare expectations and performances. In addition, the causes of disconfirmation between initial expectations and performances for each variable, if found, were to be explained in qualitative manner by the experts (Table 2).
- For each variable which had higher expectation-performance disconfirmation, all the explanations were taken into account, and common factors were induced so as to analyze the causes of expectation-performance disconfirmation. Measures to solve the common issues were sorted by causes, and they were divided into short- and mid/long-term objectives as suggestions for future improvements.
- Firstly, the extent of resources that are subject to natural landscape conservation should be enlarged. For this, we need to update the definition of natural landscape, which in the past the review was focused on the visual side of landscape. Now the ecological resources inherent in natural landscape should also be the subject of conservation.
- In order to analyze the initial expectation level and the current performance level, variables were set for this purpose and a survey was conducted to NLRP commissioners. Then, expectation and performance values by each variable were quantitatively analyzed, and the interpretation was made on the cause of disconfirmation (Figure 1).
- For each variable which had higher expectation-performance disconfirmation, all the explanations were taken into account, and common factors were induced so as to analyze the causes of expectation-performance disconfirmation. Measures to solve the common issues were sorted by causes, and they were divided into short- and mid/long-term objectives as suggestions for future improvements.
- By ordering the scale of differences, the ranks of expectation-performance disconfirmation for each variable was evaluated and the causes of disconfirmation were interpreted. The causes of disconfirmation were compiled and analyzed from qualitative responses. The test for significance regarding the differences of the values between expectations and performances was made with t-test of significance level 0.
- In order to analyze the initial expectation level and the current performance level, variables were set for this purpose and a survey was conducted to NLRP commissioners. Then, expectation and performance values by each variable were quantitatively analyzed, and the interpretation was made on the cause of disconfirmation (Figure 1). The specific methodology for the research is as follows：
- Landscape experts need to understand the unique nature of the complex and multilateral field of landscape, and have a keen insight to view development projects in an integrated and holistic manner. This study requires further research in order to complement the limitations of not including the opinions of those that are subject of the natural landscape review.
대상 데이터
- A survey was conducted to experts who take an active part as NLRP commissioners, to public servants in Ministry of Environment and its regional environmental offices, and to EIA agencies. Questionnaires were distributed in May 2008 and May 2009, and 32 responses from NLR commissioners, 18 from Ministry of Environment and its regional offices, 17 from EIA agencies were collected, and three responses could not be analyzed, hence a total of 66 were used for analysis. The rationale for the selection was for their nation-wide location and their long experience with various types of projects, and thus they were considered as experts who can present practical and valuable opinions on the expectations and performances of the Program.
데이터처리
- 05 was conducted. Microsoft Excel 2003 was used for the compilation and analysis of the data, and SPSS ver.11 was used for statistical analysis.
- The causes of disconfirmation were compiled and analyzed from qualitative responses. The test for significance regarding the differences of the values between expectations and performances was made with t-test of significance level 0.05. To analyze and verify whether there are differences depending on different group of respondents, ANOVA of significance level 0.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.