$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[국내논문] 수학 교사 공동체 관련 국내·외 연구 동향
Research Trends in Mathematics Teacher Learning Community : Literature Review 원문보기

Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education. Series E: Communications of Mathematical Education, v.34 no.4, 2020년, pp.439 - 464  

김원 (고려대학교 교육대학원) ,  임웅 (연세대학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구의 목적은 수학 교사 공동체에 대한 국내·외 연구의 최근 동향을 파악하고 그 중 특히 공동체 활동에서 구성원들의 협력의 특징을 분석함으로써 교사 공동체 연구와 실제에 시사점을 제공하는 것이다. 이를 위해 2003년부터 2019년 7월까지 국내 KCI 등재 논문 14편, 국외 SSCI 등재 논문 24편을 대상으로 연구 방법, 연구 주제, 그리고 교사 공동체에서 협력 의지, 방향, 양상을 분석하였다. 그 결과 국내·외 연구들은 통상 질적연구 방법을 활용하였다는 공통점이 있었으나 연구에서 주목한 주제와 공동체 협력의 특징에는 다소 차이가 있었다. 연구 주제 측면에서 국내 논문은 공동체 운영과 발달 및 프로그램 개발에 관한 연구가 많았으며 국외 논문은 공동체 활동과 교수 발달, 특히 교수 관행에 집중한 연구가 많았다. 또한 구성원들의 협력 양상에서 국내 논문은 지식의 제공과 교수 경험의 공유를 강조하였고, 국외 논문은 경험적 사례와 아이디어를 공유하는 것뿐 아니라 이를 반성하는 과정을 강조하였다는 차이가 나타났다. 한편 국내·외 논문에서 교사들이 주체적으로 공동체 활동 내용과 규범을 협의하는 활동에 주목하였다는 특징이 나타났다. 이러한 연구 결과를 바탕으로 교사 공동체 연구의 방법, 공동체에서 협력 방식, 그리고 교사교육 정책에 관한 시사점을 제시하였다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study conducted a systematic review of mathematics teacher learning communities, especially the characteristics of teacher collaboration in community activities. Our review includes 14 research papers published in national academic journals indexed in KCI and 24 research papers in international...

주제어

표/그림 (17)

참고문헌 (85)

  1. Kang, J. H. (2015). A study on how to promote teachers' learning community in the arts gifted education. Art Education Review, 55, 1-28. 

  2. Kang, H. Y., Ko, E. S., Lee, D. H, Lee, H., Tak, B., Cho, J. W., & Kim, S. H. (2018). A study on professional development program for mathematics teachers about process-focused assessment. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 28(3), 321-343. 

  3. Kang, H. Y., Tak, B., & Ko, E. S. (2016). A study on possibility of research community for mathematics classroom of expert-inservice teacher-preservice teacher. School Mathematics, 18(4), 857-880. 

  4. Gyeonggido Office of Education (2015). The 2015 plan to adopt grading system into the teachers' professional learning community in school. 

  5. Gyeonggido Office of Education. (2017). Gyeonggi education growing together through joint research and joint practice. Gyeonggido Office of Education Press Release. 

  6. Gyeonggido Office of Education. (2019). Understanding materials for operating a professional learning community in school 2019. 

  7. Ko, Y., Kim, Y. J., Lee, H., & Lim, K. Y. (2017). Research trends in teacher learning community in Korea: A thematic analysis of Korean journal publications. Journal of Learner-Centered Curiculum and Instruction, 17(4), 429-457. 

  8. Kwon, N. Y. (2015). Teacher noticing in the context of a learning community. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 25(2), 139-155 

  9. Kwon, N. Y., Lee, E, Park, M., & Park, J. (2012). A study on professional development for mathematics teachers: Based on the investigation of professional development programs in foreign countries. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 22(3), 387-400. 

  10. Kwon, S. Y. (2015). A study on the effective lesson study for developing PCK of elementary mathematics teachers. The Journal of Education Studies, 22(3), 387-400. 

  11. Kwon, O. N., Park, J. H., Oh, K. H., & Bae, Y. G. (2014). A case study on the development and practice of lessons for mathematics-oriented convergence through the professional development of multi-tiered teacher community. The Mathematical Education, 53(3), 357-381. 

  12. Kwon, O. N., Park, J, S., Park, J. H., & Cho, H. (2014). Designing and implementing professional development program of multi-tiered teacher community: Joint collaboration between teachers and PD program developers. The Mathematical Education, 53(2), 201-217. 

  13. Kim, N. G. (2013). A study on the socio-mathematical norms in elementary teachers' professional learning community. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 29(3), 419-441. 

  14. Kim, N. G. (2017). A Study on the development of professional learning community in mathematics based on the collaboration with university and its affiliated elementary school. The Mathematical Education, 56(1), 119-130. 

  15. Kim, N. G. Shim, Y., Kim, M., & Lee, H-M. (2014). Exploring educational meanings and discourse analysis of a professional learning community -focused on mathematics in an elementary school. Korean Speech and Discourse Analysis, 25, 7-40. 

