최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국주거학회 논문집 = Journal of the Korean Housing Association, v.23 no.1, 2012년, pp.55 - 66
황재희 (서울대학교 지역정보) , 이성우 (서울대학교 지역정보)
Present study investigates on the impact of resources and characteristics of the tenure choice for divorced women in Korea. The authors utilize the micro data from the Korea Census (2% sample) provided by the National Statistical Office. The authors apply the bivariate probit model to eliminate sele...
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
사랑이라는 가변적인 요인을 중심으로 연결된 부부관계는 그 형성과 해체가 보다 유연해지는 경향을 보이고 있는 이유는 무엇인가? | 현대 사회의 가족 구성은 개인의 선택과 관련된 사안이다. 가족주의적 규범의식이 지배적이었던 전통적 가족 구성과 달리, 결혼과 출산에 의해 결정되는 현대 핵가족의 가족 구성은 개인의 가치관에 따른 선택의 범주로 이동하고 있다. 이에 따라, 사랑이라는 가변적인 요인을 중심으로 연결된 부부관계는 그 형성과 해체가 보다 유연해지는 경향을 보이고 있다. | |
자가점유는 개인에게 어떠한 권리를 부여하는가? | 자가점유는 개인에게 주택과 근린환경에 대한 권리를 부여하며, 주거안정성은 개인과 사회 단위에 다방면의 긍정적 파급효과를 지닌다(Dietz, 2003). 따라서 본 연구는 이혼여성 가구의 자가점유에 영향을 미치는 자원과 특성을 분석하여, 이혼여성의 주거안정성 확보와 다양한 사회적 편익 창출에 기여하는 정책적 함의를 도출하였다. | |
이혼의 증가는 어떠한 연유로 주목해야 할 사회적 현상인가? | 이혼의 증가는 결혼의 해체가 여성의 사회경제적 지위에 미치는 영향이 상당함을 연유로 주목해야 할 사회적 현상이다(Udry, 1967; Glick, 1975; Norton & Glick, 1976; Carter & Glick, 1976; Duncan & Hoffman, 1985; Arendell, 1987; Bumpass, 1990). 이혼이 여성의 사회경제적 지위 하락을 야기하는 원인은 네 가지로 분류 가능 하다. |
Aaronson, D. (2000). A note on the benefits of homeownership. Journal of Urban Economics, 47(3), 356-369.
Anderson, T., Shannon, C., Schyb, I., & Goldstein, P. (2002). Welfare reform & housing: Assessing the impact to substance abusers. Journal of Drug Issues, 2002(Winter), 265-294.
Arendell, T. (1987). Women & the economics of divorce in the contemporary United States. Women & the Political Process in the United States, 13(1), 121-135.
Bahr, S., & Galligan, R. (1984). Teenage marriage and marital stability. Youth and Society, 15, 387-400.
Baker, M. (2009). The 'Quintessential Problem Debtor'?: Mother-Led Households in Economic Hard Times. Australian Social Policy conference 2009.
Becker, G. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Harvard University Press.
Becker, G., Landes, E., & Michael, R. (1977). An economic analysis of marital instability. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 1141-87.
Berk, R. (1983). An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review, 48(3), 368-398.
Bourassa, C. (1994). Immigration and housing tenure choice in Australia. Journal of Housing Research, 5(1), 117-137.
Braver, S. (1999). The gender gap in standard of living after divorce: Vanishingly small?. Family Law Quarterly, 33(1), 111-134.
Bumpass, L. (1990). What's happening to the family? Interactions between demographic & institutional change. Demography, 27, 483-98.
Byun, H., Kim, H., Yoon, H., & Han, J. (2006). The Study on Socioeconomic Status Change of Divorced Women. Research paper (3), Korean Women's Development Institute.
Carter, H., & Glick, P. (1976). Marriage & Divorce: A Social and Economic Study, Oxford (England): Harvard U. Press.
Chun, J., & Lee, S. (2007). A study on the effects of migration history on tenure choice: Focusing on the determinants and relationship between migration typology and housing choice. Journal of the Korean association of regional geographers, 13(6), 651-673.
Danes, S., & Morris, E. (1976). Housing status, housing expenditure and satisfaction. Housing and Society, 13, 32-43.
Dietz, R. (2003). The Social Consequences of Homeownership, Research paper, Homeownership Alliance.
Duncan, G., & Hoffman, S. (1985). A reconsideration of the economic consequences of marital dissolution. Demography, 22(4), 485-497.
