[논문]온라인 지식공유의 참여정도: 위키피디아에 대한 행태적 접근

박현정; 이홍주; 김종우

doi:10.13088/jiis.2013.19.4.097

온라인 지식공유의 참여정도: 위키피디아에 대한 행태적 접근
Participation Level in Online Knowledge Sharing: Behavioral Approach on Wikipedia 원문보기

지능정보연구 = Journal of intelligence and information systems, v.19 no.4, 2013년, pp.97 - 121

박현정 (서울대학교 경영연구소) , 이홍주 (가톨릭대학교 경영학부) , 김종우 (한양대학교 경영대학)

초록
AI-Helper

급변하는 환경 속에서 지속적인 경쟁우위와 혁신을 위한 지식의 중요성이 증대되면서, 그 동안 지식공유에 관한 많은 연구들이 있었다. 그런데, 이러한 연구들의 대부분이 응답자의 인지오차가 내재된 서베이에 의존해왔다. 본 연구는 대표적인 온라인 지식협업 커뮤니티인 위키피디아 유저들의 온라인 행위만을 토대로 지식공유 참여정도에 대한 행위 특성들간의 관계를 도출하였다. 그런데, 유저들의 편집 참여 패턴이 서로 다르기 때문에 편집횟수는 같아도 재방문기간은 달라질 수 있고 이에 따라 지식공유 결과가 달라질 수 있으므로, 지식공유 참여정도를 아티클 편집 참여횟수와 재방문기간의 두 가지 관점에서 접근하였다. 지식공유 참여정도에 영향을 미치는 행위특성으로는 위키 플랫폼에서 관찰이 가능한, 공적인 토론툴인 아티클 톡과 사적인 메시징 툴인 유저 톡 참여여부 및 정도, 그리고 커뮤니티 등록여부를 사용하였다. 행위 분석은 먼저, 행위특성 차원에 의한 유저 카테고리별 참여정도를 비교하였고, 행위 특성의 정도를 반영하는 독립변수들과 참여정도를 나타내는 종속변수간의 관계에 대한 로버스트 회귀분석을 수행하였다. 특히, 연구가설을 설정하는 단계에서 온라인 환경에 적합한 모티베이션 이론을 도입함으로써, 온라인 지식공유 참여정도에 관한 이론적인 설명 모델을 제시하였다. 결론적으로, 본 연구는 이론적인 시사점 외에 다음과 같은 실제적인 행위 결과를 얻었다. 첫째, 공적인 토론 및 사적인 메시징 참여와 지식공유 참여정도간에는 양의 관계가 성립한다. 둘째, 공적인 토론이 사적인 메시징 보다 지식공유 참여정도에 더 큰 영향력을 미친다. 셋째, 아티클 편집 참여횟수에 대해서는 공적인 토론과 사적인 메시징의 시너지 효과가 존재하는 반면에, 재방문기간에 대해서는 아주 약한 음의 상호작용효과를 나타낸다. 넷째, 커뮤니티 등록 여부는 재방문기간에 대해서는 절대적인 양의 영향력을 미치지만, 실질적인 편집 참여횟수에 대해서는 유의한 영향력을 나타내지 않는다. 다섯째, 사적인 메시징에 의한 관계성을 고려할 때, 관계의 범위보다는 빈도 또는 깊이가 더 중요한 것으로 보인다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

