최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.34 no.3, 2014년, pp.303 - 319
정용재 (공주교육대학교)
The purpose of this study is to investigate theoretically the meaning and features of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) based on the views of Peirce and Dewey, and to explore the implications of CoI in science education. The meaning and features of CoI are: (a) inquiry in CoI is initiated with faithful...
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
Peirce에게 있어서 믿음이란 무엇인가? | Peirce에게 있어서 믿음이란 어떤 대상의 습관을 확립함으로써(CP 5.398) 그 대상의 본질적인 의미가 확립되어 있는 상태이다(Joung & Song, 2006). 습관은 특정한 조건 하에서 그 대상이 일관되고 반복적으로 특정한 행위를 하게 되는 경향성을 나타낸다. | |
장님 코끼리 만지기는 어떤 것을 비유한 이야기인가? | 본래 ‘장님 코끼리 만지기’ 이야기는 코끼리의 각각 다른 부위를 만진 시각 장애인 세명이 코끼리가 어떻게 생겼냐는 질문에 대해서, 상아를 만진 사람은 무와 같이 생겼다고 대답하고, 꼬리를 만진 사람은 새끼줄과 같이 생겼다고 대답하고, 다리를 만진 사람은 나무와 같이 생겼다고 대답했다는 이야기이다. 이는 전체를 볼 수 없어 진실을 알지 못하는 개인의 한계를 비유한 이야기이다. 그런데 Shields(2003)는 만약 이들이 탐구공동체의 일원이었다면 다르게 행동했을 것이라고 설명한다. | |
핵심 역량이란 무엇인가? | , 2013), 과학과 교육과정 개정에 대비한 핵심역량 재구조화 방안(Kwak, 2013) 등이 이뤄진 바 있다. 핵심 역량이란 ‘학생들이 향후 사회적 삶을 성공적으로 살아가기 위해 필요로 하는 능력’을 말한다(Kwak, 2012). 예를 들어, OECD에서는 ‘양 방향적으로 도구를 활용하기’(언어와 상징 및 텍스트를 양 방향적으로 활용하기, 지식과 정보를 양 방향적으로 활용하기, 정보기술을 양 방향적으로 활용하기), ‘다양한 구성원들과 상호작용하기’(타인과 관계 맺기, 팀 속에서 일하고 협동하기, 갈등을 관리하고 해결하기), ‘자율적으로 행동하기’(장기적 전망 속에서 행동하기, 인생의 계획과 개인적 과제를 설정하고 수행하기, 권리와 관심, 한계, 필요를 주장하고 보호하기)의 세 가지를 핵심역량으로 선정한 바 있다. |
Burgh, G., & Nichols, K. (2012). The parallels between philosophical inquiry and scientific inquiry: Implications for science education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(10), 1045-1059.
Cho, H. -H. (1992). An analysis of the nature of scientific inquiry and a study on the instructional method for promoting inquiry competence. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 12(2), 61-73.
Dewey, J. (1910), How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath, Lexington. Reprinted, Dover Publication, Mineola, NY, 1997.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan. Reprinted, Dover Publication, Mineola, NY, 2004.
Dewey, J. (1938), Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company, Reprinted as pp. 1-527 in John Dewey, The Later Works, 1925-1953, Volume 12: 1938, Jo Ann Boydston (Ed.), Kathleen Poulos (text. ed.), Ernest Nagel (intro.), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL, 1986.
Driver, R. (1983). The pupils as scientist? Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172.
Hanson, N. R. (1961). Patterns of discovery: an inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jeong, H.(2005). Pragmaticism: Incomplete system of Peirce [프라그마티시즘: 퍼스의 미완성 체계]. Seoul: Cheonggye.
Jo, S. -M. (2008). How to teach the method of discussion and essay-writing in the community of inquiry. Education of Ethics and Philosophy[윤리철학교육], vol 10, 1-22.
Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. H. Jonassen, & S. M. Land (Eds). Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25-56). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Joung, Y. J. (2008). Cased and features of abductive inference conducted by a young child to explain naturel phenomena in everyday life. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 28(5), 197-210.
Joung, Y. J., & Song, J. (2006). Exploring the implication of Peirce's abduction in science education by theoretical investigation. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 26(6), 703-722.
Kim, D., (2002). Pragmatism[프래그머티즘]. Seoul: Acanet.
Kim, M. -G. (2004). Dewey's concept of situation and its educative implications. The Korean Journal of Philosophy of Education, 32, 1-26.
Kim, M. -G. (2005). Transaction & Education. Seoul: Wonmisa.
Kim, M. -G. (2010). C. S. Peirce's view of reality and the logic of inquiry: Its implications for inquiry learning. The Korean Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48, 1-22.
