[논문]공동활동참여도와 공동생활공간만족도의 효과 - 스웨덴 코하우징 거주자의 잠정적 주거조절 틀 속에서 -

최정신; 조재순; 서귀숙

doi:10.6107/jkha.2014.25.4.125

공동활동참여도와 공동생활공간만족도의 효과 - 스웨덴 코하우징 거주자의 잠정적 주거조절 틀 속에서 -
Participation in Common Activities and Satisfaction with Common Space - In a Tentative Framework of Housing Adjustment for Swedish Cohousing Residents - 원문보기

한국주거학회 논문집 = Journal of the Korean Housing Association, v.25 no.4, 2014년, pp.125 - 133

최정신 (가톨릭대학교 소비자.주거학전공) , 조재순 (한국교원대학교 가정교육과) , 서귀숙 (숭실대학교 건축학부 실내건축전공)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The purpose of this study was to find the role of participation in common activities and satisfaction with common space in a tentative housing adjustment framework for Swedish cohousing residents, applying the housing adjustment behavior model of Morris and Winter (1978, 1996). The data used for this research were a subset of data Choi and Paulsson (2011) surveyed from 12 Swedish cohousing units. Number of 216 cases whose age was 40 and over were selected and analyzed with Pearson correlations and hierarchical linear regressions by SPSS. The regression analyses included four main concepts as endogenous variables, which were participation in common activities, satisfaction with common space, overall life satisfaction, and intention to move out. The results showed that participation in common activities raised satisfaction with common space and overall life satisfaction but reduced intention to move out. Meanwhile, satisfaction with common space diminished intention to move out but did not impact overall life satisfaction. When overall life satisfaction was added to the final regression model, the direct impacts of security reasons, participation in common activities, and satisfaction with common space on intention to move out disappeared. It may be concluded that participation in common activities and satisfaction with common space acted as intervening variables in the tentative cohousing adjustment framework. Even though this study leaves further research on specifying the framework, it may be noteworthy as a first attempt that explains the flow of main concepts. This study may broaden the possibility of empirical studies to develop an analytical path model of housing adjustment for cohousing residents.

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

문제 정의

Even though this study leaves further research to specify a tentative framework, it may be noteworthy as a first attempt to articulate the concepts revealed by previous empirical cohousing research. Also this study suggests some pass flow of main concepts to broaden the possibility of developing an analytical or theoretical model of housing adjustment for cohousing residents. Lastly, it may give insight of housing alternatives for emerging Korean baby boomers.
This research attempts to find the role of participation in common activities and satisfaction with common space in a tentative housing adjustment framework for Swedish cohousing residents based on previous descriptive findings. The housing adjustment behavior model of Morris and Winter (1978, 1996) will be adapted to the tentative research framework.
The main concepts mentioned in previous cohousing studies are assumed to have a logical stream from condition (indicates what they are doing) to satisfaction (represents how they think about the condition) and then to intention to adjust (get out of here to overcome dissatisfaction, if any). This study attempts to put those main concepts together and look at the role of participation in common activities and satisfaction with common space in full path contexts.

