$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

'멸종위기에 처한 야생 동식물의 국제거래에 관한 협약'의 상어류 등재가 한국 수산업에 끼칠 영향과 대응 전략
Estimation of the Impact of the Inclusion of Sharks in the Appendices of the 'Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)' on Korean Fisheries and Recommendations of the Domestic Measures on the Trade of the Listed Shark Species 원문보기

水産海洋敎育硏究 = Journal of fisheries and marine sciences education, v.26 no.6 = no.72, 2014년, pp.1278 - 1295  

손호선 (국립수산과학원) ,  안두해 (국립수산과학원) ,  김두남 (국립수산과학원) ,  이성일 (국립수산과학원) ,  박겸준 (국립수산과학원)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The Sixteenth Meeting of the Conferences of Parties of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), which was held in March 2013 in Bangkok, Thailand, listed five shark species and one genus, and uplisted one sawfish species. All new species listings w...

주제어

#CITES   #Endangered species   #FAO   #Introduction from the Sea   #RFMO   #Shark  

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

문제 정의

  • CITES는 국가를 회원(당사국)으로 하며, 당사국 사이의 멸종위기 종 거래량 관리를 통해 과도한 포획, 거래 방지 및 종 보존이라는 협약 목표를 달성하고자 한다.
  • 우리나라 수산업에서 상업적으로 이용하고 있는 상어류들의 협약 등재로 인한 영향을 파악하기 위해 CITES에 제출된 상어류 및 ‘해상으로부터의 반입’ 관련 모든 문서들을 검토하였다.
  • 이에 본 논문은 상어류 거래에 대한 CITES 협약 적용에 따른 문제점들과 우리나라 수산업에 끼칠 영향을 파악하여 그에 따른 대응 전략을 제시하고자 한다.
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

질의응답

핵심어 질문 논문에서 추출한 답변
멸종위기에 처한 야생 동식물의 국제거래에 관한 협약에서 멸종위기 종으로 등재된 것은? 2013년 3월 태국에서 개최된 ‘멸종위기에 처한 야생 동식물의 국제거래에 관한 협약(Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, CITES)’ 제16차 총회 (Sixteenth Meeting of the Conferences of Parties, CoP16)에서 4 종류의 상어류가 멸종위기 종으로 등재 되었으며, 18개월의 준비 기간을 거친 뒤 2014년 9월 14일부터 이들 상어류에 대한 협약 적용이 시작되었다(CITES, 2013a).
CITES에서 어느 정도의 준비기간을 거친 뒤 협약이 적용되었는가? 2013년 3월 태국에서 개최된 ‘멸종위기에 처한 야생 동식물의 국제거래에 관한 협약(Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, CITES)’ 제16차 총회 (Sixteenth Meeting of the Conferences of Parties, CoP16)에서 4 종류의 상어류가 멸종위기 종으로 등재 되었으며, 18개월의 준비 기간을 거친 뒤 2014년 9월 14일부터 이들 상어류에 대한 협약 적용이 시작되었다(CITES, 2013a).
멸종위기에 처한 야생 동식물의 국제거래에 관한 협약에서 몇 종의 수산동물이 등재되어 있는가? 현재 CITES에는 고래류를 비롯한 약 255 종의 수산 동물(산호류 제외)이 멸종위기 종으로 등재 되어 있으나(CITES, 2013b; MOE, 2013), 대부분의 종이 어업 대상이 아니거나, 협약에 따른 ‘거래’가 이루어지지 않아 당사국들의 관심을 크게 끌지 못했다.
질의응답 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (61)

  1. CBD, Convention on Biological Diversity(2004). Addis Ababa Principles and Guidelines for the Sustainable Use of Biodiversity (CBD Guidelines), Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 21. 

  2. Choi, Jong-Hwa and Jae-Hak Son(2006). A study on municipal legal reception system of conservation and management measures of international fisheries organizations, The Korea Institute of Maritime Law, 18 (2), 1-26. 

  3. CITES(2000). Interpretation and implementation of Article III, paragraph 5, Article IV, paragraphs 6 and 7 and Article XIV, paragraphs 4, 5 and 6, relating to Introduction from the Sea, CITES CoP11 Document 18, [available at http://cites.org/sites/ default/files/eng/cop/11/doc/18.pdf]. 

  4. CITES(2004a). Conservation and management of sharks, CITES CoP13 Document 35, [available at http://www.cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/13/doc/E13-35.pdf]. 

  5. CITES(2004b). Decisions of the Conference of the Parties to CITES in effect after the 13th meeting, [available at http://www.cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/dec/valid13/E13-Dec.pdf]. 

