최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.36 no.1, 2016년, pp.29 - 43
There have been much efforts to reconstruct the science curriculum focusing on Disciplinary Core Ideas(DCI) in many countries such as America and Europe, the most practical effort has been to design a curriculum with learning progressions(LPs). LPs describe stepwise how students can systematically m...
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
학습발달과정이란? | 미국과 유럽의 여러 국가에서 과학의 학문 내 핵심 개념을 중심으로 과학 교육과정을 재구성하려는 노력이 시도되고 있으며 그 중 대표적인 변화가 학습발달과정을 이용한 교육과정을 설계하는 것이다. 학습발달과정은 과학의 핵심 개념과 과학적 활동과정을 논리적이며 단계적으로 정교하게 기술한 틀로서 학생이 학습하는 동안 연속적이며 체계적으로 확립되어 가는 이해의 과정을 설명한다. 미국의 차세대과학기준(NGSS)에서 제시한 생명과학 핵심 개념 중 하나인 생태계에 관하여 학습발달과정을 개발하고 개발된 학습발달과정을 평가하고자 하였다. | |
미국이 발표한 차세대 과학기준의 목표는 무엇인가? | 미국은 미래 교육을 위한 변화의 요구에 따라 과학적 소양을 갖춘 시민 양성을 목표로 차세대 과학기준(NGSS: Next Generation Science Standards)을 발표하였다(National Research Council, 2013). NGSS의 기반은 NRC(2012)에서 제시한 과학교육 틀(A Framework for K-12 science education)에 있다. | |
Rasch 분석의 산출 결과는 지도 형태로 나타나는데 이 지도는 결과를 어떻게 표현하는가? | Rasch 분석의 산출 결과는 흔히 Wright map이라고 불리는 변수로 된 지도의 형태로, 응답자의 잠재적인 능력과 문항의 항목 난이도 사이의 함수 관계로 나타낸다. Wright map은구하고자 하는 것을 사람과 사람 사이, 항목과 항목 사이, 그리고 항목과 사람 사이의 관계와 같이 측정하고자 하는 변수로 설정하고, 변수 사이의 간격이 유의미한 차이를 가지는지에 대해 표현한다(Tennant & Conaghan, 2007; Callingham & Bond, 2006; Wilson, 2005). Rasch 분석을 수행하는 것은 측정하고자 하는 framework 내의 일차원성, 척도의 순서, DIF(differential item functioning)와 같은 중요한 결과를 제공함으로써 새로운 척도를 설계할 때 검토대상의 수정을 판단할 수 있도록 한다. |
Anderson, C. W., Alonzo, A. C., Smith, C., & Wilson, M. (2007). NAEP pilot learning progression framework. Report to the National Assessment Governing Board.
Alonzo, A. C., & Steedle J. T. (2008). Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression. Science Education, 93(3), 389-421.
Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., & Orion, N. (2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 518-560.
Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., & Orpaz, T. (2010). The 'Life at the poles' study unit: Developing junior high school students' ability to recognize the relations between earth systems. Research in Science Education, 40(4), 525-549.
Berland L.K., & McNeill, K.L. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94(5), 765-793.
Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory. NY: George Braziller. Biological Education, 35(1), 22-28.
Boersma, K., Waarlo, A. J., & Klaassen, K. (2011). The feasibility of systems thinking in biology education. Journal of Biology Education, 45(4), 190-197.
Briggs, D. C., & Alonzo, A. C. (2012). The psychometric modeling of ordered multiple choice item responses for diagnostic assessment with a learning progression. In A. C. Alonzo & A. W. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions (pp. 293-316). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, The Netherlands.
Briggs, D. C., Alonzo, A. C., Schwab, C., & Wilson, M. (2006). Diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple-choice items. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 33-63.
Callingham, R. & Bond, T. (2006). Research in Mathematics Education and Rasch Measurement. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(2), 1-10
Corcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence based approach to reform. Consortium for Policy Research in Education Report #RR-63. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Draney, K. (2009). Designing learning progressions with the BEAR assessment system. Paper presented at the Learning Progressions in Science (LeaPS) Conference, Lowa City, IA, USA.
Duncan, R. G., Rogat, A. D., & Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for deepening students'understandings of modern genetics across the 5th-10th grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 655-674.
Furtak, E. M. (2012). Linking a learning progression for natural selection to teachers' enactment of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1181-1210.
Gilworth, G., Chamberlain, M. A., Bhakta, B., Haskard, D., Silman, A., & Tennant A. (2004). The development of the BD-QoL: a quality of life measure specific to Behcet's disease. J Rheumatol 31:931-937.
Gotwals, A. W., & Songer, N. B. (2013). Validity evidence for learning progression-based assessment items that fuse core disciplinary ideas and science practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 597-626.
Gunckel, K. L., Covitt, B. A., Salinas, I., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). A learning progression for water in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 843-868.
Jin, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). A learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1149-1180.
Jin, H., Zhan, L., & Anderson, C. W. (2013). Developing a Fine-Grained Learning Progression Framework for Carbon Transforming Processes. International Journal of Science Education, 35(10), 1663-1697.
Johnson, P., & Tymms, P. (2011). The emergence of a learning progression in middle school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 849-877. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20433
Kwon, Y., Kim, W., Lee, H., Byun, J., & Lee, I. (2011). Analysis of Biology Teachers' Systems Thinking about Ecosystem. The korean society of biology education. 39(4), 529-543.
Lee, H., & Liu O. L. (2009). Assessing Learning Progression of Energy Concepts Across Middle School Grades: The Knowledge Integration Perspective. Science & Education, 94(4), 665-688.
Lee, S. (2013). A critical study on the structuralizing process of school-subject knowledge: The case of the 2009 revised science curriculum in Korea. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(3), 173-199.
Lee, H., Kwon, H., Park, K., & Lee, H. (2013). An Instrument Development and Validation for Measuring High School Students' Systems Thinking. Journal of the korean earth science society. 32(5), 784?797.
Maani, K. E., & Maharaj, J. (2004). Links between systems thinking and complex decision making. System Dynamics Review, 20(1), 21-48.
Mayr, E. (1997). This Is Biology. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2014). The curriculum of 2009 Revision. Seoul, Korea: Author.
Ministry of Education and Science Technology[MEST]. (2009). Curriculum and operational practices from around the world(IV) Canada. Busan Metropolitan City Office of Education.
Ministry of Education and Science Technology[MEST]. (2011). 2009 revised national science curriculum. Seoul, Korea: Author.
Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 675-698.
National Assessment Governing Board. (2007). Science assessment and item specifications for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: NAGB
National Assessment Governing Board. (2008). Science framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: NAGB
National Research Council[NRC]. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council[NRC]. (2006). Systems for state science assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council[NRC]. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. In R. A. Duschl, H. A. Schweingruber, & A. W. Shouse (Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council[NRC]. (2012). A Framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council[NRC]. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
Neumann, K., Viering, T., Boone, W. J., & Fischer, H. E. (2013). Towards a learning progression of energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 162-188.
NGSS Lead States(2013). Next generation science standards for states, by states. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Odum, E. P. (1992) Great ideas in ecology for the 1990s. BioScience, 42(7), 542-545.
Paik, N. (2006) Specification of presentation form of educational contents in subject curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(2), 207-233.
Paik. N. (2014). Review of statements of achievement standards in subject curriculum: Focusing on the national science curriculum of Republic of Korea and the U. S. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 101-131.
Plummer, J. D. (2014). Spatial thinking as the dimension of progress in an astronomy learning progression. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 1-45.
Plummer, J. D., & Krajcik, J. (2010). Building a learning progression for celestial motion: Elementary levels from an earth-based perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 768-787.
Rittle-Johnson, B., Matthews, P. G.,, Taylor, R. S., & McEldoon, K. L. (2011). Assessing Knowledge of Mathematical Equivalence: A Construct-Modeling Approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 85-104.
Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic model for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Roseman, J. E., Caldwell, A., Gogos, A., & Kurth, L. (2006). Mapping a coherent learning progression for the molecular basis of heredity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
Rutstein, D. W. (2012). Measuring learning progressions using Bayesian modeling in complex assessments. University of Maryland, College Park in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., AchEr, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 632-654.
Seong, Y., Maeng, S., & Jang, S. (2013). A Learning Progression for Water Cycle from Fourth to Sixth Graders with Ordered Multiple-Choice Items. Journal of the Korean Society of Elementary Science Education, 32(2), 139-158.
Smith, C. L., Wiser, M., Anderson, C. W., & Krajcki, J. (2011). Implication of research on children's learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic molecular theory. Focus Article. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 14, 1-98.
Songer, N. B., Kelcey, B., & Gotwals, A.W. (2009). How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progressions focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 610-631.
Steedle, J.T., & Shavelson, R.J. (2009). Supporting valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46, 699-715.
Stevens, S. Y., Delgado, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). Developing a Hypothetical Multi-Dimensional Learning Progression for the Nature of Matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 47(6), 687-715.
Talanquer, V. (2009). On cognitive constraints and learning progressions:The case of 'structure of matter'. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 2123-2136.
Tennant, A., & Conaghan P. G. (2007). The Rasch Measurement Model in Rheumatology: What Is It and Why Use It? When Should It Be Applied, and What Should One Look for in a Rasch Paper. Journal of American College of Rheumatology, 57(8), 1358-1362.
Westra, R. H. V. (2008). Learning and Teaching Ecosystem Behavior in Secondary Education. Unpublished Doctoral Paper. University of van Utrecht.
Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wilson, M. (2009). Measuring Progressions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 716-730.
Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit value. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.