Kwak, Y. (2012). Research on ways to improve science teaching methods to develop students' key competencies. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(5), 855-865.
Kwon, Y. -J., Yang, I. -H., & Chung, W. -W. (2000). An explorative analysis of hypothesis-generation by pre-service science teachers. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20(1), 29-42.
Kwon, Y. -J., Jeong, J. -S., Park, Y. -B., & Kang, M. -J. (2003). A philosophical study on the generating process of declarative scientific knowledge: Focused on inductive, abductive, and deductive processes. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 23(3), 215-228.
Kwon, O. W. (2008). John Dewey's Understanding of Community and Its Implications for Christian Realism. Study on Theology[신학연구], 52, 185-208.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.. New York: Cambridge university press.
Lee, J. (2013). A Survey of Physics Teachers' Opinions about the 2009 Revised High-school 'Physics I' Curriculum and Test, New Physics: Sae Mulli, 63(4), 400-410.
Lee, M., Shim, J., Kim, D., Gu, J., Kim, H., Choi, B., Kim, J., Min, G., Bae, Y., & Kim, Y. (2013). Research on the development of the key achievement standards for science of elementary and middle school according to 2009 revised science curriculum. Research report CRC 2013-9. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
Lee, S. -K., Shin, M. -K., & Kim, C. -J. (2008). Exploring the educational potential of the exhibits in natural history museums as socioscientific learning materials in the context of proposing science inquiry communities: Earthquake topic. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 29(6), 506-519.
Lee, Y. -R., Kwak, Y., & Kim, D. -Y. (2005). Analysis and evaluation of the earth science content relevance in the 7th National Science Curriculum. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 26(8), 759-770.
Lim, P. K. (1999). Basis for between scientific inquiry and ethical inquiry: Focused on the Dewey's theory of inquiry and Thagard's connectionism program[과학탐구와 윤리탐구의 을 위한 기초: 듀이의 탐구 이론과 타가드의 연결주의 프로그램을 중심으로]. Doctoral Dissertation, Korea University.
Lim, P. K. (2010). Studies on the model of teaching philosophy & designing philosophy curriculum. Study on Ontology[존재론 연구], vol 24, 391-410.
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ministry of Education (2007). The 2007 Revised Science Curriculum.
Ministry of Education (2011). The 2009 Revised Science Curriculum.
Oh, C. -J., & Kim, H. -Y. (2010). A study on the improvement of the community of inquiry through comparing with the learning community. Theory and Practice of Education, 15(3), 127-152.
Paik, S. -H., Woo, S. -k., Kim, H. -N., & Won, J. -A. (2011). An analysis on achievement degree of goals of science curriculum through elementary school students' and teachers' perceptions. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(1), 113-128.
Pardales, M. J., & Girod, M. (2006). Community of Inquiry: Its past and present future. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(3), 299-309.
Park, S. -Y., & Kim, H. -Y. (2009). Reunderstanding community of philosophical inquiry for children from Dewey's thought. Theory and Practice of Education, 14(3), 25-48.
Peirce, C. S. (1899). The scientific attitude and fallibilism. In J. Buchler (Ed.). Philosophical writings of Peirce (pp. 42-59). NY: Dover Publication, 1940.
Peirce, C. S. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce [ab. CP], 8 vols. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (1931-1958) (Eds.) vols. 1-6; A. W. Burks (1931-1958) (Ed.) vols. 7-8, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Peterson, D. (1992). Life in a crowded place: Making a learning community. Heinmann: Portsmouth.
Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjecture and refutation. London: Rontledge & Kegan Paul.
Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P. W., and Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change, Science Education, 66(2). 211-227.
Rogoff, B., Matusov, E., & White, C. (1996). Models of teaching and learning: Participation in a community of learners. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.). The handbook of education and human development. Oxford: Blackwell.
Roth, W. -M. (1995). Authentic school science. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Roth, W. -M., Boutonne, S., McRobbie, C. J., & Lucas, K. B. (1999). One class, many worlds. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 59-77.
Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (2003). Key competences for a successful life and a well-functioning society. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber.
Shields, P. M. (2003). The Community of Inquiry Classical Pragmatism and Public Administration. Administration & Society, 35(5), 510-538.
Splitter, L., & Sharp, A. M. (1995). Teaching for better thinking: the classroom community. Melbourne: ACER.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge university press.
Yoon, H. -G., Joung, Y. -J., & Kim, M. (2012). The challenges of science inquiry teaching for pre-service teachers in elementary classrooms: Difficulties on and under the scene. Research in Science Education, 42(3), 580-608.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.