제안 방법

This research attempts to search the role of participation in common activities and satisfaction with common space in a tentative housing adjustment framework for Swedish cohousing, applying the housing adjustment behavior model of Morris and Winter (1978, 1996). Based on a tentative housing adjustment process, the regression analyses include four main concepts as endogenous variables, which are participation in common activities, satisfaction with common space, overall life satisfaction, and intention to move out.
). The design features of cohousing encourage social interaction by maximizing shared open spaces and common facilities. Cohousing promotes common activities among its residents by reducing daily chores.
Thereafter, many empirical cohousing studies have drawn numerous findings from their survey data (Choi, 2003, 2005, 2012, 2013a, 2013b; Choi & Cho 2006; Choi & Paullson, 2006, 2011; Choi & Strid, 2011). The studies have mainly grasped the general description of whom the residents are, what kind of housing conditions they live in, what motivated them to choose current cohousing (as reasons to move), how often they participate in what kind of common activities (called participation in common activities), how they evaluate their common space and overall life in cohousing (as satisfaction with common space and overall life satisfaction), and if they have thought of moving out (called intention to move). Some comparison studies were also performed to show the differences in two or three of the above concepts by country (Choi, 2005, 2013b), gender (Choi & Cho, 2006), or cohousing type (Choi, 2013a) through bivariate analyses.
The variables selected for this study were 10 general characteristics of respondents (6 individual, 4 housing), 4 motivation (personal, housing, environmental, and security reasons) to choose current cohousing with 3 to 6 items of 4-point Likert-scale from 1 ‘no, not at all’ to 4 ‘yes, to a high extent’, the participating level of 7 common activities with 6 point Likert-scale from 1‘never’ to 6 ‘every day’, common space satisfaction with 6 items and overall life satisfaction with 5 items of 5-point Likert-scale, and thoughts of moving out from current house as intention to move with a single question of 3-point Likert-scale from 1 ‘never’ to 3‘quite a lot’.
Active participation in common activities is a key to a vigorous cohousing life. This research attempts to search the role of participation in common activities and satisfaction with common space in a tentative housing adjustment framework for Swedish cohousing, applying the housing adjustment behavior model of Morris and Winter (1978, 1996). Based on a tentative housing adjustment process, the regression analyses include four main concepts as endogenous variables, which are participation in common activities, satisfaction with common space, overall life satisfaction, and intention to move out.
This research integrates the pieces from the findings of previous cohousing studies into the housing adjustment behavior model of Morris and Winter (1978, 1996) and explores the role of participation in common activities and satisfaction with common space in a tentative path context of cohousing adjustment framework. In the flow, satisfaction with common space and overall life satisfaction are tentatively located between participation in common activities and intention to move out.

대상 데이터

This research used a subset of data Choi and Paulsson (2011) surveyed from 12 cohousing units (4 of the +40 cohousing and 8 of the mixed-age cohousing) in 5 cities of Sweden by post mail, 2010. For this research, 216 cases whose age was 40 and over were selected from the full data set of 242. The detailed information on sampling and data collection was shown by Choi and Paulsson (2011) and Choi (2013a).

데이터처리

Pearson correlation coefficients were examined to check the multicollinearity among four endogenous variables and six general variables as exogenous variables. In every case, the magnitude of correlation coefficients was under 0.
The data were examined through descriptive analyses with frequencies and percentage, bivariate analyses with Pearson correlation (among general characteristics, participation in common activities, reasons of moving into the cohousing, and satisfaction with common space), and hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses of all four endogenous variables such as participation in common activities, satisfaction with common space, overall life satisfaction, and intention to move out by SPSS ver.12.

성능/효과

1) Frequencies of participation in common activities The 7 common activities were investigated to know how often respondents participate in each common activity with 6-point Likert-scale, from 1 ‘never’ to 6‘every day’ ([Table 3]).
Among the control variables, health condition significantly influenced all four endogenous variables, number of rooms significantly influenced two satisfaction variables, and duration of residence and age affected overall life satisfaction and intention to stay. The healthier was more likely to participate in common activities.
2%). The difference could be enhanced by the age control in this research because the original data indicated 52.5% and 47.5%, respectively. Half of the respondents (50.
The results of this research support the general belief that cohousing is a living arrangement that reinforces a sense of community stability and mutual support through common activity participation. Participation in common activities raises not only satisfaction with common space and overall life satisfaction, but also intention to stay in the cohousing even when effects of other variables were controlled in multiple linear regressions.
However, the results of previous empirical studies have been. mostly based on descriptive analyses and discovered only part of research concepts such as reasons to move into cohousing, participation in common activities, satisfaction with common space, overall life satisfaction, and intention to move out. Further research is required to connect the pieces of previous findings to show the whole picture of housing adjustment process for cohousing residents and explore the role of participation in common activities and satisfaction with common space in full flowing framework controlling the influence of other variables.

후속연구

mostly based on descriptive analyses and discovered only part of research concepts such as reasons to move into cohousing, participation in common activities, satisfaction with common space, overall life satisfaction, and intention to move out. Further research is required to connect the pieces of previous findings to show the whole picture of housing adjustment process for cohousing residents and explore the role of participation in common activities and satisfaction with common space in full flowing framework controlling the influence of other variables.
Further studies are required to explore the precise role of security reasons to participation in common activities and also the role of satisfaction with common space to overall life satisfaction. Further research may replace actual frequencies of participation in common activities with subjective evaluation of frequencies and contents of participating common activities. The considerable impact of general characteristics like health condition under controlling other variables might also be worthwhile to deeply look into, in order to develop the cohousing adjustment model.
Further studies are required to explore the precise role of security reasons to participation in common activities and also the role of satisfaction with common space to overall life satisfaction. Further research may replace actual frequencies of participation in common activities with subjective evaluation of frequencies and contents of participating common activities.