  16. Kim, D. J., Shin, J., Lee, J. E., Lim, W., Lee, Y., & Choi, S. H. (2019). Conceptualizing discursive teaching capacity: A case study of a middle school mathematics teacher. School Mathematics, 21(2), 291-318. 

  17. Kim, B. S. (2014). The activities of a learning community for professional development. Journal of CheongRam Korean Language Education, 50, 7-35. 

  18. Kim, S. J., Maeng, J. S., & Park, S. J.(2013). A case study on the learning community of the elementary school teachers. CNU Journal of Educational Studies, 34(1), 227-247. 

  19. Kim, Y. (2018). A comparative study on cooperative interaction in the teachers learning community: Focused on elementary mathematics lessons. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 28(1), 75-96. 

  20. Kim, J., Pang, J. S., & Kim, S. (2017). Case study of elementary mathematics lessons by a professional learning community among teachers. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 20(4), 267-286. 

  21. Na G. S. (2010). Reporting the activities of learning community on elementary mathematics lesson. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 20(3), 373-395. 

  22. Park, Y. (2011). Reporting the activities of professional development system for enhancing elementary mathematical teaching professionalism. Communications of Mathematical Education, 25(1), 47-61. 

  23. Pang, J. S. (2003). Mathematics teacher learning and professional development in communities. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 13(2), 143-157. 

  24. Seo, K. H. (2008). A case study on out-of-school teacher learning community. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 25(2), 53-80. 

  25. Seo, K. H. (2009). Teacher learning communities and professional development. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 26(2), 243-276. 

  26. Seo, K. H. (2013). A community approach to teacher learning. Journal of Educational Studies, 44(3), 161-191. 

  27. Song, K. O., & Choi, J. Y.(2010). Analysis on the measurement model and the level of professional learning community in elementary and secondary schools. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 27(1), 179-231. 

  28. Shin, E. J., & Park, K. A. (2018). The current status of and progressive operation measures for participation in professional learning communities by teachers of elementary, middle and high schools with a focus on teachers registered with the Seoul metropolitan education office. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18, 415-443. 

  29. Yang, S. A., & Lee, S. J. (2019). Secondary teachers advanced knowledge for teaching algebra. School Mathematics, 21(2), 419-439. 

  30. Oh, S. H. (2014). Exploring of physical education teacher's change experience and its factors through learning community participation. Korean Journal of Sport Pedagogy, 21(3), 67-88. 

  31. Oh Y. Y. (2006). Exploring teacher change through the community of practice focused on improving mathematics teaching. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 16(3), 251-272. 

  32. Oh, T. K. (2016). For the reflective practice of math classes: Case study on the learning community of math teachers in a school. School Mathematics, 18(1), 105-126. 

  33. Yun, J., Kang, E., & Cho, Y. H. (2016). A case study on the professional learning community: Characteristics & implications of elementary school teachers' experiences. Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 34(4), 155-185. 

  34. Lee, K. H., Na, G. S., Kwon, N. Y., Kim, D., Lee, H. C., Lee, D. H., Ko, E. S., Park, M. S., Park, M., Lee, E. J., Cho, J. W., & Park, J. H. (2012). A preliminary study on designing PDS model for Korean mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 22(4), 581-602. 

  35. Lee, K. H., Song, C. G., & Lee, D. Y. (2018). Praxeology-based analysis and design of mathematical tasks - A case of analysis and design of tasks about the sum of interior angles of a polygon by an inquiry community. School Mathematics, 20(4), 609-634. 

  36. Lee, K. H., Song, C. G., & Jung, H. Y. (2019). Change of teacher knowledge through task design in the teacher-researcher community: Focused on knowledge of students in the area of derivatives application. The Mathematical Education, 58(2), 299-317. 

  37. Lee, S. H., Lee, J. H., Heo, S. Y., Park, S. J., Han, S. Y., & Han, E. J. (2015). The qualitative meta analysis of attributes in teacher learning community. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 53(4), 77-101. 

  38. Lee, E. J. (2015). Research on the participation situaion of beginning physical education teacher's educational communities of practice. Korean Journal of Sport Pedagogy, 22(3), 23-50. 

  39. Jeong, D. H., & Shin, I. S. (2018). A case study on the changes of mathematical knowledge for teaching in the mathematics teacher learning community: Focused on the statistical estimation. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(20), 1401-1423. 

  40. Ju, M. K. (2008). An analysis of a preservice teacher's questioning: The effect of practicum program based on collaborative inquiry comunity. School Mathematics, 10(4), 515-535. 

  41. Choi, S. H., Ha, J., & Kim, D. J. (2016). A communicational approach to mathematical process appeared in a peer mentoring teaching method. Communications of Mathematical Education, 30(3), 375-392. 

  42. Choe, S. H., & Hwang, H. J. (2008). The research on pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics teaching. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 11(4), 569-593. 

  43. Choe, S. H., & Hwang, H. J. (2009). The research on pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) focused on instructional consulting for secondary beginning teachers. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 12(1), 27-45. 

  44. Choi, J. Y., & Song. K. O.(2006). A Study on the influence of professional learning community on elementary teachers' social studies instruction. The Journal of Elementary Education Studies, 19(2), 217-239. 