  6. CITES(2007). International Expert Workshop on Non-Detriment Findings, CITES CoP14 Document 35, [available at http://www.cites.org/eng/cop/14/doc/E14-35.pdf]. 

  7. CITES(2008). International Expert Workshop on CITES Non-Detriment Findings Cancun, Mexico, November 17th to 22nd, 2008 [available at http://www.conabio.gob.mx/institucion/cooperacion_internacional/TallerNDF/taller_ndf.html]. 

  8. CITES(2010). Fifteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties (Doha, Qatar, 13-25 March 2010) Final decisions on the proposals for amendment of Appendices I and II, [available at http://www.cites.org/eng/cop/15/prop/results.php]. 

  9. CITES(2012). Draft Guidance on the Making of Non-Detriment Findings, CITES Animals Committee 26 and Plant Committee 20 Document 8.4, [available at http://www.cites.org/eng/com/ac-pc/ac26-pc20/E-AC26-PC20-08-04.pdf]. 

  10. CITES(2013a). Amendments to Appendices I and II of the Convention, Notification to the parties, No. 2013/012, [available at http://www.cites.org/eng/notif/2013/E-Notif-2013-012.pdf]. 

  11. CITES(2013b). Appendices I, II and III (valid from 12 June 2013), [available at http://cites.org/eng/app/appendices.php]. 

  12. CITES(2013c). CITES getting ready for sharks and rays, Press Release, [available at http://www.cites.org/eng/news/pr/2013/20130914_shark_ray.php]. 

  13. CITES(2013d). List of Contracting Parties, [available at http://www.cites.org/eng/disc/parties/chronolo.php]. 

  14. CITES(2013e). Conference of Parties, [available at http://www.cites.org/eng/disc/cop.php]. 

  15. CITES(2013f). Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, [available at http://www.cites.org/eng/disc/text.php]. 

  16. CITES(2013g). CITES Secretary-General highlights Japan's contribution to CITES implementation, Press Release, [available at http://www.cites.org/eng/news/sundry/2013/20130904_sg_japan.php]. 

  17. CITES(2014a). The structure of CITES, accessed April 14, 2014 [available at http://cites.org/eng/disc/org.php]. 

  18. CITES(2014b). Reservations entered by Parties, accessed February 27, 2014 [available at http://cites.org/eng/app/reserve.php]. 

  19. CITES Database(2014). CITES Trade Database, accessed February 25, 2014 [available at http://www.unep-wcmc-apps.org/citestrade/]. 

  20. CITES and WCO(1996) Memorandum of Understanding between The World Customs Organization(WCO) and the Cites Secretariat, [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/disc/sec/CITES-WCO.pdf]. 

  21. CITES Proposal(1992a). Inclusion of Clupea harengus in Appendix I, CoP8 Proposal 73 by Botswana, Malawi, Namibia and Zimbabwe, [available at http://www.cites.org/eng/cop/08/prop/E08-Prop-73_Clupea.PDF]. 

  22. CITES Proposal(1992b). Inclusion of the western Atlantic population of Thunnus thynnus in Appendix I and of the eastern Atlantic population in Appendix II, CoP8 Proposal 76 and 77 by Sweden, [available at http://www.cites.org/eng/cop/08/prop/E08-Prop-76_77_Thunnus.PDF]. 

  23. CITES Proposal(2000a). Inclusion of Rhincodon typus in Appendix II in accordance with Article II.2.(a), CoP11 Proposal 47 by United States of America, [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/11/prop/47.pdf]. 

  24. CITES Proposal(2000b). Proposal to include Carcharodon carcharias (Great White Shark) on Appendix I of the Convention of International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), CoP11 Proposal 48 by Australia and United States of America, [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/11/prop/48.pdf]. 

  25. CITES Proposal(2000c). Inclusion of the Basking Shark (Cetorhinus maximus) on Appendix II of CITES, CoP11 Proposal 49 by United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/11/prop/49.pdf]. 

  26. CITES Proposal(2002a). Inclusion of the Whale Shark (Rhincodon typus) on Appendix II of CITES, CoP12 Proposal 35 by India and the Philippines, [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/12/prop/E12-P35.pdf]. 

  27. CITES Proposal(2002b). Inclusion of the Basking Shark (Cetorhinus maximus) on Appendix II of CITES, CoP12 Proposal 36 by United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, on behalf of the European Community, [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/12/prop/E12-P36.pdf]. 