참고문헌 (24)

Brenton, M. (2011). Cohousing: Supportive local networks in old age. In S. Bunker, C. Coates, M. Field, & J. How (Eds.), Cohousing in Britain (pp. 115-124). London, England: Diggers & Dreamers Publications.
Choi, J. (2003). Moving motivation of senior cohousing inhabitants in Scandinavian countries. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea. Planning and Design, 19(2), 129-138.
Choi, J. (2005). Comparison of life satisfaction between the residents of Danish and Swedish senior cohousing projects. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 16(6), 149-161.
Choi, J. (2012). Evaluation of physical environment design in Swedish cohousing projects. Journal of the Scandinavian Society of Korea, 13, 115-150.
Choi, J. (2013a). Why do people move to cohousing communities in Sweden? Are there any significant differences between the +40 cohousing and the mixed-age cohousing? Architectural Research, 15(2), 77-86.

원문보기 상세보기
Choi, J. (2013b). Difference of move to Swedish senior cohousing by longitudinal analysis; focus on differences between the years of 2001 and 2010. Journal of Korean Home management Association, 31(3), 81-92.

원문보기 상세보기
Choi, J., & Cho, J. (2006). Differences between male and female in moving motivation and life satisfaction of senior cohousing residents in Scandinavia. Journal of the Korean Home Management Association, 24(1), 117-128.
Choi, J., & Paulsson, J. (2006). Planning and Implementation of Scandinavian Senior Cohousing Projects. Seoul, Korea: Jipmundang.
Choi, J., & Paulsson, J. (2011). Evaluation of common activity and life in Swedish cohousing unit. International Journal of Human Ecology, 12(2), 133-146.

원문보기 상세보기
Choi, J., & Strid, M. (2011). Why do people move to cohousing communities in Sweden? Proceedings of IAP International Network Symposium, 1-10.
Durrett, C. (2009). The Senior Cohousing handbook: A Community Approach to Independent Living, 2nd ed. Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers.
Glass, A.P. (2009). Aging in a community of mutual support: The emergence of an elder intentional cohousing community in the United States. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 23(4), 283-303.

상세보기
Glass, A.P. & Vander Plaats, R.S. (2013). A conceptual model for aging better together intentionally. Journal of Aging Studies, 27, 428-442.

상세보기
Housing Study Group (2000). Cohousing in the World. Seoul, Korea: Kyomoonsa.
Im, G., & Baek, S. (2011). A study on residential mobility of baby boomers in Korea. Proceedings of 2011 Annual Conference of Korean Association for Housing Policy Studies. 1-10.
Jung, K., Lee, S.,, Lee, Y., Kim, S., Seonwoo, D., Oh, Y., Kim, K., Pak, B., Yoo, H., & Lee, U. (2010). Baby Boomers' Demographic Profiles and Welfare Needs. (KIHASA Research Report 2010-30-18). The Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
Kim, C., & Kim, T. (2012). Characteristics Analyses of Housing Demands for Baby Boom Generation. (Korea Housing Institute 2012-5). Korea Housing Institute.
Kim, H., Lee, Y., & Yoon, H. (2010). The study on housing characteristics preferred by baby boomers after retirement: Focusing on apartment's residents of Gangnam region in Seoul. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 21(5), 83-92.

원문보기 상세보기
Meltzer, G. (2011). Close relationship: Learning from the cohousing model. In S. Bunker, C. Coates, M. Field, & J. How (Eds.), Cohousing in Britain (pp. 43-58). London, England: Diggers & Dreamers Publications.
Morris, E.W. & Winter, M (1978). Housing, Family, and Society. New York, NY, U.S.A.: John Wiley & Sons.
Morris, E.W. & Winter, M (1996). Housing, Family, and Society. Revised ed. Unpublished manuscripts.
Russell, L. (2000). Housing Options for Older People. London, England: Age Concern.
Vestbro, D.U. (2000). From collective housing to cohousing: A summary of research. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 17(2), 164-177.

상세보기
Williams, J. (2006). Designing neighborhoods for social interaction: The case of cohousing. Journal of Urban Design, 10(2), 195-227.

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format