최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기환경생물 = Korean journal of environmental biology, v.34 no.4, 2016년, pp.223 - 232
김효철 (동국대학교 생명과학과) , 이용호 (고려대학교 오정에코리질리언스연구소) , 김경희 (동국대학교 생명과학과) , 신승호 (동국대학교 생명과학과) , 송기태 (동국대학교 생명과학과) , 문준철 (강원대학교 농업생명과학연구원) , 이병무 (동국대학교 생명과학과) , 김재윤 (고려대학교 생명과학대학 생명공학부)
Drought is one of important environmental stress for plant. Drought has deleterious effect to plant growth including maize (Zea mays L.) such as vegetative and/or reproductive growth, root extension, photosynthesis efficiency, flowering, anthesis-silking interval (ASI), fertilization, and grain fill...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
분자마커 중 SSR 마커를 이용한 방법의 장점은 무엇인가? | 2009). SSR 마커를 이용한 분석법은 재현성이 매우 뛰어나고 유전체 전반에 걸쳐 대립인자들이 풍부하게 분포되어 있기 때문에, 대립유전자의 특징을 명확하게 나타낼 수 있어 유전적 다양성 연구에 적합하다(Smith et al. 1997; Heckenberger et al. 2002; Warburton et al. 2002; Warburton et al. 2008). 또한 SSR 마커는 PCR (Polymerase chain reaction) 기법을 기반으로 agarose gel 전기영동 방법으로 대립유전자의 분석이 가능하기 때문에 시간절약 및 비용절감이 장점이다(Senior et al. 1998; Pinto et al. | |
ASI는 어떻게 산정되는가? | 2002). ASI는 암꽃과 수꽃의 개화일 차이로 산정하며 ASI가 증가하면 수정률이 떨어져 수확량 감소를 초래하게 된다. 따라서 ASI는 수확량과 매우 밀접하게 연관된 요인으로 한발 스트레스에 대한 지표로서 사용된다(Smith et al. | |
옥수수가 개화기에 한발 스트레스를 받으면 어떤 결과가 나타나는가? | 최근에는 기후변동에 대한 환경 스트레스의 대안으로 한발 스트레스와의 연관성 및 내성의 연구 필요성이 제기되고 있다. 옥수수의 경우 개화기에 한발 스트레스를 받을 경우 일반적으로 ASI (anthesis-silking interval)가 증가한다고 보고 되어있다(Anderson et al. 2002). |
Ajmone-Marsan P, P Castiglioni, F Fusari, M Kuiper and M Motto. 1998. Genetic diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance in maize as revealed by RFLP and AFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96:219-227.
Andersen MN, F Asch, Y Wu, CR Jensen, H Naested, VO Mogensen and KE Koch. 2002. Soluble invertase expression is an early target of drought stress during the critical, abortion sensitive phase of young ovary development in maize. Plant Physiol. 130:591-604.
Banzinger M, GO Edmeades, DL Beck and M Bellon. 2000. Breeding for drought and N stress tolerance in maize: from theory to practice. CIMMYT, Mexico, D. F.
Barata C and MJ Carena. 2006. Classification of North Dakota maize inbred lines into heterotic groups based on molecular and testcross data. Euphytica 151:339-349.
Barrett BA and KK Kidwell. 1998. AFLP-based genetic diversity assessment among wheat cultivars from the Pacific Northwest. Crop Sci. 38:1261-1271.
Bernardo R. 1996. Testcross selection prior to further inbreeding in maize: mean performance and realized genetic variance. Crop Sci. 36:867-871.
Betran FJ, D Beck, M Banziger and GO Edmeades. 2003. Genetic analysis of inbred and hybrid yield under stress and nonstress environments in tropical maize. Crop Sci. 43:807-817.
Dice LR. 1945. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26:297-302.
Dubreuil P, P Dufour, E Krejci, M Causse, D de Vienne, A Gallais and A Charcosset. 1996. Organization of RFLP diversity among inbred lines of maize representing the most significant heterotic groups. Crop Sci. 36:790-799.
Eghball B and JW Maranville. 1993. Root development and nitrogen influx of corn genotypes grown under combined drought and nitrogen stresses. Agron. J. 85:147-152.
Godshalk EB, M Lee and KR Lamkey. 1990. Relationship of restriction fragment length polymorphisms to single-cross hybrid performance of maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:273-280.
Gonzalo M, TJ Vyn, JB Holland and LM McIntyre. 2006. Mapping density response in maize: A direct approach for testing genotype and treatment interactions. Gent. 173:331-348.
Goodman MM and RM Bird. 1977. The races of maize IV: tentative grouping of 219 Latin American races. Econ. Bot. 31:204-221.
Hall AJ, JH Lemcoff and N Trapani. 1981. Water stress before and during flowering in maize and its effects on yield, its components, and their determinants. Maydica 26:19-38.
Heckenberger M, AE Melchinger, JS Ziegle, LK Joe, JD Hauser, M Hutton and M Bohn. 2002. Variation of DNA fingerprints among accessions within maize inbred lines with regard to the identification of essentially derived varieties. I. Genetic and technical sources of variation in SSR data. Mol. Breed. 10:181-191.
Lee EA and WF Tracy. 2009. Modern maize breeding. pp. 141-160. In Handbook of Maize (Bennetzen JL and SC Hake eds.). Springer.
Lee M, EB Godshalk, KR Lamkey and WL Woodman. 1989. Association of restriction fragment length polymorphisms among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their crosses. Crop Sci. 29:1067-1071.
Livini C, PA Marsan, AE Melchinger, MM Messmer and M Motto. 1992. Genetic diversity of maize inbred lines within and among heterotic groups revealed by RFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84:17-25.
Lu Y, J Yan, GT Guimaraes, S Taba, Z Hao, S Gao, S Chen, J Li, S Zhang, BS Vivek, C Magorokosho, S Mugo, D Makumbi, SN Parentoni, T Shah, T Rong, JH Crouch and Y Xu. 2009. Molecular characterization of global maize breeding germplasm based on genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120:93-115.
Makumbi D, JF Betran, M Banzinger and JM Ribaut. 2011. Combining ability, heterosis and genetic diversity in tropical maize (Zea mays L.) under stress and non-stress conditions. Euphytica 180:143-162.
Meeks M, SC Murray, S Hague and D Hays. 2013. Measuring maize seedling drought response in search of tolerant germplasm. Agronomy 3:135-147.
Melchinger AE and PK Gumber. 1998. Overview of heterosis and heterotic groups in agronomic crops. pp. 29-44. In Concepts and breeding of heterosis in crop plants (Lamkey KR and JE Staub eds.). CSSA, Madison.
Melchinger AR, J Boppenmaier, BS Dhillon, WG Pollmer and RG Herrmann. 1992. Genetic diversity for RFLPs in European maize inbreds : II. Relation to performance of hybrids within versus between heterotic groups for forage traits. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84:672-681.
Min H, C Chen, S Wei, X Shang, M Sun, R Xia, X Liu, D Hao, H Chen and Q Xie. 2016. Identification of drought tolerant mechanisms in maize Seedlings based on trascriptome analysis of recombination inbred lines. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1080.
Moll RH, JH Lonnquist, JV Fortuna and EC Johnson. 1965. The relation of heterosis and genetic divergence in maize. Genetics 52:139-144.
Nassiry MR, A Javanmard and R Tohidi. 2009. Application of statistical procedures for analysis of genetic diversity in domestic animal populations. Am. J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 4:136.
Pandey RK, JW Maranville and A Admou. 2000a. Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on maize in a Sahelian environment: I. Grain yield and yield components. Agric. Water Manage. 46:1-13.
Pandey RK, JW Maranville and MM Chetima. 2000b. Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on maize in a Sahelian environment: II. Shoot growth, nitrogen uptake and water extraction. Agric. Water Manage. 46:15-7.
Park JS, KJ Sa, KJ Park, JS Jang and JK Lee. 2009. Genetic variation of parental inbred lines for Korean waxy corn hybrid varieties revealed by SSR markers. Korean J. Breed Sci. 41:106-114.
Paterniani E and JH Lonnquist. 1963. Heterosis in interracial crosses of maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci. 3:504-507.
Pinto LR, MLC Vieira, CL de Souza and AP de Souza. 2003. Genetic diversity assessed by microsatellites in tropical maize population submitted to highdensity reciprocal recurrent selection. Euphytica 134:277-286.
Reif JC, AE Melchinger, XC Xia, ML Warburton, DA Hoisington, SK Vasal, D Beck, M Bohn and M Frisch. 2003. Use of SSRs for establishing heterotic groups in subtropical maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107:947-957.
Riede CR and JA Anderson. 1996. Linkage of RFLP markers to an aluminum tolerance gene in wheat. Crop Sci. 36:905-909.
Saker MM, SS Youssef, NA Abdallah, HS Bashandy and AM El Sharkawy. 2005. Genetic analysis of some Egyptian rice genotypes using RAPD, SSR and AFLP. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 4:882-890.
Sari-Gorla M, P Krajewski, ND Fonzo, M Villa and C Frova. 1999. Genetic analysis of drought tolerance in maize by molecular markers. II. Plant height and flowering. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99:289-295.
Semagn K, C Magorokosho, SV Bindiganavile, D Makumbi, Y Beyene, S Mugo, BM Prasanna and ML Warburton. 2012. Molecular characterization of diverse CIMMYT maize inbred lines from eastern and southern Africa using single nucleotide polymorphic markers. BMC Genomics 13:113.
Senior ML, JP Murphy, MM Goodman and CW Stuber. 1998. Utility of SSRs for determining genetic similarities and relationships in maize using agarose gel system. Crop Sci. 38:1088-1098.
Smith CW, J Betran and ECA Runge. 2004. Corn: origin, history, technology, and production. Wiley series in crop science. pp. 358-360.
Smith JSC. 1984. Genetic variability within US hybrid maize: multi-variate analysis of isozyme data. Crop Sci. 24:1041-1046.
Smith JSC and OS Smith. 1992. Fingerprinting crop varieties. Adv. Agron. 47:85-140.
Smith JSC, ECL Chin, H Shu, OS Smith, SJ Wall, ML Senior, SE Mitchell, S Kresovich and J Ziegle. 1997. An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): comparisons with data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:163-173.
Smith OS, JSC Smith, SL Bowen, RA Tenborg and SJ Wall. 1990. Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis, and RFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:833-840.
Sneath PHA and RR Sokal. 1973. Numerical taxonomy: The principles and practice of numerical classification.
Song KT, KH Kim, HC Kim, JC Moon, JY Kim, SB Baek, YU Kwon and BM Lee. 2015. Evaluation of drought tolerance in maize seedling using leaf rolling. Korean J. Crop Sci. 60:8-16.
Souza SGH, V Carpentieri-Pipolo, CF Ruas, VP Carvalho, PM Ruas and AC Gerage. 2008. Comparative analysis of genetic diversity among the maize inbred lines (Zea mays L.) obtained by RAPD and SSR markers. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 51:183-192.
Thompson JA and RL Nelson. 1998. Utilization of diverse germplasm for soybean yield improvement. Crop Sci. 38:1362-1368.
Troyer AF. 1999. Background of U.S. hybrid corn. Crop Sci. 39:601-626.
Udomprasert N, J Kijjanon, K Chusri-iam and A Machuay. 2005. Effects of water deficit at tasseling on photosynthesis, development, and yield of corn. Kasetsart J. Nat. Sci. 39:546-551.
Van Inghelandt D, AE Melchinger, C Lebreton and B Stich. 2010. Population structure and genetic diversity in a commercial maize breeding program assessed with SSR and SNP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120:1289-1299.
Varshney RK, JM Ribaut, ES Buckler, R Tuberosa, A Rafalski and P Langridgem. 2012. Can genomics boost productivity of orphan crops. Nat. Biotechnol. 30:1172-1176.
Warburton ML, JC Reif, M Frisch, M Bohn, C Bedoya, XC Xia, J Crossa, J Franco, D Hoisington, K Pixley, S Taba and AE Melchinger. 2008. Genetic diversity in CIMMYT non-temperate maize germplasm: landraces, open pollinated varieties, and inbred lines. Crop Sci. 48:617-624.
Warburton ML, X Xianchun, J Crossa, P Dubreuil and FJ Betran. 2002. Genetic characterization of CIMMYT inbred maize lines and open pollinated populations using large scale fingerprinting methods. Crop Sci. 42:1832-1840.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.