With the growing importance of knowledge for sustainable competitive advantages and innovation in a volatile environment, many researches on knowledge sharing have been conducted. However, previous researches have mostly relied on the questionnaire survey which has inherent perceptive errors of respondents. The current research has drawn the relationship among primary participant behaviors towards the participation level in knowledge sharing, basically from online user behaviors on Wikipedia, a representative community for online knowledge collaboration. Without users' participation in knowledge sharing, knowledge collaboration for creating knowledge cannot be successful. By the way, the editing patterns of Wikipedia users are diverse, resulting in different revisiting periods for the same number of edits, and thus varying results of shared knowledge. Therefore, we illuminated the participation level of knowledge sharing from two different angles of number of edits and revisiting period. The behavioral dimensions affecting the level of participation in knowledge sharing includes the article talk for public discussion and user talk for private messaging, and community registration, which are observable on Wiki platform. Public discussion is being progressed on article talk pages arranged for exchanging ideas about each article topic. An article talk page is often divided into several sections which mainly address specific type of issues raised during the article development procedure. From the diverse opinions about the relatively trivial things such as what text, link, or images should be added or removed and how they should be restructured to the profound professional insights are shared, negotiated, and improved over the course of discussion. Wikipedia also provides personal user talk pages as a private messaging tool. On these pages, diverse personal messages such as casual greetings, stories about activities on Wikipedia, and ordinary affairs of life are exchanged. If anyone wants to communicate with another person, he or she visits the person's user talk page and leaves a message. Wikipedia articles are assessed according to seven quality grades, of which the featured article level is the highest. The dataset includes participants' behavioral data related with 2,978 articles, which have reached the featured article level, with editing histories of articles, their article talk histories, and user talk histories extracted from user talk pages for each article. The time period for analysis is from the initiation of articles until their promotion to the featured article level. The number of edits represents the total number of participation in the editing of an article, and the revisiting period is the time difference between the first and last edits. At first, the participation levels of each user category classified according to behavioral dimensions have been analyzed and compared. And then, robust regressions have been conducted on the relationships among independent variables reflecting the degree of behavioral characteristics and the dependent variable representing the participation level. Especially, through adopting a motivational theory adequate for online environment in setting up research hypotheses, this work suggests a theoretical framework for the participation level of online knowledge sharing. Consequently, this work reached the following practical behavioral results besides some theoretical implications. First, both public discussion and private messaging positively affect the participation level in knowledge sharing. Second, public discussion exerts greater influence than private messaging on the participation level. Third, a synergy effect of public discussion and private messaging on the number of edits was found, whereas a pretty weak negative interaction effect of them on the revisiting period was observed. Fourth, community registration has a significant impact on the revisiting period, whereas being in

주제어

질의응답

핵심어	질문	논문에서 추출한 답변
	내부적인 자아개념 모티베이션은 무엇인가?	내부적인 자아개념(internal self-concept) 모티베이션은 개인이 자신의 내재적인(intrinsic) 기준 (standards)을 만족하는 행동을 추구하게 하는 힘을 말한다(Leonard et al., 1999).
	사회적 교환이론에 의하면 사람들은 무엇을 기대하고 사회적 상호작용에 참여하는가?	사회적 교환이론(social exchange theory)(Blau, 1964)에 의하면, 사람들은 사회적 상호작용을 통해 동의(approval), 지위(status), 존경(respect) 등과 같은 사회적 보상을 얻을 수 있다는 기대를 안고 사회적 상호작용에 참여하게 된다. 교환성(reciprocity)은 사회적 교환에 참여하는 개인을 위한 보상으로 주목을 받아온 개념이다.
	사회적 교환이론의 교환성은 무엇인가?	사회적 교환이론(social exchange theory)(Blau, 1964)에 의하면, 사람들은 사회적 상호작용을 통해 동의(approval), 지위(status), 존경(respect) 등과 같은 사회적 보상을 얻을 수 있다는 기대를 안고 사회적 상호작용에 참여하게 된다. 교환성(reciprocity)은 사회적 교환에 참여하는 개인을 위한 보상으로 주목을 받아온 개념이다. 교환성은 지식 공헌자들이 그들의 공헌에 대한 대가로 미래의 보상을 기대하기 때문에 지식 공헌자들을 위한 모티베이션으로 작용할 수 있다(Connolly and Thorn, 1990; Kollock, 1999).

참고문헌 (60)

Ahuja, M. K., D. F. Galletta and K. M. Carley, "Individual Centrality and Performance in Virtual R&D Groups : An Empirical Study," Management Science, Vol.49, No.1(2003), 21-38.

상세보기
Anthony, D., S. Smith and T. Williamson, "Reputation and Reliability in Collective Goods : The Case of the Online Encyclopedia Wikipedia," Rationality and Society, Vol.21, No.3 (2009), 283-306.

상세보기
Arazy, O., O. Nov, R. Patterson and L. Yeo, "Information quality in Wikipedia : The Effects of Group Composition and Task Conflict," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.27, No.4(2011), 71-98.

상세보기
Ardichvili, A., V. Page and T. Wentling, "Motivation and Barriers to Participation in Virtual Knowledge-sharing Communities of Practice," Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol.7, No.1(2003), 64-77.

