Domestic franchised businesses have been showing relatively fast growth, but the growth is expected to slow down as in those developed countries. In face of this changing market environment, domestic franchisers will have to turn their eyes abroad to achieve sustainable growth. On the other hand, mo...
Domestic franchised businesses have been showing relatively fast growth, but the growth is expected to slow down as in those developed countries. In face of this changing market environment, domestic franchisers will have to turn their eyes abroad to achieve sustainable growth. On the other hand, more international franchisors could pursue expanding into the Korean market due to economic or strategic reasons in their home countries. In general, enterprises are faced with several barriers when entering foreign markets by franchising their operation. Issues relating to such entry barriers can be broadly classified into legal and managerial. To begin, international franchising necessitates enterprises to handle various aspects of legal issues. There are no internationally unified rules for franchise agreements as in international goods purchase contracts. This forces franchisors to have deep knowledge of concerned regulations and practices of each of the individual target countries, in particular franchising practices which differ from those of their own countries in terms of rights and obligations of the involved parties. Having regard to this situation, this study reviewed the EU's PEL CAFDC and other domestic and overseas regulations governing franchising. From the results, several contractual obligations were derived that need to be taken into account when handling the issues around the international franchise agreement. In closing this paper mainly having in mind enterprises in various business lines seeking to expand into international franchising, some unmet needs are worth commenting. First, there is an urgent need to establish practical guidelines along with the model agreement addressing the issues of international franchising in the absence of any unified international rules. Second, to meet the first need above, it is needed that the relevant authorities conduct a comprehensive review of the existing franchising regulations available across overseas countries and, based on the results, embark on gathering good common elements in the existing franchising regulations in individual countries, ultimately developing the best possible guidelines and examples.
Domestic franchised businesses have been showing relatively fast growth, but the growth is expected to slow down as in those developed countries. In face of this changing market environment, domestic franchisers will have to turn their eyes abroad to achieve sustainable growth. On the other hand, more international franchisors could pursue expanding into the Korean market due to economic or strategic reasons in their home countries. In general, enterprises are faced with several barriers when entering foreign markets by franchising their operation. Issues relating to such entry barriers can be broadly classified into legal and managerial. To begin, international franchising necessitates enterprises to handle various aspects of legal issues. There are no internationally unified rules for franchise agreements as in international goods purchase contracts. This forces franchisors to have deep knowledge of concerned regulations and practices of each of the individual target countries, in particular franchising practices which differ from those of their own countries in terms of rights and obligations of the involved parties. Having regard to this situation, this study reviewed the EU's PEL CAFDC and other domestic and overseas regulations governing franchising. From the results, several contractual obligations were derived that need to be taken into account when handling the issues around the international franchise agreement. In closing this paper mainly having in mind enterprises in various business lines seeking to expand into international franchising, some unmet needs are worth commenting. First, there is an urgent need to establish practical guidelines along with the model agreement addressing the issues of international franchising in the absence of any unified international rules. Second, to meet the first need above, it is needed that the relevant authorities conduct a comprehensive review of the existing franchising regulations available across overseas countries and, based on the results, embark on gathering good common elements in the existing franchising regulations in individual countries, ultimately developing the best possible guidelines and examples.
가맹점계약을 체결함에 있어 가맹본부의 정보제공 의무를 제외하고 가맹본부의 핵심적 의무사항이라 할 수 있는 것은?
따라서 가맹점계약을 체결함에 있어서 가맹본부의 정보제공 의무를 제외하고 가맹본부의 지적재산권을 가맹점이 사용할 수 있도록 허여하는 것은 가맹본부의 핵심적 의무사항이라 할 수 있다. 반면, 가맹점의 입장에서는 가맹본부의 지적재산권들은 당해 가맹사업을 평가하기 위한 핵심적 고려요소로 활용할 수 있다33).
KFA에서는 가맹사업을 무엇이라 정의하는가?
“가맹사업이란 가맹본부가 가맹시스템을 사는 사람에게 가맹본부의 이름ㆍ상호ㆍ영업방법 등을 제공하여 상품과 서비스를 시장에 판매하거나, 기타 영업을 할 수 있는 권리를 부여하여, 영업에 관하여 일정한 통제ㆍ지원을 하고, 이러한 포괄적 관계에 따라 일정한 대가를 수수하는 계속적 채권관계를 의미한다.10)”
IFA는 가맹사업을 무엇이라고 정의하고 있는가?
“가맹사업(operation)은 가맹본부와 가맹점의 계약적 관계이며, 가맹본부는 훈련과 노하우(Know-how)등의 영업적 부분에 있어서 가맹점에게 지속적인 이익을 제공하며 또는 그러한 의무를 부담해야하며, 반면 가맹점은 가맹본부의 소유와 통제하에서 절차ㆍ형태 및 공통의 상호(trade name)에 따라 영업하고, 가맹점은 자신의 사업에 관하여 실질적 자본투자를 해야 한다.7)”
이 논문을 인용한 문헌
저자의 다른 논문 :
활용도 분석정보
상세보기
다운로드
내보내기
활용도 Top5 논문
해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다. 더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.