Espenshade, T. (1979). The economic consequences of divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41(3), 615-625.
Gandelman, N. (2005). Homeownership and gender. http://papers. ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id900354#sf.
Gandelman, N. (2008). Female-Headed Households and Homeownership in Latin America, (R)-547, Research Network Working papers of Inter-American Development Bank.
Glick, P. (1975). A demographer looks at american families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 37(1), 15-26.
Green, R., & White, M. (1997). Measuring the benefits of homeowning: Effects on children. Journal of Urban Economics, 41(3), 441-461.
Greene, W. (1998). Gender economics courses in liberal arts colleges: Further results. The Journal of Economic Education, 29(4), 291-300.
Harkness, J., & Newman, S. (2003). Effects of homeownership on children: The role of neighborhood characteristics and family income. Economic Policy Review, 9(2), 97-107.
Haurin, D., & Kamara, D. (1992). The homeownership decision of female-headed households. Journal of Housing Economics, 2(4), 293-309.
Hendershott, P., Ong, R., Wood, G., & Flatau, P. (2009). Marital history & home ownership: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Housing Economics, 18(2009), 13-24.
Kaplan, D., & Venezky, R. (1994). Literacy and voting behavior: A bivariate probit model with sample selection. Social Science Research, 23(4), 350-367.
Kim, L. (2010). A study in change of residence stability through analyzing homeownership rate: A case study in Seoul, Republic of Korea, 1985-2005. Seoul Studies, 11(1), 43-59.
Kim, S. (2011). Articles: Recent Divorce Trend & Policy for the Divorce in Korea. Korean Studies, 45, 61-90.
Ladenson, M. (1978). Race and sex discrimination in housing: The evidence from probabilities of homeownership. Southern Economic Journal, 45(2), 559-575.
Lane, S., & Kinsey, J. (1980). Housing tenure status & housing satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 14, 341-365
Lee, S., Yoon, S., Park, J., & Min, S. (2006). Applied Spatial Econometrics Model. Pakyoungsa.
Levinger, G. (1976). A Social psychological perspective on marital dissolution. Journal of Social Issues, 32(1), 21-47.
Mauldin, T. (1990). Women who remain above the poverty level in divorce: Implications for family policy," Family Relations, 39(2), 141-146.
Montmarquette, C., Mahseredjian, S., & Houle, R. (2000). The determinants of university dropouts: a bivariate probability model with sample selection. Economics of Education Review, 20, 475-484.
Moore, K., & Waite, L. (1981). Marital dissolution, early motherhood and early marriage. Social Forces, 60(1), 20-40.
Mott, F., & Moore, S. (1978). The causes & consequences of marital breakdown. Women, work and family, 113-135.
Munro, M., & Smith, S. (2007). Gender and housing: Broadening the debate. Housing Studies, 4(1), 3-17.
Norton, J., & Glick, P. (1976). Marital instability: Past, present and future. Journal of Social Issues, 32(1), 5-20.
Oppenheimer, V. (1994). Women's rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. Population and Development Review, 20, 293-342.
Research Division of National Association of Realtors. (2010). Social Benefits of Homeownership and Stable Housing.
Rohe, W., Zandt, S., & McCarthy, G. (2001). The Social Benefits and Costs of Homeownership: A Critical Assessment of the Research, (LIHO)-01.12., Low-Income Homeownership Working Paper Series.
Rossi, P., & Weber, E. (1996). The social benefits of homeownership: empirical evidence from national surveys. Housing Policy Debate, 7(1), 1-35.
Schoen, R., Astone, N., Rothert, K., Standish, J., & Kim, Y. (2002). Women's employment, marital happiness, and divorce. Social Forces, 81(2), 643-662.
Smith, S. (1990). Income, housing wealth and gender inequality. Urban Studies, 27(1), 67-88.
South, S., & Spitze, G. (1986). Determinants of divorce over the marital life course. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 583-590.
Temkin, K., & Rohe, W. (1998). Social capital and neighborhood stability: An empirical investigation. Housing Policy Debate, 9(1), 61-88.
Udry, J. (1967). Marital instability by race and income based on 1960 census data. American Journal of Sociology, 72(6), 673-674.
Weitzman, L. (1985). The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America, Free Press.
Wimmer, B., & Chezum, B. (2003). An empirical examination of quality certification in a lemons market. Economic Inquiry, 41(2), 279-291.
Yoon, H. (2004). The role of public & private income transfers to the income status of women who experienced marital disruption. Journal of Korean Social Welfare. 56(2), 5-27.
해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.