  45. Boaler, J., & Humphreys, C. (2005). Connecting mathematical ideas: Middle school video cases to support teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. 

  46. Clark-Wilson, A., Hoyles, C., Noss, R., Vahey, P., & Roschelle, J. (2015). Scaling a technology-based innovation: Windows on the evolution of mathematics teachers' practices. ZDM, 47, 79-92. 

  47. Confrey, J., Makar, K., & Kazak, S. (2004). Undertaking data analysis of student outcomes as professional development for teachers. ZDM, 36(1), 1-9. 

  48. Crespo, S. (2006). Elementary teacher talk in mathematics study groups. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 29-56 

  49. DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing students achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press. 

  50. Garcia Carrion, R., & Diez-Palomar, J. (2015). Learning communities: Pathways for educational success and social transformation through interactive groups in mathematics. European Educational Research Journal, 14(2), 151-166. 

  51. Glassman, M. (1994). All things being equal: The two roads of Piaget and Vygotsky. Developmental Review, 14, 186-214. 

  52. Gresalfi, M. S., & Cobb, P. (2011). Negotiating identities for mathematics teaching in the context of professional development. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42, 270-304. 

  53. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942-1012. 

  54. Goos, M. (2014). Researcher-teacher relationships and models for teaching development in mathematics education. ZDM, 46(2), 189-200. 

  55. Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (2013). Collective work with resources: An essential dimension for teacher documentation. ZDM, 45(7), 1003-1016. 

  56. Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430-511. 

  57. Hord, S. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. 

  58. Jaworski, B. (2003). Research practice into/influencing mathematics teaching and learning development: Towards a theoretical framework based on co-learning partnerships. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 249-282. 

  59. Jaworski, B. (2004). Insiders and outsiders in mathematics teaching development: The design and study of classroom activity. Research in Mathematics Education, 6(1), 3-22. 

  60. Johnson, H. L., Coles, A., & Clarke, D. (2017). Mathematical tasks and the student: Navigating "tensions of intentions" between designers, teachers, and students. ZDM, 49(6), 813-822. 

  61. Jones, K., & Pepin, B. (2016). Research on mathematics teachers as partners in task design. J ournal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(2/3), 105-121. 

  62. Karsenty, R., & Arcavi, A. (2017). Mathematics, lenses and videotapes: A framework and a language for developing reflective practices of teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(5), 433-455. 

  63. Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 203-235. 

  64. Kieran, C., Krainer, K., & Shaughnessy, J. M., (2012). Linking research to practice: Teachers as key stakeholders in mathematics education research. In A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (Vol. 27, pp. 361-392). New York: Springer. 

  65. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 

  66. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. 

  67. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Hurd, J. (2009). Improving mathematics instruction through lesson study: A theoretical model and North American case. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(4), 285-304. 

  68. Little, J. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129-151. 

  69. Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. D. (1996). Teachers' professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 757-798. 

  70. Meyer, T. (2002). Novice teacher learning communities. American Secondary Education, 31(1), 27-42. 

  71. McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York: Teachers College Press. 

  72. Morris, J. C., & Miller-Stevens, K. (2016). Advancing collaboration theory: Models, typologies, and evidence. London: Routledge Publishing. 

  73. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2007). Mathematics teaching today: Improving practice, improving student learning. Reston, VA: NCTM. 

  74. Pang, J. S. (2016). Improving mathematics instruction and supporting teacher learning in Korea through lesson study using five practices. ZDM, 48, 471-483. 

  75. Ronfeldt, M., Farmer, S. O., McQueen, K., & Grissom, J. A. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research J ournal, 52(3), 475-514. 

  76. Robutti, O., Cusi, A., Clark-Wilson, A., Jaworski, B., Chapman, O., Esteley, C., & Joubert, M. (2016). ICME international survey on teachers working and learning through collaboration. ZDM, 48(5), 651-690. 

  77. Sergiovanni, T. J., & Strarratt, R. J. (2007). Supervision: A redefinition (8th ed). New York: McGrawHill. 

  78. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13. 

  79. Stein, M. K., Silver, E. A., & Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematics reform and teacher development: A community of practice perspective. In J. Greeno & S. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices: A symposium on mathematics and science learning (pp. 17-52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates. 

  80. Stoll, L., & Louis, K. (2007). Professional learning communities. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. 

  81. Sztajn, P., Hackenberg, A. J., White, D. Y., & Allexsaht-Snider, M. (2007). Mathematics professional development for elementary teachers: building trust with in a school-based mathematics education community. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 970-984. 

  82. Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80-91. 

  83. Vrikki, M., Warwick, P., Vermunt, J. D., Mercer, N., & Van Halem, N. (2017). Teacher learning in the context of Lesson Study: a video-based analysis of teacher discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 211-224. 

  84. Westheimer, J. (2008). Learning among colleagues: Teacher community and the shared enterprise of education. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman- Nemser, & J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 756-782). New York: Routledge. 

  85. Zaslavsky, O. (2004). Learning events in the life of a community of mathematic educators. ZDM, 36(1), 20-26. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로