상세보기
Ba, S., J. Stallaert and A. B. Whinston, "Research Commentary : Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Design-The Case for Incentive Alignment," Information Systems Research, Vol.12, No.3(2001), 225-239.

상세보기
Baldwin, T., M. Bedell and J. Johnson, "The Social Fabric of a Team-based M.B.A Program: Network Effects on Student Satisfaction and Performance," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.40(1997), 1369-1397.

상세보기
Bandura, A., "Self-efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency," American Psychologist, Vol.37(1982), 122-147.

상세보기
Bandura, A., Social Foundations of Thought and Action, Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs, New Jersey, 1986.
Bandura, A., Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
Baumeister, R. and M. R. Leary, "The Need to Belong : Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation," Psychological Bulletin, Vol.117(1995), 497-529.

상세보기
Blau, P. M., Exchange and Power in Social Life, John Wiley, New York, 1964.
Bock, G. W. and Y. G. Kim, "Breaking the Myths of Rewards : An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing," Information Resource Management Journal, Vol.15, No.2(2002), 14-21.
Bock, G. W., R. W. Zmud and Y. G. Kim, "Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing : Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces and Organizational Climate," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29, No.1(2005), 87-111.

상세보기
Bulkley, N. and M. Van Alstyne, "An Empirical Analysis of Strategies and Efficiencies in Social Networks," Boston University School of Management Research Paper Series, No.2010-29, 2006.
Cabrera, A., W. C. Collins and J. F. Salgado, "Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing," International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol.17, No.2 (2006), 245-264.

상세보기
Chiu, C. M., M. H. Hsu and E. T. G. Wang, "Understanding Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities : An Integration of Social Capital and Social Cognitive Theories," Decision Support Systems, Vol.42, No.3(2006), 1872-1888.

상세보기
Choi, B., K. Alexander, R. Kraut and J. Levine, "Socialization Tactics in Wikipedia and Their Effects," Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, (2010), 107-116.
Connolly, T. and B. K. Thorn, Discretionary Databases : Theory, Data, and Implications, J. Fulk, C. Steinfield(Eds.), Organizations and Communication Technology, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, (1990), 219-233.
Constant, D., S. Kiesler and L. Sproull, "What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing," Information Systems Research, Vol.5, No.4(1994), 400-421.

상세보기
Constant, D., L. Sproull and S. Kiesler, "The Kindness of Strangers : The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice," Organization Science, Vol.7, No.2(1996), 119-135.

상세보기
DeCharms, R., Personal Causation: The Internal Affective Determinants of Behavior, Academic Press, New York, 1968.
Deci, E. L., Intrinsic Motivation, Plenum Press, New York, 1975.
Deci, E. L. and R. M. Ryan, Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior, Plenum, New York, 1985.
Deci, E. L. and R. M. Ryan, "The 'What' and 'Why' of Goal Pursuits : Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior," Psychological Inquiry, Vol.11(2000), 227-268.

상세보기
Gagne, M., "A Model of Knowledge-Sharing Motivation," Human Resource Management, Vol.48, No.4(2009), 571-589.

상세보기
Gagne, M. and E. Deci, "Self-Determination Theory and Work Motivation," Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.26(2005), 331-362.

상세보기
Giles, J., "Internet Encyclopedias Go Head-to- Head," Nature, Vol.438(2005), 900-901.

상세보기
Harter, S., Effectance Motivation Reconsidered: Toward a Developmental Model, Human Development, Berkeley, 1978.
Hsu, M. H., T. L. Ju, C. H. Yen and C. M. Chang, "Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Virtual Communities : The Relationship between Trust, Self-Efficacy, and Outcome Expectations," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol.65, No.2(2007), 153-169.

상세보기
Kalman, M. E., The Effects of Organizational Commitment and Expected Outcomes on the Motivation to Share Discretionary Information in a Collaborative Database : Communication Dilemmas and Other Serious Games, unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 1999.
Kane, G. C. and R. G. Fichman, "The Shoemaker's Children: Using Wikis to Improve IS Research, Teaching, and Publication," MIS Quarterly, Vol.33, No.1(2009), 1-22.