  28. CITES Proposal(2004). Inclusion of Carcharodon carcharias in Appendix II with a zero annual export quota, CoP13 Proposal 32 by Australia and Madagascar, [available at http://www.cites.org/eng/cop/13/prop/E13-P32.pdf]. 

  29. CITES Proposal(2007a). Inclusion of Lamna nasus (Bonnaterre, 1788) in Appendix II in accordance with Article II 2(a), CoP14 Proposal 15 by Germany, on behalf of the European Community, [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/14/prop/E14-P15.pdf]. 

  30. CITES Proposal(2007b). Inclusion of Squalus acanthias Linnaeus, 1758 in Appendix II in accordance with Article II 2(a), CoP14 Proposal 16 by Germany, on behalf of the European Community, [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/14/prop/E14-P16.pdf]. 

  31. CITES Proposal(2007c). Inclusion of all species of the family Pristidae in Appendix I of CITES, CoP14 Proposal 17 by Kenya and the United States of America, [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/14/prop/E14-P17.pdf]. 

  32. CITES Proposal(2010a). Inclusion of Sphyrna lewini (scalloped hammerhead shark) in Appendix II in accordance with Article II paragraph 2(a) of the Convention and satisfying Criterion A in Annex 2a of Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. oP14). Inclusion of Sphyrna mokarran, (great hammerhead shark), Sphyrna zygaena (smooth hammerhead shark), Carcharhinus plumbeus (sandbar shark), and Carcharhinus obscurus (dusky shark) in Appendix II in accordance with Article II paragraph 2(b) of the Convention and satisfying Criterion A in Annex 2b of Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP14), CoP15 Proposal 15 by Palau and the United States of America, [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/15/prop/E-15-Prop-15.pdf]. 

  33. CITES Proposal(2010b). Inclusion of Carcharhinus longimanus (Poey, 1861) in Appendix II in accordance with Article II paragraph 2(a) of the Convention and satisfying Criterion A in Annex 2a of Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP14), CoP15 Proposal 16 by Palau and the United States of America, [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/15/prop/E-15-Prop-16.pdf]. 

  34. CITES Proposal(2010c). Inclusion of Lamna nasus (Bonnaterre, 1788) in Appendix II in accordance with Article II 2(a) and (b), CoP15 Proposal 17 by Sweden, on behalf of the European Community, [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/15/prop/E-15-Prop-17.pdf]. 

  35. CITES Proposal(2010d). Inclusion of Squalus acanthias Linnaeus, 1758 in Appendix II in accordance with Article II 2(a) and (b), CoP15 Proposal 18 by Sweden, on behalf of the European Community, [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/15/prop/E-15-Prop-18.pdf]. 

  36. CITES Proposal(2010e). Proposal to include Atlantic Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus thynnus (Linnaeus, 1758)) on Appendix I of CITES in accordance with Article II 1 of the Convention, CoP15 Proposal 19 by Monaco, [available at http://www.cites.org/eng/cop/15/prop/E-15-Prop-19.pdf]. 

  37. CITES Proposal(2013a). Inclusion of Carcharhinus longimanus (Poey, 1861) in Appendix II in accordance with Article II paragraph 2 (a) of the Convention and satisfying Criterion A in Annex 2a of Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP14), CoP16 Proposal 42 by Brazil, Colombia and United States of America, [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/16/prop/E-CoP16-Prop-42.pdf]. 

  38. CITES Proposal(2013b). Inclusion of Sphyrna lewini (scalloped hammerhead shark) in Appendix II in accordance with Article II paragraph 2(a) of the Convention and satisfying Criterion A in Annex 2a of Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP14). Inclusion of Sphyrna mokarran (great hammerhead shark) and Sphyrna zygaena (smooth hammerhead shark) in Appendix II in accordance with Article II paragraph 2(b) of the Convention and satisfying Criterion A in Annex 2b of Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP14), CoP16 Proposal 43 by Brazil, Costa Rica and Honduras, [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/16/prop/E-CoP16-Prop-43.pdf]. 

  39. CITES Proposal(2013c). Inclusion of Lamna nasus (Bonnaterre, 1788) in Appendix II in accordance with Article II 2(a), CoP16 Proposal 44 by Brazil, Comoros, Croatia, Denmark and Egypt. [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/16/prop/E-CoP16-Prop-44.pdf]. 

  40. CITES Proposal(2013d). Transfer of Pristis microdon from Appendix II to Appendix I of CITES, CoP16 Proposal 45 by Australia. [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/16/prop/E-CoP16-Prop-45.pdf]. 

