최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.35 no.3, 2015년, pp.431 - 442
SSI instruction can be an effective tool to promote key competencies for future citizens. Our assumption of the study is that applying the concept of collective intelligence in the context of SSI learning would facilitate the learning. Thus, we designed and implemented Collective Intelligence-based ...
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
학습 및 혁신 능력에는 무엇이 포함되어 있는가? | 이들이 제시한 역량 중 학습자 역량은 핵심교과(3Rs)와 21세기 주제(Core subjects and 21st century themes), 학습 및 혁신 능력(Learning and innovation skills), 정보‧미디어‧테크놀로지 능력(Information, media and technology skills), 생애 및 경력 개발 능력(Life and career skills)을 포함한다. 이 중 학습 및 혁신 능력에는 비판적 사고력과 문제해결력, 의사소통 및 협동능력, 창의성과 혁신성 등이 포함되어 있다. 이를 기반으로 Heo et al. | |
사전 검사는 CI기반 SSI 수업을 시작하기 직전인 4월 중순에 측정하였으며, 한 학기 정도의 수업이 진행된 7월 중순에 두 번째 측정을 하였는데 왜 그렇게 진행하였나? | 사전 검사는 CI기반 SSI 수업을 시작하기 직전인 4월 중순에 측정하였으며, 한 학기 정도의 수업이 진행된 7월 중순에 두 번째 측정을 하였다. 이는 SSI 수업의 효과를 살펴본 대부분의 연구들이 SSI 수업의 투입 기간을 현장 여건을 고려하여 1학기 정도로 하고 있으며, 그 수업의 효과가 일부 나타나는 것을 보고하고 있기 때문이다. 그리고 수업이 모두 끝난 12월 중순에 사후 검사를 진행하였다. | |
학습자 역량은 무엇을 포함하는가? | 대표적 연구 중 하나로 미국의 The partnership for 21st century skills(P21)을 들 수 있으며, 이는 정부기관을 비롯한 대학, 비영리 단체, 그리고 여러 분야의 교육실천가들이 컨소시엄을 형성하여 산출한 결과물이다(Trilling & Fadel, 2009). 이들이 제시한 역량 중 학습자 역량은 핵심교과(3Rs)와 21세기 주제(Core subjects and 21st century themes), 학습 및 혁신 능력(Learning and innovation skills), 정보‧미디어‧테크놀로지 능력(Information, media and technology skills), 생애 및 경력 개발 능력(Life and career skills)을 포함한다. 이 중 학습 및 혁신 능력에는 비판적 사고력과 문제해결력, 의사소통 및 협동능력, 창의성과 혁신성 등이 포함되어 있다. |
Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students' argumentation in group discussion on a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38, 67-90.
Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2008). The world cafe: Awakening collective intelligence and committed action, In M. Tovey (Ed.). Collective intelligence: Creating a prosperous world at peace (pp. 47-54). Oakton, Virginia: Earth Intelligence Network.
Chang, H., & Lee, H. (2010). College students' decision-making tendencies in the context of socioscientific issues(SSI). Journal of Korean Association in Science Education, 30(7), 887-900.
Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S.-W. & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697.
Chung, Y., Yoo, J., Kim, S., Lee, H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Enhancing students' communication skills in the science classroom through socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Online publication.
Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing students' argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics. Research in Science Education, 40, 133-148.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In p. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-9). Oxford: Elsevier.
Dreyfus, A., & Roth, Z. (1991). Twelfth-grade biology pupils' opinions on interventions of man in nature: Agreement, indifference and ambivalence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 81-95.
Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies press.
Heo, H., Lim, K., Seo, J., & Kim, Y. (2011). Developing 21st century teaching and learning activities for supporting future school 1: Modeling 21st century learner competencies and teacher competencies (KR 2011-2). Korea Education and Research Information Service.
Hogan, K. (2002). Small groups' ecological reasoning while making an environmental management decision. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 341-368.
Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, K., Kim, S., Krajcik, J., Herman, B. C., & Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079-2113.
Lee, J., Jeon, J., Huh, K., Hong, W., & Kim, M. (2009). Redesigning elementary and secondary school curriculum for developing future koreans' core competences (RRC 2009-10-1). Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
Lee, Y., & Lee, S. (2009). Conceptual design principles of collective intelligence. Journal of Educational Technology, 25(4), 213-239.
Levy, P. (1997). Collective intelligence: Mankind's emerging world in cyberspace. Perseus Books.
Mun, K., Lee, H., Kim, S., Choi, K., Choi, S., & Krajcik, J. S. (2015). Cross-cultural comparison of perceptions on the global scientific literacy with Australian, Chinese, and Korean middle school students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 437-465.
National Research Council [NRC] (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Ratcliffe, M. (1997). Pupil decision-making about socio-scientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 167-182.
Roth, W. M. (2003). Scientific literacy as an emergent feature of collective human praxis. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(1), 9-23.
Roth, W. M. & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88(2), 263-294.
Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A. & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371-391.
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138.
Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. NY: Random House.
Tapscott, D. & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Portfolio.
Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Yang, M. (2011). Exploring the principles of collaborative learning for realization of collective intelligence. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 23(2), 457-483.
Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.