상세보기
Kankanhalli, A., B. Tan and K. Wei, "Contribution Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation," MIS Quarterly, Vol.29, No.1(2005), 113-143.
Kollock, P., The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace, Communities in Cyberspace, M. Smith and P. Kollock(Eds.), Routledge, New York, 1999, 220-239.
Krebs, D. L., "Empathy and Altruism," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.32, No.6(1975), 1132-1146.
Lakhani, K. and E. von Hippel, "How Open Source Software Works : 'Free' User-to-User Assistance," Research Policy, Vol.32, No.6(2003), 923-943.

상세보기
Lakhani, K. and R. Wolf, Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Eff ort in Free/Open Source Software Projects, in J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, and K. Lakhani (Eds.), Perspectives in Free and Open Source Software, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2005.
Leonard, N. H., L. L. Beauvais and R. W. Scholl, "Work Motivation : The Incorporation of Self Concept-Based Processes," Human Relations, Vol.52, No.8(1999), 969-998.

상세보기
Lerner, J. and J. Tirole, "The Economics of Technology Sharing : Open Source and Beyond." Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.19, No.2(2002), 99-120.
Lih, A., "Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Source?," In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Online Journalism (2004), 16-17.
Lin, N., Social Capital, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001.
Nahapiet, J. and S. Ghoshal, "Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage,"Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, No.2(1998), 242-266.

상세보기
Perreault, S., P. Gaudreau, M. C. Lapointe and C. Lacroix, "Does It Take Three to Tango? Psychological Need Satisfation and Athlete Burnout," International Journal of Sport Psychology, Vol.38(2007), 437-450.
Pink, D. H. Drive : The Surprising Truth about What Motivates Us, Riverhead Hardcover, 2009.
Reis, H. T., Domains of Experience: Investigating Relationship Processes from Three Perspectives, In R. Erber and R. Gilmour (Eds.), Theoretical Frameworks for Personal Relationships, Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, 1994, 87-110.
Rheingold, H., The Virtual Community : Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier (2nd Edition). Cambridge, MIT Press, Massachusetts, 2000.
Rogers, E. M. and D. L. Kincaid, Communication Networks : Toward a New Paradigm for Research, Free Press, New York, 1981.
Ryan, R. M. and E. L. Deci, "Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-being," American Psychologist, Vol.55(2000), 68-78.

상세보기
Sheldon, K. M. and C. P. Niemiec, "It's Not Just the Amount that Counts: Balanced Need Satisfaction Also Affects Well-Being," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.91(2006), 331-341.

상세보기
Sheldon, K., D. Turban, K. Brown, M. Barrick and T. Judge, "Applying Self-Determination Theory to Organizational Research," Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, Vol.22(2003), 357-393.

상세보기
Smith, D. H., "Altruism, Volunteers, and Volunteerism," Journal of Voluntary Action Research, Vol.10, No.1(1981), 21-36.

상세보기
Szulanski, G., "Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firm," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17(1996), 27-43.

상세보기
Stewart, D., "Status Mobility and Status Stability in a Community of Free Software Developers," Academy of Management Conference, Seattle, WA, 2003.
Von Krogh, G., S. Spaeth and K. R. Lakhani, "Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation : a Case Study," Research Policy, Vol.32, No.7(2003), 1217-1241.

상세보기
Wagner, C. and A. Majchrzak, "Enabling Customer-centricity Using Wikis and the Wiki Way," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.23, No.3(2006), 17-43.

상세보기
Wasko, M. and S. Faraj, "It Is What One Does : Why People Participate and Help Others in Electronic Monnunities of Practice," Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol.9, No.2/3(2000), 155-173.

상세보기
Wasko, M. and S. Faraj, "Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice," MIS Quarterly, Vol.29, No.1(2005), 35-57.

상세보기
White, R. W., Ego and Reality in Psychoanalytic Theory, International Universities Press, New York, 1963.
Wighting, M. J., J. Liu and A. P. Rovai, "Distinguishing Sense of Community and Motivation Characteristics between Online and Traditional College Students," The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, Vol.9, No.3 (2008), 285-295.
Xie, K., V. Durrington and L. L. Yen, "Relationship between Students' Motivation and Their Participation in Asynchronous Online Discussions," MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, Vol.7, No.1(2011), 17-29.
Yang, H. and C. Lai, "Motivations of Wikipedia Content Contributors," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.26(2010), 1377-1383.

상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

LOADING...

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증