  41. CITES Proposal(2013e). Inclusion of the Genus Manta (including Manta birostris, Manta alfredi and any other possible species of Manta) in Appendix II in accordance with Article II paragraph 2(a) of the convention and satisfying Criterion A and B in Annex 2a of Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP14), CoP16 Proposal 46 by Brasil, Colombia and Republic of Ecuador. [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/16/prop/E-CoP16-Prop-46.pdf]. 

  42. CITES Proposal(2013f). Inclusion of Paratrygon aiereba in Appendix II in accordance with article II, paragraph 2 (a) of the Convention and Resolution Conf.9.24 (Rev, CoP15), CoP16 Proposal 47 by Colombia. [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/16/prop/E-CoP16-Prop-47.pdf]. 

  43. CITES Proposal(2013g). Listing of the species Potamotrygon motoro and Potamotrygon schroederi in Appendix II in accordance with Article II 2a (b) of the Convention, and Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP15), CoP16 Proposal 48 by Colombia and Ecuador. [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/16/prop/E-CoP16-Prop-48.pdf]. 

  44. CITES Resolution(1994). Status of International Trade in Shark Species, Resolution adopted at CoP9, [available at http://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/09/E9-Res.pdf]. 

  45. CMS(2013). Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation of Migratory Sharks, accessed March 4, 2014 [available at http://sharksmou.org/]. 

  46. FAO(1999). International Plan of Action for reducing incidental catch of seabirds in longline fisheries. International Plan of Action for the conservation and management of sharks. International Plan of Action for the management of fishing capacity, Rome, Italy, pp26. [available at ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/006/x3170e/X3170E00.pdf]. 

  47. FAO(2004a). Report of the Expert Consultation on Implementation Issues Associated with Listing Commercially-exploited Aquatic Species on CITES Appendices. Rome, Italy, 25. 28 May 2004. FAO Fisheries Report. No. 741, Rome, Italy, 24. [available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y5751e/y5751e00.htm]. 

  48. FAO(2004b). Report of the Expert Consultation on Legal Issues Related to CITES and Commercially-exploited Aquatic Species. Rome, 22.25 June 2004. FAO Fisheries Report. No. 746, Rome, Italy, pp21. [available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y5807e/y5807e00.htm]. 

  49. Fischer, J. K. Erikstein B. D'Offay S. Guggisberg, and M. Barone(2012). Review of the Implementation of the International Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1076, Rome, FAO. 120. 

  50. Froese, R. and D. Pauly (Editors)(2013). FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication, [available at http://www.fishbase.org/]. 

  51. Greenpeace(2014). Defending Our Oceans, accessed Apr. 14, 2014 [available at http://www.greenpeace.org/eastasia/campaigns/oceans/]. 

  52. Korea Customs Service(2014). Korean HS code Query, accessed February 28, 2014 [available at http://portal.customs.go.kr/kcsgod/search/KCQQ001.jsp]. 

  53. Korea Overseas Fisheries Association(2013). Statistical Year Book of Overseas Fisheries, 2013. 412. 

  54. MOE, Ministry of Environment(2013). The list of globally endangered species (Public Notification 2013-92), Ministry of Environment. (in Korean) 

  55. MOF, Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries(2006). Study on the Establishment of National Plan of the International Plan of Action for Conservation and Management of Sharks and Sea Birds, pp 290. (in Korean) 

  56. MOF, Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries(2014). Fisheries Information Service, accessed March 3, 2014 [available at http://www.fips.go.kr/]. (in Korean) 

  57. Mundy-Taylor, V. and V. Crook(2013). Into the deep: Implementing CITES measures for commercially-valuable sharks and manta rays. Report prepared for the European Commission TRAFFIC, 106. 

  58. Schneider, J. A. and O. D. Foighil(1999). Phylogeny of Giant Clams (Cardiidae: Tridacninae) Based on Partial Mitochondrial 16S rDNA Gene Sequences, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 13, 59-66. 

    상세보기 crossref

  59. Shark Alliance(2014). About the Shark Alliance, accessed April 14, 2014 [available at http://www.sharkalliance.org/v.asp?rootid3&depth1&level13&level2id]. 

  60. UNEP-WCMC(2013). The Checklist of CITES Species Website CITES Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland. Compiled by UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. accessed Nov. 11, 2013 [available at http://checklist.cites.org/]. 

  61. Yoon, Chang-In(2009). The Current Status of Covered MEAs under KOUSA FTA and Its Implications, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, 35-96. (in Korean) 

저자의 다른 논문 :

LOADING...

관련 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로