참고문헌 (29)

1. Aksnes, D. W. and R. E. Taxt. 2004. "Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: A comparative study at a Norwegian university." Research Evaluation, 13(1): 33-41. 

   상세보기

2. Bakkalbasi, N., K. Bauer, J. Glover, and L. Wang. 2006. "Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science." Biomedical Digital Libraries, 7. 

   상세보기

3. Bar-Ilan, J. 2006. "An ego-centric citation analysis of the works of Michael O. Rabin based on multiple citation indexes." Information Processing and Management, 42(6): 1553-1566. 

   상세보기

4. Bar-Ilan, J. 2008. "Which h-index? - A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar." Scientometrics, 74(2): 257-271. 

   상세보기

5. Bar-Ilan, J., M. Levene, and A. Lin. 2007. "Some measures for comparing citation databases." Journal of Informetrics, 1(1): 26-34. 

   상세보기

6. Bauer, K. and N. Bakkalbasi. 2005. "An examination of citation counts in a new scholarly communication environment." D-Lib Magazine, 11(9). 

7. Bergstrom, C. T. 2007. "Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals." College & Research Libraries News, 68(5). 

   상세보기

8. Cronin, B. 1984. The Citation Process: The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication. London: Taylor Graham. 

9. Egghe, L. 2006. "Theory and practise of the g-index." Scientometrics, 69(1): 131-152. 

   상세보기

10. Giustini, D. 2006. "Blog posting at UBC Academic Search-Google Scholar Blog." [cited 2011.05.05]. . 

11. Hirsch, J. E. 2005. "An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46): 16569-16572. 

    상세보기

12. Holden, G., G. Rosenberg, and K. Barker. 2005. "Bibliometrics: A potential decision making aid in hiring, reappointment, tenure and promotion decisions." Social Work in Health Care, 41(3-4): 67-92. 

    상세보기

13. Holmes, A., and C. Oppenheim. 2001. "Use of citation analysis to predict the outcome of the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise for Unit of Assessment (UoA) 61: Library and Information Management." Information Research, 6(2). 

14. Jacso, P. 2005. "As we may search-comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases." Current Science, 89(9): 1537-1547. 

15. Kleinberg, J. 1998. "Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment." Proceeding of the 9th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 668-677. 

16. Kousha, K., and M. Thelwall. 2006. "Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines." In Book of Abstracts, 9th International Science & Technology Indicators Conference, Leuven, Belgium: 72-73. 

17. Lewison, G. 2001. "Evaluation of books as research outputs in history of medicine." Research Evaluation, 10(2): 89-95. 

    상세보기

18. MacRoberts, M. H., and B. R. MacRoberts. 1996. "Problems of citation analysis." Scientometrics, 36(3): 435-444. 

    상세보기

19. Marchionini, G., P. Solomon, C. Davis, and T. Russell. 2006. "Information and library science MPACT: A preliminary analysis." Library & Information Science Research, 28(4). 

    상세보기

20. Martin, B. R. 1996. "The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research." Scientometrics, 36(3): 343-362. 

    상세보기

21. Meho, L. I., and K. Yang. 2007. "Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science vs. Scopus and Google Scholar." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13): 2105-2125. 

    상세보기

22. Moed, H. F. 2005. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Springer, Berlin. 

23. Nisonger, T. E. 2004. "Citation autobiography: An investigation of ISI database coverage in determining author citedness." College & Research Libraries, 65(2): 152-163. 

    상세보기

24. Norris, M., and C. Oppenheim. 2007. "Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences' literature." Journal of Informetrics, 1(2): 161-169. 

    상세보기

25. Noruzi, A. 2005. "Google Scholar: The New Generation of Citation Indexes." Libri, 55(4): 170-180. 

    상세보기

26. Seglen, P. O. 1998. "Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research." Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 69(3): 224-229. 

    상세보기

27. van Raan, A. F. J. 1996. "Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer-review based evaluation and foresight exercises." Scientometrics, 36(3): 397-420. 

    상세보기

28. Vaughan, L., and D. Shaw. 2008. "A new look at evidence of scholarly citation in citation indexes and from web sources." Scientometrics, 74(2): 317-330. 

    상세보기

29. West, J. D., C. T. Bergstrom, and T. C. Bergstrom. 2010. "Big Macs and Eigenfactor Scores: Don't Let Correlation Coefficients Fool You." [online]. [cited 2011.05.05]. .