[논문]Assessment Items of Outdoor Environment through Analysis of SITES - Focused on the Comparison with G-SEED and LEED -

Lee, Hyung-Sook

doi:10.12813/kieae.2014.14.4.011

Assessment Items of Outdoor Environment through Analysis of SITES - Focused on the Comparison with G-SEED and LEED - 원문보기

KIEAE journal = 한국생태환경건축학회논문집, v.14 no.4, 2014년, pp.11 - 18

Lee, Hyung-Sook (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Gachon University)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Although assessing outdoor environment and green space in terms of sustainability and environmental performance is perceived as an important issue, most existing green building certification systems are more focused on buildings and indoor environment. Recently, the Sustainable Site Initiatives (SITES) has been developed by American Society of Landscape Architecture in order to evaluate sustainability of site development and outdoor environment. Separate from LEED, the SITES are increasingly receiving attentions as a reliable certification system in the United States. As a preliminary study to develop the items of outdoor environmental assessment, the present study is purposed to analyze the assessment items, grading system and applicability of SITES for better understanding on the system. Also it was compared to existing green building certification criteria, including G-SEED, LEED-NC, and LEED-ND in order to investigate similarities and discrepancies. The results would provide insights and basic data to improve assessment items for outdoor environment of G-SEED.

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

문제 정의

The purpose of this research is to analyze assessment items and methods of SITES, a US outdoor environment and green space evaluation system, and compare it with those of Korea’s certification system to seek improvements for Korea’s outdoor environment evaluation system.
Therefore, this research compares systems and items that can comprehensively evaluate eco-friendliness of outdoor environment to seek implications for the development of Korea’s outdoor environment evaluation system and criteria.
This research aims to analyze evaluation items and methods of SITES, a rating system for sustainable site development and outdoor environment, and compare it with outdoor environment assessment items of LEED and Korea’s green building certification so as to seek improvements for outdoor environment evaluation items. Under the circumstance that there is a insufficient number of outdoor environment and green space assessment items, this research serves to be a basic research for the establishment of appropriate, realistic, and practical outdoor evaluation items. It is expected that this research can be utilized as a material for discussion on developing a reasonable outdoor environment evaluation system.

제안 방법

Then, outdoor environment evaluation items were sampled after consultation with experts on landscape and construction. Based on the result, similarities and discrepancies between items, and evaluation standards and methods of common evaluation categories and items were analyzed.
Evaluation criteria is categorized into 7 – Sustainable Sites, Water Efficiency, Energy & Atmosphere, Materials & Resources, Indoor Environmental Quality, Innovation in Design, and Regional Priority – consisting of 43 items with eight essential items.
were also reviewed based on materials obtained via the internet. Then, outdoor environment evaluation items were sampled after consultation with experts on landscape and construction. Based on the result, similarities and discrepancies between items, and evaluation standards and methods of common evaluation categories and items were analyzed.
This research aims to analyze evaluation items and methods of SITES, a rating system for sustainable site development and outdoor environment, and compare it with outdoor environment assessment items of LEED and Korea’s green building certification so as to seek improvements for outdoor environment evaluation items.

후속연구

Since SITES, LEED-NC, LEED-ND, and G-SEED are specialized in different areas such as buildings, neighbor environment, and outdoor environment, and circumstances are different by countries, direct comparison with Korea’s certification system has limits. However, this research aims to find implications for future improvements by comparing the scope and concreteness of outdoor environment evaluation systems, and expects more practical assessment items will be developed through more consideration and discussions on green evaluation for outdoor environment. Also, when referring to overseas assessment systems regarding outdoor environment, it is required to consider different conditions from Korea and adaptations should be made with caution.
Under the circumstance that there is a insufficient number of outdoor environment and green space assessment items, this research serves to be a basic research for the establishment of appropriate, realistic, and practical outdoor evaluation items. It is expected that this research can be utilized as a material for discussion on developing a reasonable outdoor environment evaluation system.

참고문헌 (8)

Park C.H., Oh, M.W., Kim, B.S., A comparative analysis study of Green Building Certification Criteria - Focusing on the site and environment, The Korean Solar Energy Society; 2009.11, 29(10).
Yoon, Y.H., Kim, J.H., Kim, S.D., Change of Ecological Environment Sector Based on the Comparative Analysis of Revision Green Building Certification Standards in Apartment Housing, The Seoul Institute; 2011.3, 12(1)
Seong, S.T., Yu, S.E., Yang, S.W., Open Space Design for Certificated Green Apartment Housing, Urban Design Institute of Korea; 2012.6, 13(3)
Oh, S.H., Jang, S.Y., Kim, S.K., Lee, K.I., A Study of the Assessment of Environment-Friendly Outdoor Spaces in Housing Estates- Focused on the Case of Public Housing Estates in Seoul and New Towns -, Architectural Institute of Korea; 2004.6, 20(6)
Lee, K.I., Kim, M.S., A Study on the Preliminary Assessment Indicators for the Development of External Spaces of Ecological Housing Complexes through Practicing Architects" Survey, Architectural Institute of Korea; 2008.7, 24(7))
The Sustainable Sites Initiative: Guidelines and Performance Benchmarks 2009(http://www.sustainablesites.org//)
녹색건축인증 G-SEED Certification Data(http://www.g-seed.or.kr/)
LEED-NC, LEED-ND(www.usgbc.org)

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

Assessment Items of Outdoor Environment through Analysis of SITES - Focused on the Comparison with G-SEED and LEED - 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper

문제 정의

제안 방법

후속연구

참고문헌 (8)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

연합인증

Assessment Items of Outdoor Environment through Analysis of SITES - Focused on the Comparison with G-SEED and LEED - 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

AI 본문요약 엑셀 다운로드 AI-Helper

문제 정의

제안 방법

후속연구

참고문헌 (8)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

저자의 다른 논문 :

이형숙 (8)

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper