로버트 벤투리와 알도 로시 건축에서 도시 경관의 의미와 해석에 관한 연구 A Study on the Meaning and interpretation of Urban Landscape in Architecture of Robert Venturi and Aldo Rossi원문보기
After the modern age, the rapid urbanizationhad a big impact on the then architecture. R. Venturi and A. Rossi are two of the leading architects, developing architecture in cities in the US and Europe respectively. This study shed light on a tangible and intangible meaning and interpretation of urba...
After the modern age, the rapid urbanizationhad a big impact on the then architecture. R. Venturi and A. Rossi are two of the leading architects, developing architecture in cities in the US and Europe respectively. This study shed light on a tangible and intangible meaning and interpretation of urban landscapes through their architectural thoughts and architectures. The followings are the physical and intangible meaning and interpretation in architectural thoughts and works of those two architects. Venturi understood that iconological landscapes at the roadside in large citiesare the nature of physical landscapes. To Venturi, the façades of buildings at the roadside are a part of signage such as traffic lights and road signs, and those façades have the meaning of symbolic systems beyond simple physical landscapes. To A. Rossi, types of buildings as physical townscapes are a key role supporting raw data of classification in architecture. And also, those types have significance of the basic data shedding light on the principles and history of cities. For intangible factors in R. Venturi's architecture, daily routine, function and use, time, a use for a building and others form complex architecture. And also, those factors describe shared values of the same period as the façades of buildings and complex symbols and formative lexicons in metaphorical terms. For A. Rossi's intangible factors, 'collective memory' is buried in inhabitants of the city, and with that, the city is a place for memory to its inhabitants. What is more, cities' monuments have intangible landscapes like 'sustainability', 'permanence' and so on. With lots of events happening throughoutcities, those monuments are the whole images of cities giving the value to the urban buildings that reside in cities. Finally, R. Venturi's all-encompassing complex architecture concept was extended on a tangible and intangible point of townscapes. It was found that A. Rossi's tangible thought was formed from the whole landscape of historic cities in then Italy as the background of time and place. Also, With types of urban buildings and 'collective memory', A. Rossi drew architectural norms and formats of unchangeable types.
After the modern age, the rapid urbanizationhad a big impact on the then architecture. R. Venturi and A. Rossi are two of the leading architects, developing architecture in cities in the US and Europe respectively. This study shed light on a tangible and intangible meaning and interpretation of urban landscapes through their architectural thoughts and architectures. The followings are the physical and intangible meaning and interpretation in architectural thoughts and works of those two architects. Venturi understood that iconological landscapes at the roadside in large citiesare the nature of physical landscapes. To Venturi, the façades of buildings at the roadside are a part of signage such as traffic lights and road signs, and those façades have the meaning of symbolic systems beyond simple physical landscapes. To A. Rossi, types of buildings as physical townscapes are a key role supporting raw data of classification in architecture. And also, those types have significance of the basic data shedding light on the principles and history of cities. For intangible factors in R. Venturi's architecture, daily routine, function and use, time, a use for a building and others form complex architecture. And also, those factors describe shared values of the same period as the façades of buildings and complex symbols and formative lexicons in metaphorical terms. For A. Rossi's intangible factors, 'collective memory' is buried in inhabitants of the city, and with that, the city is a place for memory to its inhabitants. What is more, cities' monuments have intangible landscapes like 'sustainability', 'permanence' and so on. With lots of events happening throughoutcities, those monuments are the whole images of cities giving the value to the urban buildings that reside in cities. Finally, R. Venturi's all-encompassing complex architecture concept was extended on a tangible and intangible point of townscapes. It was found that A. Rossi's tangible thought was formed from the whole landscape of historic cities in then Italy as the background of time and place. Also, With types of urban buildings and 'collective memory', A. Rossi drew architectural norms and formats of unchangeable types.
근대 이후 도시 경관과 건축의 관계를 파악하기 위해서는 우선 경관의 기본적인 의미부터 살펴볼 필요가 있다. 일반적으로 경관은 ‘특색 있는 풍경 형태를 가진 일정한 지역’을 의미하며 시지각적인 감각과 관련이 있다. 이러한 측면에서 경관은 건축과 주변 환경의 관계를 의미하는 맥락(Context)과 관련된 것으로 시지각적 연속성의 의미를 지닌다.
급속도로 진행된 산업화, 도시화로 인해 경관은 어떠한 환경을 의미하게 되었는가?
근대 이후의 경관은 산업 혁명 무렵 시작된 도시화와 밀접한 관련을 맺고 있다. 급속도로 진행된 산업화, 도시화로 인해 경관은 무형적 측면을 포함한 복합적이고 다차원적이며 총체적인 도시적 환경을 의미하게 되었다.7) 근대 사회의 도시화는 지역적 구분이라기보다는 전세계적으로 진행되었던 시간의 흐름에 따른 자연스러운 현상이다.
꼬르뷔지에로 대표되는 근대건축는 어떠한 문제를 야기시켰는가?
하지만 근대건축의 필로티는 역설적이게도 장소의 근원을 되묻고 있었다. 또한 근대 건축은 주변 환경을 공기, 빛, 녹지 등의 물리적 요소로 단순화시키는 오류를 범했으며,1) 대표적인 공간적 특징이라고 할 수 있는 개방된 평면, 흐르는 공간은 도시공간의 비인간화, 황폐화를 가속화하였다.2) 이러한 복합적인 문제들은 건축물은 스스로 고립되는 결과를 초래하였으며, 주변 환경과의 소통의 부재에 근본적인 원인이 있었다.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.